Abstract
This study investigated the role of host traits, habitat, and sampling season on the prevalence and intensity of parasites in three species of platycephalid fishes. Three host species sampled were dusky flathead (Platycephalus fuscus, n = 3), blue-spotted flathead (Platycephalus caeruleopunctatus, n = 38), and tiger flathead (Platycephalus richardsoni, n = 59). A total of 14 metazoan parasite species were collected over 15 months, between July 2020 and September 2021. The parasites found included a chondracanthid copepod, adult hemiuroidean trematodes, cestode plerocercoids, larval and adult acanthocephalans, larval and adult nematodes, and an unknown species of helminth. General linear models were used to assess the relationship between host traits and sampling season with parasite infection intensity. The infection intensity of an unidentified plerocercoid species in P. caeruleopunctatus was found to be significantly associated with both sampling season and the interaction of host mass with sex. In P. richardsoni the infection intensity of the acanthocephalan, Corynosoma sp. was found to correlate with sampling season. The highest richness of parasite taxa was recorded from P. richardsoni, which may be due to the wide depth range of P. richardsoni, coupled with its generalist diet.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Teleost fish are infected by a wide variety of parasites (Timi and MacKenzie 2015), many of which have major impacts on aquaculture and fisheries (Wood and Lafferty 2015). Multiple studies have sought to identify the factors that influence parasite community composition and richness in teleost fish, including: host size (Guégan and Hugueny 1994; Timi and Poulin 2003), host diet (Lafferty 1999; Luque et al. 2008), host behaviour (Poulin 1999; Sasal et al. 1999), host phylogeny (Braga et al. 2015; Morand et al. 2000), habitat (Klimpel et al. 2006; Timi and Poulin 2003), and seasonality (Poulin and Valtonen 2002; Santoro et al. 2014). There is also evidence to suggest that some of these variables may act synergistically to influence species richness and composition of parasite assemblages in teleost fish (Violante-González et al. 2010).
The effect of host size on parasite richness has been compared to the theory of island biogeography (Poulin 2004; Wilson and MacArthur 1967). Hosts can be seen to function as islands, where the greater surface area available in larger hosts creates more potential niches for parasites (Morand et al. 2000; Poulin 2004). Additionally, the dietary breadth of a host may play an important role in determining the richness of parasite taxa within a given host individual (the infracommunity), through the consumption of a wider range of potential intermediate hosts (Molloy et al. 1995; Locke et al. 2014; Luque et al. 2008). Furthermore, host behaviour such as the gregariousness or propensity to form schools, may exert significant influence on their parasite communities (Sasal et al. 1999). Gregariousness may lead to greater contact between conspecifics, thus increasing transmission rates of parasites, resulting in a greater prevalence of ectoparasitic taxa in the host population (Poulin 1999). Host phylogenetic relationships may also serve to influence parasite community structure in fish (Carrassón et al. 2019; Lima et al. 2012). Furthermore, phylogenetic relatedness can result in taxa sharing similar dietary preferences, behavioural adaptations, and physiology, all of which may result in similar parasite assemblages among related host taxa (Carrassón et al. 2019).
Host habitats can also influence the richness and composition of parasite communities due to a number of abiotic and biotic factors, which operate across a range of temporal and spatial scales, such as the host’s depth range (Luque and Poulin 2004). Greater parasite richness has been observed in teleost fish inhabiting the benthic environment, as opposed to species from the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (Klimpel et al. 2006). This may be due to the higher available biomass found in benthic environments which supports a larger number of potential intermediate host species, thus promoting higher parasite diversity (Klimpel et al. 2006; Alves and Luque 2001). The effect of seasonality on parasite communities has also been documented in a number of teleost fish species (Campbell et al. 2007; Ondračková et al. 2004; Poulin and Valtonen 2002; Zander et al. 1999). Seasonal change may act as a stimulus for parasites such as digeneans to seek hosts, as water temperature rises during warmer months, it triggers the release of cercariae from first intermediate hosts, resulting in higher prevalence in downstream hosts (Ondračková et al. 2004).
The investigation of these variables is essential for improving management of fish and their associated parasite communities. This is particularly important for economically important host taxa, so that relevant agencies are suitably equipped in their ecological management (Suthar and Shamsi 2021). One family of teleost fish, the Platycephalidae, commonly referred to as flatheads, are of key importance to both recreational and commercial fisheries in Australia (Gray and Barnes 2015). Platycephalids host a diverse variety of parasite taxa, including, but not limited to a range of ectoparasites such as monogeneans and parasitic copepods, and endoparasites such as digenean trematodes and anisakid nematodes (Hooper 1983; Hossen et al. 2022). Hooper (1983) investigated the parasite communities of seven platycephalid species in New South Wales, Australia, and since then, there have been some investigation into specific parasite taxa from Australian platycephalids (Anderson and Cribb 1994, 1995; Hossen et al. 2021, 2022; Suthar and Shamsi 2021), with a particular focus on potentially zoonotic parasites such as Echinocephalus spp. and Anisakis spp. (Shamsi 2014; Shamsi et al. 2011, 2021). However, aside from Hooper (1983), none of those studies have quantified the entire parasite community for those platycephalid species in Australia.
