Introduction

Premature infants, due to their immaturity and lack of pulmonary surfactant, often develop neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and require the implementation of respiratory support measures to maintain adequate gas exchange [1]. On the other hand, these patients are particularly susceptible to lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation (MV), a key factor in the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), which has important consequences on long-term lung function [2,3,4]. According to animal models, the main mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is pulmonary overdistension due to the use of excessively high tidal volumes (VT). Barotrauma, atelectrauma, and biotrauma are also very important factors [5,6,7].

Measures to reduce the level of VILI include avoiding MV, for example, through the prophylactic use of noninvasive respiratory support with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or noninvasive nasal ventilation and the early administration of intratracheal exogenous surfactant, or ventilatory strategies to mitigate lung injury in those patients who require intubation and MV [8]. In this latter group of patients, the main therapeutic goal is to promote adequate homogeneous alveolar recruitment, thus avoiding alveolar overdistension by using lower VT and minimizing exposure to high oxygen concentrations.

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) uses very small high-frequency tidal volumes (VThf), less than that of the anatomic dead space, at a supraphysiological frequency (> 180 cycles/min). Lung recruitment maneuvers are designed to achieve a mean airway pressure that maintains the lung inflated without overdistension. This limits lung injury related to alveolar overdistension due to a large VT, as well as any damage induced by constant airway collapse and reopening. So, this technique represents a very promising strategy to reduce VILI. However, despite the good results initially reported in animal models [9], in premature patients, it has not led to a clinical uniform reduction in the incidence of BPD compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) when used electively in very immature infants [10].

One possible explanation is that initial animal experiments with HFOV were all performed at high frequencies [11, 12], but then lower frequencies were used in a clinical context, probably because physicians had reservations about using high oscillatory pressure amplitudes. When using HFOV, VThf depends on the oscillation amplitude and inspiratory time being inversely proportional to the oscillation frequency [13] and the lung and tubbing conditions. In classic high-frequency ventilators, in which VThf cannot be fixed, an increase in the frequency leads to a decrease in VThf, if the pressure amplitude (ΔPhf) remains the same, and therefore a decrease in ventilation [11, 12, 14, 15]. The value of ΔPhf has to be increased at higher frequencies in order to maintain a constant VThf. Hence, relatively low frequencies were used [9], especially in studies using the Dräger Babylog® 8000 ventilator whose manufacturer recommends frequencies of around 10 hertz (Hz) [16]. Furthermore, as VThf cannot be fixed, it varies according to changes in lung mechanics.

The appearance of volume guarantee (VG) mode, when combined with HFOV, allows VThf and the frequency to be adjusted independently, and VThf can be kept constant.

These points were confirmed in early studies of HFOV+VG in neonatal animal models [17]. In HFOV+VG mode (Babylog® VN500, Dräger, Lübeck, Germany), ventilators achieve VThf stability by automatically adjusting ΔPhf [18]. VThf fluctuates in the short term, but remains very close to the target value over longer periods [19]. The increase in ΔPhf necessary to maintain a constant VThf measured in the airway opening is damped as it traverses the airways to the alveoli, especially at higher frequencies [20,21,22], until it falls to a minimum at the resonant frequency, as described in several studies [21, 23,24,25,26]. This optimal frequency, which results in adequate gas transport during HFOV and the least harmful pressures, depends on underlying lung condition wherein higher frequencies are better suited to pulmonary diseases with low compliance and short time constants such as RDS in preterm infants [19, 21].

Following the results of previous studies, we have gone back to the initial concept of HFOV management, by using very high frequencies, even higher than those used classically (10–15 Hz), with the aim of applying the lowest VThf possible while maintaining adequate ventilation [27, 28].

Recently, in an animal model, this strategy of very high frequencies (20 Hz) and lower VThf has been shown to reduce histological lung injury compared with CMV and HFOV at standard frequencies (10 Hz) [29].

