Advertisement

Brain Structure and Function

, Volume 222, Issue 8, pp 3477–3490 | Cite as

Risk and protective factors for structural brain ageing in the eighth decade of life

  • Stuart J. Ritchie
  • Elliot M. Tucker-Drob
  • Simon R. Cox
  • David Alexander Dickie
  • Maria del C. Valdés Hernández
  • Janie Corley
  • Natalie A. Royle
  • Paul Redmond
  • Susana Muñoz Maniega
  • Alison Pattie
  • Benjamin S. Aribisala
  • Adele M. Taylor
  • Toni-Kim Clarke
  • Alan J. Gow
  • John M. Starr
  • Mark E. Bastin
  • Joanna M. Wardlaw
  • Ian J. Deary
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

Individuals differ markedly in brain structure, and in how this structure degenerates during ageing. In a large sample of human participants (baseline n = 731 at age 73 years; follow-up n = 488 at age 76 years), we estimated the magnitude of mean change and variability in changes in MRI measures of brain macrostructure (grey matter, white matter, and white matter hyperintensity volumes) and microstructure (fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity from diffusion tensor MRI). All indices showed significant average change with age, with considerable heterogeneity in those changes. We then tested eleven socioeconomic, physical, health, cognitive, allostatic (inflammatory and metabolic), and genetic variables for their value in predicting these differences in changes. Many of these variables were significantly correlated with baseline brain structure, but few could account for significant portions of the heterogeneity in subsequent brain change. Physical fitness was an exception, being correlated both with brain level and changes. The results suggest that only a subset of correlates of brain structure are also predictive of differences in brain ageing.

Keywords

Ageing Longitudinal Structural MRI Genetic Lifestyle Prediction 

Introduction

Human brain structure shows several changes as people age. Healthy brain tissue atrophies in later life, with average losses of around 0.5% of total brain volume per year (Fotenos et al. 2005). Features such as white matter hyperintensities increase in size (Schmidt et al. 2005). Changes in white matter microstructure, measured using diffusion tensor (DT) MRI, also occur, with white matter tracts showing decreases in fractional anisotropy (FA; indicating the directional coherence of the movement of water molecules in the tracts; Kochunov et al. 2012) and increases in mean diffusivity (MD; indicating the average molecular motion in the tracts; Hsu et al. 2010; Muñoz Maniega et al. In press). Alterations in these key neural parameters have been linked to decreases in cognitive ability (Kloppenborg et al. 2014; Lövdén et al. 2014; Ritchie et al. 2015a, b), and thus may form part of the neural basis of ageing-related cognitive decline (Salthouse 2011). Since cognitive decline—even without dementia—is an increasing economic and social burden in Western countries (Brayne 2007), understanding the predictors of later-life brain changes is of growing importance. Understanding why some individuals’ brains age more healthily than others’—that is, investigating what some researchers have termed “brain maintenance” (Nyberg et al. 2012)—is a critical step toward designing treatments and interventions to ameliorate cognitive decline.

Previous cross-sectional studies have discovered correlations between differences in adult brain macro- and micro-structure and lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption (Hudkins et al. 2012; Oscar-Berman and Marinković 2007), health conditions (Qiu 2014; Raz et al. 2003), physical fitness (Sexton et al. 2015), allostatic load (a measure of accumulated stress; Booth et al. 2015), and genetic factors such as the APOE e4 allele (Laukka et al. 2015) and genetic risk for schizophrenia (Staal et al. 2000). Although there is mixed evidence regarding this latter association (Liu et al. 2016; van der Auwera et al. 2015), there is reason to hypothesize that a higher load of schizophrenia-related genes may predispose individuals to poorer brain health, since strong genetic correlations have been found between schizophrenia and various cognitive abilities (Hagenaars et al. 2016).

Importantly, only some of these variables have been investigated as predictors of longitudinal changes in brain structure, and they have rarely been examined simultaneously. Poorer physical fitness (Tian et al. 2015), higher levels of glycated haemoglobin (Enzinger et al. 2005), and hypertension (Raz et al. 2003) have individually been associated with accelerated rates of brain atrophy. There is conflicting evidence for the role of the APOE e4 allele in brain tissue loss in individuals without dementia (Josephs et al. 2008; Wishart et al. 2006). Risk factors for the accumulation of white matter hyperintensities, which have been studied in more depth than changes in healthy brain tissues, tend to be vascular-related (Wardlaw et al. 2015). Very few longitudinal studies have examined predictors of later-life change in white matter diffusion parameters (see Köhncke et al. 2016, for the one example of which we are aware). The distinction between cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of brain ageing is important: in cross-sectional studies, it is not possible to differentiate between developmental processes that occur in earlier periods of life from effects that are specifically ageing-related (Tucker-Drob and Salthouse 2011).

The present study reports an analysis of predictors of change in brain volumes (grey matter, normal-appearing white matter, and white matter hyperintensities) and diffusion parameters (latent general factors of fractional anisotropy and of mean diffusivity, extracted from diffusion tensor imaging of multiple white matter tracts across the brain; see Methods) between age 73 and 76 years. We selected a wide range of potential predictors on the basis of the literature surveyed above, examining health, fitness, lifestyle, cognitive, socioeconomic, and genetic variables. In order to reduce the numerous predictor variables to a manageable number, where possible we extracted latent variables that indexed shared variance between groups of predictors. The final predictor list was the following: sex, physical fitness, allostatic load, health conditions, socioeconomic status, prior intelligence, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, APOE e4 status, and polygenic risk for schizophrenia. We tested the predictors’ relation to brain changes. First, we examined the value of each predictor individually. Second, we used penalized regression (Zou and Hastie 2005) to create parsimonious multivariate models that predicted each brain outcome from an optimal combination of predictors.

Materials and methods

Participants

The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary et al. 2007, 2012) is a longitudinal study of ageing based in the Edinburgh and Lothians area of Scotland, United Kingdom. Participants were invited to join the study on the basis of their participation, at age 11, in the Scottish Mental Survey of 1947, during which most had completed a test of general intelligence (see below). They were followed up in later life and have so far completed three waves of later-life testing. At the first wave, in 2004–2007, participants were aged 69.53 years on average (SD = 0.83; n = 1,091; 543 females). At the second wave, in 2007–2010, they were aged 72.49 years (SD = 0.71; n = 866; 418 females). At the third wave, in 2011–2014, they were aged 76.25 years (SD = 0.68, n = 697; 337 females). The majority of the ‘predictor’ variables in the present study, described below, were measured at the second testing wave.

At the second and third waves, the participants were also invited to attend for a structural and diffusion tensor brain scan (Wardlaw et al. 2011). 731 participants (343 females) were scanned at the second wave (mean age: 72.68 years; SD = 0.72), and 488 (228 females) were scanned at the third wave (mean age: 76.38 years; SD = 0.65). Different amounts of usable data were obtained for each of the brain measures: the valid sample sizes for each measure are shown in Table 2.

