Abstract
CCN2/CTGF is a matricellular protein that is known to enhance transforming growth factor-β signaling and to induce a myofibroblast-like phenotype in a variety of cell types. Here, we investigated Ccn2/Ctgf promotor activity during development and in the adult mouse eye, using CTGFLacZ/+ mice in which the β-galactosidase reporter gene LacZ had been inserted into the open reading frame of Ccn2/Ctgf. Promotor activity was assessed by staining for β-galactosidase activity and by immunolabeling using antibodies against β-galactosidase. Co-immunostaining using antibodies against glutamine synthetase, glial fibrillary acidic protein, choline acetyltransferase, and CD31 was applied to identify specific cell types. Ccn2/Ctgf promotor activity was intense in neural crest-derived cells differentiating to corneal stroma and endothelium, and to the stroma of choroid, iris, ciliary body, and the trabecular meshwork during development. In the adult eye, a persistent and very strong promotor activity was present in the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways. In addition, endothelial cells of Schlemm’s canal, and of retinal and choroidal vessels, retinal astrocytes, Müller glia, and starburst amacrine cells were stained. Very strong promoter activity was seen in the astrocytes of the glial lamina at the optic nerve head. We conclude that CCN2/CTGF signaling is involved in the processes that govern neural crest morphogenesis during ocular development. In the adult eye, CCN2/CTGF likely plays an important role for the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways and the glial lamina of the optic nerve head.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
CCN2 is a member of the cellular communication network (CCN) family of extracellular matrix-associated and heparin-binding matricellular proteins (Brigstock 2003; Leask 2020; Perbal and Perbal 2016; Perbal 2013, 2018). It is more commonly known under its original name connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) that was recently discontinued by the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee which adopted the use of CCN2 instead (Perbal et al. 2018). Because of the fairly recent change and for the sake of clarity, we will continue to use the term CCN2/CTGF throughout this contribution. Like other members of the CCN family, CCN2/CTGF is structurally characterized by four conserved, cysteine-rich domains. The domains consist of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) domain, the von Willebrand type C repeats (vWC) domain, the thrombospondin type 1 repeat (TSR) domain, and a C-terminal domain (CT) with a cysteine knot motif.
Studies in Ccn2/Ctgf-deficient mice show an important role of CCN2/CTGF for proper development of cartilage, vasculature, and pancreatic islets (Crawford et al. 2009; Hall-Glenn et al. 2012; Ivkovic et al. 2003). In the adult organism, a major function of CCN2/CTGF is the amplification of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling by both activating latent TGF-β and enhancing its binding to the TGF-β receptor II (Abreu et al. 2002; Gressner et al. 2009; Khankan et al. 2011; Mori et al. 1999). TGF-β signaling is further augmented through the TGF-β-induced increase in Ccn2/Ctgf expression that has been consistently observed in many different cell types (Fuchshofer et al. 2009, 2007; Grotendorst et al. 1996; Holmes et al. 2001; Igarashi et al. 1993; Leask et al. 2001). CCN2/CTGF is highly overexpressed in conditions associated with increased extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis and fibrosis such as scleroderma (Sato et al. 2000; Yamamoto et al. 2005), diabetic nephropathy and kidney fibrosis (Mason 2013; Yin and Liu 2019), fibrotic liver diseases (Gressner and Gressner 2008), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (Richeldi et al. 2020), or glaucoma (Browne et al. 2011; Ho et al. 2020; Wallace et al. 2013). In fibrotic conditions, CCN2/CTGF appears to be primarily involved in the differentiation of resident cells into myofibroblasts (Kapoor et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2010), a highly specialized cell type of variable origin that combines extracellular matrix synthesis with contractility (Bochaton-Piallat et al. 2016; Carthy 2018; Hinz et al. 2007, 2012).
The role of CCN2/CTGF in myofibroblast differentiation is also seen in normal cell types with myofibroblast-like characteristics such as the trabecular meshwork in the eye (Braunger et al. 2015a; Tamm et al. 2015). Depletion of CCN2/CTGF in trabecular meshwork cells causes a substantial loss of their actin cytoskeleton while its overexpression increases trabecular meshwork contractility and extracellular matrix production (Junglas et al. 2012). The increase in trabecular meshwork contractility causes dysfunction of the aqueous humor outflow pathways, high intraocular pressure and glaucoma (Junglas et al. 2012; Reinehr et al. 2019). In the present study, we wanted to learn more about the specific cell types that express CCN2/CTGF in the eye. Immunohistochemical studies are available that studied its localization in ocular tissues (Pi et al. 2011; van Setten et al. 2016). Still such studies offer only limited information about the cellular expression of Ccn2/Ctgf as it is a secreted molecule that binds with high affinity to heparan sulfate proteoglycans and other molecules on cellular surfaces. For this reason, cellular immunoreactivity for CCN2/CTGF might not necessarily indicate its cellular origin. We therefore studied Ccn2/Ctgf promotor activity in CTGFLacZ/+ mice in which the β-galactosidase marker gene LacZ has been inserted into the open reading frame of Ccn2/Ctgf (Crawford et al. 2009). Here, we report about distinct and hitherto not identified cellular sites of substantial Ccn2/Ctgf expression during ocular development and in the adult eye.
Material and methods
Animals
In CTGFLacZ/+ mice, the β-galactosidase marker gene LacZ was inserted into the open reading frame of Ccn2/Ctgf (Crawford et al. 2009). In this study, we used heterozygous CTGFLacZ/+ mice to investigate the distribution pattern of Ccn2/Ctgf promotor activity during eye development. CTGFLacZ/+ mice were found to be viable and fertile corroborating previous observations (Crawford et al. 2009). CTGF LacZ/LacZ animals were not included in this study as homozygous deficiency causes severe skeletal and vascular abnormalities leading to the death of the animals at birth (Ivkovic et al. 2003). We expected that Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity under this condition would not necessarily reflect that of wild-type mice. Mice were housed under standardized conditions of 62% air humidity and 21 °C room temperature (RT). Feeding was ad libitum. Animals were kept at a 12 h light/dark cycle (6:00–18:00). All procedures conformed to the tenets of the National Institutes of Health Guidelines on the Care and Use of Animals in Research, the EU Directive 2010/63/E and the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and were approved by the local authorities (54-2532.1-44/12; Regierung Oberpfalz, Bavaria, Germany). Before enucleation of the eyes, mice were anesthetized with CO2 and euthanized by atlanto-occipital dislocation.
