Abstract
Invasive medical procedures in hospitals are major sources of stress in children, causing pain and fear. Non-pharmacological interventions are indispensable in effective pain and fear management. However, these interventions must be personalized to be effective. This qualitative study aims to gain insight into children’s and parents’ experiences, needs, and wishes related to supporting children to develop and express their coping preferences for dealing with pain and fear during minor invasive medical procedures in order to decrease pain and fear. A qualitative study using thematic analysis was performed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with children and parents who had undergone at least five minor invasive medical procedures in the last year. Nineteen children (8–18 years) and fourteen parents were interviewed individually. The experiences, needs, and wishes expressed in the interviews could be classified into one overarching theme, that of the personal process, and two content-related sub-themes: feeling trust and gaining control. The personal process was divided into two different phases, that of developing and of expressing coping preferences. Children and parents both reported it as a continuous process, different for every child, with their own unique needs. Children and parents expected personalized attention and tailored support from professionals.
Conclusion: Professionals must combine clinical skills with child-tailored care. In the process of searching for and communicating about coping preferences, children’s unique needs and personal boundaries will thereby be respected. This gives children and parents increased trust and control during invasive medical procedures.
What is Known: • Untreated pain and stress caused by medical procedures can have severe and important short- and long-term consequences for children. Personalized non-pharmacological interventions are an essential element of procedural pain management. | |
What is New: • A personalized coping strategy is important for children when undergoing medical procedures. Each individual child has a personal way of expressing their own coping strategy. Children and their parents need information and the space to develop and express their individual coping preferences. • Children and parents expect to receive child-tailored care from professionals including respect for their own, unique needs and boundaries. Professionals should build trustful relationships and provide appropriately tailored autonomy around medical procedures. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
During medical treatment, children are often subject to invasive medical procedures such as cannula insertion. These are major sources of stress in children, causing pain and fear [1,2,3,4]. Children who frequently experience these negative feelings are at risk for both short- and long-term consequences on their mental and physical health, leading to increased procedure-related pain, a lower sense of control over their well-being, and ongoing posttraumatic stress responses [5,6,7,8]. Therefore, an effective approach minimizing pain and fear is paramount for children who frequently undergo invasive medical procedures.
Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs), besides pharmacological interventions such as sedation or local anesthesia, are crucial to pain and fear management [9,10,11]. These interventions distract the focus of attention from the procedure, thereby reducing pain, distress, and anxiety [10]. Many NPIs are simple and require minimal training, and hence can be implemented directly by children and parents [11]. They capitalize on the self-identified strategies children and parents often develop for dealing with pain and fear when they regularly experience medical procedures [12, 13]. However, these interventions are not routinely administered in clinical practice, particularly in the case of minor invasive medical procedures such as intravenous cannulation or nasogastric tube insertion [2, 3, 14].
Several reviews highlight the evidence-based efficacy of different NPIs, but also emphasize the challenges in determining the effectiveness for an individual patient in practice [10, 11, 15, 16]. There is a wide variety in NPIs, which can be applied in many different ways by parents and professionals. In addition, the child’s age and development, temperament, social skills, and previous experiences play an important role. This implies that effectiveness may at least partially depend on the preferences and circumstances of the child and their parents [5, 10, 16,17,18].
Research into children’s personal preferences during medical procedures is limited. Qualitative studies reveal that children and parents need to get personalized support and information about helpful strategies they can use [19, 20]. In addition, it is important that their wishes and personal boundaries are taken into account [12, 21]. Therefore, a deeper understanding of how to identify children’s individual preferences can help professionals provide personalized strategies.
This qualitative study aims to gain insight into children’s and parents’ experiences, needs, and wishes, related to supporting children to develop and express their coping preferences for dealing with pain and fear during minor invasive medical procedures in order to decrease pain and fear.
Methods
Design
A qualitative study was conducted, to enable an in-depth understanding of the experiences, needs, and wishes of both children and parents with regard to supporting children to express their preferences during minor invasive medical procedures. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with children and parents of a child who had recently undergone invasive medical procedures.
Study setting
The study was conducted at the Wilhelmina Children Hospital, a tertiary care pediatric university hospital in the Netherlands. Children and parents were recruited from December 2020 to May 2021.
