Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp 678–689 | Cite as

That’s a good idea, but let’s keep thinking! Can we prevent our initial ideas from being forgotten as a consequence of thinking of new ideas?

  • Annie S. Ditta
  • Benjamin C. Storm
Original Article

Abstract

Four experiments examined participants’ ability to remember their own ideas in a modified Alternative Uses Task. Participants were asked to generate uses for objects, and on half of the trials participants were then asked to think of more uses. Memory for the initial uses they generated was then tested via a cued-recall task. Results demonstrated that participants forgot their initial uses as a consequence of thinking of new uses (referred to as the thinking-induced forgetting effect), and this effect persisted even when participants chose the subset of uses they thought were the most creative and to be remembered. The only scenario in which uses were protected from forgetting was when they were required to use their uses as hints for generating more ideas. Together, these findings demonstrate that one’s own ideas are susceptible to forgetting when additional ideas must be generated, indicating that thinking is a modifier of memory despite one’s motivation to preserve their ideas.

Keywords

Retrieval Practice Creative Idea Final Recall Thinking Condition Additional Thinking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank O. Altamirano, S. Chea, J. Grinkevich, P. Gunalp, M. Hickman, S. Katawetheesakun, S. Kotzman, P. Small, S. Shrikanth, K. Ramakrishnan, and K. Williams for their assistance with data collection and data coding, as well as N. Davidenko for his comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, M. C., Green, C., & McCulloch, K. C. (2000). Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: evidence for a two-factor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1141–1159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 608–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angello, G., Storm, B. C., & Smith, S. M. (2015). Overcoming fixation with repeated memory suppression. Memory, 23(3), 381–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aslan, A., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2011). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 264–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  8. Bäuml, K. H., & Hartinger, A. (2002). On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory, 10(3), 215–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bäuml, K. H. T., & Samenieh, A. (2010). The two faces of memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 21(6), 793–795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: a meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35(2), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, M., Campbell-Ratcliffe, J., Murnane, H., & Perfect, T. (2007). Retrieval-induced forgetting in educational contexts: monitoring, expertise, text integration, and test format. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 580–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan, J. C. K. (2009). When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delaney, P. F., Nghiem, K., & Waldum, E. R. (2009). The selective directed forgetting effect: can people forget only part of a text? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1542–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs58(5), i.Google Scholar
  16. Dunn, E. W., & Spellman, B. A. (2003). Forgetting by remembering: stereotype inhibition through rehearsal of alternative aspects of identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodmon, L. B., & Anderson, M. C. (2011). Semantic integration as a boundary condition on inhibitory processes in episodic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability.Google Scholar
  20. Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2013). Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: an inhibition-free, context-based account. Psychological Review, 120(4), 852–872.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kassam, K. S., Gilbert, D. T., Swencionis, J. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Misconceptions of Memory: the Scooter Libby Effect. Psychological Science, 20(5), 551–552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22, 340–348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Loftus, G. R., & Wickens, T. D. (1970). Effect of incentive on storage and retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85(1), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior: A variational approach to the effect of Einstellung.Google Scholar
  25. Macrae, C. N., & Roseveare, T. A. (2002). I was always on my mind: the self and temporary forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Migueles, M., & García-Bajos, E. (2007). Selective retrieval and induced forgetting in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(9), 1157–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1383–1409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I., Gavrilescu, D., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 965–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raaijmakers, J. G., & Jakab, E. (2013). Rethinking inhibition theory: on the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 98–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schilling, C. J., Storm, B. C., & Anderson, M. C. (2014). Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval. Cognition, 133(2), 358–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slamecka, N., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 14, 592–604.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 121–149). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 15–31). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, S. M. (2008). Invisible assumptions and the unintentional use of knowledge and experiences in creative cognition. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 12, 509–525.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(4), 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 61–87.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 28, 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2012). Cognition and the creation of ideas. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 456–474). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Storm, B. C. (2011). The benefit of forgetting in thinking and remembering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Storm, B. C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation: creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 21, 1263–1265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Storm, B. C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1287–1293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Storm, B. C., Angello, G., Buchli, D. R., Koppel, R. H., Little, J. L., & Nestojko, J. F. (2015). A review of retrieval-induced forgetting in the contexts of learning, eye-witness memory, social cognition, autobiographical memory, and creative cognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 141–194.Google Scholar
  47. Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). When intended remembering leads to unintended forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 909–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Storm, B. C., & Jobe, T. A. (2012). Remembering the past and imagining the future: examining the consequences of mental time travel on memory. Memory, 20, 224–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Storm, B. C., Koppel, R. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2013). Selective cues to forget can fail to cause forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Storm, B. C., & Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40, 827–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Storm, B. C., & Patel, T. N. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Google Scholar
  52. Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2007). Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations