Abstract
Successful prevention of physical child abuse is dependent on improvements in risk assessment. The risk of abuse is assumed to increase when family stressors overcome resources. Severe physical disease can increase stress, and parental physical disease has been studied as a risk factor for physical child abuse, but with heterogeneous definitions. This study evaluated the relation between parental physical disease severity and severe documented physical child abuse. Models were based on data on children aged 0–17 years in Denmark between 1997 and 2018, and their parents. Severe documented physical child abuse was modeled as violence against a child registered by either health authorities in treatment or mortality registries, or police authorities in cases confirmed by the courts. Parental physical disease severity was modeled as the sum of Charlson Comorbidity Index scores for the child’s parents. The causal connection was examined in two model types: a survival model comparing exposed with non-exposed children, adjusted for covariates at baseline, and a G-model, taking time-varying covariates, including income and parental psychiatric disease into account. Neither model showed an association between parental physical disease severity and severe documented physical child abuse, with RR 0.99 and 95% CI (0.93–1.05) for the survival model and RR 1.08 for the G-model (CI not calculated).
Conclusion: In the model studied, parental physical disease severity was not a risk factor for severe documented physical child abuse. Individual categories of physical disease remain to be examined.
Trial registration: The study was pre-registered on Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/fh2sr.
What is Known: • Parental physical disease severity has been studied previously as a risk indicator of physical child abuse, but based on heterogeneous definitions. • Previous studies have not studied parental physical disease severity preceding physical child abuse. | |
What is New: • Parental severe physical disease was not prospectively associated with severe documented physical child abuse in a survival model, a G-model and a number of sensitivity analyses, respectively. • Results should be replicated in samples from populations without universal health care, and using different categories of disease. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Physical child abuse is detrimental to child well-being and has adverse consequences throughout life [1,2,3,4,5]. Successful prevention necessitates proper risk assessment and early intervention, and a number of tools exist for early clinical detection [6,7,8]. Knowledge on causes and risk factors for physical child abuse is used to develop such interventions. Despite the often cited causal assumption that physical child abuse occurs when family resources are overwhelmed by stressors [9], to the best of our knowledge, causal inference techniques and theory [10] have only been used sparsely in the field of physical child abuse [11], although this has been encouraged [12]. As improvements in preventive efforts are called for [13], research is warranted to define which risk factors are most pertinent, including parental factors that are likely to induce stress in the whole family. Physical disease in adulthood is known to cause perceived individual stress [14]. However, whereas psychiatric disease among parents has previously been shown to increase the risk of lethal physical child abuse [15, 16], parental physical disease has scarcely been studied as a risk factor. Within the highly diverse construct of physical disease, only a few definitions have been explored. Chang et al. found an association to child maltreatment, but they did not ensure that parental physical disease preceded child maltreatment temporally [17]. Household AIDS, but not other household chronic illness, predicted a high intensity of abuse [18]. “Poor maternal health” was associated with physical child abuse but was not further defined, and the temporal separation of parental health and child abuse was not clear [19]. Thus, although there are indications in the literature that parental physical health is a predictor of subsequent physical abuse, the temporality, robustness, and dose–response relationship between parental physical disease and physical child abuse remains unclear.
This study aims to explore the causal link between parental physical disease severity and severe documented physical child abuse. We hypothesize that parental physical disease severity, measured using a joint Charlson score [20] and preceding reported first incidents of abuse, will indicate the risk of severe physical child abuse documented in official registries.
Methods
Data and design
All public authorities in Denmark use the same unique personal identifier across registries [21]. This was used to create a prospective data set by linking administrative data on all children living in Denmark from the 1st of January 1997 until the 31st of December 2018 and their legal parents, updating the dataset using monthly intervals and using an existing data framework [22]. The year 1997 was chosen because some data sources used were initiated in this year, and 2018 was the latest available year, maximizing available data for a rare outcome. Children lacking both parents were censored from the first time point of this event. As the personal identifier is a prerequisite for citizenship and many public services, the coverage in the population is assumed to be practically complete. This study has been pre-registered, available along with changes since pre-registration and project code [23]. Access to data was granted by Statistics Denmark, and this study was exempt from ethics approval according to Danish law, as it only used administrative data.
Exposure—parental physical disease severity
Parental physical disease severity was modeled using a sum of both parents’ Charlson Comorbidity Index [20] as a proxy to joint parental stress from physical disease severity. Data for the index were drawn from the Danish National Patient Register. The Charlson Comorbidity Index is known as a reliable index of long-term mortality and is widely used in clinical settings [24]. ICD 8 and 10 diagnoses that increased the Charlson Comorbidity Index [25] for an individual parent were assigned points according to the original definition [20], and all diagnoses available 5 years back [25] from any given month in the dataset and until physical child abuse or censoring were included in the calculation. A full description is provided in Table 1.
Outcome variable
Severe documented physical child abuse was identified through three sources: the Danish National Patient Register [26], the Cause of Death Register [27], and the Danish Criminal Register. All models in this study focused on first-time events. All children with events before the inclusion date were excluded. Severe documented physical child abuse was operationalized as abuse that resulted in contact with a hospital, including the emergency department or any other department coding as described below. Also, death of the child resulting from non-accidental injuries or a court sentence of the perpetrator describing violence according to police codes was included in the outcome. Coding for documented physical abuse included all codes recommended by the Danish Paediatric Society [28], and all codes that specified physical violence (not accidents or uncertain intent) towards any individual less than 18 years of age. For details on codes and diagnoses used, see pre-registration and associated resources [23].
Covariates
Variables were chosen based on two Directed Acyclic Graphs [10], printed here as Fig. 1. They were drawn with exposure and outcome in mind, and based on prior literature, see Table 2. The link between ethnicity and physical child abuse was based on prior literature, showing differing risks for physical child abuse after adjusting for covariates [29,30,31,32]. Except where otherwise noted, variables were programmed as defined in the pre-registration. Table 2 provides references to further descriptions of the registries used.
Analysis
Model 1 assumed that the first change in parental physical disease severity could have downstream consequences on health and covariates. This was modeled as a survival model comparing exposed with unexposed children and analyzed by regression using pseudoobservations to estimate risk ratios [54]. Exposed children had joint parental Charlson score of two or more. Single parents were included with their own Charlson score. The index date was when the joint parental Charlson score reached two or more, or the child’s birth date, whichever came last. Exposed children were matched with 5 children with joint parental Charlson score less than two, matching on index date (matches drawn within 3 months), reconstituted family (living with biological parent(s), living with one or more unrelated adults, adopted or in foster care), child ages (within 1 year), number of children (according to categories), and mean parental age (difference less than or equal to 5 years). Pseudoobservations assumed that censoring in the dataset was marginally independent of the covariates. This was checked by fitting a Cox model of the covariates with censoring as the dependent variable. Calendar year was not marginally independent of censoring, and, adjusting for this, pseudoobservations were generated after stratifying on calendar year group. Model 1a presents the model as specified a priori. The influence of collinearity and small cells as a result of many covariates was controlled by removing candidates with collinearity and skewed distributions, shown as model 1b. The linearity of continuous variables was checked by introducing their quadratic terms in the model. Only cases with information on all variables were analyzed. For distribution across covariates, see Online Resource 1. The number of missing values across variables can be seen in Table 3. The same child could be included in the analysis as both exposed and non-exposed; to adjust for this, Eicker-Huber-White estimations were used for standard errors [55]. As siblings could be included, clustering was adjusted for at the family level, where each unique combination of parents, including single parents, was counted as a cluster. Children were followed from index date to outcome, emigration, death, age 18 years or the first of January 2018, whichever came first.
Model 2, in Fig. 1, assumed that family physical disease severity could influence and be influenced by covariates during the child’s contributed risk time. This was modeled as a G-model [10]. For this model, imputation was performed [56] and analyses were carried out on a reduced dataset with half-year intervals and a random draw of 50,000 children; see Online Resource 2. Imputation convergence and distribution of resulting variables were controlled with plots of iteration means and standard deviations, density, and box plots of distributions [57], and for the categorical and binary variables, the distribution of imputed values was compared to the observed, inspired by Harrell; results not shown [58].