Ethical approval
The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics committee of the University Medical Centre in Utrecht, Protocol number 20–634/C. The Medical Research Ethics Committee of the UMC Utrecht confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) did not apply to this study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
If children and parents agreed to participate, an assent was obtained from children under twelve and written consent from children from 12 years and older. Parental consent was sought for participating children under 16 years of age and for their own participation. All participants gave written informed consent.
Inclusion criteria
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, children and parents had to meet all of the following criteria:
-
Children had to be between 8 and 18 years old and have experienced at least five minor invasive medical procedures in the last 2 years with three in the last year in a hospital. Or: parents had to have a child (0–18) who had experienced at least five minor invasive medical procedures in the last 2 years with three in the last year in a hospital.
-
The medical procedures had to be minor but invasive (e.g. insertion of intravenous cannulas, nasogastric tubes, or urinary catheters), and carried out without sedation.
-
Able to speak, write and read Dutch.
Sampling strategy and data collection
A purposeful sample of children and parents of children who met the inclusion criteria with various health conditions, ages, sex, and different experiences of minor medical procedures was recruited. The researcher (EWS) regularly consulted with the admission planner and nurses on the wards about which children and parents could be approached for this purpose. This purposeful sampling technique was used to ensure in-depth understanding of the experiences.
After permission, EWS approached interested participants for written informed consent. Eligible children and parents were recruited from both an outpatient department and from clinical departments. A letter with general information about the study was sent to eligible parents and children from the outpatient department to give them time to consider participation during treatment.
The semi-structured face-to-face interviews were mostly held in the hospital during admission and took place at the child’s bedside in their own room. Some parents preferred an interview by telephone after discharge from the hospital. When both child and parent wanted to participate, the interviews were conducted separately. Field notes were made after each interview. All interviews were performed by the researcher (EWS), a researcher and practicing nurse, trained in performing interviews and qualitative research. The interviews were structured around the following themes: experiences of medical procedures, how helping strategies were developed, and how to express them. See Appendix: the interview guide for both children and parents. Prior to participant recruitment, the interview guide was pilot tested with two members of the hospital children’s council. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Data analysis
The analysis incorporated reflexive thematic examination of interview data to explore children’s and parents’ feelings and opinions about what helps children during medical procedures.
A six-stage inductive thematic analysis approach, as described by Braun and Clarke, was used to identify and code patterns or themes within and across the interview data [22, 23]. In the first phase, transcripts of the interviews were read and reread. This generated initial codes across the data. Themes were searched for and identified in the second and third phases. This initial analysis was conducted independently and manually by two members of the research team (EWS, AH). Detailed analysis and interpretation resulted in the identification of themes and patterns across questions. Discrepancies between the researchers about how to code the data were resolved through consensus achieved by discussion with a third researcher (MK).
In the fourth phase, after sixteen interviews with the children and fourteen interviews with parents, no additional codes related to the themes were identified in the subsequent interviews, and enrollment stopped [24]. Codes and theme codes were then compared and discussed with the whole research group in the fifth phase. In the final phase, the report was written according to the consolidate criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines [25].
The qualitative data analysis software program NVivo 11 (QSR International; Melbourne, Australia) was used for data management during the analysis.
Results
A total of 27 children and 18 parents were approached by nurses to participate in this study. Nineteen children and fourteen parents (two fathers and twelve mothers) were interviewed. In six cases, we interviewed both the child and the parent of the same family. All children and parents were interviewed separately. The interviews with children lasted between 20–35 min, while parent interviews took 20–50 min. Eight children and four parents decided not to participate.
All participating children had experiences with needle-related medical procedures, some of them frequently, and some of the children were familiar with nasogastric tube insertions in the past. The children were aged 8 to 18 years, eleven of them were girls, eight of them were boys. For further child and parent characteristics, see Tables 1 and 2. During the interviews, children and parents primarily shared their experiences of undergoing medical procedures and applying their preferred coping strategy. Children could not always verbalize what they needed to express their coping preferences, even when questioning further.
From the interviews, one overarching theme was identified: “a personal process”. Within this personal process, two content-related sub-themes were important for both children and parents: feeling trust and gaining control. In addition, two phases could be distinguished in this personal process which could alternate during the process: developing and expressing (own) coping preferences. In every phase, each individual child and parent had their own needs.
