Abstract
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial agent used to treat mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, constitutional manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study assessed the efficacy and side effects of HCQ in children with proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial study was conducted on 60 children with proliferative LN classes III and IV treated with steroids and a mycophenolate (MMF) regimen. Patients were categorized into two groups, the HCQ group (n = 30) and the placebo group (n = 30). They were evaluated initially at 6- and a 12-month follow-up by mucocutaneous, ophthalmological examination, and investigations (BUN, creatinine, 24 h proteinuria, triglycerides (TG), cholesterol, Antids-DNA, C3, C4). Disease activity was assessed using the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI-2 k). After 12 months, TG, cholesterol, 24 h proteinuria, Antids-DNA, and SLEDAI score were significantly decreased in the HCQ group (P: 0.002, 0.012, 0.031, 0.001, respectively). After 12 months, the cumulative probabilities of developing primary end-points (LN partial and complete remission) were 40% and 60% in the HCQ group versus 53.3% and 36.7% in the placebo group (P: 0.002). After 12 months, the HCQ group experienced mucocutaneous alopecia (3.3%), hyperpigmentation (10%), and ophthalmological mild retinal changes (6.7%), but they did not differ significantly from the placebo group.
Cunclusion: HCQ improved the disease and LN activity in children with proliferative LN, with documented skin hyperpigmentation and mild retinal changes following HCQ use in a few cases. This study was registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ with trial registration number (TRN): NCT03687905, September 2018 “retrospectively registered.”
What is Known: |
• Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is documented as an adjunctive treatment in children with systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE) LN with efficacy in improving lupus musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous manifestations. |
• Due to the paucity of studies, its effects and side effects in children with LN remain unclear. |
What is New: |
• This pilot randomized clinical trial assessed the efficacy and adverse effects of HCQ in children with proliferative LN. |
• HCQ had numerous advantages for LN, including rapid and sustained remission, antilipidemic effect, and rapid improvement of kidney functions. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
LN occurs in about 60% of children with systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE), ranging from silent disease to severe renal insufficiency. Despite advances in therapy, morbidity and mortality of LN remain high, leading to kidney failure in 17–25% of patients [1, 2]. All guidelines recommend a renal biopsy when a patient with SLE has proteinuria (> 500 mg/day or > 3 + on urine dipstick) to confirm the diagnosis, assess disease activity or chronicity, and guide treatment. LN is classified histologically according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) into sixth classes, Class I: Minimal mesangial LN, Class II: Mesangial LN, Class III: Focal proliferative LN, Class IV: Diffuse proliferative LN, Class V: Membranous LN, Class VI: Advanced sclerosis LN [3, 4]. HCQ is an antimalarial drug used to treat mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, and constitutional manifestations of SLE, with photoprotective, dyslipidemic, and antithrombotic actions [5]. HCQ has side effects occurring with long-term use and high cumulative doses, such as retinopathy, corneal deposits, maculopathy, decreased visual acuity, impaired night vision, hyperpigmentation, alopecia, skin rash, cardiomyopathy, ototoxicity, myopathy, leukemia, and hemolysis [6]. HCQ effects in LN treatment are still unclear, with a paucity of studies on children, so we aimed to evaluate its efficacy and side effects in treating children and adolescents with proliferative LN.
Materials and methods
Study design
This double-blind randomized-controlled trial was conducted on 60 children (sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9 with effect size 0.15, α error 0.05 and power 95%) at the Pediatric Department, Tanta University Hospitals, Egypt, between March 2019 and December 2021. Inclusion criteria were children aged ≤ 18 years who were newly diagnosed with c-SLE according to SLICC criteria with proliferative LN (LN classes III, IV, or mixed with other classes). We excluded patients with LN classes I, II, and V; end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); ophthalmologic evidence of retinopathy at initial disease presentation; neurolupus; nonadherence to treatment and follow-up; and seriously compromised patients. We used the computerized covariate adaptive randomization for patients’ selection who participated in the study. Sealed numbered containers were used for allocation concealment. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study approval
Study approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University (No. 32490/7/18) and from Protocol Registration and System on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ with trial registration number (TRN): NCT03687905, September 2018; informed consents were obtained from parents and participants in this study. The trial started with 98 newly diagnosed c-SLE cases, 24 cases were excluded as they didn't have LN classes III or IV, 6 cases declined to participate, and after allocation, 9 cases were missed and 7 cases were excluded as they were not adherent to follow-up (as shown in the CONSORT follow-diagram and Table 1).
