Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of immunohistochemistry staining conditions on the incidence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated frequencies of HER2-low breast cancer (BC) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification) before and after IHC conditions were modified in order to understand the impact of IHC staining conditions on frequencies of HER2-low BC. Primary BC cases diagnosed at the Yeungnam University Hospital (YUH, n = 728) or Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital (KUDH, n = 290) in 2022 were reviewed, and data on HER2 status and IHC conditions were collected (cohort 1). Both institutions used the 4B5 antibody for HER2 IHC but had different staining protocols. After modifications of the IHC conditions at both institutions, primary BC cases (YUH, n = 324 and KUDH, n = 135) diagnosed from April to July 2023 (cohort 2) were reviewed to assess any changes in the frequency of HER2 status. In cohort 1, of the 728 cases diagnosed at YUH, 556 (76.4%) were HER2-zero, 76 (10.4%) were HER2-low, and 96 (13.2%) were HER2-positive, and of the 290 cases diagnosed at KUDH, 135 (46.6%) were HER2-zero, 82 (28.3%) were HER2-low, and 73 (25.2%) were HER2-positive. Modifications in HER2 IHC staining conditions dramatically increased the frequencies of HER2-low BC in cohort 2 (YUH 38.9% and KUDH 49.6%), but they did not result in significant changes in the HER2-positive rates (YUH 15.4% and KUDH 25.2%) compared to cohort 1. In conclusion, minor modifications in HER2 IHC staining conditions significantly affected the frequency of HER2-low BC but had little impact on the HER2-positivity rate. Each pathology laboratory should verify IHC conditions using control slides (including 1+) to enable the accurate identification of HER2-low BC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, Sohn J, Vidal M, Tokunaga E, Tsurutani J, Ueno NT, Prat A, Chae YS, Lee KS, Niikura N, Park YH, Xu B, Wang X, Gil-Gil M, Li W, Pierga JY, Im SA et al (2022) Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 387:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2203690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolff AC, Somerfield MR, Dowsett M, Hammond MEH, Hayes DF, McShane LM, Saphner TJ, Spears PA, Allison KH (2023) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 41:3867–3872. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.02864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garrido C, Manoogian M, Ghambire D, Lucas S, Karnoub M, Olson MT, Hicks DG, Tozbikian G, Prat A, Ueno NT, Modi S, Feng W, Pugh J, Hsu C, Tsurutani J, Cameron D, Harbeck N, Fang Q, Khambata-Ford S et al (2023) Analytical and clinical validation of PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) antibody to assess HER2-low status for trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment in breast cancer. Virchows Arch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03671-x

  4. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.50.9984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, Dowsett M, Fitzgibbons PL, Hanna WM, Langer A, McShane LM, Paik S, Pegram MD, Perez EA, Press MF, Rhodes A, Sturgeon C, Taube SE, Tubbs R et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.2775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JMS, Bilous M, Ellis IO, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, McShane LM, Dowsett M (2018) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol 36:2105–2122. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.77.8738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim MC, Kang SH, Choi JE, Bae YK (2020) Impact of the updated guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 23:484–497. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang N, Choi JE, Kang SH, Bae YK (2019) Validation of the pathological prognostic staging system proposed in the revised eighth edition of the AJCC staging manual in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Virchows Arch 474:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2495-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jang N, Kwon HJ, Park MH, Kang SH, Bae YK (2018) Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density assessed using a standardized method based on molecular subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25:937–946. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6332-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim MC, Park MH, Choi JE, Kang SH, Bae YK (2022) Characteristics and prognosis of estrogen receptor low-positive breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 25:318–326. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwon HJ, Choi JE, Kang SH, Son Y, Bae YK (2017) Prognostic significance of CD9 expression differs between tumour cells and stromal immune cells, and depends on the molecular subtype of the invasive breast carcinoma. Histopathology 70:1155–1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rakha EA, Allison KH, Ellis IO, Horii R, Masuda S, Penault-Llorca F, Tsuda H, Vincent-Salomon A (2019) Invasive breast carcinoma: General overview. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) Breast tumours, 5th edn. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 82–101