A personal process; finding your own way
The interviews revealed that, when coping with medical procedures and expressing a preferred coping strategy, the children each went through their own individual process. Children of the same age experienced the same medical procedures very differently. They therefore differed in the use of coping strategies and had varied preferences for NPIs. Some children used their preferred coping strategy for a long period of time; others changed their preferred coping strategy regularly—even during one medical procedure—depending on the efficacy of the coping strategy of each child. Hence, there were large variations both in experiences of medical procedures and in coping preferences.
As a result of these varied experiences and preferences, children displayed different needs for help in coping with the pain and stress caused by the medical procedure (Table 3, quote 1a). Some children developed a coping strategy by themselves or with the help of their parents; others needed support from professionals when they underwent medical procedures. Sometimes, a fixed order of the actions during the medical procedure was important.
Because of children’s different requirements for help, there were also different needs in expressing coping preferences. When children did not need the professional’s assistance during the execution of their coping strategy, they did not feel the necessity of expressing their coping wishes to the professional and had never thought to ask for help. In contrast, when children needed the professionals’ support to execute their coping strategy, it was important for them to express their preferences. For most of the children, it was comfortable if the professional already knew their preferences before the procedure. However, some children wished to express it themselves. More details of the experiences and needs in coping strategy regarding medical procedures are described further below in this results section.
Parents’ experiences resembled those of the child, the reason not to describe these separately. They narrated more elaborately about all the experiences of their child with medical procedures and their unique needs. Although children sometimes could not remember their coping strategies or the needs they have had in the past, parents could give an overview of everything that had happened. When there were problems in the past, they emphasized the need that the professional should view and approach the child as unique. Parents realized the importance of the medical procedure, but emphasized the significance of taking into account their child’s preferences and coping strategies. (Table 3, quote 1b).
Control and trust
Despite all these differences, the experiences, needs, and wishes about coping preferences narrated in the interviews could be distinguished into two themes: feeling trust and gaining control. Some children and parents seemed to be more in need of control; others emphasized the importance of trust in the professional and how to achieve that.
In each interview, with both children and parents, one or both of these themes were mentioned.
To gain control
Although children perceived the medical procedures they had to undergo differently, they all experienced stress to a greater or lesser degree. All children had developed a coping strategy to gain control. Some teenagers had had a considerable amount of experience in medical procedures and reported that, although they were used to them, they also used a specific, usually minor, ritual as a coping mechanism, e.g. tapping with their foot or actively guiding their thoughts to other subjects.
Both children and parents stated that a coping strategy is important for them. It provided feelings of control in a situation that was perceived as stressful because it could potentially be painful (Table 3, quote 2a).
When children had developed their coping strategy themselves, they emphasized the importance of professionals taking the preferences and coping strategy into account and acting accordingly (Table 3, quotes 2b). Parents were more aware of the importance of the ritual than children, but some older teenagers with a lot of experience were adamant about their ritual needing to be done in the way they were accustomed to. For children who had previously been very anxious about a procedure, it was especially important that their coping strategy was known and taken into account.
Some children needed to express the coping strategy themselves just before the procedure (Table 3, quotes 2c). They knew what they wanted, and they had experience dealing with many different medical professionals. By emphasizing their coping preferences just before the start of the procedure, they gained a sense of security (control). These were teenagers who had undergone many procedures. They seemed secure about their coping strategy, and they needed the professional when they conducted their personal coping ritual.
To feel trust
Children and parents reported that they experienced less stress during the medical procedure when there was a feeling of trust in the professionals who were participating in the medical procedure. Several ways to foster feelings of trust around a medical procedure were mentioned, as well as unpleasant events that eliminated trust and increased stress.
The first way to gain trust in the professional is if professionals can show that they are aware of coping preferences (Table 3, quote 3a). Especially younger children did not appear willing to communicate their wishes every time before a procedure. It was difficult for them to tell the reason why, but parents revealed that it provided a feeling of trust when a professional was aware of their preferences and had already prepared to perform the coping strategy.