Results
The characteristics of the full population, from which the samples for model 1 and model 2 were drawn, are shown in Table 3.
Model 1a and 1b: survival model
Data from 1,160,840 children were used, 43% of the original cohort, and after removing those that could not be matched with five unexposed controls, 1,160,529 children remained. The average follow-up time for these children was 12.22 years, and the total follow-up time was 14,184,982 years. In this dataset 28,190 children were registered as having been exposed to documented physical abuse for the first time between 1997 and 2018, including 29 cases of lethal abuse. Among the 1,160,529 children, deaths with no known relation to physical abuse during the same period totaled 1097. Model 1a showed a relative risk for children with parental joint Charlson score of two or more of 0.99 (0.93–1.05) and model 1b of 1.02 (0.96–1.08). As the Directed Acyclic Graph was designed with parental physical disease severity in mind, all other estimates in Table 4 cannot be interpreted causally but are reported for comparison with the existing literature. A parent with tertiary level education or higher predicted less abuse with a relative risk of 0.53 (0.50–0.57) (model 1a) or 0.53 (0.49–0.56) (model 1b) compared to primary education, respectively, and parental history of childhood maltreatment or neglect showed a relative risk of 2.25 (2.10–2.40) (model 1a) or 2.30 (2.16–2.46) (model 1b). See Table 4 for further information.
Model 2: G-model
Plots of imputed data compared to observed data showed plausible results for all five datasets. The G-model on a random extract of 50,000 children from the main dataset showed that parental joint Charlson score of two or more had a relative risk of 1.08 for documented child abuse compared to unexposed children, adjusting for the same variables as included in model 1 with the exception of interparental violence, parental substance abuse, and status as refugee, as the model could not converge with the full set of variables.
Sensitivity analyses
Because of computational intensity, all model control and sensitivity analyses were carried out on variations of model 1, except for control of pseudoobservations which was done in a Cox model. Model results are not shown. The introduction of quadratic terms was significantly associated with the outcome but did not influence the main result. A number of separate models excluding parents with a registered death before the end of the study period, excluding child deaths, stratifying on less than and older than 7 years, changing the joint Charlson score cutoff to 4 and 8 (two different models), excluding immigrants and emigrants, and stratifying on children living with single parents and children living in other family arrangements showed essentially unchanged results (data not shown). A model exchanging parental physical disease with psychiatric disease, leaving out parental physical disease, showed a RR of 1.41 (1.30–1.52). Part of the outcome was drawn from the Victims of Criminal Offences registry, only available from after 2000, and restricting the data to this time frame, results were essentially unchanged (data not shown).
Discussion
This study aimed to explore the link between parental physical disease severity and severe documented physical child abuse. The results from all models correspond closely and do not indicate a causal connection. To the best of our knowledge, there are no similar longitudinal results in the literature for comparison. However, given the methodological challenges mentioned in the introduction with preceding studies, this result is not in opposition to earlier findings. The associations estimated for the covariates from model 1a do not allow causal inference, but the associations demonstrated were in line with previous literature, including the negative association with family highest education [32], and the positive association with parental maltreatment in childhood [43]. The sensitivity analysis exchanging the exposure with parental psychiatric disease also showed an association with parental psychiatric disease, in line with earlier studies [15, 16].