Treatment regimen and follow-up
All studied c-SLE patients had proliferative LN and received steroids and MMF regimen: (a) induction phase (three daily intravenous pulse methylprednisolone doses (500 mg/m2/dose) was given followed with oral steroids (2 mg/kg/day), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1200 mg/m2/day) combined with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and hydroxychloroquine (5 mg/kg/day) for 4 week;s then, steroids were tapered to (5 mg/day) after 6 months. This regimen (low steroid dose 5 mg/day) + MMF 1200 mg/m2/day) was continued for another 18 months (Maintenance phase). If complete remission (proteinuria reduction < 500 mg/day, normalized serum creatinine with controlled blood pressure) was not achieved after 12 months of follow-up (resistant and refractory cases), MMF is shifted to cyclophosphamide (CYC) (500 mg/m2/4 weeks) for 6 doses; then, once every 3 months for another 18 months, cyclosporine A (CsA) (5 mg/kg/day) is added as a third line in addition to steroids and MMF (augmentation regimen) or rituximab is given (357 mg/m2/week) [7] as shown in the following diagram:
The studied patients were randomized into two groups: (1) HCQ group: Thirty patients received HCQ at a dose (5 mg/kg/day) and (2) placebo group: Thirty patients received a placebo (sugar pills like the shape and package of HCQ pills that were prepared in Tanta Faculty of Pharmacy). At initial disease presentation and throughout treatment follow-up at 6 and 12 months, all patients were subjected to the following: history taking, clinical examination: thorough general and mucocutaneous examination (malar rash, pigmentation, pruritis, eruption, alopecia, and oral ulcer), ocular examination (visual field, which is the most sensitive subjective investigation for the diagnosis of HCQ retinopathy done by confrontational visual field exam, visual acuity; using Snellen test or Random E chart and fundus examination using fundus auto-fluorescence (AF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of any lesion in the early stage of disease). Laboratory investigations included (24 h proteinuria, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), complements C3 and C4). Renal biopsies have been done for all cases as they met one of the following criteria: increasing serum creatinine and proteinuria of ≥ 0.5 g/24 h with hematuria or cellular casts that were evaluated according to (the ISN/RPS) grading system [8]. Assessment of the disease activity: using systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 k), the disease activity was categorized as follows: no activity (SLEDAI < 4), mild activity (SLEDAI 4–7), moderate activity (SLEDAI 8–11), and severe activity (SLEDAI ≥ 12) [9].
