Abstract
Extramedullary involvement of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), aka myeloid sarcoma, is a rare phenomenon in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia with RBM15:: MRTFA(MKL1) fusion, which might mimic non-hematologic malignancies. A 7-month-old infant presented with leukocytosis, hepatosplenomegaly, multiple lymphadenopathies, and a solid mass in the right thigh. Initially, the patient was diagnosed with a malignant vascular tumor regarding the expression of vascular markers from the biopsy of the right thigh lesion that was performed after the inconclusive bone marrow biopsy. The second bone marrow biopsy, which was performed due to the partial response to sarcoma treatment, showed hypercellular bone marrow with CD34 and CD61-positive spindle cell infiltration and > 20% basophilic blasts with cytoplasmic blebs. RNA sequencing of soft tissue biopsy revealed the presence of RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion. Based on these findings, myeloid sarcoma/AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion diagnosis was made. AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion can initially present as extramedullary lesions and might cause misdiagnosis of non-hematologic malignancies.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) is an infrequent subtype (3–5%) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is characterized by > 20% blasts with megakaryocytic differentiation recognized with the combination of morphological, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic features [1]. Acute myeloid leukemia with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion is a specific type of AMKL that accounts for 10–12% of the cases [1,2,3]. It is usually seen in infants without trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) [2]. Extramedullary involvement of AML known as myeloid sarcoma or extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia can occur simultaneously with bone marrow involvement [4,5,6,7]. However, it is a rarely described phenomenon in AMKL, which creates diagnostic difficulties [4, 5]. There are a few reported cases of myeloid sarcoma related to AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion in the literature, which mimic non-hematologic malignancies like neuroblastoma [8, 9], hepatoblastoma [10], or small round blue cell tumor [11], thus the differential diagnosis may be challenging.
Here, we present a case of AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion in a 7-month-old infant. The patient had bone marrow involvement as well as a soft tissue mass in the right thigh. The thigh mass was initially misdiagnosed as a malignant vascular tumor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion and soft tissue involvement.
Case presentation
The patient was a 7-month-old male infant whose prenatal and natal history were unremarkable. In a routine clinical visit, hepatosplenomegaly and anemia were detected. The patient was evaluated for hematolymphoid malignancies and neuroblastoma in another hospital but no definitive diagnosis was made and the patient was referred to our hospital. In the complete blood count, anemia (hemoglobin 8.0 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (56,000 × 106/L), leukocytosis (18,500 × 106/L), and lymphocytosis (13,500 × 106/L) were detected. Radiological examinations revealed abdominal, mediastinal, and hilar multiple lymphadenopathies, hepatosplenomegaly, a lung nodule, subcutaneous nodules in the abdominal and thoracal wall, a solid mass in the right thigh anterior to femur between muscle plains, and diffuse increased signal density in the bone marrow. A bone marrow sampling was performed for further evaluation.
In the histological examination of bone marrow biopsy, hypercellular bone marrow with extensive crush artifact and increased reticulin fibrosis mostly representing the subcortical zone was seen (Fig. 1a-b). The limited number of discernable cells mostly had ovoid to spindle-shaped nuclei, irregular nuclear contours, and fine chromatin (Fig. 1c). They showed varied immunopositivity for CD34 (Fig. 1d) and CD61 (Fig. 1e) but the significance of these stainings could not be interpreted optimally due to prominent crush artifacts. Bone marrow aspirate was also suboptimal due to the absence of bone marrow particles. Still, a few blastic cells with fine chromatin, multiple small nucleoli, and occasional cytoplasmic blebs (Fig. 1f) and dysplastic myeloid and erythroid precursor cells were noted. However, it wasn’t possible to reach a definitive diagnosis with this biopsy alone, even though the possibility of AMKL was considered. A biopsy from either the lung or thigh lesions was recommended.