In this study, the three species of platycephalids were chosen for investigation based on variations in their respective ecologies, which allowed for the comparison of their parasite community metrics, including prevalence and infection intensity. The first species chosen, the dusky flathead (Platycephalus fuscus) inhabits estuarine and near-shore marine environments along the east coast of Australia, ranging between Cairns, Queensland in the north, to the Gippsland Lakes, Victoria in the south (Gray et al. 2002; Gray and Barnes 2015), this is also the largest species of platycephalid, attaining a maximum total length of over 100 cm (Gray and Barnes 2015). The second species included in this study was the blue-spotted flathead (Platycephalus caeruleopunctatus). This species of platycephalid inhabits exposed areas of marine sand along the south eastern coast of Australia (Fetterplace et al. 2016; Moore et al. 2011), where it typically occurs in water between 40-100 m deep, however this species is also found in water as shallow as 10 m (Fetterplace et al. 2016; Hossen et al. 2022), and can attain a maximum total length of 62.3 cm (Barnes et al. 2011a). The third species of platycephalid included in this study was the tiger flathead (Platycephalus richardsoni), which occurs in offshore marine environments between 40-300 m deep (Fairbridge 1951; Keenan 1991, as cited in Hossen et al. 2021), and can attain a maximum total length of 65 cm (Barnes et al. 2011b).
This study sought to investigate how host traits and environmental factors may influence the parasite communities of three species of Australian platycephalid; dusky flathead (P. fuscus), blue-spotted flathead (P. caeruleopunctatus), and tiger flathead (P. richardsoni).
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Three species of flathead were collected over the course of 15 months, between July 2020 and September 2021 (UNE Animal Research Authority No.: AEC19-124). The three species examined in this study were dusky flathead (P. fuscus), bluespotted flathead (P. caeruleopunctatus), and tiger flathead (P. richardsoni). P. fuscus and P. caeruleopunctatus were caught via angling with hook and line, and euthanised immediately upon capture by pithing the brain case using a pithing tool. This method of euthanasia was selected as it is both humane and effective (Diggles 2016). Specimens were then placed into individual, zip-lock bags labelled with a collection number and site details, including water depth and coordinates. Total length (TL) and mass were recorded for each specimen in millimetres and grams respectively. Both species were collected in the Shoalhaven region of New South Wales, with P. fuscus captured from Lake Conjola (within a 5 km radius of the nominated site coordinates: S 35°15.435’ E 150°28.118’) and P. caeruleopunctatus collected from an offshore location near Mollymook Beach (within a 5 km radius of the nominated site coordinates: S 35°20.012’ E 150°29.014’). P. richardsoni were purchased unfrozen from Fishermen’s Wharf Seafood Pty. Ltd., 1/33 Wason St, Ulladulla NSW 2539, which acquired these specimens through commercial trawl operators working offshore from Eden, NSW.
Depth ranges of specimens collected were 3.2—5.5 m for P. fuscus, and 11.4 – 25.5 m for P. caeruleopunctatus. Information on depth range was not available for the purchased P. richardsoni, as retail staff from Fishermen’s Wharf Seafood Pty. Ltd. could not obtain those records. Based on published literature, the depth range for P. richardsoni is typically between 40—300 m (Fairbridge 1951; Keenan 1991, as cited in Hossen et al. 2021). Sampling activities were arranged to allow the collection of host specimens throughout the year to obtain data on potential temporal changes in the parasite communities of the three species of platycephalid.
Dissection of host specimens and examination for parasites
Necropsy of specimens collected via angling commenced within 1 h of returning from the sampling trip. For P. richardsoni, dissection occurred within 30 min after purchase. The external surface and buccopharyngeal cavity were examined for ectoparasites using a hand lens. Sections of dermis, fins, and gills were isolated using a scalpel, and placed into petri dishes of tap water for microscopic examination. Specimens were then dissected, and the internal organs including the liver, gall bladder, pylorus, stomach, intestines, and gonads were separated into petri dishes of water and examined under a stereomicroscope.
Slices of muscle tissue surrounding the abdominal cavity were examined with a hand lens for the presence of parasites such as anisakid larvae. Parasites were photographed using a microscope to mobile phone camera adaptor (Gosky Optics), and identified via morphological analysis based on Hooper (1983) and other published literature on flathead parasites. Data including abundance, identity, and host site within the fish were recorded for each species of parasite found within a host specimen. The parasites were then removed from the host for preservation in vials of 96% ethanol solution. Stomach contents, and the sex of each fish were also recorded during dissection. Examples of the stomach contents recovered from the host sample populations are visible in Fig. 1.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Rcmdr, a GUI for the statistical package R. Due to the small sample size for P. fuscus (n = 3), only parasite records obtained for P. caeruleopunctatus and P. richardsoni were used in the data analysis, and only parasite taxa with a prevalence of ≥ 10% were included in the analyses, as parasites with less than 10% prevalence were present in such low number of hosts relative to the total number of hosts sampled, that any analyses on them would not be statistically robust or meaningful. Due to the uneven distribution of parasites among hosts, log transformation of data was performed prior to their use in any statistical analysis. General linear models were generated to assess relationships between parasite infection intensity with host length (mm), mass (g), sex, and sampling season (winter, spring, summer, autumn) as dependent variables.