After demonstrating the clinical feasibility of this strategy in preterm infants [30], we implemented this approach at our institution for premature patients who required intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (MV).

Noninvasive management strategies have also been enhanced with the use of synchronized noninvasive mechanical ventilation (sNIMV) as a rescue treatment in the event of nCPAP failure [31] and less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) techniques in spontaneously breathing preterm infants [32], but neither of these strategies has been shown to clearly reduce the incidence of BPD [33,34,35].

Objectives

To assess how mortality and the incidence of type 2–3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants (gestational age < 32 weeks at birth) exposed to mechanical ventilation (MV) during the first 3 days of life are affected by our modification to respiratory management strategy: the earlier implementation of HFOV with higher frequencies and a lower tidal volume.

Materials and methods

Prospective, observational, single-center study was carried out in the Neonatal Department of the Hospital Gregorio Marañón in Madrid.

Inclusion criteria

Preterm infants born at a gestational age of less than 32 + 0 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between January 2012 and December 2017 and who had been exposed to invasive MV (for more than 1 h) in the first 3 days of life.

Exclusion criteria

Referred patients who were more than 6 h old at admission, patients in whom active resuscitation measures were not initiated, and patients with congenital malformations.

Changes to the ventilator management strategy (Appendix link)

During the baseline period (2012–2013), our hospital used a Babylog® 8000 (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany) ventilator which provides HFOV without VG. These ventilators can measure but cannot fix the high-frequency tidal volume (VThf). Although we began using HFOV+VG (Babylog® VN500, Dräger, Lübeck, Germany) in 2014, the strategy was not implemented for all premature infants until 2016.

  • An earlier rescue therapy with HFOV was implemented in the second period (2016–2017) with lower transition criteria (online appendix).

  • The acquisition of HFOV with volume guarantee permitted the modification of the respiratory strategy in the second period, applying the maximum frequency that allows a minimum VThf while maintaining DCO2 constant (online appendix).

After the transition to HFOV, a regulated recruitment maneuver was carried out in the two periods by an oxygenation-guided stepwise increase in mean airway pressure (PMAP) to determine the opening pressure, then a stepwise decrease in PMAP to identify the closing pressure. After reopening the lung, final PMAP is defined as the closing pressure + 2 cmH2O [30].

The same CMV management protocol was used throughout the study, that is, pressure support ventilation combined with VG (4–5 mL/kg). A Drager Babylog® 8000 plus ventilator was used in the baseline period and a Babylog® VN500 in the second period with the new management strategy.

The same surfactant (Beractant) and surfactant administration or intubation criteria were used in both periods, although synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) was implemented in the second period as a rescue strategy to avoid intubation if nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) failed. We also modified the surfactant administration technique. In the second period, it was administered through a tracheal catheter to spontaneously breathing patients (less-invasive surfactant administration, LISA), while in the first period, it was administered after intubation and connection to MV, followed by early extubation (within 1 h), in what is known as the INSURE method—INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation.

As only patients who required intubation and connection to mechanical ventilation for more than 1 h in the first 3 days postpartum were included in the study, changes in noninvasive management did not have a significant effect on the study objectives. Furthermore, these changes would probably apply to more severe cases of respiratory distress syndrome in the second period as they correspond to patients who did not respond to noninvasive strategies. For a better understanding of the impact of changes to noninvasive respiratory management on the main outcome, we also analyzed the group of infants exposed to MV after the first 3 days of life and those who did not require MV during hospitalization.

Variables

We collected the following perinatal variables with respect to mortality and the development of BPD: gender; gestational age at birth (GA); birth weight; antenatal steroid treatment (a complete course was defined as the administration of two doses, the last one at least 4 h before delivery) and the results of placental pathology (classification elaborated by Redline) [36, 37]; respiratory support at birth and during hospitalization; clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score as a predictor of mortality [38]; time on MV (hours); air leak, including pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema; and any abnormalities detected in cranial ultrasound (intracranial hemorrhage grade ≥ 3 or periventricular leukomalacia). Mortality was considered at discharge.