The study was approved by the Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee for Scotland (MREC/01/0/56) and the Lothian Research Ethics Committee (LREC/2003/2/29). All participants completed written informed consent forms before any cognitive, MRI, or other measurements were taken.

Measures

MRI scanning

All participants were scanned using the same scanner (1.5 T GE Signa Horizon HDx; General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA), using the same protocol, at both waves. The full imaging protocol is described elsewhere (Wardlaw et al. 2011).

Brain volumetric measures

We measured brain volumes (specifically grey matter, normal-appearing white matter, and white matter hyperintensity volumes) using a validated multispectral image processing method that combines T1-, T2-, T2*-, and FLAIR-weighted MRI sequences for segmentation (based on a previous method; Valdés Hernández et al. 2010). According to STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE), we explicitly defined white matter hyperintensities as punctate, focal, or diffuse lesions in all subcortical regions (Wardlaw et al. 2013). We manually checked all segmented images for accuracy blinded to all participant characteristics, corrected errors, and excluded imaging-detected infarcts from white matter hyperintensity volumes (Wang et al. 2012). White matter hyperintensity volume was log-transformed before inclusion in the analyses, since it had a right–skewed distribution (that is, many participants had few hyperintensities). White matter hyperintensities are illustrated as the crosshatched areas in Fig. 1, alongside the diffusion-tensor measures described below. Note that the analyses below are performed on the total tissue volumes; when adjusting these volumes for intracranial volume, the pattern of results—especially for longitudinal changes (the main focus of the report)—was nearly identical.

Fig. 1

Illustration of the 12 white matter tracts (five bilateral; two from the corpus callosum) measured using probabilistic neighborhood tractography in one Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 study participant (in color). Also shown are the volumetrically-estimated white matter hyperintensities observed in this participant (crosshatched). Tracts and hyperintensities are displayed inside the participant’s spatially-registered T1-weighted brain volume

White matter diffusion-tensor measures

All diffusion MRI data were converted from DICOM (http://dicom.nema.org/) to NIfTI-1 (http://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/nifti-1/) format using TractoR tools (http://www.tractor-mri.org.uk; Clayden et al. 2011), and pre-processed with FSL tools (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/; Jenkinson et al. 2012) in order to extract the brain, eliminate bulk patient motion and eddy current-induced artifacts, and estimate FA and MD in each brain voxel. The underlying connectivity data was generated using BedpostX/ProbTrackX (Behrens et al. 2007), with a two-fiber model and 5000 streamlines to reconstruct tracts of interest.

As described in detail previously (Ritchie et al. 2015a), 12 tracts of interest were identified in each participant using probabilistic neighborhood tractography, an automatic tract segmentation method with good reproducibility (Clayden et al. 2009). The 12 tracts segmented were the genu and splenium of corpus callosum; the bilateral cingulum cingulate gyri; the arcuate, uncinate, and inferior longitudinal fasciculi; and the anterior thalamic radiations. Tract-averaged values of MD and FA, weighted by connection probability, were generated for each pathway in those tracts that were visually assessed to be anatomically plausible representations of the fasciculus of interest. The tracts are illustrated in color in Fig. 1.

At each scanning wave, we estimated latent general factors of FA and MD from tract-averaged estimates from each of the measured tracts. These general factors capture the shared variance in FA or MD across multiple tracts. Similar analyses have been used in several previous studies of white matter microstructure (Ritchie et al. 2015a; Bender et al. 2016). All latent variable loadings were highly significant and mostly moderate-to-large in size, except for the loading of MD in the splenium of the corpus callosum on general MD at each wave, which were weak (0.200 at age 73 and 0.275 at age 76). For this reason, we did not use this tract as part of the general MD factor, reducing the number of indicators for MD at each wave to 11. All 12 tracts were used to indicate the general FA factor at both waves.

Predictors of brain change

We selected 11 candidate predictors of brain change. For four of the predictors, we created latent variables from multiple manifest indicators. Physical fitness comprised grip strength in the dominant hand (measured on a Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer), forced expiratory volume in 1s (measured using a Micro Medical Spriometer), and 6-metre walk time, all measured at age 73. All three physical variables were adjusted for height. Allostatic load, a variable theoretically representing ‘wear and tear’ on bodily systems (McEwen 1998), was indicated by a variety of inflammatory biomarkers (fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6) and metabolic biomarkers (triglycerides, glycated haemoglobin, low- and high-density lipoprotein, and body mass index), all derived from blood samples or direct measurements taken at age 73 (Booth et al. 2015). Socioeconomic status was indicated by the participant’s father’s occupational class at their birth in 1936, the participant’s own highest achieved occupational class before retirement, and the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, a government-collected, neighborhood-level indicator of social deprivation, estimated for the present participants at age 70 (Executive 2006). Prior intelligence was indicated by the participant’s scores on three tests: the Moray House Test No. 12 (Scottish Council for Research in Education 1949), taken at age 11, the National Adult Reading Test (Nelson and Willison 1991), and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (Wechsler 2001). The latter two tests were taken at age 70, during the first wave of the study.

The remaining seven predictors were included in the model as manifest (i.e. single) variables. Sex was indicated at entry to the study. Health conditions were measured as a sum of the number of the following conditions the participants reported suffering from: diabetes, hypertension, stroke, and cardiovascular disease (since these were all binary variables, we chose to calculate a sum rather than a latent variable). Education was self-reported by the participants as the number of years of formal, full-time education the participants completed. Smoking status was recorded as current, ex-, or never, reported at age 73. Alcohol consumption was recorded as grams per week, as reported on a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire at age 70 (this variable was log-transformed to normalize its distribution). Apolipoprotein (APOE) e4 genotype was derived from blood samples using TaqMan technology at the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility Genetics Core at the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. The APOE variable used here classifies participants into ‘no e4 alleles’ versus ‘one or two e4 alleles’. Finally, each participant’s regression-weighted polygenic risk score for schizophrenia was derived from single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping, using summary data from the most recent genome-wide association study for schizophrenia (Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 2014; see previous work in this sample by McIntosh et al. 2013, for more details about risk score calculation). For the present study, we used the most liberal SNP inclusion threshold (all SNPs, p = 1.00). When using the polygenic score, we also included four multidimensional scaling components to control for population stratification. Participants also completed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; Folstein et al. 1975) at both waves. This was used as part of a secondary analysis, described below.

Statistical analyses

We estimated three structural equation models, each including different brain measurements as the dependent variables. These were change score models (McArdle 2009), which allow the assessment of levels (in this case, the brain’s baseline status at age 73) and changes across two measurement waves (brain changes between age 73 and age 76).

