Skip to main content
Log in

Technology challenges in screening single gene disorders

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The completion of the human genome project and the accelerated discovery of genes responsible for single gene disorders will allow for the preventive screening of carriers and patients. Accuracy and reliability of analytic tests are major demands on technologies used in a diagnostic screening environment. The consistency of results and the potential of multiplexing suggest mass spectrometry as the method of choice for large-scale genetic screening programs. The added ability to analyze other large molecules such as peptides and proteins further underlines the versatility and usefulness of this technology. We describe the use of mass spectrometry for screening of sickle cell disease at the level of DNA and protein. Conclusion:analytic methods are needed for large-scale screening and diagnostic applications that are highly accurate, fully automated and cost-effective. The precise measurement of molecular weights and the use of high fidelity enzymes to produce diagnostic products make mass spectrometry the method of choice for DNA and protein screening procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MALDI-TOF MS :

matrix assisted laser desorption ionization—time of flight mass spectrometry

SNP :

single nucleotide polymorphism

References

  1. Braun A, Little DP, Koester H (1997) Detecting CFTR gene mutations by using primer oligo base extension and mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 43: 1151–1158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buetow KH, Edmonson M, MacDonald R, Clifford R, Yip P, Kelley J, Little DP, Strausberg R, Koester H, Cantor CR, Braun A (2001) High-throughput development and characterization of a genome-wide collection of gene-based single nucleotide markers by chip-based matrix-assisted laser desorption / ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. PNAS 98: 581–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charrow J, Goodman SI, McCabe ERG, Rinaldo P (2000) ACMG/ASHG Statement. Tandem mass spectrometry in newborn screening. Genet Med 2: 267–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dequeker E, Cassiman JJ (2000) Genetic testing and quality control in diagnostic laboratories. Nat Genet 25: 259–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dequeker E, Ramsden S, Grody WW, Stenzel TT, Barton DE (2001) Quality control in molecular genetic testing. Nat Rev Genet 2: 717–723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaback MM (2000) Population-based genetic screening for reproductive counseling: the Tay-Sachs disease model. Eur J Pediatr 159[Suppl 3]: S192–S195

  7. McGovern MM, Benach MO, Wallenstein S, Desnick RJ, Keenlyside R (1999) Quality assurance in molecular genetic testing laboratories. JAMA 281: 835–840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weatherall DJ, Clegg JB (2001) Inherited haemoglobin disorders: an increasing global health problem. Bull World Health Org 79: 704–712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Braun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braun, A., Roth, R. & McGinniss, M.J. Technology challenges in screening single gene disorders. Eur J Pediatr 162 (Suppl 1), S13–S16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1343-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1343-3

Keywords

Navigation