Target variable

Survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia grades 2 and 3 (moderate–severe) (SF-BPD). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was defined as moderate or severe using the criteria reported by Jobe and Bancalari at a postmenstrual age of 36 weeks [39], adding physiologic definition [40].

Variables were evaluated for the whole study population as well as for the group of infants born at a gestational age of less than 29 + 0 weeks.

Statistical analysis

Categorical data are expressed as frequencies and percentages, and continuous data as medians and interquartile range (25th–75th percentile). The chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables and Student’s t test, the Mann–Whitney U test or the Wilcoxon rank–sum test for continuous variables according to the normal or nonnormal distribution of data. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the primary outcome. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval. Confounders were included according to clinical relevancy; so, the maximal model comprises gender [41], gestational age [42], antenatal steroids [43], and placental histology [44]. CRIB scores were not included as they could be affected by the different respiratory management strategies employed and also to avoid collinearity with gestational age. We use a stepwise-background regression model. The final models were internally validated by comparing the estimation coefficients. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS® version 21.0) program (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

A total of 182 patients subjected to MV in the first 3 days of life were included in the study out of the 618 patients born between January 2012 and December 2017 (Fig. 1). The subjects had an average gestational age of 27.1 weeks (IQR 25.2–28.8), and the mean weight was 956 g (IQR 707.5–1150).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow Chart. A total of 618 preterm infants born with less than 32 weeks of GA were admitted in the NICU between January 2012 and December 2017. Period 2012–2013 is compared with 2016–2017

When considering all the preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks’ GA in both periods (n = 428), a lower proportion of patients required MV in the first 3 days postpartum in the second period (Table 1). Thus, after adjusting for prenatal risk factors, the second period was associated with a decreased probability of being exposed to MV in the first 3 days of life (OR 0.540; 95% CI 0.343–0.852; p = 0.008).

Table 1 Distribution of respiratory management variables according to the study periods in the whole population of preterm infants (born with less than 32 weeks GA). INSURE, intubation-surfactant administration-extubation; LISA, less-invasive surfactant administration (surfactant without intubation); Intubated, mechanical ventilation exposure more than 1 h; VMNIs, synchronized nasal ventilation; MV, mechanical ventilation; dol, days of life; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; SF-BPD, survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia type 2–3; BPD 2–3, bronchopulmonary dysplasia type 2–3. Data expressed as frequencies and percentages in parenthesis

Patients exposed to more than 1 h of mechanical ventilation in the second period (2016–2017) were significantly more immature and, according to the CRIB score, had an increased risk of mortality compared with patients in the baseline period (2012–2013). There were no significant differences in gender, prenatal corticosteroid course completion percentages, or placental pathology (Table 2).

Table 2 Distribution of perinatal variables and outcomes according to study periods considering only patients exposed to mechanical ventilation during the first 3 days after birth. Data expressed frequencies and percentages in parenthesis or median and interquartile range (25th–75th percentile). GA, gestational age; dol, days of life; CRIB, critical index for babies; MV, mechanical ventilation; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus

The percentage of patients treated with HFOV on the third day postpartum was greater in the second period (56.4% in 2012–2013 vs 79.5% in 2016–2017; p = 0.019). HFOV was initiated at an earlier age, with an increased frequency and significantly lower VThf. There were no differences in the other parameters (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of management and settings on HFOV between periods in patients supported with HFOV on day 3 after birth. Data expressed as mean (IQR). PMAP, mean airway pressure; VThf, high-frequency tidal volume; DCO2, carbon dioxide diffusion coefficient; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; CMV, conventional mechanical ventilation

There were no significant differences in the incidence of pneumothorax/interstitial emphysema or the MV exposure time during the first 3 days postpartum; however, time of exposure to MV over the entire hospital admission period was greater in the second period (Table 2). There were no differences in mortality rates between the two periods.