Model 1 had as its dependent variables three brain volumetric changes: changes in the volumes of grey matter, normal-appearing white matter, and white matter hyperintensities. Model 2 used the FA values from the DT-MRI scans, producing a latent variable of general FA across the 12 tracts at each scanning wave, and a latent change score variable (ΔFA) indexing the FA change across the waves. Model 3 used the MD values from the same DT-MRI scans, producing a latent variable of cross-wave MD change (ΔMD). Figure 2 shows a simplified diagram of the model. For general FA and MD, we imposed strong measurement invariance across the waves (that is, we constrained the loadings and intercepts of each tract to equality across wave, under the assumption that the same latent trait was being measured across waves; see Widaman et al. 2010; Ritchie et al. 2015a) Since there was a small amount of within-wave age variability, models adjusted the brain variables for the participant’s age in days at the time of scanning. For each of the three models, we tested the association of brain baseline levels and changes with each individual predictor variable (some of which were latent variables, and some of which were manifest, as described above), by regressing the brain outcome on each predictor separately. All of these analyses also adjusted for sex. Structural equation modeling was performed in Mplus v7.3 (Muthén and Muthén 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014), and used full-information maximum likelihood estimation in order to use all of the available data.

Fig. 2

Simplified diagram of the structural equation model for the general fractional anisotropy (FA) variable. FA in white matter tracts 1–12 was measured at baseline (age 73) and follow-up (age 76), and a General FA factor extracted at each wave. From these a latent change score variable (Δ General FA) was calculated. Then, each of the predictor variables was assessed for its relation with baseline level (path A) and change (path B). The equivalent model for general mean diffusivity used only 11 tracts. The equivalent models for grey matter volume, white matter volume, and white matter hyperintensity volume did not use latent factors at each wave

Next, we produced simultaneous, multivariate regression models that included a combination of the most appropriate predictor variables for each brain outcome. Methods of producing such models include forwards and backwards stepwise regression, but these can lead to overfitting, and thus a lower likelihood of findings that are replicable in independent datasets. For this reason, we used a penalized regression method, the elastic net (Zou and Hastie 2005), which combines the advantages of least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression (production of a parsimonious model by removing irrelevant variables) and ridge regression (good performance in the presence of collinear predictors, as was the case in our dataset; Morozova et al. 2015). These analyses were performed using the ‘glmnet’ package for R (Friedman et al. 2010), with 10-fold cross-validation. We bootstrapped each model 1000 times, including in the final model only those variables that had a non-zero coefficient in 50% or more of the iterations. Thus, we selected variables that were stably chosen by the estimator as relevant predictors of each neuroanatomical outcome. We took these selected predictors and simultaneously entered them into the latent difference score models to produce the results described below.

Results

Full descriptive statistics and valid sample sizes for all measures, along with the loadings of each variable on its factor (where applicable) are presented in Tables 1 (for predictors) and 2 (for brain parameters). Correlations among the predictor variables are shown in Table 3.

Table 1

Descriptive statistics and factor loadings for predictor variables

Variable category

Measured variable

n

Mean (SD) or n for categorical measures

Factor loading

Physical fitness (latent)

Grip strength

823

28.54 (9.39)

0.393

Forced expiratory volume

856

2.30 (0.68)

0.458

6 m walk time

860

4.35 (1.32)

0.482

Allostatic load (latent)

Fibrinogen

819

3.25 (0.61)

0.482

C-reactive protein

830

4.94 (7.84)

0.506

Interleukin-6

815

2.05 (1.73)

0.585

Triglycerides

832

1.65 (0.82)

0.314

Glycated haemoglobin

826

5.75 (0.66)

0.376

Low-density lipoprotein

829

2.93 (1.04)

0.251

High-density lipoprotein

832

1.46 (0.44)

0.341

Body mass index

866

27.92 (4.45)

0.402

Socioeconomic status (latent)

Father’s occupational class (1–5)*

960

2.91 (0.94)

0.372

Own occupational class (1–5)*

1091

3.54 (1.20)

0.505

Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (1–8)*

1083

6.25 (2.09)

0.540

Prior intelligence (latent)

Moray House Test (age 11)

1028

100 (15.00)

0.731

NART (max. 50)

864

34.38 (8.18)

0.958

WTAR (max. 50)

864

41.01 (6.97)

0.944

Manifest (single) predictors

Health conditions (0–4)

854

0.95 (0.91)

Education (years)*

1091

10.74 (1.13)

Smoking

866

415 never; 378 ex; 73 current

Alcohol (g per week)*

928

11.98 (16.79)

APOE e4

1028

306 with 1 or 2 e4 alleles; 722 with no e4 alleles

Polygenic risk for SCZ

953

0.49 (0.02)

Dementia screening

MMSE age 73 (max. 30)

865

28.75 (1.42)

MMSE age 76 (max. 30)

697

28.65 (1.70)

*Variables collected at age 70; all other variables collected at age 73, unless otherwise noted

Table 2

Descriptive statistics and factor loadings for brain measurements

Measured variable

Wave 2 (age 73)

Wave 3 (age 76)

n

M (SD)

Factor loading

n

M (SD)

Grey matter volume (cm3)

657

472.43 (44.68)

461

465.67 (43.61)

White matter volume (cm3)

657

476.89 (50.55)

461

464.25 (53.09)

White matter hyperintensity volume (cm3)

656

12.23 (12.18)

464

15.85 (14.57)

Corpus callosum genu FA

646

0.41 (0.05)

0.602

438

0.38 (0.04)

Corpus callosum splenium FA

663

0.49 (0.07)

0.338

437

0.51 (0.07)

L arcuate fasciculus FA

639

0.45 (0.04)

0.648

455

0.43 (0.04)

R arcuate fasciculus FA

580

0.43 (0.04)

0.613

414

0.41 (0.04)

L anterior thalamic radiation FA

556

0.32 (0.03)

0.642

429

0.33 (0.03)

R anterior thalamic radiation FA

643

0.33 (0.03)

0.657

453

0.34 (0.03)

L rostral cingulum FA

641

0.44 (0.05)

0.596

448

0.44 (0.05)

R rostral cingulum FA

650

0.39 (0.04)

0.551

448

0.41 (0.05)

L uncinate fasciculus FA

567

0.33 (0.03)

0.680

407

0.34 (0.03)

R uncinate fasciculus FA

628

0.33 (0.03)

0.670

443

0.33 (0.03)

L inferior longitudinal fasciculus FA

663

0.40 (0.05)

0.510

455

0.39 (0.06)

R inferior longitudinal fasciculus FA

664

0.38 (0.05)

0.480

462

0.38 (0.05)

Corpus callosum genu MD

646

770.05 (66.05)

0.659

438

850.28 (82.99)

Corpus callosum splenium MD

663

978.47 (173.32)

-

437

852.01 (153.16)

L arcuate fasciculus MD

639

659.50 (47.60)

0.686

455

699.45 (58.14)