RNA analysis
Total RNA from sensory retinal tissue was extracted with TriFast™ (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the qScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta Biosciencies Gaithersburg, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time RT-PCR was performed on a BioRad CFX Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad, Munich, Germany) with the temperature profile as follows: 50 cycles of 20 s melting at 94 °C, 10 s of annealing at 60 °C, and 20 s of extension at 60 °C. All primers were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, USA) and extended over exon–intron boundaries. CTGF forward 5′TGACCTGGAGGAAAACATTAAGA3′, CTGF reverse 5′AGCCCTGTATGTCTTCACACTG3′, RPL32 forward 5′GCTGCCATCTGTTTTACGG3′, RPL32 reverse 5′TGACTGGTGCCTGATGAACT3′. RNA that was not reverse transcribed served as negative control. For relative quantification of the experiments, RPL32 was used as a housekeeping gene. Quantification was performed using BioRad CFX Manager software version 3.1.1517.0823 (BioRad).
Western blot analysis
Proteins were isolated following the RNA isolation according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Peqlab). Proteins were dissolved in 1% SDS containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors, and protein content was measured with the bicinchoninic acid assay (Interchim, Montluçon Cedex, France). Western blot analysis was performed with specific antibodies as described previously (Fuchshofer et al. 2011, 2007). Specific antibodies were used as follows: goat anti-CTGF (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA), rabbit anti-α-tubulin (1:2500, Rockland Immunochemicals Inc., Gilbertsville, USA), donkey anti-goat (1:2000, Bethyl Laboratories Inc., Montgomery, USA), and goat anti-rabbit (1:5000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA). Chemiluminescence was detected on a LAS 3000 imaging workstation (Fujifilm, Düsseldorf, Germany). For normalization of the signal intensity, α-tubulin was used as a loading control. The intensity of the bands detected by Western blotting was determined using appropriate software (AIDA Image analyzer software, Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany).
Microscopy and quantitative morphometry
For light and transmission electron microscopy, eyes were obtained from young adult animals at 9 weeks of age. Eyes were enucleated and fixed in Karnovsky’s solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2.5% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer) for 24 h (Karnovsky 1965). After rising in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, postfixation was accomplished in a mixture of 1% OsO4 and 0.8% potassium ferrocyanide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 2 h at 48 °C. After dehydration in a graded series of ethanol, the eyes were embedded in Epon (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany). Semithin sections (1 µm) were collected on uncoated glass slides and stained with methylene blue/azure II (Richardson et al. 1960). Ultrathin sections were mounted on uncoated copper grids, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined on a Zeiss Libra transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss AG). Quantitative morphometry of the retina was performed on semithin sections. The length of each retinal hemisphere was divided through 10, and the thickness at each point was measured. Means of the measured points were plotted in a spider diagram and statistical analysis was performed to compare single measure points of CTGFLacZ/+ and WT mice. Thickness of Descemet’s membrane was measured at 6 measure points in the peripheral cornea of semithin sections.
Staining for β-galactosidase activity
Eyes of mice at different ages (postnatal days (P) 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 49) were used. Embryos were obtained from timed matings with noon of the day of vaginal plug discovery designated as 0.5 days of gestation (E 0.5). Ccn2/Ctgf promotor activity was analyzed at E11.5 and E16.5. Eyes and embryos were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 5 mM egtazic acid (EGTA; pH 7.3) and 2 mM MgCl2 dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 30 min at RT. Followed by three washing steps with washing buffer (1 M MgCl2, 1% NaDC, 2% Tergitol in 0.1 M phosphate buffer), samples were immersed for 24 h at 37 °C in the dark with X-Gal staining solution (2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate, 0.02% Nonidet-P40, 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 1 mg/ml X-Gal dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) to visualize β-galactosidase activity. Afterwards, samples were washed three times for 10 min with washing buffer, followed by a second washing step for three times for 10 min with 0.1 M phosphate buffer. After incubation for 1 h with 50% isopropanol and 1 h with 70% isopropanol, samples were embedded in paraffin. Finally, 6 µm sections were cut on a Supercut microtom (Reichert-Jung, Kirchseeon, Germany).
Immunohistochemistry
Eyes were enucleated and fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde overnight or 2 h for retinal flat mount preparation. Eyes were equilibrated in 10%, 20%, and 30% sucrose, embedded in Tissue-Tek optimal cooling temperature compound (Sakura Finetek Europe B.V., Zoeterwounde, Netherlands) and stored at − 20 °C. Frozen 12 µm sections were cut on a cryostat. For retinal flat mounts, the whole retina was dissected and put on an object slide. Retinal flat mounts were pretreated with 50 mM NH4Cl (1 h, RT) and 0.5% Triton-X-100 (30 min, RT). Afterwards, sections and retinal flat mounts were incubated with 2% bovine serum albumin, 0.2% cold water fish gelatin, 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer and stained with specific antibodies as follows: rabbit anti-β-galactosidase (1:100, ICL Lab, Portland, USA), chicken anti-GFAP (1:2000, LifeSpan Biosciences, Seattle, USA), goat anti-glutamine synthetase (1:100, Santa Cruz), goat anti-CD31 (1:100, R&D systems, Minneapolis, USA), goat anti-choline acetyltransferase (1:50, Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, USA), goat anti-Cy™3 IgG (1:2000, Jackson Research Laboratories, West Grove, USA), Alexa Fluor® 647 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:200, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti-chicken IgG (H+L) (1:1000, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor® 488 donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L) (1:1000, Biotium Inc, Fremont, USA), biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (1:500, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, USA), and Streptavidin Alexa Fluor® 488 (1:1000, Invitrogen). To control for unspecific binding of the secondary antibody, negative controls were performed in which primary antibodies had been omitted. Finally, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindoel (DAPI, Vector Laboratories) was added to counterstain nuclear DNA.
Light and fluorescence microscopy
After immunohistochemical staining and staining for β-galactosidase activity, tissue sections and retinal flat mounts were analyzed using a Zeiss Axio Imager microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany).
