Abstract
Embryonic expression of a Zic homologue (Ttu-Zic) was examined in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. The body plan of T. tubifex is characterized by obvious segmentation in the ectoderm and mesoderm. Ttu-Zic expression is detected in the mesodermal germ band and a subset of micromere descendants. Ttu-Zic is transiently expressed in primary m-blast cells (i.e., founder cells of mesodermal segments) as early as the time of their birth from M teloblasts. During its development, each mesodermal segment experiences two additional phases of Ttu-Zic expression. Ttu-Zic expression in micromere descendants is seen on the anterior surfaces of embryos undergoing teloblastogenesis; subsequently, these cells proliferate to form bilateral clusters, which then become internalized. Finally, clusters of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells are found in the center of the prostomium, corresponding to the cerebral ganglion. The Ttu-Zic expression profile in the early embryogenesis of T. tubifex may be homologous to those of evolutionarily distant animals.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Zic family genes are found in a wide range of eumetazoans (Aruga et al. 2006, 2007). Expression and functional analyses indicate that Zic zinc finger proteins commonly play roles in cell differentiation and proliferation in the early embryonic stages in Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa, and Cnidaria (reviewed in Aruga 2004; Merzdorf 2007). However, an obvious defect in our understanding of the Zic phylogeny is the lack of information on lophotrochozoan Zic in the literature, except in terms of gene structure. Lophotrochozoa is the sister taxon of Ecdysozoa in the Protostomia and includes mollusks, annelids, and platyhelminthes.
As a model lophotrochozoan animal, the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex, a freshwater sludgeworm, has a body organization that is notable for its clear segmentation (Shimizu 1982; Goto et al. 1999a; Nakamoto et al. 2000). The ectodermal and mesodermal segmental structures arise from five bilateral pairs of coherent longitudinal columns (bandlets) of blast cells that are formed by five bilateral pairs of embryonic stem cells called teloblasts (named M, N, O, P, and Q). The teloblasts are located at the posterior end of the embryo and generate daughter cells one by one through asymmetrical cell divisions. The older daughter cells are located in the anterior side of each bandlet, making it easy for researchers to observe the series of differentiation processes in the array of body segments. Among the teloblasts, the M teloblast lineage contributes solely to the oligocheates’ mesodermal segments (Goto et al. 1999b; Nakamoto et al. 2000).
In this study, we examined the expression of Tubifex Zic (Ttu-Zic) in the course of embryonic development to better understand the evolution of Zic gene expression. The results revealed that some expression features are shared with other bilaterian Zic homologues.
Materials and methods
Animals
T. tubifex were obtained as described (Shimizu 1982). For experiments, embryos were freed from cocoons in the culture medium (Shimizu 1982).
PCR cloning and RT-PCR analysis
RNAs were isolated by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were generated by reverse transcription using PrimeScript reverse transcriptase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). The following primers were used for the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis: Emx-F, 5′-GTTTCCAGGTCTGACGGATT-3′; Emx-R, 5′-GGTGTCGATTCCAATGCAGT-3′; Msx-F, 5′-GTCATGTCTGGTTCTTCGAC-3′; Msx-R, 5′-GCCTAGAATACCGTCAACTG-3′; Zic-F, 5′-CGTACAACTGCAAGATGCGA-3′; Zic-R, 5′-TGTCGTCTGAAACCGAGAAC-3′; Actin-F, 5′-TGGGAYGAYATGGARAARAT; Actin-R, 5′-GCCATYTCYTGYTCRAA-3′. The PCR reaction was carried out with ExTaq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio) in the presence of BD TaqStart anti-Taq antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Each PCR consisted of 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min. Tubifex Emx cDNA was obtained by a PCR screening of Tubifex homeodomain-containing genes (unpublished results). The Emx sequence was deposited in the DDBJ database with accession number AB439506. Tubifex Zic (Ttu-Zic, AB231870) and Tubifex Msx (Ttu-Msx, AB302957) cDNAs were previously described (Aruga et al. 2006; Takahashi et al. 2008).