Strengths and weaknesses
To the best of our knowledge, no study before this has tested a causal hypothesis on parental physical disease and severe documented physical child abuse. Models and all definitions of variables were based on prior literature, and their associations were illustrated in a pre-specified directed acyclic graph. Also, no prior study on parental physical disease has tested disease severity as a risk factor. This study uses data from health registries, and police cases confirmed by the courts. Data from social services were not available on a national level in sufficient detail to be included in this study. This is likely to limit cases to those severe enough to warrant either hospital treatment, sufficient evidence for a court trial, or both. Consequently, our results may not be generalizable to the large number of cases of physical child abuse that do not reach the attention of health care or law enforcement. Because of the computational intensity of the models, the number of children included was limited by available machine power, even on a server with 1 terabyte of working memory. For the same reason, as imputation in the full dataset was not feasible, only cases with information on all variables were used in model 1, thereby deviating from the pre-registration. The number of missings across variables was substantial. Assuming that low socioeconomic status predicts an increased risk of both missing variables [59], parental physical disease [60], and physical child abuse [29], bias could be introduced. However, this would be accounted for by adjusting for socioeconomic status. As we adjust for both level of education and income, the influence of this bias is expected to be small. Additionally, finding similar results across two models based on two different data excerpts, one of which used imputation for missing values, and finding essentially unchanged results, does not indicate major influence by missing values. This also indicates a minimal risk of major differences when using a larger dataset or computer. The population-level data on place of residence proved to be unreliable, to the point that the number of adults in each family could not be reliably determined, and this was a deviation from the pre-registration. However, the reconstituted family variable made a useful replacement and is assumed to explain at least part of the same variation. Who lives with the child is of more importance than how many adults are in the household. The data specified if a child lived with both biological parents, with a step-parent, or if the child was adopted or in foster care. Living with a single parent may have influenced the joint Charlson score. However, a sensitivity analysis stratifying the dataset on single parents and children living in other family constitutions showed essentially unchanged results. The G-model includes a large number of model specifications, thus increasing the risk of mis-specifications. Nonetheless, it is reassuring that the G-model and the regression based on pseudoobservations reach highly similar conclusions, despite very different assumptions. The median child age at index date in the source population (Table 3) is 0.0, 0.4 in the random draw from the source population (Online Resource 2), and 10.3 in data for model 1 (Online Resource 1). The age differences between samples question the comparability between model 1 and 2. It is reassuring that stratifying model 1 into children younger than and older than 7 years gives essentially unchanged results in both strata, and that the results in model 1a, 1b, and 2 are similar. Confidence intervals for the G-model were intended to be derived from bootstrapping by family unit to adjust for similarities among siblings. However, because of the reduced sample size of 50,000 and only 1.7% of families with joint Charlson scores above 2, the G-model did not converge reliably using the bootstrapped samples. Therefore, model 2 was presented without confidence intervals. For both models 1 and 2, the few families with a joint Charlson score above 2 meant a small group of exposed children, indicating that the Charlson score might not appropriately describe disease in the parental population.
The study has controlled for socioeconomic indicators and age and is comprehensive in the inclusiveness of all kinds of citizens in Denmark and can thus be generalized to similar populations with some degree of certainty. A note of caution should be made to societies without universal health care, as it seems likely that disease in such a society may affect the family stress level differently than in this cohort. The access to affordable health care has been shown to affect levels of maltreatment, although not physical abuse [61]. Another issue is that data from administrative sources largely underestimate the incidence of physical child abuse [62]. Thus, misclassification of outcomes as non-abuse could result in a weakening of any associations found in the present study. As there is a risk that the underlying populations differ, our results may not be generalizable to cases of physical child abuse unknown to authorities or, as mentioned above, known only to child protective services. We had access to data on the entire child population living permanently in Denmark up until 2018 in this study, and in models 1a and 1b, we used substantial samples of this population. We did, however, not use a population correction factor to correct our confidence intervals. This was because we regarded the population studied as a sample of a child population living with universal health care, which is a limited population but a population extending beyond Danish children. Using a population correction factor on models 1a and 1b would have narrowed their confidence intervals but likely not have changed their interpretation, as they are both close to 1 with point estimates 0.99 and 1.02. Model 2 was run on only a subsample of 50,000 children and would therefore not justify the use of a population correction factor.