Results
To analyze the amounts of CCN2/CTGF in CTGFLacZ/+ mice with one null allele of Ccn2/Ctgf, we performed real-time RT-PCR and Western blot analyses using RNA or protein extracts isolated from the sensory retina of the mice at the age of 4 weeks. Analysis of retinal mRNA showed an approx. 50% reduction of Ccn2/Ctgf mRNA expression in CTGFLacZ/+ mice (0.50 ± 0.12, *p = 0.02, n = 4) when compared to their wild type (WT) littermates (1 ± 0.14, n = 3; Fig. 1a). The decrease in mRNA expression correlated with a decrease in the amounts of CCN2/CTGF which were significantly reduced (0.57 ± 0.35; *p = 0.04, n = 6) when compared to those of WT littermates (1 ± 0.23, n = 6; Fig. 1b). The lack of one functional Ccn2/Ctgf allele did neither cause obvious structural nor ultrastructural changes in young adult mice at 9 weeks of age (Fig. 2). More specifically, the cornea was completely transparent in all investigated animals. The corneal stroma of Ccn2/Ctgf mice did not differ from that of WT mice, neither in structure nor in amount of its collagen layers. (Fig. 2 a and a’; CTGFLacZ/+ n = 6; WT n = 5). Both in WT and mutant mice, Descemet’s membrane (DM) was entirely composed of electron dense material with its characteristic banding pattern (Fig. 2 b and b’). Thickness of Descemet’s membrane did not differ between CTGFLacZ/+ mice (2.26 ± 0.24 µm; n = 4) and their WT littermates (2.21 ± 0.09 µm, n = 2), and was similar as observed by others in wild-type mice at the same age and with a similar genetic background (Jun et al. 2006). The inner surface of the cornea was entirely covered by endothelial cells and no signs of corneal vascularization were observed in any of the investigated animals (Fig. 2 a and a’; CTGFLacZ/+ n = 6; WT n = 5).
The anterior chamber angle was wide open, and trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal were clearly visible in both groups (Fig. 2 a and a’). Moreover, the ultrastructural analysis of the conventional outflow pathways showed no structural differences between CTGFLacZ/+ mice and their WT littermates. Schlemm’s canal endothelium was normally formed showing giant vacuoles and the typical discontinuous basement membrane. In the juxtacanalicular region of the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways we observed in both groups regularly formed collagen fibrils and elastic fibers interrupted by optically empty spaces (Fig. 2 c and c’).
In both CTGFLacZ/+ mice and their WT littermates, the retina showed its normal layers (Fig. 2 d and d’). Moreover, the thicknesses of the outer nuclear layer and inner nuclear layer of CTGFLacZ/+ and WT littermates at the age of 2 months were not significantly different (n = 3) (Fig. 2 e and f). Taken together, reduction of CCN2/CTGF in heterozygous deficient CTGFLacZ/+ mice did not cause phenotypic changes, a finding that is in agreement with previous studies focusing on the retinal vasculature (Kuiper et al. 2007, 2008).
To analyze Ccn2/Ctgf promotor activity during embryonic development, we took advantage of the fact that in CTGFLacZ/+ mice, the β-galactosidase marker gene LacZ had been inserted into the open reading frame of Ccn2/Ctgf. At embryonic day (E) 11.5 during formation of the lens vesicle and the optic cup all cell types of the developing eye stained positive for β-galactosidase including those of the surrounding neural crest (Fig. 3a). At E16.5, the neural crest cells forming the sclera and the stroma of the developing choroid, ciliary body, and iris were labelled intensely for β-galactosidase (Fig. 3b). In addition, cells of both corneal epithelium and endothelium stained positive as did the cells of the lens epithelium. Positive staining was absent in lens fibers. Cells of the retinal pigment epithelium were essentially negative and the sensory retina showed only weak labeling in its anterior inner parts. Positive labeling continued to the inner epithelium of the optic cup anterior lip in region of the developing iris/ciliary body cells. At the developing optic nerve its surrounding meninges showed staining for β-galactosidase as did cells of the hyaloid artery passing through the optic nerve. Eyes of newborn mice (postnatal day (P1)) showed an essentially similar staining pattern (Fig. 3c). At P5, a distinct labeling was first observed at the optic nerve head that corresponded to the site of the developing glial lamina. Labeling of the glial lamina was also present at later stages and in adult eyes. A distinct staining of individual cells in the sensory retina became apparent at P10 and extended until adulthood (Fig. 3e–g). Simultaneously, the positive staining of sclera, cornea and lens became weaker and was barely detectable in adult eyes. Throughout postnatal life and in adulthood, staining for β-galactosidase was always intense in the stroma of the ciliary body and the adjacent tissues of the chamber angle including the trabecular meshwork (Fig. 3c–g). When control eyes of wildtype littermates where processed for β-galactosidase, no staining was detected (Fig. 3h).
Ccn2/Ctgf expression in the anterior eye
Upon higher magnification of the developing cornea and lens, we observed that cells did not stain homogenously for β-galactosidase (Fig. 4a–g). In contrast, the staining was especially intense in distinct focal regions which we attributed to the fact that high amounts of the enzyme were present in the perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum causing local high enzymatic activity to process X-gal. Co-labeling with antibodies against β-galactosidase and DAPI to visualize nuclei showed perinuclear immunolabeling and supported our assumption (Fig. 4h, i). The staining pattern was intense from E16.5 to P10 in the epithelial layers of lens and cornea, and in the corneal endothelium (Fig. 4a–d). At P10 and P15, additional labeling was observed in keratocytes of the corneal stroma (Fig. 4d, e). Staining of the lens epithelium was much weaker when eyes from P15 to adulthood were investigated (Fig. 4e). The same was the case for all corneal cell types at P20 and later (Fig. 4f, g).
In the chamber angle region, positive labelling of the stroma in the developing iris/ciliary body was intense at E16.5 and remained so in postnatal life until adulthood (Fig. 5a–f). Between P5 and 15, there was an additional very intense labeling in the limbus area marking the transition between cornea and sclera (Fig. 5c–e). Since during that time period the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways including Schlemm’s canal and its collector channels develop in the mouse eye (Cvekl and Tamm 2004), we aimed at identifying more about the nature of the β-galactosidase-positive cells in this region. To this end, we again performed immunohistochemistry as the blue reaction product of the β-galactosidase stain tends to diffuse in regions of high LacZ expression. By using immunolabeling, we identified as site of the highest expression in the P15 anterior eye the pigmented ciliary epithelium (Fig. 5g). In addition, we confirmed that the neural crest-derived cells of the anterior eye such as stroma cells of iris/ciliary body and adjacent choroid, chamber angle and corneal endothelium express β-galactosidase (Fig. 5g). Corroborating our findings seen after X-gal histochemistry, immunoreactivity for β-galactosidase was detected in the cells of the limbus region. In the adult eye, β-galactosidase immunoreactivity was markedly weaker in cells of anterior uvea and ciliary epithelium but remained intense in region of the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways (Fig. 5h). To identify which cell type of the outflow pathways expresses β-galactosidase, we performed double-immunohistochemistry with antibodies against β-galactosidase and CD31 (Fig. 5i–p) that bind to vascular endothelial cells including those of Schlemm’s canal (Herrnberger et al. 2012). Both at P15 (Fig. 5i–l) and in the adult eye (Fig. 5 m–p), cells of the trabecular meshwork adjacent to the inner site of Schlemm’s canal showed intense immunoreactivity. In addition, some cells in the inner wall endothelium of Schlemm’s canal were positively labeled (Fig. 5i–p).