A second way of gaining trust is that children and parents who regularly came to the outpatient department indicated that they appreciated to be known by the professional and vice versa, i.e. that they know the professional (Table 3, quote 3b). Being familiar with the professional provided a feeling of calm which made it easier to express preferences. They understood (were aware) that having exclusive involvement of professionals familiar to them is not always possible in a hospital. Nevertheless, a professional’s open and interested attitude and a positive atmosphere on the ward were still important. On the other hand, a disinterested attitude expressed by the professional was experienced as increasing feelings of unsafety, in particular by the parents.
Thirdly, children and parents stressed that professionals have to respect pre-set agreements, rituals, and boundaries of the child. Conversely, if the child’s boundaries were disregarded by the professional, it had a negative impact on the child’s trust of the whole situation concerning the procedure (Table 3, quote 3c). Almost all children who were very anxious or had been very anxious in the past had experienced a panic attack during a prior procedure during which professionals and parents did not listen to them. This caused loss of trust and high levels of fear. It took a long time to rebuild a level of trust and this often required help from other professionals.
Besides these three aspects, there were more elements that helped children to gain trust. The competence of the professional to perform the procedure and the success or failure of the procedure are an often-mentioned fourth aspect (Table 3, quote 3d). This was particularly true for needle-related procedures. Children and parents emphasized that a successful procedure instils trust. Conversely, a procedure that goes wrong undermines this trust. Some parents mentioned that then, in addition to reducing trust, a sense of control could also be lost.
Phases in the personal process of expressing coping preferences
Despite all the different coping mechanisms and needs among children, there appeared to be a shared process regarding developing and expressing an effective preferred coping strategy.
First and foremost, each child needed the space to develop and to try out an appropriate coping strategy, which, as described earlier, is a very personal process (Table 3, quote 4a). A lot of children changed their coping strategy over time because the one they were used to no longer fitted their needs. Information about different NPIs and coping strategies and the space to try out coping strategies could help children and parents find the most suitable and personalized coping strategy. Some children and parents indicated that they would have preferred to have received this information earlier on.
Furthermore, in most of the situations, it was important that the professionals who were involved in the medical procedure were aware of the preferences of each child. Professionals need to know these preferences because they often help the child to use their preferred coping strategy. This implies that a coping strategy should be expressed by the child or parent to professionals (Table 3, quote 4b). As described earlier, it was remarkable that children and parents had different ideas and preferences about how to express and share this information with the professional. This means that for expressing coping strategies there are also preferences. Nevertheless, children and parents emphasized overall the important role professionals played in performing a coping strategy.
Discussion
The interviews in this study demonstrated that a personal coping strategy was important for children who had experienced medical procedures. An overarching theme from all interviews was that developing and expressing a coping ritual for a medical procedure was a deeply personal process. In order to express a coping strategy, it is important that a child is given the necessary space and information to develop preferences for coping.
During the development and expression of these strategies, children experienced gaining control and feeling trust as important themes. This helped reduce children’s fear of the medical procedure they had to undergo. The necessity for control made it important for professionals to accommodate for the child’s coping strategy. Feelings of trust allow children and parents to express their coping strategy more easily. It was essential to parents and children that professionals were aware of personal coping strategies.
Research on the process of how children learn and express coping strategies to decrease pain and fear during medical procedures is limited. In agreement with previous studies, many children who receive painful treatments in the hospital or at home have developed a coping strategy spontaneously or with the help of their parents, these often being effective [13, 26,27,28]. The strategies varied between children and were used differently on different occasions [12]. Our study shows that learning effective coping strategies is a personal process. Hence, in order to accommodate the coping preferences of a child, the professional must always familiarize themselves with the personal situation of the young patient [28].
Although children could devise sufficient coping strategies on their own, children and parents had the desire to receive information about other options for effective, and possibly more optimal, coping strategies. In the interviews, this desire for more information about effective coping strategies and the possibilities available in the hospital came primarily from the parents and some older teens. Previous studies showed that younger children also feel a necessity for personalized information on better coping strategies that might help them deal with medical procedures [13, 29].