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed as described (Matsuo and Shimizu 2006). The stained embryos were cleared by placing them in a 1:2 mixture of benzyl alcohol and benzyl benzoate.
Results and discussion
Comparison of temporal expression profiles
The processes of Tubifex development have been described in previous studies (Shimizu 1982; Goto et al. 1999a; Nakamoto et al. 2000). Figure 1a summarizes the Tubifex developmental processes relevant to this study; we used this figure as a staging diagram. The temporal expression profile was first examined by RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 1b) using the RNAs from representative developmental stages (stages 1, 2–8, 12, 15, and 16–17). In the course of embryonic development, Ttu-Zic expression was first detected at the beginning of teloblastogenesis (stage 12), peaked at the beginning of germ band coalescence (stage 15), and continued thereafter (stages 16–17). Ttu-Emx showed strong expression at stages 16 and 17 and weak expression at stages 12 and 15. Ttu-Msx expression was first detected at stage 15 and continued further. Tubifex vasa showed an earlier expression peak, in agreement with the results of a previous study (Oyama and Shimizu 2007), thus validating our results.
Expression of Ttu-Zic in early embryogenesis
We performed in situ hybridization analyses using a Ttu-Zic antisense riboprobe and a series of embryos from the one-cell stage (stage 1) to the vermicular form stage (stage 18). In embryos processed for in situ hybridization with a sense probe, no staining was detected from stage 1 to stage 18 (data not shown).
In the course of Tubifex development, marked expression of Ttu-Zic was first detected at the transition to stage 12, when a proteloblast, NOPQ, on each side of the embryo divides into N and OPQ (Fig. 1). At this stage, the signals can be seen as two bilateral pairs of dots in uncleared embryos (Fig. 2a). One pair is located on the anterior surface of the micromere cap comprising the micromere progeny. The Ttu-Zic-positive cells in the micromere cap appear to be connected to each other by thin processes, which assume an arched shape (Fig. 2a, arrows; Fig. 2b). In contrast, the other pairs of Ttu-Zic-positive cells are not surface cells and are located in the interior region of the embryo (Fig. 2a, solid arrowheads); the embryonic origin of these interior cells remains to be explored. As indicated by the open arrowheads in Fig. 2b, c, cleared specimens of the same stage exhibit additional stained cells, which are located in front of M teloblasts (Fig. 2b, c, open arrowheads). Judging from their size and position, it is safe to say that these positive cells correspond to the primary m-blast cells that have most recently been formed from the M teloblasts. Given the absence of Ttu-Zic expression in the M teloblasts, it is likely that nascent m-blast cells initiate zygotic transcription of this gene upon their birth.
Expression of Ttu-Zic during germ band elongation (stages 14 and 15)
In embryos undergoing gastrulation (stages 13 to 16), germ bands elongate, curve round toward the ventral midline, and coalesce with each other along the ventral midline (Fig. 1, stages 13–15); this coalescence begins at the anterior end of the embryo and proceeds in an anterior-to-posterior fashion.
We hybridized stage 14 embryos with the antisense Ttu-Zic riboprobe (Fig. 2d–f, 4a). Ttu-Zic is expressed in the anterior-most pair of cell clusters that is first seen at stage 12 (Fig. 2f, arrows) and in the mesodermal germ bands (Fig. 2d, e). The anterior cell cluster is composed of five or six stained cells, and when viewed from the side, it appears as a discrete dot (Fig. 2l, arrow; the fate of this cell cluster will be described later).
The expression of Ttu-Zic in the mesodermal germ band during stage 14 is restricted to four or five anterior-most segments and one or two posterior-most “segments” (nascent primary m-blast cells; Fig. 2f, open arrowheads). In each of the anterior segments, Ttu-Zic-expressing cells are organized in transverse dumbbell-shaped structures (Fig. 2g); the hybridization signal is apparently stronger in the most posterior segment than in the more anterior segments (Fig. 2d, e, g). As the development proceeds, Ttu-Zic-expressing cells emerge in the more posterior segments as well. At early stage 15, eight anterior segments exhibit Ttu-Zic-expressing cells on either side of the embryo (Fig. 2h, i).
