Abstract
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are being promoted by World Health Organization (WHO) as key vector control tool for the prevention and control of malaria and other vector-borne diseases. A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the bio-efficacy of a new alphacypermethrin LN (HILNET®) against insecticide-susceptible Anopheles culicifacies s.l.. This study presents the observations on (a) regeneration time, the period required to regenerate insecticide in the LLIN after three consecutive WHO standard washes in a single day to deplete the insecticide on the net surface, and (b) wash resistance of the LLIN to retain bio-efficacy up to 20 repeated washes at intervals corresponding to the regeneration time in days. In the present evaluation, the regeneration time of HILNet® was determined as 2 days. Wash resistance studies of HILNet® showed a knockdown rate of 100% up to 15 washes and 97% at the 20th wash and complied with the criteria of WHO knockdown rate of ≥ 95%. The mean active ingredient content from 0 to 20 washes was in the range of 5.8 to 6.04 g/kg and met the WHO criteria of the product claim (± 25% g/kg). The insecticide un-impregnated control net has shown no detectable levels of alphacypermethrin. In this evaluation, HILNet® fulfilled the WHO laboratory (phase I) efficacy criteria based on the rates of knockdown up to 20 standard WHO washes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E et al (2015) The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature 526:207–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15535
Corbel V, Joseph C, Dabiré Roch K et al (2010) Field efficacy of a new mosaic long-lasting mosquito net (PermaNet® 3.0) against pyrethroidresistant malaria vectors: a multi-centre study in Western and Central Africa. Malaria Journal, 9:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-113
Lengeler, C. (2004) Insecticide-treated bed nets and curtains for preventing Malaria. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2:CD000363. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000363.pub2
Raghavendra K, Barik TK, Reddy BPN et al (2011) Malaria vector control: from past to future. Parasitol Res 108:757–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2232-0
Sampath TRR, Yadav RS, Sharma VP, Adak T (1998) Evaluation of Lambdacyhalothrin-impregnated bednets in a malaria endemic area of India. Part 2. Impact on malaria vectors. J Am Control Assoc 14 No.4 :437–43
Sharma VP (1998) Fighting malaria in India. Curr Sci 75:1127–1140
WHO (2007) Report of the eleventh WHOPES working group meeting: WHO/HQ, Geneva, 10–13 December 2007: review of spinosad 7.48% DT, Netprotect LN, Duranet LN, Dawaplus LN, ICON®MAXX CS
WHO (2013) Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets. World Health Organization, Geneva (WHO/HTM/NTD/WHOPES/2013.1). http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/80270
WHO (2011) Report of the fourteenth WHOPES working group meeting: WHO/HQ, Geneva, 11–15 April 2011: review of Spinosad EC Lifenet LN MAGNet TM LN, Royal Sentry LN YaheLN
WHO (2015) Report of the eighteenth WHOPES working group meeting: WHO/HQ, Geneva, 29 June-1 July 2015: review of MiraNet LN, Panda Net 2.0 LN, Yahe LN, SafeNet LN
WHO (2016) Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes, 2nd edn. In: World Health Organization (ed). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250677.2016
WHO (2019) Guidelines for malaria vector control. World Health Organization, Geneva
Acknowledgements
Authors’ thank Director, ICMR-NIMR for the support in conducting the study. Authors acknowlewdge Ms Sanchita Jain, Mr V.P. Singh, Mr Varun, Mr Rajinder Singh, and Mr Vinod Kumar for the technical support for conduct of the study.
Funding
The funding for the study was provided by the sponsor M/S HIL (India) Ltd, New Delhi. The funders are not involved in the design of the study and interpretation of data and in writing of this manuscript but funders given their approval to publish this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VV and RK conducted the study. VV and DK analyzed the data and prepared the illusrations. VV, RK, and MR drafted the MS. All authors saw the draft and approved it.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The approval for conducting the study was taken from Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi on 08th August, 2019 (File No:5/8– 7(224)/2016/ECD-II Dated 8th August, 2019). Institutional Animal Ethics Committee clearance was obtained for feeding mosquitoes on rabbit for colonization in Insectary.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The permission to publish this manuscript was taken by Research Ethics Committee of ICMR-National Institute for Malaria Research, Delhi, India with approval number RIC-54/2021.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Section Editor: Van Lun Low
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Verma, V., Rahi, M., K., D. et al. Laboratory evaluation of a new alphacypermethrin long-lasting insecticidal net against Anopheles culicifacies s.l.. Parasitol Res 121, 2725–2731 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07604-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07604-6