Treatment assessment
Primary end-points: (1) Assessment of the disease activity: no activity (SLEDAI < 4). (2) Assessment of the renal activity: Partial remission (PR) is defined as a reduction of proteinuria by at least 50% and to < 3 g/day or protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) (300 mg/mmol) and kidney function stabilization (10–15% of base line). Complete remission (CR) is defined as a reduction of proteinuria < 0.5 g/day or protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) (50 mg/mmol) and kidney function stabilization; no remission is failure to achieve a partial or complete response within 6–12 months of starting therapy [10, 11]. Secondary end-points: (1) Occurrence of disease flaring: (SLEDAI ≥ 4), (2) LN activity: (edema, increased proteinuria > 0.5 g/day, increased kidney functions), and (3) HCQ side effects: during the 12 months of follow-up.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done by SPSS v27 (IBM©, Chicago, IL, USA). Shapiro-Wilks’s test and histograms were used to evaluate the normality of the distribution of data. Quantitative parametric data were presented as mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD) and were analyzed by t-test. Quantitative non-parametric data were presented as median and interquartile range (median IQR), and were analyzed by Mann–Whitney. Qualitative variables were presented as frequency and percentage (n, %) and were analyzed by chi-square test. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to analyze longitudinal repeated measures of studied groups during the follow-up visits. Multivariate Cox regression estimate the renal survival (time of partial and complete remission). P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Sixty children with proliferative LN have been included in this trial, with ages ranging between 9 and 18 years (13.3 ± 2.2), eight males (13%) and 52 females (87%), with a male-to-female ratio of (1/6.5). Thirty-two patients (54%) had LN class III, 26 (43%) had LN class IV, and two patients (3%) had mixed LN class IV-V (Table 2). The comparison between laboratory investigations of the studied groups during the follow-up durations is shown in (Table 3). As regard serum triglycerides, cholesterol, 24 h urinary proteins, and Antids-DNA levels, there were no significant differences between studied groups initially and after 6 months, while there was a significant reduction in their levels in the HCQ group after 12 months (P: 0.002, 0.012, 0.031, and 0.005 respectively). After 6 and 12 months, the HCQ group had a significantly lower SLEDAI score than the other groups (P = 0.001), with the difference being more significant after 12 months (Figs. 1 and 2). The cumulative probabilities of developing primary end-points (LN partial remission and complete remission) at 6 months of the HCQ group were 24 cases (80%) and 5 (17%), respectively, with no remission in one case (3.3%) in comparison to the placebo group that was partial remission in 20 cases (67%). There was complete remission in three cases (10%), no remission in 5 cases (17%), and relapse in 2 cases (6.7%)], at 12 m; primary end-points of the HCQ group were partial remission in 11 cases (37%), complete remission in 18 cases (60%), and relapse in 1 case (3.3%) in comparison to the placebo group that was partial remission in 13 cases (43%), complete remission in 12 cases (40%), no remission in one case (3.3%), and relapse in four cases (13%) (P: 0.003, 0.002). HCQ side effects documented during 1 year of follow-up are depicted in (Table 4); (1) Mucocutaneous complications such as alopecia which occurred in one case (3.3%), and hyperpigmentation, which occurred in three cases (10%), did not differ significantly from to the placebo group. (2) Ophthalmological complications: fundus examination showed mild changes in one case (3.3%) after 6 months and 2 cases (6.7%) after 12 months in the HCQ group but did not differ significantly from the placebo group, with a non-significant difference in terms of visual acuity between the two groups. Table 5 shows the multivariate Cox regression analysis of HCQ effects in studied patients (Antids-DNA (OR: 0.428, 95%CI: 0.274–0.865), TG (OR: 0.724, 95%CI: 0.534–0.924), 24 h proteinuria (OR: 0.423, 95%CI: 0.108–0.851) and SLEDAI (OR:0.352, 95%CI: 0.173–0.453)) was significant (P: 0.025, 0.041, 0.017 and 0.001, respectively).
Discussion