Expression of Ttu-Zic during embryo body elongation (stages 16 to 18)
In Tubifex embryos, gastrulation is followed by dorsal-ward expansion of germ bands and by simultaneous body elongation, which proceeds in an anterior-to-posterior fashion (see Fig. 1, stages 16–18). By the beginning of stage 16 (i.e., at the beginning of body elongation), the number of Ttu-Zic-positive segments has increased to 16 (Fig. 3a and 4b). On the basis of the distribution pattern of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells in individual segments, three domains are discernible along the germ band: the anterior domain (domain X in Fig. 3a) with paired dots on either side of each segment (Fig. 3b), the mid domain (Y in Fig. 3a) with a single dot (with weak signals) in each segment, and the posterior domain (Z in Fig. 3a) with positive cells organized in the transverse dumbbell-shaped structures seen in stage 14 embryos (see Fig. 2e, g). Ttu-Zic-positive cells are absent in the first segment (Fig. 3a) and in the region behind the above-mentioned posterior domain (Z), except for a single cell (Fig. 3a, open arrowhead) located in front of the M teloblasts.
At stage 17, Ttu-Zic-expressing cells are organized in paired dots in most of the mesodermal segments, except in the posterior region of the embryo (Fig. 3c and 4c), where positive cells are apparently organized in dumbbell-shaped structures (Fig. 3c, domain Z). At this stage as well, Ttu-Zic-positive cells are not detected in the first segment (indicated by a thin line in Fig. 3c). At late stage 17, the cessation of Ttu-Zic expression begins at the anterior-most region of the embryo and proceeds in an anterior-to-posterior fashion (Fig. 4d).
In summary, we suggest that the Ttu-Zic expression in mesodermal segments is a triphasic process. The first phase of expression occurs in primary m-blast cells shortly after their birth. The expression is apparently transient and ceases upon the first cell division (which takes place concurrently with the next division of their mother cell, the M teloblast; see Goto et al. 1999b). The second phase of Ttu-Zic expression commences some time after cessation of the first expression, and Ttu-Zic-expressing cells are organized in transverse dumbbell-shaped structures. These structures exhibit signals that gradually become weaker with time, and they appear to be transformed into dot-like structures with weak signals. Ttu-Zic expression resumes again sometime after the attenuation of the second phase. This third phase of expression consists of intensely stained, paired dots of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells on either side of the embryo.
The Ttu-Zic expression profiles in the mesodermal lineage may accommodate the differentiation stage of each segment. To learn whether the aforementioned spatiotemporal expression pattern of Ttu-Zic is widespread among genes expressed in the mesodermal cell lineage (i.e., in the germ band), we examined the expression pattern of another developmental tool-kit gene, Ttu-Msx (Takahashi et al. 2008), which was shown to be expressed in the mesodermal lineage in a preliminary observation. Expression of Ttu-Msx begins at late stage 14, and hybridization signals are detected as transverse, regularly repeating stripes in the anterior region of the mesodermal germ band (Fig. 4e). As development proceeds, Ttu-Msx-positive stripes emerge in the more posterior region as well; concurrently with this, the preexisting stripes in the anterior region exhibit stronger signals than before (compare Fig. 4f with Fig. 4e). The signals in each segment become weaker during development up to stage 17 (Fig. 4g, h). As a result, the expression pattern of Ttu-Msx is distinct from that of Ttu-Zic (Fig. 4i). It is apparent that the triphasic mode of expression is a feature specific to Ttu-Zic.
Ttu-Zic expression in putative setal sacs
We next examined the identity of the paired dots in the third phase of expression. The paired dots appeared at stage 16 and later (Fig. 3a–c) and were arranged in the same transverse plane around the periphery of each segment and located in the interior region, but not on the embryo surface (Fig. 3e, f). Furthermore, each dot was composed of two pairs of signal-forming conical shapes (Fig. 3d).