Interpretation
The results fail to reject the null hypothesis. This could indicate that although parents may be stressed by documented physical disease [14], this stress does not result in an increased risk of severe documented physical child abuse. It is, however, also possible that specific entities of disease are associated with documented physical abuse in line with the hypothesis, but that any signal from these are muted by a large heterogeneity in the diseases included in the Charlson index. Different categories of disease would have to be studied separately to uncover this. In addition, to better describe this population, a definition of physical disease not emphasizing severity but broader disease categories might show different results, as high Charlson scores are rare in this population, affecting only 1.7% of families. Furthermore, levels of health-related stress may differ in families living in countries without universal health care, and results may not replicate in such settings. If longitudinal results differ in such countries, our results might indicate that access to health care in families with parental physical disease is protective against physical child abuse.
Conclusion
The present data showed no link between parental physical disease and an increased risk of severe documented physical child abuse. A possible explanation is that previous studies have not modeled disease severity, categories, and covariates in a similar cohort. Other explanations could be that any disease categories consistent with the hypothesis are muted by disease heterogeneity. Further research should explore individual disease categories and seek to confirm results in countries with non-universal health care, and in data sets including cases of physical abuse unknown to authorities, as the results might differ in these populations. Also, these results should be confirmed in data with self-report of physical child abuse.
Data availability
Data could not be made available due to legal requirements by Statistics Denmark.
Code availability
All code used, and additional resources, is available at https://osf.io/fh2sr.
Abbreviations
- ICD 8:
-
International Classification of Diseases, 8th edition
- ICD 10:
-
International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition
- ISCED:
-
International Standard Classification of Education
- N:
-
Number of units
- RR:
-
Relative risk
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- T0, T1, T2:
-
Time 0, time 1, time 2
References
Sethi D, World Health Organization (2013) European report on preventing child maltreatment. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
Buckingham ET, Daniolos P (2013) Longitudinal outcomes for victims of child abuse. Curr Psychiatry Rep 15:342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0342-3
Gilbert LK, Breiding MJ, Merrick MT et al (2015) Childhood adversity and adult chronic disease: an update from ten states and the District of Columbia, 2010. Am J Prev Med 48:345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.006
Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D et al (1998) Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med 14:245–258
Scott KM, Smith DR, Ellis PM (2010) Prospectively ascertained child maltreatment and its association with DSM-IV mental disorders in young adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67:712–719. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.71
Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Lorenz DJ et al (2021) Validation of a clinical decision rule to predict abuse in young children based on bruising characteristics. JAMA Netw Open 4:e215832. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5832
Hoedeman F, Puiman PJ, van den Heuvel E et al (2023) A validated screening instrument for child abuse and neglect (SCAN) at the emergency department. Eur J Pediatr 182:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04635-0
Pfeiffer H, Cowley LE, Kemp AM et al (2020) Validation of the PredAHT-2 prediction tool for abusive head trauma. Emerg Med J 37:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208893
Belsky J (1993) Etiology of child maltreatment: a developmental-ecological analysis. Psychol Bull 114:413–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.413
Hernán MA, Robins JM (2020) Causal inference: what if. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Risch EC, Owora A, Nandyal R et al (2014) Risk for child maltreatment among infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit: a sibling comparison. Child Maltreat 19:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559514539387
Foster EM, McCombs-Thornton K (2013) Child welfare and the challenge of causal inference. Child Youth Serv Rev 35:1130–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.012
Euser S, Alink LR, Stoltenborgh M et al (2015) A gloomy picture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment. BMC Public Health 15:1068. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2387-9
Prior A, Fenger-Grøn M, Larsen KK et al (2016) The association between perceived stress and mortality among people with multimorbidity: a prospective population-based cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 184:199–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv324
Lysell H, Runeson B, Lichtenstein P, Långström N (2014) Risk factors for filicide and homicide: 36-year national matched cohort study. J Clin Psychiatry 75:127–132. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.13m08372