LN is defined as histopathologically proven glomerular immune complex deposition which activates complement, Toll-like receptors, and other inflammatory mediators leading to renal injury [12]. Treatment decisions are guided by the histological appearances that are graded according to the 2018 ISN/RPS classification [8]. Most histologically proven diseases are LN class IV, the most active disease class associated with the poorest kidney prognosis. Histological activity and chronicity characteristics can predict renal outcomes [13]. Updated treatment regimens have improved the renal and overall survival of c-SLE patients [14]. Due to its immunomodulatory, antihyperlipidemic, and antithrombotic properties, HCQ remains the main line of SLE treatment [15, 16]. The present study demonstrated that 54% of patients had LN class III, 43% had LN class IV, and 3% had LN classes IV-V. Levy and Kamphuis [17], Hiraki et al. [18], and Pereira et al. [13] also demonstrated that LN classes III and IV are the most common forms of LN in the pediatric population. The present study showed a significant reduction in serum triglycerides, cholesterol, 24-h proteinuria, and Antids-DNA levels in HCQ group after 12 months of treatment. Tam et al. [19] and Hodis et al. [20] also found significant differences in serum lipid parameters between HCQ-treated and untreated patients. Tam et al. [19], Borba et al. [21], Rahman et al. [22], and Willis et al. [23] analyzed the effect of HCQ on the lipid profile in SLE patients taking corticosteroids; they found a significant reduction in TG and cholesterol levels. In the present study, there was a significant reduction in SLEDAI scores after 6 and 12 months in the HCQ group. Mok et al. [24] reported that the prescribed HCQ dose also correlated significantly with baseline SLEDAI scores, indicating that higher doses were used for more active manifestations with serologic and clinical remission, and having therapeutic HCQ levels, a trend of lower disease activity and fewer incidences of flares were observed. Regarding renal survival, the probabilities of developing 1ry and 2ry end-points were higher in the HCQ group at 6 and 12 months as shown by Andrade Balbi et al. [25], Lee et al. [26], and Pons-Estel et al. [27] who revealed higher recovery of renal function and lower probability of kidney failure after 6 months of HCQ treatment. In addition, HCQ can delay the development of renal damage in LN with lower disease activity and glucocorticoid doses than in patients who did not receive HCQ [27]. Moreover, in the study of Ruiz-Irastorza et al. [28] and Alarcón et al. [29], chloroquine and HCQ exert a protective effect on survival, and patients treated with either of these compounds had a higher survival rate than those who were not treated with either agent. The present study demonstrated that HCQ complications were mucocutaneous (alopecia 3.3%, 10% hyperpigmentation) and ophthalmological (7% mild retinal changes without visual acuity changes). Kim et al. [30] found a retinal toxicity rate of 13.8% among patients with a 10-year mean duration of HCQ use and a mean dose of 6.4 mg/kg. Only one patient had retinal toxicity with a daily dose of < 5 mg/kg. Additionally, Melles and Marmor [31] demonstrated that 7.5% of their studied patients who had used HCQ for at least 5 years had retinal toxicity. Longer duration of HCQ use, higher daily HCQ doses, and the presence of kidney disease are factors that increase the risk of HCQ-induced retinal toxicity [30, 31].
Study limitations were the small sample size, short flow up duration, and non-monitoring the cumulative doses of HCQ and its serum levels.
Conclusions
HCQ is an adjunctive treatment for proliferative LN that has been demonstrated to improve kidney outcomes with few side effects, such as skin hyperpigmentation and retinopathy. In addition, annual ophthalmological screening is recommended.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AF:
-
Auto-fluorescence
- anti-dsDNA:
-
Anti-double-stranded DNA
- CR:
-
Complete remission
- c-SLE:
-
Childhood systemic lupus erythematosus
- ESKD:
-
End stage kidney disease
- HCQ:
-
Hydroxychloroquine
- ISN/RPS:
-
International Society of Nephrology/ Renal Pathology Society
- LN:
-
Lupus nephritis
- MMF:
-
Mycophenolate mofetil
- OCT:
-
Optical coherence tomography
- PCR:
-
Protein/creatinine ratio
- PR:
-
Partial remission
- SLEDAI:
-
SLE disease activity index
- TG:
-
Triglycerides
References
Gasparotto M, Gatto M, Binda V, Doria A, Moroni G (2020) Lupus nephritis: clinical presentations and outcomes in the 21st century. Rheumatology (Oxford) 5(59):39–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa381. PMID: 3328
Gergianaki I, Fanouriakis A, Repa A, Tzanakakis M, Adamichou C, Pompieri A, Spirou G, Bertsias A, Kabouraki E, Tzanakis I, Chatzi L, Sidiropoulos P, Boumpas DT, Bertsias GK (2017) Epidemiology and burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in a Southern European population: data from the community-based lupus registry of Crete, Greece. Ann Rheum Dis 76:1992–2000. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211206. Epub 2017 Aug 5 PMID: 28780511.0015; PMCID: PMC7751166