R arcuate fasciculus MD

580

646.35 (52.29)

0.715

414

681.46 (58.21)

L anterior thalamic radiation MD

556

758.24 (66.00)

0.653

429

795.90 (66.85)

R anterior thalamic radiation MD

643

754.29 (62.44)

0.738

453

791.45 (86.75)

L rostral cingulum MD

641

648.13 (45.64)

0.557

448

673.84 (46.71)

R rostral cingulum MD

650

651.92 (45.08)

0.618

448

663.39 (42.12)

L uncinate fasciculus MD

567

770.37 (53.82)

0.643

407

794.30 (57.22)

R uncinate fasciculus MD

628

756.31 (52.30)

0.703

443

796.54 (58.11)

L inferior longitudinal fasciculus MD

663

771.85 (100.10)

0.426

455

826.54 (143.47)

R inferior longitudinal fasciculus MD

664

772.20 (101.48)

0.414

462

801.15 (122.90)

Factor loadings were invariant across waves. The splenium had a low loading for MD and so was not included in the general factor

FA fractional anisotropy; MD mean diffusivity; L/R left/right hemisphere

Table 3

Associations (standardized betas) among latent and manifest predictor variables, estimated within a structural equation model

Variable

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

1. Sex (male)

         

2. Physical fitness

0.01

        

3. Allostatic load

−0.02

−0.68***

       

4. Health conditions

0.11**

−0.36***

0.37***

      

5. Socioeconomic status

0.05

0.38***

−0.35***

−0.11*

     

6. Prior intelligence

−0.09**

0.26***

−0.20***

−0.09**

0.69***

    

7. Education

0.01

0.16**

−0.17***

−0.08*

0.71***

0.55***

   

8. Smoking

−0.08*

−0.27***

0.25***

0.05

−0.21***

−0.07*

−0.11**

  

9. Alcohol consumption

0.35***

0.12*

−0.18***

−0.05

0.35***

0.19***

0.19***

0.03

 

10. APOE e4

0.04

0.08

−0.07

−0.03

0.04

0.03

0.002

−0.06

0.03

11. Polygenic risk for schizophrenia

0.04

−0.03

−0.02

−0.04

−0.003

−0.07

−0.02

0.06

0.06

−0.01

*p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001. = latent variable predictor

All brain measures showed statistically significant mean change across the 3 years of the study (all p values <0.001). The models implied that grey matter volume change was −0.07 SDs/year (−0.64% change/year). Normal-appearing white matter volume change was −0.10 SDs/year (−1.01%/year). White matter hyperintensity volume change was +0.11 SDs/year (+11.04%/year). General FA change was −0.09 SDs/year. General MD change was +0.34 SDs/year. Each of the brain changes is illustrated in Fig. 3; although mean change was observed, there was substantial between-person variation in the magnitude of these changes.

Fig. 3

Change in each brain measure between age 73 and age 76 years, showing an individual point for each participant at the first scanning wave (left, red cluster) and the second (right, purple cluster). Participants who returned for the second scan have their points connected with a grey line. For comparison, all measurements are shown on a standardized scale

The base models for general FA and MD had adequate fit to the data (general FA: χ 2(251) = 639.44, p < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.047, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.914, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.906; general MD: χ 2(207) = 618.86, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.059, CFI = 0.917, TLI = 0.907). Note that the base model for the three brain volumetric variables was saturated and thus had perfect fit to the data by definition.

Individual predictors of brain structure baseline level and change

We regressed each brain baseline level and change variable on each of the predictors separately (also controlling for sex in each case; the effect of sex alone was also examined). The results of these analyses are shown in Fig. 4 (all values are provided in Supplementary Tables S1 for baseline level and Supplementary Table S2 for change). All results are reported with the brain outcomes scaled such that higher scores indicate healthier baseline levels (more grey and white matter, higher general FA, lower hyperintensity volume and lower general MD) and healthier changes (less decline in grey matter, white matter, and general FA; shallower increases in hyperintensity volume and general MD). That is, positive associations suggest healthier ageing and negative correlations suggest less healthy ageing.

Fig. 4

Associations of each predictor with baseline levels of (left) and changes in (right) each brain measure (all associations adjusted for age and sex). Brain variables scaled such that positive associations (green) indicate healthier brain baseline levels and brain ageing, and negative associations (red) indicate unhealthier brain baseline levels and brain ageing. Hyperintensity = white matter hyperintensity; FA fractional anisotropy; MD mean diffusivity. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction; aeffect size for baseline was significantly different from effect size for change

Many associations were found between the predictors and brain baseline level in all five measures. The only variables that showed no significant relation with any baseline brain variable were alcohol consumption, APOE e4 status, and polygenic schizophrenia risk. We note that many of the predictor associations with brain baseline levels have been reported individually in previous publications on the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Booth et al. 2015; Gow et al. 2012; Ritchie et al. 2015a, b); these results are provided here so as to evaluate multiple predictors together, and as a comparison to the new results for brain changes.

For change, there were far fewer associations. Only sex was associated with change in grey matter volume, with males declining faster. There were no significant relations with change in general FA. Some predictors had value, as shown in Fig. 4: physical fitness was significantly associated with healthier ageing in white matter volume and general MD, the APOE e4 allele was linked to less healthy changes in white matter and white matter hyperintensity volume, among some other, borderline associations. Importantly however, these results are uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Introducing a per-outcome false discovery rate correction (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995) reduced all change associations to non-significance except the association of sex with grey matter change, and the association of physical fitness with change in general MD (see dagger signs in Fig. 4).

We next explored the degree of correspondence between predictors of level and predictors of change. We did this in two ways. First, for those predictors that were significant (uncorrected) for either level or change, we tested whether the effect sizes for level and for change were significantly different from one another. As shown by the ‘a’ superscript in Fig. 4, we found that many of the associations that were significant for level were significantly different from the corresponding association for change (for example, the associations of SES, prior intelligence, and education with the volumetric measures). Some of the significant associations with change (namely the APOE e4 allele and the schizophrenia polygenic profile score) were significantly larger than those for level. Second, we tested the correlation of the vector of effect sizes for baseline level with the vector of effect sizes for change. Across all effect sizes for all brain variables, there was only a modest, non-significant correlation between the effect sizes (r(53) = 0.27, p = 0.05), suggesting relatively poor correspondence between the effect sizes. Overall, this indicated that obtaining a significant effect for a correlate of levels of late life brain structure cannot be regarded as prima facie evidence that the variable is a similarly-effective predictor of ageing-related structural change.