Ccn2/Ctgf expression in the posterior eye
At E16.5 and P1 β-galactosidase labeling was observed in the developing choroid and sclera, while the retinal pigment epithelium and the sensory retina were negative (Fig. 6a, b). At P5-positive staining became detectable in the neuroblastic layer of the developing sensory retina and, albeit with weaker intensity, in the ganglion cell layer (Fig. 6c). Staining of the ganglion cell and of the inner nuclear layer became more distinct at P10 (Fig. 6d). An intense signal was observed in both layers at P15 and in adulthood (Fig. 6e, f). From that time on until adulthood, staining was seen in the inner and outer plexiform layers (Fig. 6e, f). Positive staining in the choroid was seen through all postnatal stages until adulthood (Fig. 6b–f). To obtain more information on the specific cell type that expresses β-galactosidase in the ganglion cell and inner nuclear layer, we immunostained retinal flat mounts of CTGFLacZ/+ mice with antibodies against β-galactosidase and investigated a vertical view of 3D reconstructions of z-stacks through the entire retina (Fig. 6g–i). Again, we observed intense immunolabeling in ganglion cell layer and inner nuclear layer corroborating our findings obtained through X-gal staining. When analyzing individual stacks in the ganglion cell layer in a horizontal view, we identified positively labelled cells with cellular processes that were in contact with vessels on the retinal surface and very likely represented astrocytes (Fig. 6i). In contrast, cells in the inner nuclear layer had no obvious association with retinal capillaries (Fig. 6h). Next, we analyzed meridional sections through the retina that were again immunostained for β-galactosidase. Comparable to findings obtained with X-gal staining, immunoreactivity was seen in inner and outer plexiform layer, inner nuclear layer and ganglion cell layer. Double-immunostaining with antibodies against GFAP to visualize astrocytes on the retinal surface distinctly overlapped with β-galactosidase immunoreactivity and supported our assumption that retinal astrocytes express Ccn2/Ctgf (Fig. 7a–f). Next, double-immunostaining with antibodies against glutamine synthetase (GS) to stain Müller cells and β-galactosidase were performed, which showed a clear Ccn2/Ctgf expression in Müller cell processes and endfeet (Fig. 7g–l). Furthermore, we observed some scattered β-galactosidase-positive cells scattered in the ganglion cell layer and in the inner nuclear layer, which were negative for GS and GFAP. The localization and appearance of the cells matched with the description of displaced amacrine cells. The majority of displaced amacrine cells are starburst amacrine cells (Perez De Sevilla Muller et al. 2007), which is why we performed double-immunohistochemistry with antibodies against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), a specific marker for starburst amacrine cells and against β-galactosidase. As expected, ChAT-immunoreactive somata were localized to the inner portion of the inner nuclear layer and the outer border of the inner plexiform layer, both at P15 and in adulthood (Fig. 7m–r). Positive staining for β-galactosidase was seen in their perinuclear cytoplasm (Fig. 7m–r). Finally, we performed double-immunohistochemistry for β-galactosidase and CD31 to identify that endothelial cells of choroidal and retinal vessels homogenously express Ccn2/Ctgf (Fig. 7s–x).
Ccn2/Ctgf expression in the optic nerve
Until P1, the optic nerve and the optic nerve head remained unstained for β-galactosidase, with the exception of the hyaloid artery and its surrounding meninges that were positively labeled (Fig. 8b, c). At P5, positive labeling for β-galactosidase could be observed in the glial lamina of the optic nerve head. The staining was very intense at P10 and remained so until adulthood (Fig. 8e–h). In addition, from P5 until adulthood there was positive labeling of the optic nerve head prelaminar region albeit with less intensity than in the glial lamina (Fig. 8d–h). At P15, several distinct spots were intensively labeled in the postlaminar region of the optic nerve (Fig. 8f), a staining pattern that was less prominent at P20 and in the adult optic nerve. To identify the cellular origin of Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity at the optic nerve head, we performed double-immunohistochemistry with antibodies against both β-galactosidase and GFAP which is highly expressed in astrocytes of the mouse glial lamina (Howell et al. 2007; Sun et al. 2009). Immunoreactivity for β-galactosidase and GFAP was weak in the postlaminar region of the P15 optic nerve but more intense in the posterior part of the glial lamina (Fig. 9a–d). In the anterior glial lamina, there was intense immunoreactivity for β-galactosidase corroborating the findings seen with X-gal staining (Fig. 9c, d). Higher magnification showed a close association and partial overlapping with GFAP labelled astrocytes. We attributed lack of complete overlap to the different intracellular location of GFAP-positive intermediate filaments and perinuclear β-galactosidase. The staining pattern in the adult optic nerve head was essentially similar to that seen in P15 (Fig. 9e–h).
Discussion
We conclude that CCN2/CTGF signaling is involved in the processes that govern neural crest (NC) morphogenesis during late embryonic and postnatal eye development. In the adult eye, it primarily contributes to functional processes in the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways, the choroidal and retinal vasculature, and the optic nerve head. This conclusion rests on our observation of (1) Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity in NC-derived cells differentiating to uveal and corneal tissues, and (2) persistent strong promoter activity in trabecular meshwork, endothelial cells of Schlemm’s canal, retinal and choroidal vessels, and astrocytes of the optic nerve head glial lamina.
NC cells migrate to the developing eye to form the corneal stroma and endothelium, and later during a second migration wave the stroma of choroid, iris and ciliary body, and the trabecular meshwork (Cvekl and Tamm 2004). NC migration in cranial development is under control of a variety of transcription factors that initiate distinct signaling processes to guide NC migration and differentiation. There is substantial evidence obtained from studies of a variety of induced mutant mouse strains that members of the TGF-β superfamily play a critical role in those signaling processes (Conway and Kaartinen 2011; Oka et al. 2007). The same appears to be the case for NC cells that are involved in eye development as both deficiency in TGF-β (Iwao et al. 2009; Saika et al. 2001; Sanford et al. 1997) or BMP4 signaling (Chang et al. 2001), or overexpression of TGF-β signaling (Flügel-Koch et al. 2002) interfere with NC-derived ocular morphogenesis. The well-documented amplifying activity of CCN2/CTGF on TGF-β signaling (Abreu et al. 2002; Gressner et al. 2009; Khankan et al. 2011; Mori et al. 1999) may well be involved in the action of TGF-β signaling on cranial NC development. In support of this assumption are observations that CCN2/CTGF can rescue the phenotype caused by deficient TGF-β signaling in the developing cranial NC such as the formation of mandibular dysgenesis or cleft palate (Oka et al. 2007), or causes similar defects when deleted (Ivkovic et al. 2003; Lambi et al. 2012; Tarr et al. 2017). Since our findings show high Ccn2/Ctgf expression in ocular NC cells, it is tempting to speculate that it plays a similarly important role to modulate NC morphogenesis during eye development. The availability of CCN2/CTGF during those critical processes in eye development may not exclusively depend on autocrine secretion by NC cells. In contrast, it may well be supported by adjacent paracrine sources as we also detected Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity in immediately adjacent cells of non-NC origin such as lens epithelium or pigmented ciliary epithelium.