Laursen TM, Munk-Olsen T, Mortensen PB et al (2010) Filicide in offspring of parents with severe psychiatric disorders: a population-based cohort study of child homicide. J Clin Psychiatry 72:698–703. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.09m05508gre
Chang C-C, Hsieh M-H, Chiou J-Y et al (2021) Multiple factors associated with child abuse perpetration: a nationwide population-based retrospective study. J Interpers Violence 36:5360–5382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518805100
Meinck F, Cluver LD, Boyes ME (2015) Household illness, poverty and physical and emotional child abuse victimisation: findings from South Africa’s first prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 15:444. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1792-4
Brown J, Cohen P, Johnson JG, Salzinger S (1998) A longitudinal analysis of risk factors for child maltreatment: findings of a 17-year prospective study of officially recorded and self-reported child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Negl 22:1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00087-8
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
Pedersen CB (2011) The danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Health 39:22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810387965
Obel C About – nordiclifecore.com. http://nordiclifecore.com/about/. Accessed 11 Apr 2022
Græsholt-Knudsen T, Obel C, Rask C, Lucas S (2021) Is parental illness a risk indicator of future physical child abuse? https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FH2SR
Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C (2022) Charlson Comorbidity Index: a critical review of clinimetric properties. Psychother Psychosom 91:8–35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521288
Rytgaard HC, Munch A, Torp-Pedersen A et al Charlson.Codes: Charlson.Codes in tagteam/heaven: data preparation routines for medical registry data. https://rdrr.io/github/tagteam/heaven/man/charlson.codes.html. Accessed 11 May 2022
Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL et al (2015) The danish national patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 449. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125
Helweg-Larsen K (2011) The danish register of causes of death. Scand J Public Health 39:26–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811399958
Selskab DP (2020) Socialpædiatriske diagnose og procedurekoder. http://paediatri.dk/images/dokumenter/Retningslinjer_2020/Socialp%C3%A6diatriske_diagnose_og_procedurekoder_revideret_1.6.20.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2021
Mersky JP, Berger LM, Reynolds AJ, Gromoske AN (2009) Risk factors for child and adolescent maltreatment: a longitudinal investigation of a cohort of inner-city youth. Child Maltreat 14:73–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559508318399
Brenner RA, Overpeck MD, DrPh, et al (1999) Deaths attributable to injuries in infants, United States, 1983–1991. Pediatrics 103:968–974. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.103.5.968
Freisthler B, Maguire-Jack K (2015) Understanding the interplay between neighborhood structural factors, social processes, and alcohol outlets on child physical abuse. Child Maltreat 20:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559515598000
Gessner BD, Moore M, Hamilton B, Muth PT (2004) The incidence of infant physical abuse in Alaska. Child Abuse Negl 28:9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.03.002
TølbøllBlenstrup L, Knudsen LB (2011) Danish registers on aspects of reproduction. Scand J Public Health 39:79–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811399957
Bliddal M, Broe A, Pottegård A et al (2018) The danish medical birth register. Eur J Epidemiol 33:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0356-1
Baadsgaard M, Quitzau J (2011) Danish registers on personal income and transfer payments. Scand J Public Health 39:103–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811405098
Cheung C-k, Leung K-k (2011) Neighborhood homogeneity and cohesion in sustainable community development. Habitat Int 35:564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.004
Pedersen CB, Antonsen S, Timmermann A et al (2022) Urban-rural differences in schizophrenia risk: multilevel survival analyses of individual- and neighborhood-level indicators, urbanicity and population density in a Danish national cohort study. Schizophr Bull Open 3:sgab056. https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgab056
SDG Indikator: 1.2.1 - Fattigdomsindikatorer. https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/Sdg/01-afskaf-fattigdom/delmaal-02/indikator-1. Accessed 11 Apr 2020
Greenland S, Pearce N (2015) Statistical foundations for model-based adjustments. Annu Rev Public Health 36:89–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122559
Keenan HT (2003) A population-based study of inflicted traumatic brain injury in young children. JAMA 290:621. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.5.621
Zuravin SJ (1988) Fertility patterns: their relationship to child physical abuse and child neglect. J Marriage Fam 50:983–993. https://doi.org/10.2307/352109
Helweg-Larsen K, Larsen HB (2005) A critical review of available data on sexual abuse of children in Denmark. Child Abuse Negl 29:715–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.11.005