Models with multiple predictors of baseline brain structure and change

The elastic net regression procedure selected variables to include in the simultaneous-predictor models, keeping each model as parsimonious as possible (Table 4). As shown previously (Morozova et al. 2015), penalized regression procedures often select variables that are not incrementally significant in a regression model, but that nonetheless reduce the mean squared error if they are included. This was the case for our models: the selection procedure selected several variables that were not significant in the model (the unbolded coefficients in Table 4). With only a few differences, the change results from the individual analyses remained intact in these simultaneous models: physical fitness and APOE e4 status remained the most substantial predictors of brain change, although some factors that were not previously statistically significant, such as alcohol consumption (in this case associated with white matter hyperintensity progression) became significant in the simultaneous model.

Table 4

Results from the simultaneous models, after variable selection by elastic net

Outcome type

Predictor

Association with brain outcomes

Grey matter volume

Normal-appearing white matter volume

White matter hyperintensity volume

General fractional anisotropy

General mean diffusivity

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Brain baseline level

Sex (male)

0.609

0.026

<0.001†

0.576

0.033

<0.001†

      

0.078

0.047

0.098

Physical fitness

0.042

0.056

0.457

0.019

0.066

0.768

0.144

0.066

0.029

0.180

0.069

0.009

0.181

0.074

0.015

Allostatic load

−0.174

0.044

<0.001

−0.101

0.048

0.035

   

−0.095

0.053

0.072

   

Health conditions

−0.059

0.035

0.094

−0.029

0.040

0.466

   

0.100

0.042

0.017

   

SES

0.054

0.055

0.330

0.173

0.059

0.004†

   

0.047

0.068

0.489

   

Prior intelligence

0.164

0.037

<0.001

0.116

0.047

0.013

   

0.094

0.052

0.069

   

Education

   

0.002

0.046

0.966

   

− 0.138

0.050

0.006

   

Alcohol consump

   

− 0.065

0.041

0.117

         

APOE e4 genotype

0.059

0.032

0.066

0.074

0.037

0.043

         

Polygenic SCZ risk

0.022

0.032

0.505

0.068

0.037

0.067

         

Brain change

Sex (male)

0.199

0.049

<0.001

0.090

0.052

0.084

         

Physical fitness

   

0.259

0.096

0.007

−0.065

0.077

0.396

   

0.346

0.103

0.001

Allostatic load

0.103

0.059

0.083

0.107

0.063

0.091

         

Health conditions

   

−0.009

0.055

0.870

      

−0.114

0.059

0.055

SES

   

0.132

0.072

0.068

         

Education

      

0.032

0.037

0.389

      

Smoking

               

Alcohol consump

      

−0.108

0.038

0.004†

      

APOE e4 genotype

   

0.152

0.050

0.002

0.080

0.035

0.023

      

Polygenic SCZ risk

   

−0.099

0.052

0.055

−0.039

0.037

0.290

   

0.120

0.059

0.041

Blank cells indicate variables that were not selected for the relevant brain outcome. Bold values are statistically significant. All brain outcomes scored such that positive associations indicate links to healthier ageing, and negative associations indicate links to unhealthy ageing

Variables not selected for inclusion in the models for any brain outcome were smoking (for brain baseline levels) and intelligence (for brain changes). p-values shown uncorrected; those values that survived per-outcome False Discovery Rate correction are indicated with a symbol

SCZ schizophrenia; SES socioeconomic status; β standardized beta

Models excluding individuals with possible dementia

Finally, we re-ran our individual-predictor-variable analyses removing sixteen individuals with mini-mental state examination (Folstein et al. 1975) scores below 24 (a commonly-used cut-off that might indicate mild cognitive impairment or dementia) at either testing wave. Whereas the vast majority of the results were very similar to those from the main analysis, there were no longer any significant baseline level associations for smoking, or any significant change associations for possession of the APOE e4 allele.

Discussion

This investigation of neurostructural changes between age 73 and age 76 makes two key contributions. First, it identifies some potentially important predictors of brain change. For example, physical fitness and APOE e4 were the most consistent predictors of differential rates of brain ageing, and are therefore promising foci for further investigation into predictions of brain change. On the whole, effect sizes for predictors of longitudinal brain change were small (all standardized β values < 0.4 for brain changes), and few were statistically significant. Predictors differed across the different neural outcomes under study, suggesting that ageing-related brain change is a multifaceted, multidetermined process (see e.g. Kievit et al. 2014). Second, the results highlight the important point that variables that are significantly associated cross-sectionally with baseline levels of neural structure do not necessarily make significant predictions about longitudinal neural changes. We found that many of the correlates of initial baseline levels of brain structure did not significantly predict subsequent rates of change in brain structure; in some cases predictor associations with change were in opposite directions from associations with baseline levels.

The fact that significant predictors of longitudinal brain changes were not always correlates of baseline levels of brain structure suggests that variables we found to be related to brain structure longitudinally but not cross-sectionally (such as APOE e4 and polygenic schizophrenia risk; though note that these were both weak associations that did not survive multiple comparisons correction) are, if causal, only likely to operate in old age, since they had not had any appreciable associations with brain structure preceding the follow-up waves of our study. Variables such as education and prior intelligence, which were related cross-sectionally but not longitudinally to brain structure, might represent correlates of developmental changes in brain structure from earlier in life, but appear not to be prospectively coupled with ageing-related changes in the indices of brain structure examined here.

Physical fitness was significantly related to healthier brain ageing in three of the five measures included here, and two of these relations (to changes in normal-appearing white matter and in general mean diffusivity) survived both the multivariate model and the MMSE exclusion. It was also one of the few variables that had a significant correlation both with baseline levels and with changes in multiple brain measures. Such results are in line with the literature on the effects of physical fitness on brain (and cognitive) ageing, some of which comes from randomized experiments and can thus test causality (Ahlskog et al. 2011). One caveat should be noted: whereas the measures we used (grip strength, lung function, and walk speed) are excellent general indicators of physical fitness (Enright et al. 2003), they may—at least partially—reflect pre-existing differences in bodily integrity (Frederiksen et al. 2002). The results do not, therefore, mean that improving physical fitness in old age will necessarily improve brain health, although they do leave open that possibility. Nevertheless, whether or not the relations we found are causal, our results show that differences in physical fitness may be informative for the prediction of future brain ageing.

Sex differences were found for grey matter both at baseline and in terms of change, but they ran in the opposite direction: males had significantly larger grey matter volume at baseline (as expected on the basis of prior studies: see the meta-analysis by Ruigrok et al. 2014), but also showed significantly greater loss of grey matter across the subsequent 3 years than females. This may be due to the ‘law of initial value’ (that the degree of change is affected by the baseline level; in this case, that individuals with initially-higher levels of a trait have ‘more to lose’ subsequently), or could represent a sex-specific ageing process, affecting males disproportionately during this period of life.