We observed that the Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity in NC-derived ocular tissues might be depended on developmental stages. In the adult eyes, the Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity remained mainly detectable in the trabecular meshwork and the adjacent limbus. This observation agrees with data obtained through the NEIBank sequence tag analysis that identified Ccn2/Ctgf as one of the highest expressed genes in the human trabecular meshwork (Tomarev et al. 2003). We showed in previous work that CCN2/CTGF is critically required for actin stress fiber formation and contractility of trabecular meshwork cells and is simultaneously involved in the modulation of their ECM deposition (Junglas et al. 2012, 2009; Kuespert et al. 2015). Since both processes are critically involved in generating and modulating aqueous humor outflow resistance (Stamer et al. 2015; Tamm et al. 2015), the continuous high promoter activity of Ccn2/Ctgf in the mouse eye is not necessarily surprising. An interesting new aspect of our study is that we were able to show promoter activity in Schlemm’s canal cells in situ corroborating data from previous in vitro studies (Overby et al. 2014).
Schlemm’s canal cells are not the only type of vascular endothelial cells in the eye that display Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity as our data show that the same is the case for retinal and choroidal endothelial cells. Ccn2/Ctgf promoter activity or mRNA expression has also been shown for developing and adult vascular endothelial cells of other organs (Friedrichsen et al. 2005, 2003; Hall-Glenn et al. 2012). Our findings in the eye agree with those of Pi and colleagues (Pi et al. 2011) who observed CCN2/CTGF immunostaining in retinal vascular endothelial cells and pericytes during retinal angiogenesis. In addition, the authors showed that CCN2/CTGF is critically required for retinal angiogenesis, since the injection of antibodies against CCN2/CTGF into the vitreous of P2 mice resulted in a decrease of the superficial retinal vascular plexus. The continuous promoter activity of Ccn2/Ctgf in the adult mouse eye agrees with data obtained by immunohistochemistry of human eyes (van Setten et al. 2016) and strongly indicates a function for the adult eyes that is beyond angiogenesis in retinal development. A potential function could be related to the observation that Ccn2/Ctgf expression is upregulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (He et al. 2003; Suzuma et al. 2000) and its known inhibiting role of VEGF-induced angiogenesis by formation of VEGF-CTGF complexes (Inoki et al. 2002; Jang et al. 2004). The continuous expression of CCN2/CTGF in adult retinal vessel might be useful to antagonize signaling processes that have the potential to cause retinal neovascularization and its associated adverse effects on retinal structure and function. An additional paracrine expression of Ccn2/Ctgf in perivascular astrocytes on the retinal surface may well contribute to this function. Quite similarly Müller cell-derived CCN2/CTGF likely antagonizes a VEGF-induced growth signal on intraretinal capillaries while the continuous Ccn2/Ctgf expression in adult choroidal vessels likely contributes to prevent choroidal neovascularization. Overall, the TGF-β amplifying function of CCN2/CTGF is likely to contribute to its effects on retinal and choroidal vessels as lack of TGF-β signaling in the eye causes retinal and choroidal neovascularization that finally destroys retinal structure and function (Braunger et al. 2015b; Schlecht et al. 2017).
An unexpected finding was the very high expression of Ccn2/Ctgf in the glial lamina of the mouse optic nerve head. This area is equivalent to the Lamina cribrosa in the primate eye (Stowell et al. 2017; Tamm et al. 2017) and contains a dense network of intertwined astrocytes that constitutively express GFAP and show other similarities to white matter fibrous astrocytes (Sun et al. 2009). Unlike their counterpart in the brain, astrocytes in the mouse glial lamina are under a substantial and continuous mechanical strain induced by intraocular pressure (IOP) as are the astrocytes in the Lamina cribrosa of the primate eye. IOP is the most critical risk factor for damage of axons at the optic nerve head in glaucoma, both in the primate and the mouse eye (Quigley 2011; Steinhart et al. 2014; Weinreb et al. 2014). Experimental data indicate a rapid reorganization of glial lamina astrocytes and their processes in response to brief and mild elevations of IOP (Sun et al. 2013). A signaling factor like CCN2/CTGF that is known to modulate the actin cytoskeleton and the synthesis of fibrillar ECM components that are connected via integrins may be an essential requirement for quick astrocyte reorganization in response to mechanical stimuli. In support of this assumption, we observed the promoter activity in the cornea and sclera only during development, which might be necessary to build up the ECM of these load-bearing structures. The slow ECM turnover in the cornea and sclera in the adult tissues might not require CCN2/CTGF activity under normal conditions. In contrast, in tissues that are subject to continuous micro-strain, CCN2/CTGF might be induced through mechanical stimuli. This scenario likely involves activation of mechanotransducing proteins such as YAP and TAZ, which were both identified in human trabecular meshwork cells and in fibroblasts (Chudgar et al. 2006; Guo et al. 2011; Schild and Trueb 2002; Thomasy et al. 2013). There is substantial evidence that CCN2/CTGF inhibits oligodendrocyte differentiation in vitro and in vivo (Lamond and Barnett 2013; Stritt et al. 2009). In the brain, it is neuronal-derived CCN2/CTGF that acts negatively on myelination (Ercan, et al. 2017). It is tempting to speculate that in the optic nerve head, the local high amounts of astrocyte-derived CCN2/CTGF inhibit myelination of the optic nerve axons that pass through the glial lamina and that the lack of myelination increases their vulnerability to mechanical strain induced by intraocular pressure. Further studies using mice with an induced conditional deletion of Ccn2/Ctgf appear to be the appropriate tool to shed light on the distinct functional role(s) of Ccn2/Ctgf in the glial lamina of the optic nerve head.