Widom CS, Czaja SJ, DuMont KA (2015) Intergenerational transmission of child abuse and neglect: real or detection bias? Science 347:1480–1485. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259917
Norredam M, Kastrup M, Helweg-Larsen K (2011) Register-based studies on migration, ethnicity, and health. Scand J Public Health 39:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810396561
Schnitzer PG, Ewigman BG (2005) Child deaths resulting from inflicted injuries: household risk factors and perpetrator characteristics. Pediatrics 116(5):e687–e693
Jensen VM, Rasmussen AW (2011) Danish education registers. Scand J Public Health 39:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810394715
Paxson C, Waldfogel J (2002) Work, welfare, and child maltreatment. J Labor Econ 20:435–474. https://doi.org/10.1086/339609
McGuigan WM, Pratt CC (2001) The predictive impact of domestic violence on three types of child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl 25:869–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00244-7
Jobe-Shields L, Moreland AD, Hanson RF et al (2018) Co-occurrence of witnessed parental violence and child physical abuse from a national sample of adolescents. J Child Adolesc Trauma 11:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-015-0057-9
Chaffin M, Kelleher K, Hollenberg J (1996) Onset of physical abuse and neglect: psychiatric, substance abuse, and social risk factors from prospective community data. Child Abuse Negl 20:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(95)00144-1
Doidge JC, Higgins DJ, Delfabbro P, Segal L (2017) Risk factors for child maltreatment in an Australian population-based birth cohort. Child Abuse Negl 64:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.12.002
Wasserman DR, Leventhal JM (1993) Maltreatment of children born to cocaine-dependent mothers. Am J Dis Child 147:1324–1328. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160360066021
Ahacic K, Kennison RF, Kåreholt I (2014) Alcohol abstinence, non-hazardous use and hazardous use a decade after alcohol-related hospitalization: registry data linked to population-based representative postal surveys. BMC Public Health 14: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-874
Andersen PK, PoharPerme M (2010) Pseudo-observations in survival analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 19:71–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280209105020
Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J (2006) The R Package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Soft 15: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v015.i02
Buuren S van, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Soft 45:1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
van Buuren S (2018) Flexible imputation of missing data, 2nd edn. CRC Press
Harrell FE (2017) Regression modeling strategies. Springer
Tsiampalis T, Panagiotakos DB (2020) Missing-data analysis: socio-demographic, clinical and lifestyle determinants of low response rate on self-reported psychological and nutrition related multi-item instruments in the context of the ATTICA epidemiological study. BMC Med Res Methodol 20:148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01038-3
Nandi A, Glymour MM, Subramanian SV (2014) Association among socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and all-cause mortality in the United States: Epidemiology 25:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000038
Brown ECB, Garrison MM, Bao H et al (2019) Assessment of rates of child maltreatment in states with medicaid expansion vs states without medicaid expansion. JAMA Netw Open 2:e195529. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5529
Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Alink LRA, van IJzendoorn M, (2015) The prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe: review of a series of meta-analyses. Child Abuse Rev 24:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2353
Acknowledgements
Professor in Statistics E. Parner is thanked for his valuable guidance and advice on the methods used in this paper.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Royal Danish Library, Aarhus University Library This work was supported by grants from Dagmar Marshalls Fund and the PhD School of Health, Aarhus University. These grants supported author Troels Græsholt-Knudsen and project-related expenses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T. G.-K., C. O., C. U. R. and S. L. contributed to the study conception, and all authors contributed to the design. Data preparation and analysis were performed by T. G.-K., and revisions of the analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by T. G.-K. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript, except C. O. who passed away before the final version was prepared.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Access to data was granted by Statistics Denmark, and this study was exempt from ethics approval according to Danish law, as it only used administrative data.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Gregorio Milani
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Carsten Obel was deceased during the preparation of this study.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Græsholt-Knudsen, T., Rask, C.U., Lucas, S. et al. Parental physical disease severity and severe documented physical child abuse: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Pediatr 183, 357–369 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05291-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05291-8