Abstract
Purpose
Performance of 3D-T1W-TSE has been proven superior to 3D-MP-GRE at 3 T on brain metastases (BM) contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI. However, its performance at 1.5 T is largely unknown and sparsely reported. This study aims to assess image quality, lesion detectability and conspicuity of 1.5 T 3D-T1W-TSE on planning MRI of frameless BM radiotherapy.
Methods
94 BM patients to be treated by frameless brain radiotherapy were scanned using 3D-T1W-TSE with immobilization on multi-vendor 1.5 T MRI-simulators. BMs were jointly diagnosed by 4 reviewers. Enhanced lesion conspicuity was quantitatively assessed by calculating contrast ratio (CR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) reduction of white matter due to the use of flexible coil was assessed. Lesion detectability and conspicuity were compared between 1.5 T planning MRI and 3 T diagnostic MRI by an oncologist and a radiologist in 10 patients.
Results
497 BMs were jointly diagnosed. The CR and CNR were 75.2 ± 39.9% and 14.2 ± 8.1, respectively. SNR reduced considerably from 31.7 ± 8.3 to 21.9 ± 5.4 with the longer distance to coils. 3 T diagnostic MRI and 1.5 T planning MRI yielded exactly the same detection of 84 BMs. Qualitatively, lesion conspicuity at 1.5 T was not inferior to that at 3 T. Quantitatively, lower brain SNR and lesion CNR were found at 1.5 T, while lesion CR at 1.5 T was highly comparable to that at 3 T.
Conclusion
1.5 T 3D-T1W-TSE planning MRI of frameless BM radiotherapy was comprehensively assessed. Highly comparable BM detectability and conspicuity were achieved by 1.5 T planning MRI compared to 3 T diagnostic MRI. 1.5 T 3D-T1W-TSE should be valuable for frameless brain radiotherapy planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bednarz G, Downes MB, Corn BW, Curran WJ, Goldman HW (1999) Evaluation of the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based stereotactic target localization for gamma knife radiosurgery of functional disorders. Neurosurgery 45:1156–1161. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199911000-00028
Busse RF, Brau AC, Vu A et al (2008) Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 60:640–649. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21680
Chandarana H, Wang H, Tijssen RHN, Das IJ (2018) Emerging role of MRI in radiation therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 48(6):1468–1478. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26271
Danieli L, Riccitelli GC, Distefano D et al (2019) Brain tumor-enhancement visualization and morphometric assessment: a comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6096
Davis FG, Dolecek TA, McCarthy BJ, Villano JL (2012) Toward determining the lifetime occurrence of metastatic brain tumors estimated from 2007 United States cancer incidence data. Neuro Oncol 14:1171–1177. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos152
Devic S (2012) MRI simulation for radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys 39:6701–6711. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4758068
Eichler AF, Plotkin SR (2008) Brain metastases. Curr Treat Options Neurol 10:308–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-008-0033-x
Furutani K, Harada M, Mawlan M, Nishitani H (2008) Difference in enhancement between spin echo and 3-dimensional fast spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in steady state magnetic resonance imaging of brain metastasis at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:313–319. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318074fd9d
Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Hiai Y et al (2007) Detection of brain metastasis at 3T: comparison among SE, IR-FSE and 3D-GRE sequences. Eur Radiol 17:2345–2351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0599-9
Kato Y, Higano S, Tamura H et al (2009) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions in detection of small brain metastasis at 3T MR imaging: comparison with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:923–929. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1506
Kaufmann TJ, Smits M, Boxerman J et al (2020) Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases (BTIP-BM). Neuro Oncol 22(6):757–772. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa030
Kupelian P, Sonke JJ (2014) Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy: a solution to the future. Semin Radiat Oncol 24:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.02.013
Kwak H-S, Hwang S, Chung G-H, Song J-S, Choi E-J (2015) Detection of small brain metastases at 3 T: comparing the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted SPACE, MPRAGE, and 2D FLASH imaging. Clin Imaging 39:571–575. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6096
Lagendijk JJW, Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJE et al (2008) MRI/linac integration. Radiother Oncol 86:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.034
Lagendijk JJ, Raaymakers BW, van Vulpen M (2014) The magnetic resonance imaging-linac system. Semin Radiat Oncol 24:207–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.02.009
Mandija S, D’Agata F, Navest RJM et al (2019) Brain and head-and-neck MRI in immobilization mask: a practical solution for MR-only radiotherapy. Front Oncol 9:647. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00647
McClelland S, Watson GA (2019) Impact of MRI timing on accuracy of stereotactic radiosurgical planning: visualizing the forest from the trees. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 103:1012–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.030
Mugler JP 3rd (2014) Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:745–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24542
Nagao E, Yoshiura T, Hiwatashi A et al (2011) 3D turbo spin-echo sequence with motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation for detection of brain metastases on 3T MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:664–670. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2343
Oelfke U (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy: technological innovation provides a new vision of radiation oncology practice. Clin Oncol (r Coll Radiol) 27:495–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2015.04.004
Paulson ES, Crijns SP, Keller BM et al (2016) Consensus opinion on MRI simulation for external beam radiation treatment planning. Radiother Oncol 121:187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.018
Pope WB (2018) Brain metastases: neuroimaging. Handb Clin Neurol 149:89–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00007-4
Putz F, Mengling V, Perrin R et al (2020) Magnetic resonance imaging for brain stereotactic radiotherapy : a review of requirements and pitfalls. Strahlenther Onkol 196:444–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01604-0
Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJW, Overweg J et al (2009) Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept. Phys Med Biol 54:N229–N237. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/12/N01
Reichert M, Morelli JN, Runge VM et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional SPACE versus MP-RAGE for the detection of brain metastases: considerations with a 32-channel head coil. Invest Radiol 48:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318277b1aa
Seibert TM, White NS, Kim GY et al (2016) Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning. Pract Radiat Oncol 6:e319–e328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2016.05.008
Suh CH, Jung SC, Kim KW, Pyo J (2016) The detectability of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced spin-echo or gradient-echo images: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 129:363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2185-y
Tabouret E, Chinot O, Metellus P, Tallet A, Viens P, Goncalves A (2012) Recent trends in epidemiology of brain metastases: an overview. Anticancer Res 32:4655–4662
Takeda T, Takeda A, Nagaoka T et al (2008) Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) imaging is superior to spin-echo imaging in delineating brain metastases. Acta Radiol 49:1167–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850802477924
Walker A, Liney G, Metcalfe P, Holloway L (2014) MRI distortion: considerations for MRI based radiotherapy treatment planning. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 37:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0252-2
Weygand J, Fuller CD, Ibbott GS et al (2016) Spatial precision in magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy: the role of geometric distortion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1304–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.059
Wong OL, Yuan J, Yu SK, Cheung KY (2017) Image quality assessment of a 1.5T dedicated magnetic resonance-simulator for radiotherapy with a flexible radio frequency coil setting using the standard American College of Radiology magnetic resonance imaging phantom test. Quant Imaging Med Surg 7:205–14. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2017.02.08
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by hospital research project REC-2018-06.
Funding
This study was supported by hospital research project REC-2018-06.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Hospital research ethics committee.
Consent to participate
Written patient consent form was waived due to the retrospective nature.
Consent for publication
The authors give consents for the publication of this manuscript.
Data availability
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, J., Law, S.C.K., Wong, K.K. et al. 3D T1-weighted turbo spin echo contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T for frameless brain metastases radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 148, 1749–1759 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03755-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03755-8