The two genetic factors we studied, the APOE e4 allele and polygenic risk for schizophrenia, showed small-sized relations to neurostructural decline. APOE e4 was linked to significantly faster decline in white matter volume and significantly faster accumulation of white matter hyperintensities (though this association did not survive multiple comparisons correction). As noted above, there has previously been mixed evidence for any detectable influence of APOE e4 on brain decline in healthy individuals (Josephs et al. 2008; Wishart et al. 2006), despite its being a well-replicated risk factor for Alzheimer’s-related brain pathology (Liu et al. 2015). It should be noted that the effects of APOE e4 were smaller in the analysis excluding individuals with low MMSE scores, implying that any APOE effects are stronger in individuals whose MMSE scores might indicate prodromal dementia (though the significant effects were small in the full sample, so this may also reflect the lower power of the secondary analysis). To our knowledge, no studies have tested the association of polygenic schizophrenia risk with longitudinal brain change. Suggestive evidence from the present study hints that polygenic schizophrenia risk may be a useful predictor of subsequent decline in brain structure (the relation did not survive multiple comparisons correction); if replicated, the reasons for this—a shared genetic aetiology (Lopez et al. 2015), or influences of schizophrenia genes on lifestyle factors that are detrimental to brain maintenance—would be uncertain. The polygenic schizophrenia risk score was chosen on the basis of work showing genetic correlations between schizophrenia and cognitive abilities, including in older age (Hagenaars et al. 2016; there have also been previous cognitive results in this sample; McIntosh et al. 2013), but polygenic risk scores for other conditions, such as stroke, may also be predictive of neurostructural changes and should be a target for future work.

Rather than relying on conventional multiple regression methods, which have biases with respect to overfitting (particularly in the presence of high multicollinearity), we used penalized regression—designed to reduce overfit—in our simultaneous models. Future studies of ageing-related brain changes could use our multivariate findings as a basis for investigations to more directly determine the replicability of these results.

All of the structural brain parameters we measured have previously been related both to baseline levels of and changes in at least some key cognitive functions, such as memory, reasoning, and processing speed (e.g. Charlton et al. 2010; Lövdén et al. 2014; Ritchie et al. 2015a, b). Future work should use more complex structural equation models to simultaneously investigate predictors of brain change alongside predictors of cognitive change: for instance, researchers could test whether fitness-related white matter changes mediate simultaneous changes in cognitive ability. Such an analysis, which is beyond the scope of the present paper, would take a step closer to a causal understanding of the antecedents and brain mechanisms of ageing-related cognitive decline (see Köhncke et al. 2016 for an example of this design with engagement in leisure activities as the predictor).

The present study is, to our knowledge, the largest-scale investigation of predictors of differential brain ageing to date. Compared to previous longitudinal studies of this nature (e.g. Enzinger et al. 2005), our sample was particularly large, enough to reduce (though not eliminate) the impact of scanner measurement noise on our estimates. We also assessed a large number of of predictors and structural indices, adding to our study’s comprehensiveness. Moreover, the narrow age range meant that the confounding effects of age were substantially reduced, and the cultural and ethnic homogeneity of the cohort limited other confounding effects. Where appropriate, we capitalized on latent variable modeling, which reduced the dimensionality of our predictors and eliminated measurement error (for instance, the use of general factors of FA and MD removed the influence of tract-specific measurement error), implementing latent difference score models of change over time.

The study has some limitations. First, our study period only lasted 3 years: such a brief period may not have resulted in substantial enough changes for us to reliably detect predictors with smaller effect sizes, even with our relatively large sample size (it is likely that the majority of the effects of these predictors are small); two waves of measurement also prevented us from examining any non-linearities in brain change. Second, healthier individuals are more likely to enroll in studies of this nature, and are less likely to drop out as the study continues. We implemented maximum likelihood estimation methods that reduce missing data bias resulting from longitudinal attrition, under the assumption that patterns of missingness in our outcomes that systematically relate to the unobserved scores on those outcomes are accounted for by non-missing scores on the variables included in our model. Nevertheless, restriction of range in baseline levels of our variables meant that we likely underestimated many effect sizes reported here. We might, for instance, have missed particularly debilitating brain change effects in individuals with very high baseline levels of allostatic load.

Third, the brain variables we used were relatively broad-brush: they indexed change in global grey and white matter, and in general white matter microstructure, but further research with finer-grained brain measures—examining particular grey matter regions or specific white matter tracts, which may themselves be more strongly linked to certain cognitive abilities—is required to test hypotheses relating potential predictors to specific brain areas (Maass et al. 2015). Fourth, our predictors were all time-invariant: we focused on the predictive value of measurements made at age 73 for declines in neural health between 73 and 76. However, a number of the parameters—such as physical fitness, allostatic load, and alcohol consumption—also change over time. Future studies should investigate whether changes in these parameters are coupled with changes in any of the brain markers assessed here. Additional waves of follow-up in the LBC1936 should allow us greater power to detect correlations with time-varying covariates (Rast and Hofer 2014).

This study investigated predictors of differential brain ageing between age 73 and 76 years. There was little correspondence between variables that were cross-sectionally associated with brain variables and those that predicted their changes, though physical fitness—among the strongest predictors in our analyses—was an exception. These results serve as a benchmark for future studies that attempt to replicate and validate the contributions of predictors of brain maintenance (Nyberg et al. 2012), and to estimate the extent to which their proximal effects on different brain structures mediate their ultimate effects on cognitive and functional decline.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the LBC1936 members for their participation. We thank Catherine Murray, Caroline Brett, and Ross Henderson for data collection and data entry; the nurses and other staff at the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility and the radiographers at the Brain Research Imaging Centre for acquisition of all MRI data; and the staff at Lothian Health Board and at the Scottish Council for Research in Education (SCRE) Centre, University of Glasgow. LBC1936 data collection was supported by the Disconnected Mind project, funded by Age UK. J.M.W. is part-funded by the Scottish Funding Council as part of the SINAPSE Collaboration (http://www.sinapse.ac.uk). The work was undertaken by The University of Edinburgh Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, part of the cross council Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Initiative (MR/K026992/1). Funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) is gratefully acknowledged. Some of the work on this paper was carried out with the assisance of a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds travel grant to author S.J.R. None of the authors have relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

429_2017_1414_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 32 KB)