Judging from the spatial pattern of their occurrence, it is likely that the paired dots correspond to the setal (chaetal) sacs that exist in every embryonically produced segment except the first. In previous studies, we have suggested that the cells comprising Tubifex setal sacs express Ttu-dpp and Ttu-p68 (a DEAD-box RNA helicase; Matsuo and Shimizu 2006; Oyama et al. 2008). Interestingly, Ttu-dpp-expressing cells are organized in dot-like structures, which are composed of conical units like those seen in the dots of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells (Matsuo and Shimizu 2006). However, Ttu-Zic-expressing cells may be distinct from those expressing Ttu-dpp because Ttu-dpp-expressing cells in the setal sacs are of ectodermal origin (Matsuo and Shimizu 2006). Given that Ttu-dpp-expressing cells contribute chaetoblasts that produce setae (chaetae) for setal (chaetal) sacs, it is plausible that Ttu-Zic-expressing cells contribute mesodermal tissues such as muscle tissue to the setal sacs.
Expression of Zic in cerebral-ganglion-forming region
The anteriorly localized, bilateral clusters of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells, which are located in the outer cell layer during stages 14 and 15 (Fig. 2f, j, k, l), appear to be internalized during subsequent development. Stage 17 embryos exhibit a cluster of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells in the central region, but not the periphery, of the prostomium (Fig. 5c). Close examination of the cell cluster suggests that it could result from the apposition of separate clusters of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells (Fig. 5e, g). From their location, it seems likely that these positive cells correspond to a subpopulation of micromere progeny that form a cerebral ganglion.
Since no reliable markers for cerebral ganglion precursors were available in T. tubifex, we cloned a Tubifex homologue of the Emx gene (Ttu-Emx) as a potential cerebral ganglion marker and then examined its expression pattern. Emx homologues are expressed in early embryonic brains in both Drosophila and the mouse (Lichtneckert and Reichert 2005).
As expected, Ttu-Emx hybridization signals were observed in the cerebral-ganglion-forming region in the late vermiform embryo (Fig. 5d, f, h); in younger embryos, Ttu-Emx-expressing cells were found on the surface of the rostral end (Fig. 5b). The rostral Ttu-Emx signals were located near the Ttu-Zic-expressing region and partly overlapped with the Ttu-Zic-expressing region in the vermiform embryos (Fig. 5e–h). The hybridization signals were stronger in the rostral part of the Ttu-Emx-expressing region than in the caudal part (Fig. 5f, h), whereas the Ttu-Zic signals were stronger in the caudal part than in the rostral part (Fig. 5e, g). The gross localization of the Ttu-Zic hybridization signal and comparison of the localization with the Ttu-Emx expression pattern suggest that at least some of Ttu-Zic-expressing cells residing in the central region of the prostomium contribute to formation of the cerebral ganglion.
Comparison of Ttu-Zic expression profiles with those of other animals
We reported in this paper the first Zic expression profile in lophotorochozoan embryonic development. In previous studies, the expression profiles of Zic homologues in deuterostomes (vertebrates and ascidians) and ecdysozoans (flies and nematodes) have been described, and a shared expression feature in the earliest neural tissue have been pointed out (Aruga 2004). Furthermore, in Cnidaria, hydra Zic (Hyzic) is expressed just before achaete-scute homologue expression; this is similar to what occurs in vertebrate neurogenesis (Lindgens et al. 2004). Expression in the presumptive cerebral-ganglion-forming cells seems to be homologous to the expression of the Zic homologues in the earliest neuroectoderm. Ttu-Zic expression in the earliest mesodermal cells may be consistent with that in vertebrates and ascidians (references in Merzdorf 2007). Most interestingly, the Ttu-Zic expression pattern in the segmented mesodermal cell lineage is very similar to the differentiation-stage-specific expression changes in Zic1, Zic2, and Zic3 that are observed in the course of mammalian somitogenesis (Inoue et al. 2007): Zic3 is detected in the earliest mesodermal cells adjacent to the primitive streaks, the Zic2 expression is enhanced in forming somites and most newly formed somites, and the expression of the three Zic genes continues in the dorsomedial part of the somite derivatives in later embryonic development.