Results
Prevalence and mean intensity of parasites
A total of 14 metazoan parasite species were recorded from a sample of 100 host specimens comprising of three species of platycephalid from the NSW South Coast region. This included one species of copepod, four species of trematodes, one species of cestode, five species of nematodes, two species of acanthocephalans, and one species of unidentified helminth (see Table 1 for details). The number of hosts examined included 3 P. fuscus, 38 P. caeruleopunctatus, and 59 P. richardsoni. The P. fuscus sample was comprised of 1 female and 2 male specimens. The P. caeruleopunctatus sample was comprised of 1 juvenile specimen of indeterminate sex, 9 female, and 28 male specimens. The P. richardsoni sample was comprised of 33 female, and 26 male specimens. The average TL of P. fuscus was 368 mm (range = 341-397 mm), and the average mass was 293 g (range = 210-378 g). For the P. caeruleopunctatus sample, the average TL was 267.8 mm (range = 197-352 mm), and the average mass was 129.1 g (range = 54-291 g). The P. richardsoni sample included the largest hosts measured in terms of TL and mass, where the average TL was 383.7 mm (range = 309-512 mm), and the average mass was 414.5 g (range = 205-903 g). Three species of parasites were recorded from P. fuscus, five parasite species were recorded from P. caeruleopunctatus, and 13 parasite species were recorded from P. richardsoni.
The parasite with the highest recorded prevalence in P. fuscus was the digenean, Helicodidymozoon helicis, observed in 100% (3/3) of hosts. For P. caeruleopunctatus, cystacanths of the acanthocephalan, Corynosoma sp., had the highest prevalence, with 94.74% (36/38) of the hosts infected with a mean intensity of 19.81 ± 1.71 SE (3–47). In P. richardsoni, the most common parasites were Corynosoma sp. cystacanths and a digenean, Aponurus sp., both attained a prevalence of 18.64% (11/59). Of these two parasites, Corynosoma sp. had the highest mean intensity, at 24.33 ± 8.62 (3–112) SE. The least common parasites overall were Anisakis sp., Echinocephalus sp., and an unidentified species of helminth. For P. caeruleopunctatus, the least common parasites were Anisakis sp. and Lecithochirium sp. The parasites with the lowest prevalence in the P. richardsoni population were Anisakis sp., Echinocephalus sp., and a single unidentified helminth of the same species as the one that was found in P. fuscus.
Of the three platycephalid species, P. caeruleopunctatus and P. richardsoni have the greatest commonality in their parasite taxa, with 5 species shared by both host species (see Fig. 2). Only one species of parasite, the nematode Philometra pellucida, was found in all host species sampled in this study. The highest diversity of parasites was observed in P. richardsoni, which, with the exception of the trematode H. helicis, was host to all the parasite taxa that were also recorded from P. fuscus and P. caeruleopunctatus. This is in addition to 7 parasite species that were only found in P. richardsoni. All the parasite taxa recorded from P. caeruleopunctatus were also found in P. richardsoni. The only ectoparasites recorded during this study was the copepod Acanthochondria alatalongicollis, and a species of unidentified helminth, both found in the buccal cavity.
General linear models
The general linear model analyses for P. caeruleopunctatus found a statistically significant relationship between cestode plerocercoids infection intensity and sampling season (F5,31 = 3.406, p = 0.0396), along with a borderline association with mass (F5,31 = 3.406, p = 0.0533), which was found to be more significant once the interaction between host mass and sex has been accounted for (F5,31 = 3.406, p = 0.021). For P. richardsoni, Corynosoma sp. infection intensity was found to be marginally associated with sampling season (F5,52 = 1.056, p = 0.052, see Fig. 3).
Discussion
A previous study conducted by Hooper (1983) examining the metazoan parasite communities of Australian platycephalids identified a total of 26 parasite species from a sample of 200 host specimens, comprised of seven species of platycephalids. In the 41 years since that study was published, there has been a small number of other studies focused on quantifying aspects of the infracommunities of Australian platycephalids (Anderson 1998; Anderson and Cribb 1994, 1995; Hossen et al. 2021, 2022; Suthar and Shamsi 2021), however, few have investigated platycephalid parasite communities to the level of metapopulation.