Afterward, an initial core biopsy followed by an excisional biopsy from the right thigh lesion was performed. In the microscopic examination of the lesion, a multinodular neoplasm infiltrating adjacent skeletal muscles was seen (Fig. 2a). The neoplasm is comprised of both epithelioid and spindle-looking cells in a fibrotic background. Epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm were predominantly observed in the vascular spaces (Fig. 2b). Neoplastic cells exhibited vesicular chromatin, multiple prominent nucleoli, irregular nuclear contours, and increased mitotic activity (Fig. 2c). They were positive for CD34 (Fig. 2d), CD31 (Fig. 2e), ERG (Fig. 2f), and Factor VIII (Fig. 2g), and negative for CD163 immunohistochemically. Based on morphologic and immunophenotypic results a malignant vascular neoplasm most consistent with composite hemangioendothelioma was considered in the foreground of the differential diagnosis. A sample from the soft tissue mass was sent out for the detection of DNA and RNA alterations using next-generation sequencing.
While waiting for NGS results, the patient received three courses Paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) + Carboplatin (5 mg AUC) + Bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) therapy every three weeks with the presumptive diagnosis of malignant mesenchymal tumor. There was partial response at the end of third chemotherapy course. Since the patient’s splenomegaly and cytopenia did not respond well to the treatment, another bone marrow biopsy was performed. Microscopic examination of this biopsy revealed a hypercellular bone marrow with spindle cell infiltration in a fibrotic background (Fig. 3a-b-c). Immunohistochemically, neoplastic cells were focally positive for CD34 (Fig. 3d) and CD61 (Fig. 3e) and negative for TdT, CD3, CD20, and CD68. In the aspiration smears, more than 20% of the cells were blasts with fine chromatin, multiple prominent nucleoli, basophilic cytoplasm, and cytoplasmic blebs (Fig. 3f). Myeloid precursors showed dysplastic features. The morphology of blasts and the presence of CD61 expression were suggestive of megakaryoblastic differentiation. In the meantime, an RNA sequencing study revealed the presence of RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion.
Based on the evaluation of all these findings together, acute myeloid leukemia with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion diagnosis was made, and the diagnosis for soft tissue lesion was revised to myeloid sarcoma.
Discussion
Acute myeloid leukemia with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion, which is the consequence of t(1;22)(p13;q13), is a molecularly defined distinctive subtype of AML with megakaryoblastic differentiation [2]. It is usually seen in infants without Down syndrome and presents with anemia, thrombocytopenia, and hepatosplenomegaly. Bone marrow biopsy generally shows extensive fibrosis with increased reticulin fibers and interpretation can be hard because of the crush artifact, but typical megakaryoblasts might be appreciated in the bone marrow aspiration or peripheral blood smears [1]. Megakaryoblasts show immunopositivity for one or more platelet glycoproteins like CD41, CD61, and CD42b [2]. Detection of RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion by FISH, RT-PCR, etc. is essential for a definite diagnosis. Extramedullary involvement known as myeloid sarcoma is reported in the liver, spleen, lymph nodes, lung, bone, and pancreas in this patient group [1, 8, 10,11,12]. Samples from extramedullary sites can mimic non-hematopoietic malignancies like neuroblastoma [8, 9], hepatoblastoma [10], or small round blue cell tumors [11] due to extensive fibrosis, the cohesiveness of epithelioid/spindle-looking neoplastic cells, the presence of vascular/sinusoidal invasion or shared immunophenotypic features. Therefore, atypical extramedullary tumors in the pediatric age group should be evaluated along with bone marrow biopsy. Utilization of advanced molecular techniques would also be helpful in difficult cases.