Conservation of the two expression features between deuterostomes and protostomes suggests that a presumptive bilaterian ancestor had these expression features. It will be interesting to elucidate the Zic expression in other lophotrochozoans and to deduce the conserved expression features in this large taxon of Protostomia.
References
Aruga J (2004) The role of Zic genes in neural development. Mol Cell Neurosci 26:205–221
Aruga J, Kamiya A, Takahashi H, Fujimi TJ, Shimizu Y, Ohkawa K, Yazawa S, Umesono Y, Noguchi H, Shimizu T, Saitou N, Mikoshiba K, Sakaki Y, Agata K, Toyoda A (2006) A wide-range phylogenetic analysis of Zic proteins: implications for correlations between protein structure conservation and body plan complexity. Genomics 87:783–792
Aruga J, Odaka YS, Kamiya A, Furuya H (2007) Dicyema Pax6 and Zic: tool-kit genes in a highly simplified bilaterian. BMC Evol Biol 7:201
Goto A, Kitamura K, Arai A, Shimizu T (1999a) Cell fate analysis of teloblasts in the Tubifex embryo by intracellular injection of HRP. Dev Growth Differ 41:703–713
Goto A, Kitamura K, Shimizu T (1999b) Cell lineage analysis of pattern formation in the Tubifex embryo. I. Segmentation in the mesoderm. Int J Dev Biol 43:317–327
Inoue T, Ota M, Mikoshiba K, Aruga J (2007) Zic2 and Zic3 synergistically control neurulation and segmentation of paraxial mesoderm in mouse embryo. Dev Biol 306:669–684
Lichtneckert R, Reichert H (2005) Insights into the urbilaterian brain: conserved genetic patterning mechanisms in insect and vertebrate brain development. Heredity 94:465–477
Lindgens D, Holstein TW, Technau U (2004) Hyzic, the Hydra homolog of the zic/odd-paired gene, is involved in the early specification of the sensory nematocytes. Development 131:191–201
Matsuo K, Shimizu T (2006) Embryonic expression of a decapentaplegic gene in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. Gene Expr Patterns 6:800–806
Merzdorf CS (2007) Emerging roles for zic genes in early development. Dev Dyn 236:922–940
Nakamoto A, Arai A, Shimizu T (2000) Cell lineage analysis of pattern formation in the Tubifex embryo. II. Segmentation in the ectoderm. Int J Dev Biol 44:797–805
Oyama A, Shimizu T (2007) Transient occurrence of vasa-expressing cells in nongenital segments during embryonic development in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. Dev Genes Evol 217:675–690
Oyama A, Yoshida H, Shimizu T (2008) Embryonic expression of p68, a DEAD-box RNA helicase, in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. Gene Expr Patterns 8:464–470
Shimizu T (1982) Development in the freshwater oligochaete Tubifex. In: Harrison FH, Cowden RR (eds) Developmental biology of freshwater invertebrates. Liss, New York, pp 283–316
Takahashi H, Kamiya A, Ishiguro A, Suzuki AC, Saitou N, Toyoda A, Aruga J (2008) Conservation and diversification of Msx protein in metazoan evolution. Mol Biol Evol 25:69–82
Acknowledgments
We thank Takashi Inoue, Takahiko J. Fujimi, and other members of the Aruga laboratory for their helpful comments on the in situ hybridization experiments. This study was funded by the RIKEN Brain Science Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D.A. Weisblat
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, H., Shimizu, T. & Aruga, J. Expression pattern of annelid Zic in embryonic development of the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex . Dev Genes Evol 218, 553–560 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-008-0252-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-008-0252-x