References
Abreu JG, Ketpura NI, Reversade B, De Robertis EM (2002) Connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF) modulates cell signalling by BMP and TGF-beta. Nat Cell Biol 4:599–604
Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani G, Hinz B (2016) The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrosis: answered and unanswered questions. F1000Res 5:752
Braunger BM, Fuchshofer R, Tamm ER (2015) The aqueous humor outflow pathways in glaucoma: a unifying concept of disease mechanisms and causative treatment. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 95:173–181
Braunger BM, Leimbeck SV, Schlecht A, Volz C, Jagle H, Tamm ER (2015) Deletion of ocular transforming growth factor beta signaling mimics essential characteristics of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Pathol 185:1749–1768
Brigstock DR (2003) The CCN family: a new stimulus package. J Endocrinol 178:169–175
Browne JG, Ho SL, Kane R, Oliver N, Clark AF, O’Brien CJ, Crean JK (2011) Connective tissue growth factor is increased in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:3660–3666
Carthy JM (2018) TGFbeta signaling and the control of myofibroblast differentiation: implications for chronic inflammatory disorders. J Cell Physiol 233:98–106
Chang B, Smith RS, Peters M, Savinova OV, Hawes NL, Zabaleta A, Nusinowitz S, Martin JE, Davisson ML, Cepko CL, Hogan BL, John SW (2001) Haploinsufficient Bmp4 ocular phenotypes include anterior segment dysgenesis with elevated intraocular pressure. BMC Genet 2:18
Chudgar SM, Deng P, Maddala R, Epstein DL, Rao PV (2006) Regulation of connective tissue growth factor expression in the aqueous humor outflow pathway. Mol Vis 12:1117–1126
Conway SJ, Kaartinen V (2011) TGFbeta superfamily signaling in the neural crest lineage. Cell Adh Migr 5:232–236
Crawford LA, Guney MA, Oh YA, Deyoung RA, Valenzuela DM, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Lyons KM, Brigstock DR, Economides A, Gannon M (2009) Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) inactivation leads to defects in islet cell lineage allocation and beta-cell proliferation during embryogenesis. Mol Endocrinol 23:324–336
Cvekl A, Tamm ER (2004) Anterior eye development and ocular mesenchyme: new insights from mouse models and human diseases. BioEssays 26:374–386
Ercan E, Han JM, Di Nardo A, Winden K, Han MJ, Hoyo L, Saffari A, Leask A, Geschwind DH, Sahin M (2017) Neuronal CTGF/CCN2 negatively regulates myelination in a mouse model of tuberous sclerosis complex. J Exp Med 214:681–697
Flügel-Koch C, Ohlmann A, Piatigorsky J, Tamm ER (2002) Disruption of anterior segment development by TGF-beta1 overexpression in the eyes of transgenic mice. Dev Dyn 225:111–125
Friedrichsen S, Heuer H, Christ S, Cuthill D, Bauer K, Raivich G (2005) Gene expression of connective tissue growth factor in adult mouse. Growth Factors 23:43–53
Friedrichsen S, Heuer H, Christ S, Winckler M, Brauer D, Bauer K, Raivich G (2003) CTGF expression during mouse embryonic development. Cell Tissue Res 312:175–188
Fuchshofer R, Stephan DA, Russell P, Tamm ER (2009) Gene expression profiling of TGFbeta2- and/or BMP7-treated trabecular meshwork cells: Identification of Smad7 as a critical inhibitor of TGF-beta2 signaling. Exp Eye Res 88:1020–1032
Fuchshofer R, Ullmann S, Zeilbeck LF, Baumann M, Junglas B, Tamm ER (2011) Connective tissue growth factor modulates podocyte actin cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix synthesis and is induced in podocytes upon injury. Histochem Cell Biol 136:301–319
Fuchshofer R, Yu AH, Welge-Lüssen U, Tamm ER (2007) Bone morphogenetic protein-7 is an antagonist of transforming growth factor-beta2 in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:715–726
Gressner OA, Gressner AM (2008) Connective tissue growth factor: a fibrogenic master switch in fibrotic liver diseases. Liver Int 28:1065–1079
Gressner OA, Lahme B, Siluschek M, Rehbein K, Weiskirchen R, Gressner AM (2009) Connective tissue growth factor is a Smad2 regulated amplifier of transforming growth factor beta actions in hepatocytes - but without modulating bone morphogenetic protein 7 signaling. Hepatology 49:2021–2030
Grotendorst GR, Okochi H, Hayashi N (1996) A novel transforming growth factor beta response element controls the expression of the connective tissue growth factor gene. Cell Growth Differ 7:469–480
Guo F, Carter DE, Leask A (2011) Mechanical tension increases CCN2/CTGF expression and proliferation in gingival fibroblasts via a TGFbeta-dependent mechanism. PLoS ONE 6:e19756
Hall-Glenn F, De Young RA, Huang BL, van Handel B, Hofmann JJ, Chen TT, Choi A, Ong JR, Benya PD, Mikkola H, Iruela-Arispe ML, Lyons KM (2012) CCN2/connective tissue growth factor is essential for pericyte adhesion and endothelial basement membrane formation during angiogenesis. PLoS ONE 7:e30562
He S, Jin ML, Worpel V, Hinton DR (2003) A role for connective tissue growth factor in the pathogenesis of choroidal neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol 121:1283–1288
Herrnberger L, Ebner K, Junglas B, Tamm ER (2012) The role of plasmalemma vesicle-associated protein (PLVAP) in endothelial cells of Schlemm’s canal and ocular capillaries. Exp Eye Res 105:27–33
Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Galli A, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani G (2007) The myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins. Am J Pathol 170:1807–1816
Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Prunotto M, Desmouliere A, Varga J, De Wever O, Mareel M, Gabbiani G (2012) Recent developments in myofibroblast biology: paradigms for connective tissue remodeling. Am J Pathol 180:1340–1355
Ho LTY, Osterwald A, Ruf I, Hunziker D, Mattei P, Challa P, Vann R, Ullmer C, Rao PV (2020) Role of the autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid axis in glaucoma, aqueous humor drainage and fibrogenic activity. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1866:165560
Holmes A, Abraham DJ, Sa S, Shiwen X, Black CM, Leask A (2001) CTGF and SMADs, maintenance of scleroderma phenotype is independent of SMAD signaling. J Biol Chem 276:10594–10601
Howell GR, Libby RT, Jakobs TC, Smith RS, Phalan FC, Barter JW, Barbay JM, Marchant JK, Mahesh N, Porciatti V, Whitmore AV, Masland RH, John SW (2007) Axons of retinal ganglion cells are insulted in the optic nerve early in DBA/2J glaucoma. J Cell Biol 179:1523–1537