The interviews in our study revealed that the experiences, needs, and wishes in developing and expressing coping preferences evolved around two themes: gaining control and feeling trust. Children and parents sometimes found it difficult to indicate their needs and wishes in expressing coping preferences; they shared more about their experiences with medical procedures. A certain degree of control and trust was yet again prominent in these narratives. Hence, these two themes are not only essential for expressing coping preferences, but are also helpful in experiencing less anxiety about a procedure.
Although both themes were described separately in the results section to provide more clarity, the themes also seemed to be interrelated. In most interviews, both themes emerged to a greater or lesser extent. For example, if a child became very anxious about the medical procedure, it meant that self-confidence and confidence in the professionals had decreased seriously. By providing trust, empathy, and regaining control, the fear decreased and trust could be rebuilt. Expressing preferences just before a procedure was very important for some children to help them gain a feeling of control; otherwise, they did not trust that the professional knew the preferred coping strategy. However, no research that has studied the relationship between control and trust in the subjective experience of medical procedures could be found.
There has been little investigation of the need to gain control during a medical procedure. Blount et al. suggested that adults need not give too much control to the child at critical periods during the procedures [30]. Giving them too great a degree of control left them to their own devices. They distinguished decisional control, whereby the child may be offered a choice with a limitation (left arm or right arm) and behavioral control, which can give indefinite delay (when will we start). The latter situation was likely to increase distress and anxiety. Nevertheless, our study showed that if professionals did not take children’s personal boundaries into account, with subsequent loss of control, children experienced greater anxiety for a medical procedure. More research is needed on which manner (form and degree) of control helps a child feel comfortable during a medical procedure.
Much more research was present on gaining trust and developing a trustful relationship with the professional. Sheenan et al. stressed that a trusting child is likely to be less fearful, experience clinical procedures as less threatening, and is more likely to adhere to treatment [31]. Other research highlighted that when patients and professionals established mutual trust, patients demonstrated better adaptation and collaboration for improvement of health: they expressed a (greater) sense of security [32, 33]. These outcomes are consistent with our study in which children and parents indicated that it gives them a sense of calm to be known by the professional who is aware of their coping preferences.
The meaning and content of a trustful relationship between patient and professional is described in the theory of presence, developed by Baart and Klaver [34]. This theory, which is rather an approach than a method, stated that good care is tuning, effective, legitimated, feasible, and mediating [35]. According to Baart, attentive professionals take time to get to know their patients and environment deeply and strive to affirm the fundamental dignity of the person. Whilst not problem-focused, this approach may lead to person-centered problem solving. Professionals should get more training on the principles of this approach. It could inspire them to be attentive and give them a better understanding of the personal needs of children and their parents regarding medical procedures.
This study has several limitations. Children and parents were not sent a summary of their interview to verify their meaning. Furthermore, the study was conducted in a single Dutch academic hospital with a sample containing mostly well-educated, Dutch-speaking children and parents. Hence, a sample from various international hospitals may lead to different results because of cultural differences in expressing preferences.
A third limitation was the challenge to include parents of young children. It could therefore be possible that perspectives from young children were less addressed. However, interviews of parents with this target group did not provide new insights.
An important strength of this qualitative study is that to our knowledge it is the first study to describe children’s and parents’ perspectives on expressing coping preferences around medical procedures. Moreover, parents and children with different conditions and different experiences were included.
Furthermore, rigor and evaluation of trustworthiness were examined using investigator triangulation. This was attained by debating the data extraction and defining analytical themes among the researchers and within the research group.
Conclusion
Professionals must combine clinical skills with personal attention and respect for children’s unique needs and personal boundaries in the process of searching and communicating coping preferences. Children and parents need tailored information about coping strategies to develop an optimal personal coping strategy. Training for professionals in procedural care is required that, besides technical aspects, also addresses children’s specific psychosocial care during a procedure. This gives children and parents the feelings of control and trust they need to express their preferences and to experience the least possible pain and fear during invasive medical procedures.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data are located in controlled access data storage at University Medical Center Utrecht.
