Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints on host use by a parasitic plant

  • Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumers do not always utilize all suitable hosts. Understanding why parasitic plants do not always parasitize potentially suitable hosts requires a better understanding of the constraints that limit host use by parasitic plants. In Texas salt marshes, the parasitic plant Cuscuta indecora rarely parasitizes three hosts that support vigorous growth in the greenhouse. We identified three constraints on host use by C. indecora. First, a mismatch between the phenology of C. indecora and some suitable hosts meant that these hosts were not abundant when C. indecora was growing most vigorously, and therefore were underutilized. Second, C. indecora preferentially parasitized tall plants versus short ones, causing relatively short species to be underutilized. Third, C. indecora overwinters in some perennial hosts but has to reinfect annual hosts each year, causing annuals and perennials that do not support overwintering to be underutilized. In combination, these constraints, which reflect the general lack of mobility of parasitic plants relative to herbivores, remove half of the potential host species from the actual diet of C. indecora, and therefore likely represent a major limitation on the success of this parasite. Similar constraints are likely to limit the realized host range of many parasitic plants and select for generalized diet preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald S, Bond WJ (2003) Growing tall vs. growing wide: tree architecture and allometry of Acacia karroo in forest, savanna, and arid environments. Oikos 102:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR (1977) The insect herbivore as a predictive model in parasitic seed plant biology. Am Nat 111:579–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR (1983) Host-parasite interactions in higher plants. In: Lange O, Nobel P, Osmond C, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 519–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR, Strong DR (1970) The population biology of annual grassland hemiparasites. I. The host environment. Evolution 24:278–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein L (1975) Effects of salinity and sodicity on plant growth. Annu Rev Phytopathol 13:295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Loffell D (2001) Introduction of giraffe changes acacia distribution in a South African savanna. Afr J Ecol 39(3):286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Pennings SC (1998) Impact of a parasitic plant on the zonation of two salt marsh perennials. Oecologia 114:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang T-I, Heckard LR (1971) Observations on root-parasitism in Cordylanthus (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 58:218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay K, Kover PX (1996) The red queen hypothesis and plant/pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Pyhtopathol 34:29–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JH, Musselman LJ, Wolswinkel P, Dörr I (1994) Biology and control of Cuscuta. Rev Weed Sci 6:265–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean HL (1937) Gall formation in host plants following haustorial invasion by Cuscuta. Am J Bot 24:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean HL (1954) Dodder overwintering as haustorial tissues within Cuscuta-induced galls. Proc Iowa Acad Sci 61:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Forkner RE, Marquis RJ, Lill JT, Corff JL (2008) Timing is everything? Phenological synchrony and population variability in leaf-chewing herbivores of Quercus. Ecol Entomol 33(2):276–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring CA, Whitham TG (1992) Reduced mycorrhizae on Juniperus monosperma with mistletoe: the influence of environmental stress and tree gender on a plant parasite and a plant-fungal mutualism. Oecologia 89:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CC, Watkinson AR (1989) The host range and selectivity of a parasitic plant: Rhinanthus minor L. Oecologia 78:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CC, Watkinson AR (1991) Host selectivity and the mediation of competition by the root hemiparasite Rhinanthus minor. Oecologia 86:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman EF (1999) Lycium carolinianum. FPS-356. Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, University of Florida

  • Goranson CE, Ho C-K, Pennings SC (2004) Environmental gradients and herbivore feeding preferences in coastal salt marshes. Oecologia 140:591–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker SD, Bertness MD (1995) An herbivore paradox: why salt marsh aphids live in poor quality plants. Am Nat 145:192–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Axelrod R, Tanese R (1990) Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci 87:3566–3573

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst LH, Peck JR (1996) Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex. Trends Ecol Evol 11:A46–A52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CK (1990) Plant foraging: a marginal value model and coiling response in Cuscuta subinclusa. Ecology 71:1916–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CK (1992) Resource choice in Cuscuta europaea. PNAS 89:12194–12197