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim MC, Cho EY, Park SY, Lee HJ, Lee JS, Kim JY, Lee H-c, Yoo JY, Kim HS, Kim B, Kim WS, Shin N, Maeng YH, Kim HS, Kwon SY, Kim C, Jun S-Y, Kwon GY, Choi HJ et al (2024) A nationwide study on HER2-low breast cancer in South Korea: its incidence of 2022 real world data and the importance of immunohistochemical staining protocols. J Korean Cancer Assoc 0:0. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baez-Navarro X, van Bockstal MR, Andrinopoulou ER, van Deurzen CHM (2023) HER2-low breast cancer: incidence, clinicopathologic features, and survival outcomes from real-world data of a large nationwide cohort. Mod Pathol 36:100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horisawa N, Adachi Y, Takatsuka D, Nozawa K, Endo Y, Ozaki Y, Sugino K, Kataoka A, Kotani H, Yoshimura A, Hattori M, Sawaki M, Iwata H (2022) The frequency of low HER2 expression in breast cancer and a comparison of prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-negative breast cancer by HR status. Breast Cancer 29:234–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01303-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu Y, Jones D, Zhao W, Tozbikian G, Wesolowski R, Parwani AV, Li Z (2023) Incidence, clinicopathologic features, HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization profile, and oncotype DX results of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancers: experience from a single academic center. Mod Pathol 36:100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarantino P, Hamilton E, Tolaney SM, Cortes J, Morganti S, Ferraro E, Marra A, Viale G, Trapani D, Cardoso F, Penault-Llorca F, Viale G, Andrè F, Curigliano G (2020) HER2-low breast cancer: pathological and clinical landscape. J Clin Oncol 38:1951–1962. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.19.02488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen YY, Yang CF, Hsu CY (2023) The impact of modified staining method on HER2 immunohistochemical staining for HER2-low breast cancer. Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.06.002

  19. NordiQC (2022) Assessment Run B33 2022 HER2 IHC. https://www.nordiqc.org/downloads/assessments/159_11.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2023

  20. Ramos-Vara JA, Miller MA (2014) When tissue antigens and antibodies get along: revisiting the technical aspects of immunohistochemistry--the red, brown, and blue technique. Vet Pathol 51:42–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813505879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stumptner C, Pabst D, Loibner M, Viertler C, Zatloukal K (2019) The impact of crosslinking and non-crosslinking fixatives on antigen retrieval and immunohistochemistry. New Biotechnol 52:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2019.05.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boenisch T (2002) Heat-induced antigen retrieval restores electrostatic forces: prolonging the antibody incubation as an alternative. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 10:363–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129039-200212000-00013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krenacs L, Krenacs T, Stelkovics E, Raffeld M (2010) Heat-induced antigen retrieval for immunohistochemical reactions in routinely processed paraffin sections. Methods Mol Biol 588:103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-324-0_14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Miglietta F, Griguolo G, Bottosso M, Giarratano T, Lo Mele M, Fassan M, Cacciatore M, Genovesi E, De Bartolo D, Vernaci G, Amato O, Conte P, Guarneri V, Dieci MV (2021) Evolution of HER2-low expression from primary to recurrent breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 7:137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00343-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jeong YS, Kang J, Lee J, Yoo TK, Kim SH, Lee A (2020) Analysis of the molecular subtypes of preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimens in invasive breast cancer. J Pathol Transl Med 54:87–94. https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2019.10.14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a Yeungnam University Research Grant (2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MCK collected the clinicopathological data, evaluated the slides, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. SYK participated in the study design, collected the clinicopathological data, evaluated the slides, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. HRJ collected the clinicopathological data and evaluated the slides. YKB conceived the study, evaluated clinicopathological data and slides, analyzed the data, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors agreed with the submission of the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Kyung Bae.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with ethical standards

This retrospective study involving patients’ medical records and pathologic slides (HER2 immunohistochemistry and silver in situ hybridization) was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yeungnam University Hospital (YUMC 2023-10-046) and the Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital (DSMC2023-11-026), which waived the requirement for informed consent.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

Supplementary Table S1 Comparison of HER2 IHC results before (cohort 1) and after (cohort 2) modifying immunohistochemical staining conditions by specimen types at both institutions (DOCX 13 kb)

ESM 2

Supplementary Fig S1 HER2 IHC results of PATHWAY HER2 4 in 1 control slides using the original and modified protocols in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (DOCX 1.90 MB)

ESM 3

Supplementary Fig S2 Representative figures for SISH analysis on IHC 3+ cases (DOCX 1371 kb)

ESM 4

Supplementary Fig S3 Comparisons of core needle biopsy (CNB) and subsequent resection specimen HER2 IHC scores in cohort 2 at YUH (A) and KUDH (B) (DOCX 257 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M.C., Kwon, S.Y., Jung, H.R. et al. Impact of immunohistochemistry staining conditions on the incidence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer. Virchows Arch (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03824-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03824-6

Keywords

Navigation