Abbreviations
- NPI:
-
Non-pharmacological interventions
- WMO:
-
Wet Maatschappelijke Ondersteuning (Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act)
- UMC:
-
University Medical Centre
References
Stevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J, Harrison D, Stinson J, Taddio A et al (2011) Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. CMAJ 183(7):E403–E410. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101341
Birnie KA, Chambers CT, Fernandez CV, Forgeron PA, Latimer MA, McGrath PJ et al (2014) Hospitalized children continue to report undertreated and preventable pain. Pain Res Manag. 19(4):198–204. [pii]
Walther-Larsen S, Pedersen MT, Friis SM, Aagaard GB, Rømsing J, Jeppesen EM et al (2017) Pain prevalence in hospitalized children: a prospective cross-sectional survey in four Danish university hospitals. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 61(3):328–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12846
Senger A, Bryce R, McMahon C, Baerg K (2021) Cross-sectional study of pediatric pain prevalence, assessment, and treatment at a Canadian tertiary hospital. Can J Pain 5(1):172–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2021.1961081
Heden L, von Essen L, Ljungman G (2016) The relationship between fear and pain levels during needle procedures in children from the parents’ perspective. Eur J Pain 20(2):223–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.711
McMurtry CM, Pillai Riddell R, Taddio A, Racine N, Asmundson GJG, Noel M et al (2015) Far from “just a poke”: common painful needle procedures and the development of needle fear. Clin J Pain 31. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000272
Taddio A, Ipp M, Thivakaran S, Jamal A, Parikh C, Smart S et al (2012) Survey of the prevalence of immunization non-compliance due to needle fears in children and adults. Vaccine 30(32):4807–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.011
Price J, Kassam-Adams N, Alderfer MA, Christofferson J, Kazak AE (2016) Systematic review: a reevaluation and update of the integrative (trajectory) model of pediatric medical traumatic stress. J Pediatr Psychol 41(1):86–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsv074
Taddio A, McMurtry CM, Shah V, Riddell RP, Chambers CT, Noel M et al (2015) Reducing pain during vaccine injections: clinical practice guideline. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J 187(13):975. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000312
Leroy PL, Costa LR, Emmanouil D, van Beukering A, Franck LS (2016) Beyond the drugs: nonpharmacologic strategies to optimize procedural care in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 29(Suppl 1):1. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000312
Birnie KA, Noel M, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Parker JA (2018) Psychological interventions for needle‐related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4
Kleye I, Hedén L, Karlsson K, Sundler AJ, Darcy L (2021) Children’s individual voices are required for adequate management of fear and pain during hospital care and treatment. Scand J Caring Sci 35(2):530–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12865
Sørensen K, Skirbekk H, Kvarstein G, Wøien H (2021) I don’t want to think about it: a qualitative study of children (6–18 years) with rheumatic diseases and parents’ experiences with regular needle injections at home. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 19(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00495-4
Taddio A, Ipp M, Vyas C, Parikh C, Smart S, Thivakaran S et al (2014) Teaching parents to manage pain during infant immunizations: laying the foundation for better pain management practices. Clin J Pain 30(11):987–994. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000051
Chambers CT, Taddio A, Uman LS (2009) McMurtry CM (2009) Psychological interventions for reducing pain and distress during routine childhood immunizations: a systematic review. Clin Ther 31:S77–S103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.023
Koller D, Goldman RD (2012) Distraction techniques for children undergoing procedures: a critical review of pediatric research. J Pediatr Nurs 27(6):652–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2011.08.001
Harvey JH, Harris B (1975) Determinants of perceived choice and the relationship between perceived choice and expectancy about feelings of internal control. J Pers Soc Psychol 31(1):101–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076169
Lerwick JL (2016) Minimizing pediatric healthcare-induced anxiety and trauma. World J Clin Pediatr 5(2):143–150. https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.143
Karlsson K, Englund AD, Enskär K, Rydström I (2014) Parents’ perspectives on supporting children during needle-related medical procedures. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 9. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.23759
Bray L, Appleton V, Sharpe A (2019) ‘If I knew what was going to happen, it wouldn’t worry me so much’: Children’s, parents’ and health professionals’ perspectives on information for children undergoing a procedure. J Child Health Care 23(4):626–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493519870654
Pope N, Tallon M, Leslie G, Wilson S (2018) Ask me: children’s experiences of pain explored using the draw, write, and tell method. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 23(3):e12218. https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12218