Some of the parasite taxa identified by Hooper (1983), such as the acanthocephalan Corynosoma sp. were also recorded in this study. Corynosoma sp. was the most frequently recorded parasite in this study, often found encysted along the alimentary canal of both P. caeruleopunctatus, and P. richardsoni. Corynosoma is a cosmopolitan genus that includes over 40 species, and has been recorded in a wide variety of marine and freshwater teleost fish (Hernandez-Orts et al. 2017). For marine species of Corynosoma, the acanthella larvae primarily infect crustacean intermediate hosts, such as amphipods, where they develop into a dormant stage referred to as a cystacanth (Hernandez-Orts et al. 2017). Teleost fish that consume infected amphipods serve as paratenic hosts for the cystacanth, which may remain dormant for an extensive period of time (Canel et al. 2019; Hernandez-Orts et al. 2017). When a definitive host such as a marine mammal or sea bird eats infected fish, the cystacanth develops into an adult and undergoes sexual reproduction (Canel et al. 2019; Hernandez-Orts et al. 2017; Weaver and Smales 2014). Given the relatively high prevalence and mean intensity for Corynosoma sp. in P. caeruleopunctatus and its presence in P. richardsoni, this may be used to infer the trophic position of both platycephalids as mid-level predators in their respective food webs, and the inclusion of crustaceans in their diets, with P. caeruleopunctatus consuming relatively more crustaceans. This is supported by stomach content recorded in this study, which found a mixture of prey items in both P. caeruleopunctatus and P. richardsoni that included crustaceans (e.g. Figure 1, see Suppl. Table S1 for details).
In P. richardsoni, the relationship between Corynosoma sp. infection intensity and sampling season was shown to be marginally significant (Fig. 3). Prevalence and abundance of Corynosoma cystacanths in their teleost paratenic hosts can remain remarkably stable across multiple years (Sinisalo and Valtonen 2003), though less is known about potential seasonal patterns. While we found higher infection intensity of Corynosoma sp. in P. richardsoni during the winter sampling periods, since cystacanths can persist in their paratenic hosts over long durations and accumulate over the fish’s lifespan (Canel et al. 2019; Comiskey and MacKenzie 2000), the flatheads may have acquired the cystacanths during warmer periods months or even years prior to being sampled.
An unidentified species of cestode was found in the P. caeruleopunctatus sample, referred to as ‘unidentified plerocercoid’ in this study. Work by Hooper (1983) identified two different types of cestode plerocercoids from platycephalids: one from the family Phyllobothriidae, order Phyllobothriidea, and the other being Nybelinia sp., from the family Tentaculariidae, order Trypanorhyncha. Based on the morphology and microhabitat of plerocercoids recorded in this study, it is possible that the unidentified plerocercoid belonged to the family Phyllobothriidae, as it lacks the distinctive hooked tentacles and characteristics of trypanorhynch larvae (Hooper 1983). The order Phyllobothriidea includes species that use elasmobranchs as the definitive host (Caira et al. 2020), which might reflect the mid-level trophic status of platycephalids (as discussed above for Corynosoma) through their role as a second intermediate host for larval cestodes.
The infection intensity of this cestode was found to be significantly associated with sampling season along with host mass. However, it must be cautioned that this is based upon a total of four infected hosts from the sample, therefore it difficult to draw any firm conclusions at this point. Furthermore, marine cestode plerocercoids are generally long-lived and their abundance in paratenic hosts are not affected by seasonality (Speare 1995; Braicovich et al. 2012; Pereira et al. 2014). This persistence can lead them to accumulate in paratenic hosts as they age, which may explain the marginally significant relationship that was found between host mass and plerocercoid intensity, as larger, and therefore older fish have been accumulating cestode larvae through consumption of intermediate or paratenic hosts (Poulin 2000). It should be noted that the relationship between host mass and plerocercoid intensity became more significant once the effect of host sex on body mass was accounted for. This might be the result of an uneven sex ratio in the sample population of P. caeruleopunctatus, which contained 28 males, 1 juvenile of indeterminate sex, and only 9 females.
Only one species of parasite, the philometrid nematode P. pellucida, was found in all three platycephalids, occurring only in sexually mature fishes. Adult philometrids may infect various organs, as well as the visceral cavity and fins in a wide range of freshwater and marine teleost definitive hosts (Iwaki et al. 2020; Moravec et al. 2021; Quiazon et al. 2008; Uhazy 1978). In platycephalids, philometrids such as P. pellucida and P. parabrevicollis may be found in the gonads (Hooper 1983; Moravec et al. 2021). In this study, the gonads were also recorded as the site of infection for P. pellucida in all platycephalid species. Hoopers (1983) reported finding P. pellucida in the ovaries of females and the testes of males, and in this study we found mostly female fish with infected ovaries, and a single male dusky flathead that harboured P. pellucida in its testes (see Suppl. Table S1). Even though Philometra are usually found in the ovaries of female fishes, they have also occasionally been reported from testes of male fishes (Moravec et al. 2014, 2020). The platycephalids in this study may have all become infected with the same species of philometrid through consuming the same type of intermediate host.
Some nematodes recorded during this study may also pose a risk to human health, such as the anisakid nematode, Anisakis sp. found in the visceral cavity on the stomach wall of both P. caeruleopunctatus and P. richardsoni, along with Echinocephalus, and Hysterothylacium which were found in the mesentery of P. richardsoni. Anisakis is a widely-recognised zoonotic parasite which uses cetaceans as definitive host and a range of crustaceans, fish, and squid as intermediate and paratenic hosts (Hochberg et al. 2010). Echinocephalus uses elasmobranchs as definitive hosts, and a variety of fish and marine invertebrates as intermediate or paratenic hosts (Karagiorgis et al. 2022), and it has been suggested as a potential cause for gnathostomiasis in Australia (Shamsi et al. 2021). The genus Hysterothylacium includes approximately 67 species, all of which utilise large teleost fishes as the definitive host and can also accidentally infect humans (Shamsi et al. 2013).
