Correction to: Molecular Genetics and Genomics (2020) 295:13–21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-019-01600-9

The original version of this article contained errors in Table 5 and the description about Fig. 3. The authors apologize for this oversight. The corrected Table 5 and the description about Fig. 3 can be found below.

Table 5 The performance of the model for identifying Ψ sites in each species

“As shown in Fig. 3, when the 54, 97, and 90 optimal features were used, the best predictive accuracies of 66.1%, 73.4%, and 71.1% were obtained for identifying Ψ sites in H. sapiens, M. musculus, and S. cerevisiae, respectively.”