Lam NC, Ghetu MV, Bieniek ML (2016) Systemic lupus erythematosus: primary care approach to diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 94:284–294
Rees F, Doherty M, Grainge MJ, Lanyon P, Zhang W (2017) The worldwide incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:1945–1961. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex260.PMID:28968809.94(4):284-94. PMID: 27548593
Ponticelli C, Moroni G (2017) Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Expert Opin Drug Saf 16:411–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2017.1269168. Epub 2016 Dec 14 PMID: 27927040
Cunha C, Alexander S, Ashby D, Lee J, Chusney G, Cairns TD, Lightstone L (2018) Hydroxycloroquine blood concentration in lupus nephritis: a determinant of disease outcome? Nephrol Dial Transplant 33:1604–1610. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx318. PMID: 29186572; PMCID: PMC7170714
Parikh SV, Rovin BH (2016) Current and emerging therapies for lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 27:2929–2939. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2016040415. Epub 2016 Jun 9 PMID: 27283496; PMCID: PMC5042683
Bajema I, Wilhelmus S, Alpers C, Bruijn J, Colvin R, Cook T, D’Agati VD, Ferrario F, Haas M, Jennette JC et al (2018) Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis: clarification of definitions, and modified National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices. Kidney Int 93:789–796
Touma Z, Urowitz MB, Gladman DD (2010) SLEDAI-2 K for a 30-day window. Lupus 19:49–50
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, Anders HJ, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis J, Frangou E, Houssiau FA, Hollis J, Karras A, Marchiori F, Marks SD, Moroni G, Mosca M, Parodis I, Praga M, Schneider M, Smolen JS, Tesar V, Trachana M, van Vollenhoven RF, Voskuyl AE, Teng YKO, van Leew B, Bertsias G, Jayne D, Boumpas DT (2020) 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 79:713–723. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216924. Epub 2020 Mar 27 PMID: 32220834
Hanaoka H, Iida H, Kiyokawa T, Takakuwa Y, Kawahata K (2018) Early achievement of deep remission predicts low incidence of renal flare in lupus nephritis class III or IV. Arthritis Res Ther 20:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1576-1. PMID: 29720229; PMCID: PMC5932878
Anders HJ, Rovin B (2016) A pathophysiology-based approach to the diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 90:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Jul 1 PMID: 27378475
Pereira T, Abitbol CL, Seeherunvong W, Katsoufis C, Chandar J, Freundlich M, Zilleruelo G (2011) Three decades of progress in treating childhood-onset lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:2192–2199. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00910111. Epub 2011 Jul 28 PMID: 21799148; PMCID: PMC3359002
Ruggiero B, Vivarelli M, Gianviti A, Benetti E, Peruzzi L, Barbano G, Corona F, Ventura G, Pecoraro C, Murer L, Ghiggeri GM, Pennesi M, Edefonti A, Coppo R, Emma F (2013) Lupus nephritis in children and adolescents: results of the Italian Collaborative Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28:1487–1496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs589. Epub 2013 Jan 22 PMID: 23345627
Clark MR, Trotter K, Chang A (2015) The pathogenesis and therapeutic implications of tubulointerstitial inflammation in human lupus nephritis. Semin Nephrol 35:455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2015.08.007. PMID: 26573548; PMCID: PMC4653081
Jung H, Bobba R, Su J, Shariati-Sarabi Z, Gladman DD, Urowitz M, Lou W, Fortin PR (2010) The protective effect of antimalarial drugs on thrombovascular events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 62:863–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27289. PMID: 20131232
Levy DM, Kamphuis S (2012) Systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 59:345–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.03.007. PMID: 22560574; PMCID: PMC3348509
Hiraki LT, Benseler SM, Tyrrell PN, Hebert D, Harvey E, Silverman ED (2008) Clinical and laboratory characteristics and long-term outcome of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study. J Pediatr 152:550–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.019. Epub 2007 Nov 5 PMID: 18346514
Tam LS, Li EK, Lam CW, Tomlinson B (2000) Hydroxychloroquine has no significant effect on lipids and apolipoproteins in Chinese systemic lupus erythematosus patients with mild or inactive disease. Lupus 9:413–416. https://doi.org/10.1191/096120300678828541. PMID: 10981644
Hodis HN, Quismorio FP Jr, Wickham E, Blankenhorn DH (1993) The lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein effects of hydroxychloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 20:661–665. PMID: 8496861
Borba EF, Longterm BE (2001) beneficial effect of chloroquine diphosphate on lipoprotein profile in lupus patients with and without steroid therapy. J Rheumatol 28:780–785. PMID: 11327250
Rahman P, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Yuen K, Hallett D, Bruce IN (1999) The cholesterol lowering effect of antimalarial drugs is enhanced in patients with lupus taking corticosteroid drugs. J Rheumatol 26:325–330. PMID: 9972966
Willis R, Seif AM, McGwin G Jr, Martinez-Martinez LA, González EB, Dang N, Papalardo E, Liu J, Vilá LM, Reveille JD, Alarcón GS, Pierangeli SS (2012) Effect of hydroxychloroquine treatment on pro-inflammatory cytokines and disease activity in SLE patients: data from LUMINA (LXXV), a multiethnic US cohort. Lupus 8:830–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203312437270. Epub 2012 Feb 17 PMID: 22343096; PMCID: PMC3808832
Mok CC, Penn HJ, Chan KL, Tse SM, Langman LJ, Jannetto PJ (2016) Hydroxychloroquine serum concentrations and flares of systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal cohort analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 68:1295–1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22837. Epub 2016 Jul 27 PMID: 26749299
Andrade Balbi V, Artur Silva C, Nascimento Pedrosa T, Maria Rodrigues Pereira R, de Arruda M, Campos L, Pires Leon E, Duarte N, Melechco Carvalho V, Gofinet Pasoto S, Cordeiro do Rosário D, Kolachinski Brandao L, I Brunner H, Bonfá E, Emi Aikawa N, (2022) Hydroxychloroquine blood levels predicts flare in childhood-onset lupus nephritis. Lupus 31:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033211062515. Epub 2021 Dec 29 PMID: 34965782
Lee JS, Oh JS, Kim YG, Lee CK, Yoo B, Hong S (2020) Recovery of renal function in patients with lupus nephritis and reduced renal function: the beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine. Lupus 29:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203319890007. Epub 2019 Dec 2 PMID: 31793379
Pons-Estel GJ, Alarcón GS, McGwin G Jr, Danila MI, Zhang J, Bastian HM, Reveille JD, Vilá LM (2009) Lumina Study Group. Protective effect of hydroxychloroquine on renal damage in patients with lupus nephritis: LXV, data from a multiethnic US cohort. Arthritis Rheum 61:830–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24538. PMID: 19479701; PMCID: PMC2898742
Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide MV, Pijoan JI, Garmendia M, Villar I, Martinez-Berriotxoa A, Erdozain JG, Aguirre C (2006) Effect of antimalarials on thrombosis and survival in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 15:577–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203306071872. PMID: 17080912
Alarcón GS, McGwin G, Bertoli AM, Fessler BJ, Calvo-Alén J, Bastian HM, Vilá LM, Reveille JD (2007) LUMINA Study Group. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on the survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: data from LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA L). Ann Rheum Dis 66:1168–1172. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.068676. Epub 2007 Mar 27 PMID: 17389655; PMCID: PMC1955128
Kim JW, Kim YY, Lee H, Park SH, Kim SK, Choe JY (2017) Risk of Retinal Toxicity in Longterm Users of Hydroxychloroquine. J Rheumatol 44:1674–1679. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170158. Epub 2017 Sep 1 PMID: 28864645
Melles RB, Marmor MF (2014) The risk of toxic retinopathy in patients on long-term hydroxychloroquine therapy. JAMA Ophthalmol 132(12):1453–1460. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3459. PMID: 25275721
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Material preparation and data collection were performed by FG and HA; data analysis and revision were performed by HD and WE and SE The first draft of the manuscript was written by HA. All authors contributed to the study conception, design, and revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University (No.32490/7/18), and from Protocol Registration and System with ID: NCT 03687905.
Consent to participate
Informed consent obtained from parents and participants in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Gregorio Milani.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gheet, F.S., Dawoud, H.ES., El-Shahaby, W.A. et al. Hydroxychloroquine in children with proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pediatr 182, 1685–1695 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04837-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04837-0