The cystacanths of Corynosoma can also be a potential zoonosis as humans may acquire Corynosoma infection through the consumption of raw or undercooked fish (Fujita et al. 2016; Sasaki et al. 2019). However, unlike anisakid infections which can cause acute gastrointestinal pain and distress (Hochberg et al. 2010), the symptoms of Corynosoma infection are not as severe and may be more chronic in nature (Fujita et al. 2016). As Corynosoma are capable of surviving within humans for an extended period of time, an infection by this parasite may lead to cumulative, localized damage at the site of attachment within the intestines (Fujita et al. 2016).
Of the host species sampled in this study, P. richardsoni had the highest parasite taxa richness, which may be attributed to the broad depth range of P. richardsoni, relative to P. fuscus and P. caeruleopunctatus, which may have allowed it to encounter a wider range of prey items serving as potential intermediate and paratenic hosts (Luque and Poulin 2004). While the depth range for P. fuscus in this study was 3.2—5.5 m, and the depth range for P. caeruleopunctatus was 11.4 – 25.5 m, P. richardsoni may be found anywhere between 40-300 m (Fairbridge 1951; Keenan 1991, as cited in Hossen et al. 2021). However, depth range alone is not the primary determinant of parasite richness in fish (Luque et al. 2004), and in order to properly evaluate the influence of depth range on the parasite communities of platycephalids, it would be necessary to determine the area covered by the commercial fishing vessel that captured the specimens of P. richardsoni as well as the vagility of these fish within the environment.
Most of the parasites found in this study were trophically transmitted and would have been acquired by the flatheads via ingesting parasitized intermediate or paratenic hosts. All four species of digeneans found in the flatheads were adult flukes from the Hemiuroidea superfamily. Species in this superfamily generally have life cycles that involve two to four intermediate hosts, and are trophically transmitted to the definitive predatory fish hosts (Louvard et al. 2024). Some of the other trophically transmitted parasites such as the philometrid P. pellucida, found in all host species, may suggest some overlaps in their dietary breadth, as all known philometrid life cycles involves copepods as their intermediate host (Moravec 2004). However, the wide host range of some parasites such as Anisakis and Corynosoma may limit their usefulness for inferring aspects of host ecology. The developmental stages of parasites found in this study may also be used to infer the host’s trophic position (Poulin and Leung 2011). The presence of both adult and larval parasites in platycephalids suggests that they occupy a mid-level position in the food web, as they are at high enough trophic level to serve as definitive hosts for some parasites, yet also function as either intermediate or paratenic hosts for other parasites (Locke et al. 2014).
Future studies should also include measurements on other variables that can influence parasite richness and intensity, such as host age (Poulin 2000), water temperature, which may affect fish metabolism (Poulin 2020), and salinity, particularly for estuarine hosts (Blanar et al. 2011; Braicovich and Timi 2008; Sobecka et al. 2011).
Conclusion
Overall, the parasite communities of the platycephalids studied were consistent with previous records documented by Hooper (1983). This suggests that a degree of repeatability exists among platycephalid parasite communities. Hooper (1983) noted that there was very limited information regarding potential predators of platycephalids. This knowledge is still relatively scarce and represents a substantial data deficiency. An investigation of platycephalid prey species and potential predators may allow us to gain a more complete picture of how parasite life cycles relate to the trophic position(s) of these fishes. Finally, investigating other fish and invertebrate species living in sympatry with platycephalids will provide a more comprehensive understanding of parasite communities in the region, and help elucidate the relationship between parasites and trophic interactions in marine ecosystems.