In our case, the interpretation of the first bone marrow biopsy was suboptimal to reach a clear diagnosis due to a prominent crush artifact, even though a few blastic cells suggestive of megakaryoblastic differentiation were observed in the aspiration smears. Excisional biopsy from the right thigh lesion showed cohesive tumor cells with epithelioid to spindled morphology in a fibrotic background, vascular involvement, and immunopositivity for vascular markers (CD31, CD34, ERG, and factor VIII). These findings led to the misdiagnosis of malignant vascular neoplasm. However, the second bone marrow biopsy that consisted of more than 20% megakaryoblasts and detection of RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion by RNA sequencing in the soft tissue lesion has prompted a diagnosis of AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion. As a consequence, the diagnosis of the soft tissue lesion was amended to myeloid sarcoma. RBM15::MRTFA is among the recurring translocations defining acute myeloid leukemia. In the presence of this recurrent genetic abnormality, more than or equal to 10% blast count is required for AML diagnosis in the ICC 2022 classification [13]. However, a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia can be rendered regardless of blast count in the WHO 2022 classification if RBM15::MRTFA can be demonstrated with genetic studies. Therefore, genetic studies are especially valuable in cases, such as ours, where significant bone marrow fibrosis is present. Significant bone marrow fibrosis, which usually accompanies AMKL can prevent obtaining sufficient bone marrow aspirate to enumerate blast counts reliably, highlighting the importance of clinicopathological suspicion and molecular tests for the diagnosis.
Myeloid sarcoma is described as a tumor mass composed of myeloid blasts involving any anatomical sites other than bone marrow. Skin and soft tissue are reported as more frequently involved sites in children [6, 7]. It has been known that myeloid sarcoma shares similar molecular and cytogenetic alterations with bone marrow AML [7]. To the best of our knowledge, in the literature, there are only a few cases of AMKL with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion that presented with myeloid sarcoma [8,9,10,11]. In our patient, biopsy-proven soft tissue involvement and radiologically detected skin, liver, spleen, lymph node, and lung involvements were considered as evidence of extramedullary disease. Samples from extramedullary sites, without proper bone marrow sampling, can lead to misdiagnosis of non-hematopoietic neoplasm as in our case. Therefore, in children with atypical soft tissue lesions, the possibility of myeloid sarcoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis, especially if there is evidence of bone marrow involvement.
The process leading to a misdiagnosis of malignant vascular tumor, particularly composite hemangioendothelioma, a vascular tumor composed of a complex admixture of histologically benign and malignant vascular components, is ameliorated by the complex morphology and immunohistochemical expressions of CD31, CD34, ERG, and Factor VIII, largely known as vascular/endothelial markers [14]. Morphologically, the tumor was composed of monotonous histiocytoid spindle cells resembling an intermediate sarcoma and nested or papillary-like involvement of vascular spaces, reminiscent of papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma. However, the clinical setting especially extensive involvement of bone marrow and hepatosplenomegaly is not compatible with the diagnosis of composite hemangioendothelioma. Among the vascular markers, CD34 and ERG are the least specific for endothelial cells; the former is expressed in many mesenchymal tumors and the latter is also found in epithelioid sarcomas and prostatic adenocarcinomas. Although CD31 and Factor VIII are known to be more specific to endothelial cells, CD31 expression in macrophages, megakaryocytes, and platelets [15, 16] and Factor VIII expression in platelets [17] constitute the major pitfall misleading to an erroneous preliminary diagnosis of vascular tumor in this case. Given the discordance of clinical and pathological findings, utilization of a non-targeted molecular test, e.g. RNA sequencing, was essential to reach the correct diagnosis.
The prognosis of AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion is not fully clear. Some studies suggest a better prognosis [12, 18] while others suggest a worse prognosis [19, 20] compared with other AMKL subtypes. Analysis of the prognosis of the reported cases with extramedullary involvement reveals that two of the patients died before the correct diagnosis was made [9, 10], one died within 11 months due to disease progression [11], and one was in complete remission in the second year of diagnosis [8]. We started the BFM AML 2019 protocol, and he achieved clinical and radiological remission after one cycle of induction. A clinical decision will be made whether the patient will undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation or not, depending on the response to subsequent treatment.
In conclusion, AML with RBM15::MRTFA(MKL1) fusion can initially present as a soft tissue lesion in children and may lead to misdiagnosis of the malignant mesenchymal tumor. It would be wise to remember myeloid sarcoma in atypical extramedullary lesions in pediatric patients.