Igarashi A, Okochi H, Bradham DM, Grotendorst GR (1993) Regulation of connective tissue growth factor gene expression in human skin fibroblasts and during wound repair. Mol Biol Cell 4:637–645
Inoki I, Shiomi T, Hashimoto G, Enomoto H, Nakamura H, Makino K, Ikeda E, Takata S, Kobayashi K, Okada Y (2002) Connective tissue growth factor binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenesis. FASEB J 16:219–221
Ivkovic S, Yoon BS, Popoff SN, Safadi FF, Libuda DE, Stephenson RC, Daluiski A, Lyons KM (2003) Connective tissue growth factor coordinates chondrogenesis and angiogenesis during skeletal development. Development 130:2779–2791
Iwao K, Inatani M, Matsumoto Y, Ogata-Iwao M, Takihara Y, Irie F, Yamaguchi Y, Okinami S, Tanihara H (2009) Heparan sulfate deficiency leads to Peters anomaly in mice by disturbing neural crest TGF-beta2 signaling. J Clin Invest 119:1997–2008
Jang HS, Kim HJ, Kim JM, Lee YS, Kim KL, Kim JA, Lee JY, Suh W, Choi JH, Jeon ES, Byun J, Kim DK (2004) A novel ex vivo angiogenesis assay based on electroporation-mediated delivery of naked plasmid DNA to skeletal muscle. Mol Ther 9:464–474
Jun AS, Chakravarti S, Edelhauser HF, Kimos M (2006) Aging changes of mouse corneal endothelium and Descemet’s membrane. Exp Eye Res 83:890–896
Junglas B, Kuespert S, Seleem AA, Struller T, Ullmann S, Bosl M, Bosserhoff A, Kostler J, Wagner R, Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R (2012) Connective tissue growth factor causes glaucoma by modifying the actin cytoskeleton of the trabecular meshwork. Am J Pathol 180:2386–2403
Junglas B, Yu AH, Welge-Lussen U, Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R (2009) Connective tissue growth factor induces extracellular matrix deposition in human trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res 88:1065–1075
Kapoor M, Liu S, Huh K, Parapuram S, Kennedy L, Leask A (2008) Connective tissue growth factor promoter activity in normal and wounded skin. Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair 1:3
Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron-microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137e138
Khankan R, Oliver N, He S, Ryan SJ, Hinton DR (2011) Regulation of fibronectin-EDA through CTGF domain-specific interactions with TGFbeta2 and its receptor TGFbetaRII. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:5068–5078
Kuespert S, Junglas B, Braunger BM, Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R (2015) The regulation of connective tissue growth factor expression influences the viability of human trabecular meshwork cells. J Cell Mol Med 20:1–11
Kuiper EJ, Roestenberg P, Ehlken C, Lambert V, van Treslong-de Groot HB, Lyons KM, Agostini H-JT, Rakic J-M, Klaassen I, Van Noorden CJF, Goldschmeding R, Schlingemann RO (2007) Angiogenesis is not impaired in connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) knock-out mice. The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society 55:1139–1147
Kuiper EJ, van Zijderveld R, Roestenberg P, Lyons KM, Goldschmeding R, Klaassen I, Van Noorden CJF, Schlingemann RO (2008) Connective tissue growth factor is necessary for retinal capillary basal lamina thickening in diabetic mice. The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society 56:785–792
Lambi AG, Pankratz TL, Mundy C, Gannon M, Barbe MF, Richtsmeier JT, Popoff SN (2012) The skeletal site-specific role of connective tissue growth factor in prenatal osteogenesis. Dev Dyn 241:1944–1959
Lamond R, Barnett SC (2013) Schwann cells but not olfactory ensheathing cells inhibit CNS myelination via the secretion of connective tissue growth factor. J Neurosci 33:18686–18697
Leask A (2020) Conjunction junction, what’s the function? CCN proteins as targets in fibrosis and cancers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 318(6):C1046–C1054. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00028.2020
Leask A, Sa S, Holmes A, Shiwen X, Black CM, Abraham DJ (2001) The control of ccn2 (ctgf) gene expression in normal and scleroderma fibroblasts. Mol Pathol 54:180–183
Liu S, Taghavi R, Leask A (2010) Connective tissue growth factor is induced in bleomycin-induced skin scleroderma. J Cell Commun Signal 4:25–30
Mason RM (2013) Fell-Muir lecture: connective tissue growth factor (CCN2) - a pernicious and pleiotropic player in the development of kidney fibrosis. Int J Exp Pathol 94:1–16
Mori T, Kawara S, Shinozaki M, Hayashi N, Kakinuma T, Igarashi A, Takigawa M, Nakanishi T, Takehara K (1999) Role and interaction of connective tissue growth factor with transforming growth factor-beta in persistent fibrosis: a mouse fibrosis model. J Cell Physiol 181:153–159
Oka K, Oka S, Sasaki T, Ito Y, Bringas P Jr, Nonaka K, Chai Y (2007) The role of TGF-beta signaling in regulating chondrogenesis and osteogenesis during mandibular development. Dev Biol 303:391–404
Overby DR, Zhou EH, Vargas-Pinto R, Pedrigi RM, Fuchshofer R, Braakman ST, Gupta R, Perkumas KM, Sherwood JM, Vahabikashi A, Dang Q, Kim JH, Ethier CR, Stamer WD, Fredberg JJ, Johnson M (2014) Altered mechanobiology of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells in glaucoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:13876–13881
Perbal A, Perbal B (2016) The CCN family of proteins: a 25th anniversary picture. J Cell Commun Signal 10:177–190
Perbal B (2013) CCN proteins: a centralized communication network. J Cell Commun Signal 7:169–177
Perbal B (2018) The concept of the CCN protein family revisited: a centralized coordination network. J Cell Commun Signal 12:3–12
Perbal B, Tweedie S, Bruford E (2018) The official unified nomenclature adopted by the HGNC calls for the use of the acronyms, CCN1-6, and discontinuation in the use of CYR61, CTGF, NOV and WISP 1–3 respectively. J Cell Commun Signal 12:625–629
Perez De Sevilla Muller L, Shelley J, Weiler R (2007) Displaced amacrine cells of the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 505:177–189
Pi L, Xia H, Liu J, Shenoy AK, Hauswirth WW, Scott EW (2011) Role of connective tissue growth factor in the retinal vasculature during development and ischemia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:8701–8710
Quigley HA (2011) Glaucoma Lancet 377:1367–1377