Data availability
Data for this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Alves D, Luque J (2001) Community ecology of the metazoan parasites of white croaker, Micropogonias furnieri (Osteichthyes: Sciaenidae), from the coastal zone of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 96:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762001000200002
Anderson GR (1998) Rhopalotrema (Digenea: Didymozoidae), a new genus from Australian platycephalid fishes. Syst Parasitol 41:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006020008534
Anderson GR, Cribb TH (1994) Five new didymozoid trematodes (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) from Australian platycephalid fishes. Zoolog Scr 23:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1994.tb00377.x
Anderson GR, Cribb TH (1995) New didymozoid trematodes from Onigocia-stem platycephalid fishes. Parasite 2:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/1995021049
Barnes LM, Leclerc M, Gray CA, Williamson JE (2011a) Dietary niche differentiation of five sympatric species of Platycephalidae. Environ Biol Fishes 90:429–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9752-4
Barnes LM, Gray CA, Williamson JE (2011b) Divergence of the growth characteristics and longevity of coexisting Platycephalidae (Pisces). Mar Freshw Res 62:1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF11045
Blanar CA, Marcogliese DJ, Couillard CM (2011) Natural and anthropogenic factors shape metazoan parasite community structure in mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) from two estuaries in New Brunswick. Canada. Folia Parasitologica 58:240. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2011.023
Braga MP, Razzolini E, Boeger WA (2015) Drivers of parasite sharing among Neotropical freshwater fishes. J Anim Ecol 84:487–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12298
Braicovich PE, Timi JT (2008) Parasites as biological tags for stock discrimination of the Brazilian flathead Percophis brasiliensis in the south-west Atlantic. J Fish Biol 73:557–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01948.x
Braicovich PE, Luque JL, Timi JT (2012) Geographical patterns of parasite infracommunities in the rough scad, Trachurus lathami Nichols, in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. J Parasitol 98:768–777. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-2950.1
Caira JN, Jensen K, Pickering M, Ruhnke TR, Gallagher KA (2020) Intrigue surrounding the life-cycles of species of Clistobothrium (Cestoda: Phyllobothriidea) parasitising large pelagic sharks. Int J Parasitol 50:1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.08.002
Campbell N, Cross MA, Chubb JC, Cunningham CO, Hatfield EM, MacKenzie K (2007) Spatial and temporal variations in parasite prevalence and infracommunity structure in herring (Clupea harengus L.) caught to the west of the British Isles and in the North and Baltic Seas: implications for fisheries science. J Helminthol 81:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X07747454
Canel D, Levy E, Alarcos AJ, Braicovich PE, Cantatore DM, Irigoitia MM, Lanfranchi AL, Timi JT (2019) Distribution patterns of two species of Corynosoma (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) in fishes from Southwestern Atlantic. Parasitol Res 118:2831–2841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06440-5
Carrassón M, Dallarés S, Cartes JE, Constenla M, Pérez-del-Olmo A, Zucca L, Kostadinova A (2019) Drivers of parasite community structure in fishes of the continental shelf of the Western Mediterranean: the importance of host phylogeny and autecological traits. Int J Parasitol 49:669–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.04.004
Comiskey P, MacKenzie K (2000) Corynosoma spp. may be useful biological tags for saithe in the northern North Sea. J Fish Biol 57:525–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02190.x
Diggles BK (2016) Development of resources to promote best practice in the humane dispatch of finfish caught by recreational fishers. Fish Manage Ecol 23:200–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12127
Fairbridge WS (1951) The New South Wales tiger flathead, Neoplatycephalus macrodon (Ogilby). I. Biology and age determination. Mar Freshw Res 2:117–178. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9510117
Fetterplace LC, Davis AR, Neilson JM, Taylor MD, Knott NA (2016) Active acoustic tracking suggests that soft sediment fishes can show site attachment: a preliminary assessment of the movement patterns of the blue-spotted flathead (Platycephalus caeruleopunctatus). Animal Biotelemetry 4(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-016-0107-6
Fujita T, Waga E, Kitaoka K, Imagawa T, Komatsu Y, Takanashi K, Anbo F, Anbo T, Katuki S, Ichihara S, Fujimori S (2016) Human infection by acanthocephalan parasites belonging to the genus Corynosoma found from small bowel endoscopy. Parasitol Int 65:491–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2016.07.002
Gray CA, Barnes LM (2015) Spawning, maturity, growth and movement of Platycephalus fuscus (Cuvier, 1829) (Platycephalidae): fishery management considerations. J Appl Ichthyol 31:442–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12703
Gray CA, Gale VJ, Stringfellow SL, Raines LP (2002) Variations in sex, length and age compositions of commercial catches of Platycephalus fuscus (Pisces: Platycephalidae) in New South Wales, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 53:1091–1100. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF02036
Guégan JF, Hugueny B (1994) A nested parasite species subset pattern in tropical fish: host as major determinant of parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 100:184–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317145
Hernandez-Orts JS, Brandão M, Georgieva S, Raga JA, Crespo EA, Luque JL, Aznar FJ (2017) From mammals back to birds: Host-switch of the acanthocephalan Corynosoma australe from pinnipeds to the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus. PLoS One 12:e0183809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183809
Hochberg NS, Hamer DH, Hughes JM, Wilson ME (2010) Anisakidosis: perils of the deep. Clin Infect Dis 51:806–812. https://doi.org/10.1086/656238
Hooper JN (1983) Parasites of estuarine and oceanic flathead fishes (family Platycephalidae) from northern New South Wales. Aust J Zool Suppl Ser 31:1–69. https://doi.org/10.1071/AJZS090