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Chan WC, Carroll A, Alvarado CS, Phillips S, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Kurczynski E, Pappo A, Emami A, Bowman P, Head DR (1992) Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia in infants with t(1;22)(p13;q13) abnormality. Am J Clin Pathol 98:214–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/98.2.214
Board WCoTE (2022) Haematolymphoid tumours Lyon (France):nternational Agency for Research on Cancer; forthcoming. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 11). https://publications.iarc.fr. Accessed 1 Dec 2023
Bernstein J, Dastugue N, Haas OA, Harbott J, Heerema NA, Huret JL, Landman-Parker J, LeBeau MM, Leonard C, Mann G, Pages MP, Perot C, Pirc-Danoewinata H, Roitzheim B, Rubin CM, Slociak M, Viguie F (2000) Nineteen cases of the t(1;22)(p13;q13) acute megakaryblastic leukaemia of infants/children and a review of 39 cases: report from a t(1;22) study group. Leukemia 14:216–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2401639
Shallis RM, Gale RP, Lazarus HM, Roberts KB, Xu ML, Seropian SE, Gore SD, Podoltsev NA (2021) Myeloid sarcoma, chloroma, or extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia tumor: A tale of misnomers, controversy and the unresolved. Blood Rev 47:100773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2020.100773
Nagamine M, Miyoshi H, Kawamoto K, Takeuchi M, Yamada K, Yanagida E, Kohno K, Ohshima K (2022) Clinicopathological analysis of myeloid sarcoma with megakaryocytic differentiation. Pathology 54:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2021.08.015
Reinhardt D, Creutzig U (2002) Isolated myelosarcoma in children–update and review. Leuk Lymphoma 43:565–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428190290012056
Zhou T, Bloomquist MS, Ferguson LS, Reuther J, Marcogliese AN, Elghetany MT, Roy A, Rao PH, Lopez-Terrada DH, Redell MS, Punia JN, Curry CV, Fisher KE (2020) Pediatric myeloid sarcoma: a single institution clinicopathologic and molecular analysis. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 37:76–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08880018.2019.1683107
Gökçe M, Aytaç S, Ünal Ş, Altan İ, Gümrük F, Çetin M (2015) Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia with t(1;22) Mimicking Neuroblastoma in an Infant. Turk J Haematol 32:64–67. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2013.0189
Kawasaki Y, Makimoto M, Nomura K, Hoshino A, Hamashima T, Hiwatari M, Nakazawa A, Takita J, Yoshida T, Kanegane H (2015) Neonatal acute megakaryoblastic leukemia mimicking congenital neuroblastoma. Clin Case Rep 3:145–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.183
Marques-Piubelli ML, Cordeiro MG, Cristofani L, Barroso RS, Paes VR, Castelli JB, Rodrigues Pereira Velloso ED (2020) Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia with t(1;22)(p13.3;q13.1); RBM15-MKL1 mimicking hepatoblastoma in an infant: The role of karyotype in differential diagnosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 67:e28111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28111
Gutiérrez-Jimeno M, Panizo-Morgado E, Calvo-Imirizaldu M, Galán-Gómez V, Escudero-López A, Patiño-García A (2022) Case report: the value of genomic analysis in a case of megakaryoblastic leukemia with atypical initial manifestation. Front Pediatr 10:875510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.875510
Chisholm KM, Smith J, Heerema-McKenney AE, Choi JK, Ries RE, Hirsch BA, Raimondi SC, Wang YC, Dang A, Alonzo TA, Sung L, Aplenc R, Gamis AS, Meshinchi S, Kahwash SB (2023) Pathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features of acute myeloid leukemia with megakaryocytic differentiation: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 70:e30251. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.30251