References

  1. Ahlskog JE, Geda YE, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC (2011) Physical exercise as a preventive or disease-modifying treatment of dementia and brain aging. Mayo Clin Proc 86:876–884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Behrens TEJ, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations. What can we gain?. NeuroImage 23:144–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender AR, Prindle JJ, Brandmaier AM, Raz N (2016) White matter and memory in healthy adults: coupled changes over 2 years. NeuroImage. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.085 Google Scholar
  4. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  5. Booth T, Royle NA, Corley J, Gow AJ, Valdés Hernández MC, Muñoz Maniega S, Ritchie SJ, Bastin ME, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM, Deary IJ (2015) Association of allostatic load with brain structure and cognitive ability in later life. Neurobiol Aging 36:1390–1399CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Brayne C (2007) The elephant in the room—healthy brains in later life, epidemiology and public health. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:233–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlton RA, Schiavone F, Barrick TR, Morris RG, Markus HS (2010) Diffusion tensor imaging detects age related white matter change over a 2 year follow-up which is associated with working memory decline. J Neurol Psychiatr 81:1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clayden J, Storkey A, Muñoz Maniega S, Bastin ME (2009) Reproducibility of tract segmentation between sessions using an unsupervised modelling-based approach. NeuroImage 45:377–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Clayden JD, Muñoz Maniega S, Storkey AJ, Martin MD, Bastin ME, Clark CA (2011) TractoR: magnetic resonance imaging and tractography with R. J Stat Soft 44:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deary IJ, Gow AJ, Taylor MD, Corley J, Brett C, Wilson V, Campbell H, Whalley LJ, Visscher PM, Porteous DJ, Starr JM (2007) The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: a study to examine influences on cognitive ageing from age 11 to age 70 and beyond. BMC Geriatr 7:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Deary IJ, Gow AJ, Pattie A, Starr JM (2012) Cohort profile: the Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936. Int J Epidemiol 41:1576–1584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V, Tracy RP, McNamara R, Arnold A, Newman AB (2003) The 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. CHEST J 123:387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enzinger C, Fazekas F, Matthews PM, Ropele S, Schmidt H, Smith S, Schmidt R (2005) Risk factors for progression of brain atrophy in aging: 6-year follow-up of normal subjects. Neurology 64:1704–1711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fotenos AF, Snyder AZ, Girton LE, Morris JC, Buckner RL (2005) Normative estimates of cross-sectional and longitudinal brain volume decline in aging and AD. Neurology 64:1032–1039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Frederiksen H, Galst D, Petersen HC, Hjelmborg J, McGue M, Vaupel JW, Christensen K (2002) Hand grip strength: a phenotype suitable for identifying genetic variants affecting mid-and late-life physical functioning. Genet Epidemiol 23:110–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Soft 33:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gow AJ, Bastin ME, Muñoz Maniega S, Valdés Hernández S, Morris Z, Murray C, Royle NA, Starr JM, Deary IJ, Wardlaw JM (2012) Neuroprotective lifestyles and the aging brain activity, atrophy, and white matter integrity. Neurology 79:1802–1808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagenaars SP, Harris SE, Davies G, Hill WD, Liewald DC, Ritchie SJ, Deary IJ (2016) Shared genetic aetiology between cognitive functions and physical and mental health in UK Biobank (N = 112 151) and 24 GWAS consortia. Mol Psychiatr 21:1624–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu J-L, van Hecke W, Bai C-H, Lee C-H, Tsai Y-H, Chiu H-C, Jaw F-S, Hsu C-Y, Leu J-G, Chen W-H, Leemans A (2010) Microstructural white matter changes in normal aging: a diffusion tensor imaging study with higher-order polynomial regression models. NeuroImage 49:32–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hudkins M, O’Neill J, Tobias MC, Bartzokis G, London ED (2012) Cigarette smoking and white matter microstructure. Psychopharmacol 221:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM (2012) FSL. NeuroImage 62:782–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Ahmed Z, Shiung MM, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Parisi JE, Petersen RC, Dickson DW, Jack CR Jr (2008) β-amyloid burden is not associated with rates of brain atrophy. Ann Neurol 63:204–212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kievit RA, Davis SW, Mitchell DJ, Taylor JR, Duncan J, Cam-CAN Research team, Henson RN (2014) Distinct aspects of frontal lobe structure mediate age-related differences in fluid intelligence and multitasking. Nat Commun 5:5658CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kloppenborg RP, Nederkoorn PJ, Geerlings MI, van den Berg E (2014) Presence and progression of white matter hyperintensities and cognition: a meta-analysis. Neurology 82:2127–2138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kochunov P, Williamson DE, Lancaster J, Fox P, Cornell J, Blangero J, Glahn DC (2012) Fractional anisotropy of water diffusion in cerebral white matter across the lifespan. Neurobiol Aging 33:9–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Köhncke Y, Laukka EJ, Brehmer Y, Kalpouzos G, Li TQ, Fratiglioni L, Lövdén M (2016) Three-year changes in leisure activities are associated with concurrent changes in white matter microstructure and perceptual speed in individuals aged 80 years and older. Neurobiol Aging 41:173–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Laukka EJ, Lövdén M, Kalpouzos G, Papenberg G, Keller L, Graff C, Li T-Q, Fratiglioni L, Bäckman L (2015) Microstructural white matter properties mediate the association between APOE and perceptual speed in very old persons without dementia. Plos One 10:e0134766CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Yu JT, Wang HF, Han PR, Tan CC, Wang C, Meng XF, Riascher SL, Saykin AJ, Tan L (2015) APOE genotype and neuroimaging markers of Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 86:127–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu B, Zhang X, Cui Y, Qin W, Tao Y, Li J, Jiang T (2016) Polygenic risk for schizophrenia influences cortical gyrification in 2 independent general populations. Schiz Bull doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw051 Google Scholar
  31. Lopez LM et al (2015) Genes from a translational analysis support a multifactorial nature of white matter hyperintensities. Stroke 46:341–347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lövdén M, Köhnke Y, Laukka EJ, Kalpouzous G, Salami A, Li T-Q, Fratiglioni L, Bäckman L (2014) Changes in perceptual speed and white matter microstructure in the corticospinal tract are associated in very old age. NeuroImage 102:520–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Maass A, Düzel S, Brigadski T, Goerke M, Becke A, Sobieray U, Neumann K, Lövdén M, Lindenberger U, Bäckman L, Braun-Dullaeus R, Ahrens D, Heinze HJ, Müller NG, Lessmann V, Sendtner M, Düzel E (2015) Relationships of peripheral IGF-1, VEGF and BDNF levels to exercise-related changes in memory, hippocampal perfusion and volumes in older adults. NeuroImage. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.084 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McArdle JJ (2009) Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Ann Rev Psychol 60:577–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McEwen BS (1998) Stress, adaptation, and disease: allostasis and allostatic load. Ann NY Acad Sci 840:33–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McIntosh AM, Gow AJ, Luciano M, Davies G, Liewald DC, Harris SE, Corley J, Hall J, Starr JM, Porteus DJ, Tenesa A, Visscher PM, Deary IJ (2013) Polygenic risk for schizophrenia is associated with cognitive change between childhood and old age. Biol Psychiatr 73:938–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morozova O, Levina O, Uusküla A, Heimer R (2015) Comparison of subset selection methods in linear regression in the context of health-related quality of life and substance abuse in Russia. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Muñoz Maniega S, Chappell FM, Valdés Hernández MC, Armitage PA, Makin SD, Heye AK, Thrippleton MJ, Sakka E, Shuler K, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM (In Press) Integrity of normal-appearing white matter: influence of age, visible lesion burden and hypertension in patients with small vessel disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16635657