Hossen M, Wassens S, Shamsi S (2021) Integrative species delimitation and community structure of nematodes in three species of Australian flathead fishes (Scorpaeniformes: Platycephalidae). Parasitol Res 120:461–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06802-4
Hossen M, Barton DP, Wassens S, Shamsi S (2022) Occurrence and molecular identification of Monogenea from blue-spotted flathead Platycephalus caeruleopunctatus (Scorpaeniformes: Platycephalidae) in Australian waters. Parasitol Res 121:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07404-4
Iwaki T, Tamai K, Ogimoto K, Iwahashi Y, Waki T, Kawano F, Ogawa K (2020) New records of Philometra pellucida (Jägerskiöld, 1893) (Nematoda: Philometridae) from the body cavity of Arothron mappa (Lesson) and Arothron nigropunctatus (Bloch et Schneider) reared in aquariums, with synonymisation of Philometra robusta Moravec, Möller et Heeger, 1992. Folia Parasitologica 67:1–5. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2020.025
Karagiorgis C, Ploeg RJ, Ghafar A, Gauci CG, Sukee T, Cutmore SC, Claybrook J, Loneragan NR, Wee NQ-X, Gillett AK, Beveridge I, Jabbar A (2022) Genetic characterisation of Echinocephalus spp. (Nematoda: Gnathostomatidae) from marine hosts in Australia. Int J Parasitol: Parasite Wildl 17:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.12.012
Keenan CP (1991) Phylogeny of Australian species of flatheads (Teleostei, Platycephalidae) as determined by allozyme electrophoresis. J Fish Biol 39:237–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1991.tb05087.x
Klimpel S, Palm HW, Busch MW, Kellermanns E, Rückert S (2006) Fish parasites in the Arctic deep-sea: Poor diversity in pelagic fish species vs. heavy parasite load in a demersal fish. Deep Sea Res Part I 53:1167–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.05.009
Lafferty KD (1999) The evolution of trophic transmission. Parasitol Today 15:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01397-6
Lima DP, Giacomini HC, Takemoto RM, Agostinho AA, Bini LM (2012) Patterns of interactions of a large fish–parasite network in a tropical floodplain. J Anim Ecol 81:905–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01967.x
Locke SA, Marcogliese DJ, Tellervo Valtonen E (2014) Vulnerability and diet breadth predict larval and adult parasite diversity in fish of the Bothnian Bay. Oecologia 174:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2757-x
Louvard C, Yong RQY, Cutmore SC, Cribb TH (2024) The oceanic pleuston community as a potentially crucial life-cycle pathway for pelagic fish-infecting parasitic worms. Int J Parasitol 54:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.11.001
Luque JL, Poulin R (2004) Use of fish as intermediate hosts by helminth parasites: a comparative analysis. Acta Parasitol 49:353–361
Luque JL, Mouillot D, Poulin R (2004) Parasite biodiversity and its determinants in coastal marine teleost fishes of Brazil. Parasitology 128:671–682. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005050
Luque JL, Felizardo NN, Tavares LER (2008) Community ecology of the metazoan parasites of namorado sandperches, Pseudopercis numida Miranda-Ribeiro, 1903 and P. semifasciata Cuvier, 1829 (Perciformes: Pinguipedidae), from the coastal zone of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J Biol 68:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842008000200007
Molloy S, Holland C, Poole R (1995) Metazoan parasite community structure in brown trout from two lakes in western Ireland. J Helminthol 69:237–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X0001419X
Moore CH, Van Niel K, Harvey ES (2011) The effect of landscape composition and configuration on the spatial distribution of temperate demersal fish. Ecography 34:425–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06436.x
Morand S, Cribb TH, Kulbicki M, Rigby MC, Chauvet C, Dufour V, Faliex E, Galzin R, Lo CM, Lo-Yat A, Pichelin S (2000) Endoparasite species richness of New Caledonian butterfly fishes: host density and diet matter. Parasitology 121:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182099006058
Moravec F (2004) Some aspects of the taxonomy and biology of dracunculoid nematodes parasitic in fishes: a review. Folia Parasitol 51:1–13. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2004.001
Moravec F, Mizher JA, Ali AH (2021) Records of two gonad-infecting species of Philometra (Nematoda: Philometridae) from marine fishes off Iraq, including the description of Philometra parabrevicollis n. sp. from the bigeye snapper Lutjanus lutjanus Bloch (Pisces, Lutjanidae). Syst Parasitol 98:443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-021-09988-y
Moravec, F, Bakenhaster, M, Fajer-Ávila, EJ (2014). Three new gonad-infecting species of Philometra (Nematoda: Philometridae) parasitic in Lutjanus spp.(Lutjanidae) in the northern Gulf of Mexico off Florida, USA. Folia Parasitologica 61:355–369. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2014.041
Moravec, F, Bakenhaster, MD, Switzer, TS (2020). New records of Philometra spp. (Nematoda: Philometridae) from marine perciform fishes off Florida, USA, including descriptions of two new species. Folia Parasitologica, 67:017. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2020.017
Ondračková M, Reichard M, Jurajda P, Gelnar M (2004) Seasonal dynamics of Posthodiplostomum cuticola (Digenea, Diplostomatidae) metacercariae and parasite-enhanced growth of juvenile host fish. Parasitol Res 93:131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-004-1123-7
Pereira AN, Pantoja C, Luque JL, Timi JT (2014) Parasites of Urophycis brasiliensis (Gadiformes: Phycidae) as indicators of marine ecoregions in coastal areas of the South American Atlantic. Parasitol Res 113:4281–4292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4106-3
Poulin R (1999) Parasitism and shoal size in juvenile sticklebacks: conflicting selection pressures from different ectoparasites? Ethology 105:959–968. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00491.x
Poulin R (2000) Variation in the intraspecific relationship between fish length and intensity of parasitic infection: biological and statistical causes. J Fish Biol 56:123–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02090.x
Poulin R (2004) Macroecological patterns of species richness in parasite assemblages. Basic Appl Ecol 5:423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2004.08.003