After adjusting for perinatal risk factors, the second period was associated with a significant increase in survival without BPD type 2–3 (SF-BPD) not only in the whole population of preterm infants but also when considered those patients exposed to mechanical ventilation in the first 3 days of life (Table 4). This outcome was even more marked in the group of patients with a gestational age of less than 29 weeks, where the incidence of BPD was reduced by at least 44% in the second period (Tables 5 and 6). Also, with regard to patients treated using HFOV in the third day postpartum, SF-BPD increased by at least 48% in the second period (Table 6).

Table 4 Results of adjusted binary logistic regression analysis for main outcomes in the second study period (2016–2017) as compared with the first study period (2012–2013). Adjusted for perinatal risk factors: gestational age, gender, antenatal steroids, and placental histology. SF-BPD 2–3, survival without BPD grades 2–3; MV, mechanical ventilation; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; SF, survival without; dol, days of life
Table 5 Distribution of main outcome variables according to study periods in the group of infants born with less than 29 wGA exposed to mechanical ventilation during the first 3 days after birth. Data expressed in frequencies and percentages are in parenthesis. BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; SF-BPD, survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia type 2–3; SF-PCU, survival without pathological cranial ultrasound
Table 6 Results of adjusted binary logistic regression analysis for main outcomes in the second study period (2016–2017) as compared with the first study period (2012–2013) in patients born with less than 29 weeks gestational age. Adjusted for perinatal risk factors: gestational age, gender, antenatal steroids, and placental histology. SF-BPD, survival without BPD grades 2–3; MV, mechanical ventilation; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; SF, survival without

There were no differences in SF-BPD rates between the two periods in infants exposed to MV after the 3 days postpartum (45.2% 2012–2013 and 52.2% 2016–2017; p = 0.784; OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.449–3.907) or infants with no exposure to MV during hospitalization (96.7% 2012–2013 and 99% 2016–2017; p = 0.342; OR 3.487; 95% CI 0.356–34.09). (Tables 4 and 6).

Discussion

Changes implemented in respiratory management strategies for preterm infants have led to a reduction in intubation rates and an increase in survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia grades 2 and 3 (SF-BPD) across the entire population of preterm infants. This effect is mainly at the expense of the group of infants exposed to mechanical ventilation in the first 3 days of life, associated with the modifications implemented in the mechanical ventilation strategy during the second period. We did not observe any significant differences in mortality, with this effect being attributed to a decrease of at least 10% in the incidence of BPD 2–3 in the second period.

The use of HFOV as an early rescue strategy was evident in this population, with a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving HFOV on day 3 postpartum in the second period, reaching almost 80% (Table 1). Along with an earlier age at the beginning of HFOV treatment, we significantly reduced administered tidal volume among patients treated with the new strategy by using higher frequencies and keeping the other parameters constant (DCO2, PMA, and FiO2 level) (Table 3).

There is not enough data on the best tidal volume to be delivered during HFOV, or even for conventional ventilation, and it may differ between patients and depending on the course of the disease [45, 46]. As such, the tidal volume should be adjusted individually in each patient, while also taking into account that its value may differ according to each ventilator’s measurement method. The Babylog® VN500 generates a sinusoidal pressure signal around a set mean airway pressure and features both active inspiration and active expiration. The VG mode is volume-targeted ventilation where the microprocessor compares the VThf for the previous breath, using leak-compensated VThf, and adjusts delta pressure to achieve the set VThf.

Minimizing the tidal volume by increasing the frequency is a safe, feasible strategy that seems to reduce ventilator-induced lung injury. In animal models, ventilation using high frequencies (20 Hz) and a low VT (1.56 mL/kg) decreased histological lung damage in comparison with both CMV (VT 7.33 ± 0.20 mL/kg) and HFOV at lower frequencies (10 Hz; VT 2.54 mL/kg) [21].

This concept has also been evaluated recently in preterm infants by Zannin et al. using increasing frequencies while applying higher oscillatory amplitudes to maintain a constant DCO2 [47]. In this study, VThf was measured and found to take lower values at higher frequencies. The use of the highest frequency that maintains adequate ventilation in patients with diffuse alveolar damage has been proposed as the optimal approach following correct lung recruitment [21, 48, 49]. Even when higher delta pressures (ΔPhf) are administered at the airway opening, this pressure is increasingly dampened along the endotracheal tube at higher frequencies, so it is minimal in the distal airway.

The incorporation of VG on HFOV results in lower VThf fluctuations with greater ventilation stability [17], which implies a further improvement obtained through this strategy.

The use of VG on HFOV at standard frequencies (7–12 Hz) has also been extended to other neonatal units, yielding less fluctuation in oxygen saturation and PCO2 levels [19, 50,51,52].

In the present study, the combination of the earlier use of HFOV with a strategy involving higher frequencies and a lower tidal volume was associated with a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. This effect was particularly evident in patients with a gestational age of less than 29 weeks, probably because they are at an earlier stage of pulmonary development in which preventing ventilator-induced lung injury plays a key role in reducing the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In this group of extremely immature infants, we found that the modifications to the HFOV management strategy were associated with at least a 48% increase in SF-BPD (Table 6).

Although our results have been adjusted for perinatal risk factors, it should be borne in mind that the earlier use of HFOV in the new strategy period may have given rise to more severe respiratory distress syndrome in patients treated using this method at 3 days old in the baseline period. What we can infer with more certainty is that the combination of these two strategies, the earlier use of HFOV together with a reduced VThf and higher frequencies, is associated with an increase in SF-BPD.

There is increasing evidence that pulmonary overdistension secondary to the use of high tidal volumes is the determining factor in VILI and therefore a pathogenic factor in the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [53, 54]. Alveolar overdistension is often due to heterogeneous pulmonary recruitment where, despite a relatively low tidal volume, said volume is only distributed over the recruited areas, producing overdistension in these zones while the rest of the lung remains atelectatic. This is why it is so important to achieve optimal pulmonary recruitment, with HFOV being the most suitable ventilator mode because it allows for standardized recruitment maneuvers with minimum pressure changes over the respiratory cycle, thus maintaining a constant lung volume [55, 56].

Therefore, although the best protection against VILI is to avoid intubation by employing noninvasive strategies [57, 58], we believe that HFOV applied at high frequencies and with a low VThf can currently be considered the best way to protect against lung damage in preterm infants who need to be connected to a ventilator.

The main limitation of this study is that it is observational and the patients have been compared from two different time periods. As such, some other differences that occurred between these periods could have influenced the results. In fact, the surfactant administration technique was modified and noninvasive ventilation was used more frequently in the second period with the new strategy which meant that the subjects in each period had different baseline characteristics. Also, VG on HFOV was only employed in the second period, and it could also have had an impact on BPD reduction. To the best of our knowledge, only one small study has analyzed the long-term impact of HFOV combined with VG, and the authors observed a reduction in the combined outcome of death or BPD [51]. But it should be noted that the VG group in this study had a higher gestational age and there were fewer patients. We believe that VG enables greater tidal volume stability and facilitates management on HFOV, yet the lower incidence of DBP observed in the present study cannot be attributed solely to the implementation of VG, but also to the combination of all lung protective strategies.

Another aspect to consider is the multifactorial origin of this pathology and that in this study only assessed VILI, so we cannot rule out the interaction of other factors even though all outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders.

Another noteworthy point is that this is a single-center study, in which the only ventilator used in HFOV+VG mode was the Babylog® VN500, so VThf values may differ from those required when using another device.

In conclusion, we found that the early use of HFOV with a very low VThf and at very high frequencies was associated with a reduced incidence of grade 2–3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia in our population, particularly in higher risk patients such as those with a gestational age of less than 29 weeks.