Reinehr S, Koch D, Weiss M, Froemel F, Voss C, Dick HB, Fuchshofer R, Joachim SC (2019) Loss of retinal ganglion cells in a new genetic mouse model for primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cell Mol Med 23:5497–5507
Richardson KC, Jarre, L, Finke H, (1960) Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain Technol 35:313e323
Richeldi L, Fernandez Perez ER, Costabel U, Albera C, Lederer DJ, Flaherty KR, Ettinger N, Perez R, Scholand MB, Goldin J, Peony Yu KH, Neff T, Porter S, Zhong M, Gorina E, Kouchakji E, Raghu G (2020) Pamrevlumab, an anti-connective tissue growth factor therapy, for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (PRAISE): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 8:25–33
Saika S, Liu CY, Azhar M, Sanford LP, Doetschman T, Gendron RL, Kao CW, Kao WW (2001) TGFbeta2 in corneal morphogenesis during mouse embryonic development. Dev Biol 240:419–432
Sanford LP, Ormsby I, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Sariola H, Friedman R, Boivin GP, Cardell EL, Doetschman T (1997) TGFbeta2 knockout mice have multiple developmental defects that are non- overlapping with other TGFbeta knockout phenotypes. Development 124:2659–2670
Sato S, Nagaoka T, Hasegawa M, Tamatani T, Nakanishi T, Takigawa M, Takehara K (2000) Serum levels of connective tissue growth factor are elevated in patients with systemic sclerosis: association with extent of skin sclerosis and severity of pulmonary fibrosis. J Rheumatol 27:149–154
Schild C, Trueb B (2002) Mechanical stress is required for high-level expression of connective tissue growth factor. Exp Cell Res 274:83–91
Schlecht A, Leimbeck SV, Jägle H, Feuchtinger A, Tamm ER, Braunger BM (2017) Deletion of endothelial transforming growth factor-beta signaling leads to choroidal neovascularization. Am J Pathol 187:2570–2589
Stamer WD, Braakman ST, Zhou EH, Ethier CR, Fredberg JJ, Overby DR, Johnson M (2015) Biomechanics of Schlemm’s canal endothelium and intraocular pressure reduction. Prog Retin Eye Res 44:86–98
Steinhart MR, Cone-Kimball E, Nguyen C, Nguyen TD, Pease ME, Chakravarti S, Oglesby EN, Quigley HA (2014) Susceptibility to glaucoma damage related to age and connective tissue mutations in mice. Exp Eye Res 119:54–60
Stowell C, Burgoyne CF, Tamm ER, Ethier CR, Participants LIIoAGN (2017) Biomechanical aspects of axonal damage in glaucoma: a brief review. Exp Eye Res 157:13–19
Stritt C, Stern S, Harting K, Manke T, Sinske D, Schwarz H, Vingron M, Nordheim A, Knoll B (2009) Paracrine control of oligodendrocyte differentiation by SRF-directed neuronal gene expression. Nat Neurosci 12:418–427
Sun D, Lye-Barthel M, Masland RH, Jakobs TC (2009) The morphology and spatial arrangement of astrocytes in the optic nerve head of the mouse. J Comp Neurol 516:1–19
Sun D, Qu J, Jakobs TC (2013) Reversible reactivity by optic nerve astrocytes. Glia 61:1218–1235
Suzuma K, Naruse K, Suzuma I, Takahara N, Ueki K, Aiello LP, King GL (2000) Vascular endothelial growth factor induces expression of connective tissue growth factor via KDR, Flt1, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-akt-dependent pathways in retinal vascular cells. J Biol Chem 275:40725–40731
Tamm ER, Braunger BM, Fuchshofer R (2015) Intraocular pressure and the mechanisms involved in resistance of the aqueous humor flow in the trabecular meshwork outflow pathways. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 134:301–314
Tamm ER, Ethier CR, Participants LIIoAGN (2017) Biological aspects of axonal damage in glaucoma: a brief review. Exp Eye Res 157:5–12
Tarr JT, Visser TG, Moon JE, Hendesi H, Barbe MF, Bradley JP, Popoff SN (2017) The pivotal role of CCN2 in mammalian palatogenesis. J Cell Commun Signal 11:25–37
Thomasy SM, Morgan JT, Wood JA, Murphy CJ, Russell P (2013) Substratum stiffness and latrunculin B modulate the gene expression of the mechanotransducers YAP and TAZ in human trabecular meshwork cells. Exp Eye Res 113:66–73
Tomarev SI, Wistow G, Raymond V, Dubois S, Malyukova I (2003) Gene expression profile of the human trabecular meshwork: NEIBank sequence tag analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2588–2596
van Setten GB, Trost A, Schrodl F, Kaser-Eichberger A, Bogner B, van Setten M, Heindl LM, Grabner G, Reitsamer HA (2016) Immunohistochemical detection of CTGF in the human eye. Curr Eye Res 41:1571–1579
Wallace DM, Clark AF, Lipson KE, Andrews D, Crean JK, O’Brien CJ (2013) Anti-connective tissue growth factor antibody treatment reduces extracellular matrix production in trabecular meshwork and lamina cribrosa cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7836–7848
Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA (2014) The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA 311:1901–1911
Yamamoto T, Sawada Y, Katayama I, Nishioka K (2005) Nodular scleroderma: increased expression of connective tissue growth factor. Dermatology 211:218–223
Yin Q, Liu H (2019) Connective tissue growth factor and renal fibrosis. Adv Exp Med Biol 1165:365–380
Acknowledgments
We thank Maureen Gannon (Vanderbilt University Medical Center) for generously providing us with CTGFLacZ/+-breeding couples and Elke Stauber and Angelika Pach (Institute of Human Anatomy and Embryology, University of Regensburg) for excellent technical assistance.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FU734/6‐1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Andrea E. Dillinger and Sabrina Kuespert: conducting experiments and manuscript preparation. Franziska Froemel: conducting experiments. Ernst R. Tamm: manuscript preparation. Rudolf Fuchshofer: planning and conducting experiments; manuscript preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All experiments conformed to the tenets of the National Institutes of Health Guidelines on the Care and Use of Animals in Research, the EU Directive 2010/63/E and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic in Vision Research, and were approved by local authorities (permit ID: 54-2532.1-44/12; committee: Regierung Oberpfalz, Bavaria, Germany).
Informed consent
None. No data of patients were included in the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dillinger, A.E., Kuespert, S., Froemel, F. et al. CCN2/CTGF promotor activity in the developing and adult mouse eye. Cell Tissue Res 384, 625–641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03332-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03332-4