  39. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2014) Mplus User’s Guide: The Comprehensive Modeling Program for Applied Researchers. (Muthén and Muthén)Google Scholar
  40. Nelson HE, Willison JR (1991) National Adult Reading Test (NART). Windsor: Nfer-NelsonGoogle Scholar
  41. Nyberg L, Lövdén M, Riklund K, Lindenberger U, Bäckman L. (2012) Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trend Cognitive Sci 16:292–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oscar-Berman M, Marinković K (2007) Alcohol: effects on neurobehavioral functions and the brain. Neuropsychol Rev 17:239–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Qiu C, Sigurdsson A, Zhang Q, Jonsdottir MK, Kjartansson O, Eiriksdottir G, Garcia ME, Harris TB, van Buchem MA, Gudnason V, Launer LJ (2014) Diabetes, markers of brain pathology and cognitive function. Ann Neurol 75:138–146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Rast P, Hofer SM (2014) Longitudinal design considerations to optimize power to detect variances and covariances among rates of change: simulation results based on actual longitudinal studies. Psychol Methods 19:133–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Raz N, Rodrigue KM, Acker JD (2003) Hypertension and the brain: vulnerability of the prefrontal regions and executive functions. Behav Neurosci 117:1169–1180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ritchie SJ, Bastin ME, Tucker-Drob EM, Muñoz Maniega S, Engelhardt LE, Cox SR, Royle NA, Gow AJ, Corley J, Pattie A, Taylor AM, Valdés Hernández MC, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM, Deary IJ (2015a) Coupled changes in brain white matter microstructure and fluid intelligence in later life. J Neurosci 35:8672–8682CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Ritchie SJ, Dickie DA, Cox SR, Valdés Hernández MC, Corley J, Royle NA, Pattie A, Aribisala BS, Redmond P, Muñoz Maniega S, Taylor AM, Sibbett R, Gow AJ, Starr JM, Bastin ME, Wardlaw JM, Deary IJ (2015b) Brain volumetric changes and cognitive ageing during the eighth decade of life. Hum Brain Mapp 36:4910–4925CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruigrok AN, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Lai MC, Baron-Cohen S, Lombardo MV, Tait RJ, Suckling J (2014) A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 39:34–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Salthouse TA (2011) Neuroanatomical substrates of age-related cognitive decline. Psychol Bull 137:753–784CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2014) Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 511:421–427CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt R, Ropele S, Enzinger C, Petrovic K, Smith S, Schmidt H, Matthews PM, Fazekas F (2005) White matter lesion progression, brain atrophy, and cognitive decline: the Austrian stroke prevention study. Ann Neurol 58:610–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Scottish Council for Research in Education (1949) The trend of scottish intelligence: a comparison of the 1947 and 1932 surveys of the intelligence of 11-year-old pupils (University of London Press)Google Scholar
  53. Scottish Executive (2006) Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006 (Scottish Executive)Google Scholar
  54. Sexton CE, Betts JF, Demnitz N, Dawes H, Ebmeier KP, Johansen-Berg H (2015) A systematic review of MRI studies examining the relationship between physical fitness and activity and the white matter of the ageing brain. NeuroImage. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.071 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Staal WG, Hulshoff Pol HE, Schnack HG, Hoogendoorn MLC, Jellema K, Kahn RS (2000) Structural brain abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia and their healthy siblings. Am J Psychiatr 157:416–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tian Q, Studenski SA, Resnick SM, Davatzikos C, Ferrucci L (2015) Midlife and late-life cardiorespiratory fitness and brain volume changes in late adulthood: results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. doi: 10.1093/erona/glv041 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Tucker-Drob EM, Salthouse TA (2011) Individual differences in cognitive aging. In: Chamorro-Premuzic T, von Stumm S, Furnham A (eds). The wiley-blackwell handbook of individual differences, 1st edn. (Wiley-Blackwell), p 242–267Google Scholar
  58. Valdés Hernández MC, Ferguson KJ, Chappell FM, Wardlaw JM (2010) New multispectral MRI data fusion technique for white matter lesion segmentation: method and comparison with thresholding in FLAIR images. Eur Radiol 20:1684–1691CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Van der Auwera S, Wittfeld K, Homuth G, Teumer A, Hegenscheid K, Grabe HJ (2015) No association between polygenic risk for schizophrenia and brain volume in the general population. Biol Psychiatr. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.038 Google Scholar
  60. Wang X, Valdés Hernández MC, Doubal F, Chappell FM, Wardlaw JM (2012) How much do focal infarcts distort white matter lesions and global cerebral atrophy measures? Cerebrovasc Dis 34:336–342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Wardlaw JM, Bastin ME, Valdés Hernándes MC, Muñoz Maniega S, Royle NA, Morris Z, Clayden JD, Sanderman EM, Eadie E, Murray C, Starr JM, Deary IJ (2011) Brain aging, cognition in youth and old age and vascular disease in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: rationale, design and methodology of the imaging protocol. Int J Stroke 6:547–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wardlaw JM et al (2013) Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 12:822–838CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Wardlaw JM, Valdés Hernández MC, Muñoz Maniega S (2015) What are white matter hyperintensities made of? Relevance to vascular cognitive impairment. J Am Heart Assoc 4:e001140CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Wechsler D (2001) Wechsler test of adult reading: WTAR (psychological corporation)Google Scholar
  65. Widaman KF, Ferrer E, Conger RD (2010) Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Dev Perspect 4:10–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Wishart HA, Saykin AJ, McAllister TW, Rabin LA, McDonald BC, Flashman LA, Roth RM, Mamourian AC, Tsongalis GJ, Rhodes CH (2006) Regional brain atrophy in cognitively intact adults with a single APOE ε4 allele. Neurology 67:1221–1224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J Royal Stat Soc B 67:301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart J. Ritchie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elliot M. Tucker-Drob
    • 3
  • Simon R. Cox
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Alexander Dickie
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Maria del C. Valdés Hernández
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Janie Corley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Natalie A. Royle
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Paul Redmond
    • 1
  • Susana Muñoz Maniega
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Alison Pattie
    • 1
  • Benjamin S. Aribisala
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Adele M. Taylor
    • 1
  • Toni-Kim Clarke
    • 8
  • Alan J. Gow
    • 2
    • 9
  • John M. Starr
    • 2
    • 10
  • Mark E. Bastin
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Joanna M. Wardlaw
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Ian J. Deary
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive EpidemiologyThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  4. 4.Brain Research Imaging CentreThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  5. 5.Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) CollaborationEdinburghUK
  6. 6.Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  7. 7.Computer Science Department, Faculty of ScienceLagos State UniversityLagosNigeria
  8. 8.Division of PsychiatryThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  9. 9.Department of PsychologyHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK
  10. 10.Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research CentreThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations