Abstract
Headache is a common complaint in children who present at the pediatric emergency department (PED). Serious conditions such as intracranial tumors and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) should be rapidly ruled out. Ophthalmoscopy for the presence of papilledema has long been considered critical to the assessment of headaches in children; however, the yield of this procedure is poorly validated. This retrospective study implemented a computerized search of the medical records of a single tertiary center to identify all children aged 2–18 years who presented at the PED complaining of headache between 2007 and 2017. The clinical, demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data were analyzed. Of the 948 children aged 2–18 years who presented at the PED complaining of headache, 536 had an ophthalmoscopy examination carried out by an ophthalmologist. Forty-one had papilledema, of whom 7 had an intracranial tumor, 15 had IIH, and 9 had optic nerve head drusen. Of the 495 children without papilledema, 3 had intracranial tumor, and 11 had IIH. The sensitivity and specificity of papilledema for the diagnosis of intracranial tumor were 70% and 93.5%, respectively, with an NPV and PPV of 99.4% and 17.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of papilledema for the diagnosis of intracranial pathology in general were 61.1% and 96.2%, respectively, with an NPV and PPV of 97.2% and 53.7%, respectively.
Conclusion: Assessment by ophthalmoscopy for papilledema in children presenting to the PED with headache had high sensitivity and high specificity, thus reinforcing the importance of ophthalmoscopy as a screening tool in these children.
What is Known: • Headache is a common complaint in children. Serious intracranial pathologies need to be rapidly excluded. • Ophthalmoscopy for the presence of papilledema is commonly used as a screening tool for intracranial pathology, but this procedure is poorly validated. | |
What is New: • Ophthalmoscopy for the assessment of papilledema in children who present with headache to the pediatric emergency department is shown to exhibit sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of intracranial pathology. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PED:
-
Pediatric emergency department
- ICP :
-
Intracranial pressure
- IIH:
-
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- OCT:
-
Optical coherence tomography
- FA:
-
Fluorescein angiography
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- LP:
-
Lumbar puncture
References
Sergott RC (2012) Headaches associated with papilledema. Curr Pain Headache Rep 16(4):354–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11916-012-0283-X
Ehlers JP, Shah CP, Wills Eye Hospital (Philadelphia Pa) (2008) The Wills eye manual : office and emergency room diagnosis and treatment of eye disease. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Rigi M, Almarzouqi SJ, Morgan ML, Lee AG (2015) Papilledema: epidemiology, etiology, and clinical management. Eye Brain 7:47–57. https://doi.org/10.2147/EB.S69174
Prezioso G, Suppiej A, Alberghini V et al (2022) Pediatric headache in primary care and emergency departments: consensus with RAND/UCLA method. Life 12(2):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12020142
Santiago Medina L, Pinter JD, Zurakowski D, Davis RG, Kuban K, Barnes PD (1997) Children with headache: clinical predictors of surgical space-occupying lesions and the role of neuroimaging. Radiology 202(3):819–824. https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOLOGY.202.3.9051039
Klein J, Koch T (2020) Headache in children. Pediatr Rev 41(4):159–171. https://doi.org/10.1542/PIR.2017-0012
Raucci U, Della Vecchia N, Ossella C et al (2019) Management of childhood headache in the emergency department. Review of the Literature. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNEUR.2019.00886
Kovarik JJ, Doshi PN, Collinge JE, Plager DA (2015) Outcome of pediatric patients referred for papilledema. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 19(4):344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAPOS.2015.05.007
Quality standards | NICE (2021) Quality statement 1: Headaches and “red flag” symptoms in children | Suspected neurological conditions: recognition and referral. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs198/chapter/Quality-statement-1-Headaches-and-red-flag-symptoms-in-children. Accessed 13 Apr 2022
Friedman DI, Liu GT, Digre KB (2013) Revised diagnostic criteria for the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children. Neurology 81(13):1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0B013E3182A55F17
Whiting AS, Johnson LN (1992) Papilledema: clinical clues and differential diagnosis. Am Fam Physician 45(3):1125–1134. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/1543098. Accessed 30 Apr 2022
Segev-Becker A, Har-Gil M, Fainmesser P, Assia EL, Watemberg N (2014) Yield and clinical efficacy of funduscopic examinations performed in the pediatric emergency room. Eur J Pediatr 173(3):375–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00431-013-2176-3
van Crevel H (1979) Papilloedema, CSF pressure, and CSF flow in cerebral tumours. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42(6):493. https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.42.6.493
Jurkiewicz E, Pakuła-Kościesza I, Rutynowska O, Nowak K (2010) Trilateral retinoblastoma: an institutional experience and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 26(1):129–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0958-8
Crum OM, Kilgore KP, Sharma R et al (2020) Etiology of papilledema in patients in the eye clinic setting. JAMA Netw Open 3(6):e206625. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2020.6625
Auw-Haedrich C, Staubach F, Witschel H (2002) Optic disk drusen. Surv Ophthalmol 47(6):515–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(02)00357-0
Do TP, Remmers A, Schytz HW et al (2019) Red and orange flags for secondary headaches in clinical practice: SNNOOP10 list. Neurology 92(3):134. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006697
Lamont AC, Alias NA, Win MN (2003) Red flags in patients presenting with headache: clinical indications for neuroimaging. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/89012738
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Drs. Hashavya, Mechulam, and Gilboa conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Drs. Biro, Cohen and Ms. Guzner, Ms. Peyser-Rosenberg, and Ms. Azulai designed the data collection instruments, collected data, carried out the initial analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Drs. Azzam Kawar and Gross conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (approval number: 0274–17-HMO).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kawar, R.A., Gross, I., Biro, Y. et al. The yield of ophthalmoscopy as a screening tool for intracranial pathology in pediatric headache. Eur J Pediatr 182, 609–614 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04708-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04708-0