Poulin R (2020) Meta-analysis of seasonal dynamics of parasite infections in aquatic ecosystems. Int J Parasitol 50:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.03.006
Poulin R, Leung TLF (2011) Body size, trophic level, and the use of fish as transmission routes by parasites. Oecologia 166:731–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1906-3
Poulin R, Valtonen ET (2002) The predictability of helminth community structure in space: a comparison of fish populations from adjacent lakes. Int J Parasitol 32:1235–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00109-1
Quiazon KMA, Yoshinaga T, Ogawa K (2008) Taxonomical study into two new species of Philometra (Nematoda: Philometridae) previously identified as Philometra lateolabracis (Yamaguti, 1935). Folia Parasitol 55:29–41. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2008.005
Santoro M, Mattiucci S, Cipriani P, Bellisario B, Romanelli F, Cimmaruta R, Nascetti G (2014) Parasite communities of icefish (Chionodraco hamatus) in the Ross Sea (Antarctica): influence of the host sex on the helminth infracommunity structure. PLoS One 9:e88876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088876
Sasaki M, Katahira H, Kobayashi M, Kuramochi T, Matsubara H, Nakao M (2019) Infection status of commercial fish with cystacanth larvae of the genus Corynosoma (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) in Hokkaido. Japan Int J Food Microbiol 305:e88876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088876
Sasal P, Niquil N, Bartoli P (1999) Community structure of digenean parasites of sparid and labrid fishes of the Mediterranean Sea: a new approach. Parasitology 119:635–648. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182099005077
Shamsi S (2014) Recent advances in our knowledge of Australian anisakid nematodes. Int J Parasitol: Parasite Wildl 3:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.04.001
Shamsi S, Eisenbarth A, Saptarshi S, Beveridge I, Gasser RB, Lopata AL (2011) Occurrence and abundance of anisakid nematode larvae in five species of fish from southern Australian waters. Parasitol Res 108:927–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2134-1
Shamsi S, Gasser R, Beveridge I (2013) Description and genetic characterisation of Hysterothylacium (Nematoda: Raphidascarididae) larvae parasitic in Australian marine fishes. Parasitol Int 62:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2012.10.001
Shamsi S, Steller E, Zhu X (2021) The occurrence and clinical importance of infectious stage of Echinocephalus (Nematoda: Gnathostomidae) larvae in selected Australian edible fish. Parasitol Int 83:102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2021.102333
Sinisalo T, Valtonen ET (2003) Corynosoma acanthocephalans in their paratenic fish hosts in the northern Baltic Sea. Parasite 10:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2003103227
Sobecka E, Łuczak E, Więcaszek B, Antoszek A (2011) Parasite community structure of cod from Bear Island (Barents Sea) and Pomeranian Bay (Baltic Sea). Polish Polar Res 32:253–262. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10183-011-0016-6
Speare P (1995) Parasites as biological tags for sailfish Istiophorus platypterus from east coast Australian waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 118:43–50. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps118043
Suthar J, Shamsi S (2021) The occurrence and abundance of infective stages of zoonotic nematodes in selected edible fish sold in Australian fish markets. Microb Pathog 154:104833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104833
Timi JT, MacKenzie K (2015) Parasites in fisheries and mariculture. Parasitology 142:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182014001188
Timi JT, Poulin R (2003) Parasite community structure within and across host populations of a marine pelagic fish: how repeatable is it? Int J Parasitol 33:1353–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00203-0
Uhazy LS (1978) Lesions associated with Philometroides huronensis (Nematoda: Philometridae) in the white sucker (Catostomus commersoni). J Wildl Dis 14:401–408. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-14.4.401
Violante-González J, Mendoza-Franco EF, Rojas-Herrera A, Guerrero SG (2010) Factors determining parasite community richness and species composition in black snook Centropomus nigrescens (Centropomidae) from coastal lagoons in Guerrero, Mexico. Parasitol Res 107:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1834-x
Weaver HJ, Smales LR (2014) Two species of Acanthocephala (Rhadinorhynchidae and Transvenidae) from elasmobranchs from Australia. Comp Parasitol 81:110–113. https://doi.org/10.1654/4654.1
Wilson EO, MacArthur RH (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wood CL, Lafferty KD (2015) How have fisheries affected parasite communities? Parasitology 142:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118201400002X
Zander CD, Reimer LW, Barz K (1999) Parasite communities of the Salzhaff (Northwest Mecklenburg, Baltic Sea). I. Structure and dynamics of communities of littoral fish, especially small-sized fish. Parasitol Res 85:356–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004360050562
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank DPIE Fisheries for approving the permit required to undertake this study.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study was conceptualized by TLFL. OB and TLFL contributed to the design and methodology of the study. Fish collection and necropsies were performed by OB. Data analysis and interpretation were by OB and TLFL. The initial draft was prepared by OB and the final manuscript was written by OB and TLFL. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All procedures in this study were conducted under Animal Research Authority Number: AEC19-124 and were approved by the University of England Animal Ethics Committee.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Section Editor: Bronwen Presswell
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bellingham, O., Leung, T.L.F. How host ecology influences the parasite communities of three Australian flathead fishes, Platycephalus spp. (Scorpaeniformes: Platycephalidae). Parasitol Res 123, 339 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-024-08359-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-024-08359-y