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27(2):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Braun V, Clarke V (2021) To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 13(2):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Sørensen K, Skirbekk H, Kvarstein G, Wøien H (2020) Children’s fear of needle injections: a qualitative study of training sessions for children with rheumatic diseases before home administration. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 18(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-020-0406-6
Franck LS, Sheikh A, Oulton K (2008) What helps when it hurts: children’s views on pain relief. Child Care Health Dev 34(4):430–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00812.x
Salmela M, Salantera S, Ruotsalainen T, Aronen ET (2010) Coping strategies for hospital-related fears in pre-school-aged children. J Paediatr Child Health 46(3):108–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01647.x
Bray L, Appleton V, Sharpe A (2019) The information needs of children having clinical procedures in hospital: Will it hurt? Will I feel scared? What can I do to stay calm? Child Care Health Dev 45(5):737–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12692
Blount RL, Davis N, Powers SW, Roberts MC (1991) The influence of environmental factors and coping style on children’s coping and distress. Clin Psychol Rev 11(1):93–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(91)90139-L
Sheehan R, Fealy G (2020) Trust in the nurse: findings from a survey of hospitalised children. J Clin Nurs 29(21–22):4289–4299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15466
Leslie JL, Lonneman W (2016) Promoting trust in the registered nurse-patient relationship. Home Healthc Now 34(1):38–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000322
Wiechula R, Conroy T, Kitson AL, Marshall RJ, Whitaker N, Umbrella RP (2016) Review of the evidence: what factors influence the caring relationship between a nurse and patient? J Adv Nurs 72(4):723–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12862
Klaver K, Baart A (2011) Attentiveness in care: towards a theoretical framework. Nurs Ethics 18(5):686–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011408052
Baart A (2004) What makes care good care. Sociale Interventie 13(3):14–26
Acknowledgements
We gratefully thank all children and parents who participated in the current study.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors participated in conception or design of the work, as listed hereafter: EWS data collection. EWS, AH MK, MACPM data analysis and interpretation; EWS drafting the article; EWS, AH, MK, MACPM, EP, LS critical revision of the article. All authors final gave approval of the version to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated by Peter de Winter
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix. Interview guides children and parents
Appendix. Interview guides children and parents
Interview guide children
-
1.
Can you tell what procedures you have experienced (such as IV insertion, drawing blood, or inserting a tube)? What was the last time and how did you feel about it?
-
2.
What helps you during a procedure to feel as comfortable as possible? (think about distraction techniques). And why?
-
3.
Do you ever get asked what is for you the most comfortable way? How did you feel you could comment on that?
-
4.
And if they don’t asked you, what then?
-
5.
How do you know what helps you? How did you choose the most effectively way?
-
6.
Can someone else choose for you? Who is that? Do you like that?
-
7.
Did you know the possibilities for being distracted? How can we tell/indicate that? Would you have liked more explanation? And when (just before the procedure or a while before?)
-
8.
What do you think about writing down your preferences? In what way would you like that (booklet, cards, app)
-
9.
What would you say to other children, parents or staff about telling them what important is for you?
-
10.
Are there any other events or experiences about this topic that you would like to share?
Interview guide parents
-
1.
What are your experiences with medical interventions your child had to undergo? How was that for you as a parent?
-
2.
What do you do to support your child through the intervention? Would you like to do it differently?
-
3.
Are you or your child ever asked what your child would like? How do you feel about that? Does that help your child?
-
4.
And if not asked, what then? Do you feel space to say something that would help to communicate it anyway?
-
5.
Did your child indicate something on his/her own or did he/she do something that helped him/her?
-
6.
Optional: When do you say by yourself what your child wants, when do you let your child to say it?
-
7.
What help from the professional would be useful in being able to indicate what is comfortable for your child or letting your child say what he/she is comfortable with?
-
8.
In what way could be recorded what you and your child want? (booklet, app, something in HIX, card system)
-
9.
What would you advise other parents or children about telling children their wishes in medical interventions that may cause anxiety and/or pain?
-
10.
Are there any other events or experiences on this topic that you would like to share?
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Segers, E.W., Ketelaar, M., de Man, M.A.C.P. et al. How to support children to develop and express their coping preferences around minor invasive medical procedures: children’s and parents’ perspectives. Eur J Pediatr 182, 5553–5563 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05222-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05222-7