Campo E, Jaffe ES, Cook JR, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Swerdlow SH, Anderson KC, Brousset P, Cerroni L, de Leval L, Dirnhofer S, Dogan A, Feldman AL, Fend F, Friedberg JW, Gaulard P, Ghia P, Horwitz SM, King RL, Salles G, San-Miguel J, Seymour JF, Treon SP, Vose JM, Zucca E, Advani R, Ansell S, Au WY, Barrionuevo C, Bergsagel L, Chan WC, Cohen JI, d’Amore F, Davies A, Falini B, Ghobrial IM, Goodlad JR, Gribben JG, Hsi ED, Kahl BS, Kim WS, Kumar S, LaCasce AS, Laurent C, Lenz G, Leonard JP, Link MP, Lopez-Guillermo A, Mateos MV, Macintyre E, Melnick AM, Morschhauser F, Nakamura S, Narbaitz M, Pavlovsky A, Pileri SA, Piris M, Pro B, Rajkumar V, Rosen ST, Sander B, Sehn L, Shipp MA, Smith SM, Staudt LM, Thieblemont C, Tousseyn T, Wilson WH, Yoshino T, Zinzani PL, Dreyling M, Scott DW, Winter JN, Zelenetz AD (2022) The international consensus classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms: a report from the clinical advisory committee. Blood 140:1229–1253. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022015851
Board WCoTE (2020) Soft tissue and bone tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 3). Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/33. Accessed 1 Dec 2023
McKenney JK, Weiss SW, Folpe AL (2001) CD31 expression in intratumoral macrophages: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1167–1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200109000-00007
Parums DV, Cordell JL, Micklem K, Heryet AR, Gatter KC, Mason DY (1990) JC70: a new monoclonal antibody that detects vascular endothelium associated antigen on routinely processed tissue sections. J Clin Pathol 43:752–757. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.43.9.752
Yarovoi HV, Kufrin D, Eslin DE, Thornton MA, Haberichter SL, Shi Q, Zhu H, Camire R, Fakharzadeh SS, Kowalska MA, Wilcox DA, Sachais BS, Montgomery RR, Poncz M (2003) Factor VIII ectopically expressed in platelets: efficacy in hemophilia a treatment. Blood 102:4006–4013. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1519
de Rooij JD, Masetti R, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Cayuela JM, Trka J, Reinhardt D, Rasche M, Sonneveld E, Alonzo TA, Fornerod M, Zimmermann M, Pigazzi M, Pieters R, Meshinchi S, Zwaan CM, Locatelli F (2016) Recurrent abnormalities can be used for risk group stratification in pediatric AMKL: a retrospective intergroup study. Blood 127:3424–3430. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-695551
Schweitzer J, Zimmermann M, Rasche M, von Neuhoff C, Creutzig U, Dworzak M, Reinhardt D, Klusmann JH (2015) Improved outcome of pediatric patients with acute megakaryoblastic leukemia in the AML-BFM 04 trial. Ann Hematol 94:1327–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2383-2
Inaba H, Zhou Y, Abla O, Adachi S, Auvrignon A, Beverloo HB, de Bont E, Chang TT, Creutzig U, Dworzak M, Elitzur S, Fynn A, Forestier E, Hasle H, Liang DC, Lee V, Locatelli F, Masetti R, De Moerloose B, Reinhardt D, Rodriguez L, Van Roy N, Shen S, Taga T, Tomizawa D, Yeoh AE, Zimmermann M, Raimondi SC (2015) Heterogeneous cytogenetic subgroups and outcomes in childhood acute megakaryoblastic leukemia: a retrospective international study. Blood 126:1575–1584. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-02-629204
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FG wrote the manuscript. KK, AA, SA, VH, and AH reviewed the manuscript. KK, AÜ, and AA analyzed the data. FG, AA, AÜ, SA, VH, and KK collected the data. AA, AÜ, and KK are responsible of pathological findings. UA reviewed radiological data. All authors gave final approval for publication. KK takes full responsibility for the work as a whole, including the study design, access to data, and the decision to submit and publish the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This is a case report with depersonalized data of the patient and did not require informed consent. Verbal and written consent has also been obtained.
Disclosure/Conflict of interest
No disclosures or conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gündoğdu, F., Agaimy, A., Aytaç, S. et al. Myeloid sarcoma with RBM15::MRTFA (MKL1) mimicking vascular neoplasm. Virchows Arch (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03766-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03766-z