Abstract
Modern genetic testing relies on a wide spectrum of cytogenetic and molecular genetic methods. The decision as to which method and application achieves the best diagnostic result is made by the medical expert based on a suspected diagnosis. Diverse processing steps have to be passed till a clinical diagnosis is finally secured, especially for genetically heterogeneous diseases like neuromuscular disorders. The accomplished diagnostic pipeline may be carried out by multiple processing units or in one centralized facility offering the whole sample workflow. The challenges for such diagnostic units are diverse. On one side, they have to generate and maintain a validated, standardized workflow meeting the highest quality requirements. Additionally, the ability to adjust to the changing field of genetic testing methods, to process urgent samples (e.g., from pregnant women), or to deal with uncommon sample material still has to be guaranteed. Here, we describe how methods for genetic testing are applied for diagnostics, the creation of a standardized sample workflow for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based diagnostic gene panels, and how a high degree of automation and quality may be achieved while flexibility is retained.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Koboldt DC, Steinberg KM, Larson DE, Wilson RK, Mardis ER. The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell. 2013;155:27–38.
Practice BTP. The Economic and Functional Impacts of Genetic and Genomic Clinical Laboratory Testing in the United States. 2012.
United Health, Center for Health Reform & Modernization. Personalized medicine: trends and prospects for the new science of genetic testing and molecular diagnostics; 2012. http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/~/media/UHG/PDF/2012/UNH-Working-Paper-7.ashx
Norwitz ER, Levy B. Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(2):48–62.
Carr DF, Alfirevic A, Pirmohamed M. Pharmacogenomics: current state-of-the-art. Genes (Basel). 2014;5(2):430–43.
Raphael BJ. Chapter 6: structural variation and medical genomics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(12):e1002821.
Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch K, Feuk L, Perry G, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature. 2006;444:444–54.
Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Dunning M, Ingle CE, Beazley C, et al. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science. 2007;315:848–53.
Gijsbers AC, Ruivenkamp CA. Molecular karyotyping: from microscope to SNP arrays. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;76(3):208–13.
Breman AM, Bi WM, Cheung SW. Prenatal diagnosis by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the clinical laboratory setting. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2009;41(4):500–4.
Pearson PL. Historical development of analysing large-scale changes in the human genome. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115(3–4):198–204.
Katsanis SH, Katsanis N. Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:415–26.
Davidson CJ, Zeringer E, Champion KJ, Gauthier MP, Wang F, Boonyaratanakornkit J, Jones JR, Schreiber E. Improving the limit of detection for Sanger sequencing: a comparison of methodologies for KRAS variant detection. Biotechniques. 2012;53(3):182–8.
Tsiatis AC, Norris-Kirby A, Rich RG, Hafez MJ, Gocke CD, Eshleman JR, Murphy KM. Comparison of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and melting curve analysis for the detection of KRAS mutations: diagnostic and clinical implications. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12(4):425–32.
Gerstung M, Papaemmanuil E, Campbell PJ. Subclonal variant calling with multiple samples and prior knowledge. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1198–204.
Laing NG. Genetics of neuromuscular disorders. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2012;49:33–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hadaschik, D., Singh, Y., Biskup, S. (2015). Genetic Testing: An Industrial Perspective. In: Schneider, S., Brás, J. (eds) Movement Disorder Genetics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17223-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17223-1_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17222-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17223-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)