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CK, Horning K (1999) Acquisition order and resource value in Cuscuta attenuata. PNAS 96:13219–13222

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijt J (1969) The biology of parasitic plants. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunza AE, Pennings SC (2008) Patterns of plant diversity in Georgia and Texas salt marshes. Estuaries Coasts 31:673–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitch M, Nowak MA, Ebert D, May RM (1995) The population dynamics of vertically and horizontally transmitted parasites. Proc R Soc Lond B260:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies D (1996) Interactions between the root hemiparasite Melampyrum arvense and mixtures of host plants: heterotrophic benefit and parasite-mediated competition. Oikos 75:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies D (1998) Influence of the host on growth and biomass allocation in the two facultative root hemiparasites Odontites vulgaris and Euphrasia minima. Flora 193:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulebrouck K, Ameloot E, Brys R, Tanghe L, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2009) Hidden in the host—unexpected vegetative hibernation of the holoparasite Cuscuta epithymum (L.) L. and its implications for population persistence. Flora 204:306–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell FJG, Kirby KJ (1990) The impact of large herbivores on the conservation of semi-natural woods in the British uplands. Forestry 63(4):333–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon D, Stiling P (2000) Relative importance of abiotically induced direct and indirect effects on a salt marsh herbivore. Ecology 81:470–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mopper S, Simberloff D (1995) Differential herbivory in an oak population—the role of plant and insect performance. Ecology 76:1233–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselman LJ, Press MC (1995) Introduction to parasitic plants. In: Press MC, Graves JD (eds) Parasitic plants. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton DA, De Lange PJ (1999) Host specificity in parasitic mistletoes (Loranthaceae) in New Zealand. Funct Ecol 13:552–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SC, Bertness MD (2001) Salt marsh communities. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SC, Callaway RM (1996) Impact of a parasitic plant on the structure and dynamics of salt marsh vegetation. Ecology 77:1410–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SC, Callaway RM (2002) Parasitic plants: parallels and contrasts with herbivores. Oecologia 131:479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SC, Simpson JC (2008) Like herbivores, parasitic plants are limited by host nitrogen. Plant Ecol 196:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press MC, Graves JD (1995) Parasitic plants. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Press MC, Graves JD, Stewart GR (1990) Physiology of the interaction of angiosperm parasites and their higher plant hosts. Plant Cell Environ 13:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runyon JB, Mescher MC, De Moreas CM (2006) Volatile chemical cues guide host location and host selection by parasitic plants. Science 313:1964–1967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seel WE, Press MC (1993) Influence of the host on three sub-Arctic annual facultative root hemiparasites. I. Growth, mineral accumulation and above-ground dry-matter partitioning. New Phytol 125:131–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seel WE, Press MC (1994) Influence of the host on three sub-Arctic annual facultative root hemiparasites. II. Gas exchange characteristics and resource use-efficiency. New Phytol 127:37–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seel WE, Cooper RE, Press MC (1993) Growth, gas exchange and water use efficiency of the facultative hemiparasite Rhinanthus minor associated with hosts differing in foliar nitrogen concentration. Physiol Plant 89:64–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Asch M, Visser ME (2007) Phenology of forest caterpillars and their host trees: the importance of synchrony. Annu Rev Entomol 52:3755

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR, Gibson CC (1988) Plant parasitism: the population dynamics of parasitic plants and their effects upon plant community structure. In: Davy AJ, Hutchings MJ, Watkinson AR (eds) Plant population ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 393–411

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of Houston Coastal Center for funding. We thank M. Noorbhai and L. Wason for help in the field and greenhouse, R. Azevedo, W. Rogers, J. Rudgers, and R. Zufall for discussion, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Pennings.

Additional information

Communicated by Meelis Partel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marquardt, E.S., Pennings, S.C. Constraints on host use by a parasitic plant. Oecologia 164, 177–184 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1664-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1664-7

Keywords

Navigation