Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Involvement of the 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase 4CL4 in rice phosphorus acquisition and rhizosphere microbe recruitment via root growth enlargement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Main conclusion

The 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase 4CL4 is involved in enhancing rice P acquisition and use in acid soil by enlarging root growth and boosting functional rhizosphere microbe recruitment.

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cannot easily acquire phosphorus (P) from acid soil, where root growth is inhibited and soil P is fixed. The combination of roots and rhizosphere microbiota is critical for plant P acquisition and soil P mobilization, but the associated molecular mechanism in rice is unclear. 4CL4/RAL1 encodes a 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase related to lignin biosynthesis in rice, and its dysfunction results in a small rice root system. In this study, soil culture and hydroponic experiments were conducted to examine the role of RAL1 in regulating rice P acquisition, fertilizer P use, and rhizosphere microbes in acid soil. Disruption of RAL1 markedly decreased root growth. Mutant rice plants exhibited decreased shoot growth, shoot P accumulation, and fertilizer P use efficiency when grown in soil—but not under hydroponic conditions, where all P is soluble and available for plants. Mutant ral1 and wild-type rice rhizospheres had distinct bacterial and fungal community structures, and wild-type rice recruited some genotype-specific microbial taxa associated with P solubilization. Our results highlight the function of 4CL4/RAL1 in enhancing rice P acquisition and use in acid soil, namely by enlarging root growth and boosting functional rhizosphere microbe recruitment. These findings can inform breeding strategies to improve P use efficiency through host genetic manipulation of root growth and rhizosphere microbiota.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw data for rhizosphere microbiota were submitted to the NCBI BioProject database under accession number PRJNA821392. Further detailed data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

4CL:

4-Coumarate:coenzyme A ligase

RAL1:

Resistance to aluminum 1

OTU:

Operational taxonomic unit

NMDS:

Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling

ANOSIM:

Analysis of similarities

References

  • Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO (2017) Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol 8:971

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AE, Grussu D, Kam J, Caul S, Halpin C (2015) Plant lignin content altered by soil microbial community. New Phytol 206:166–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertel D, Peck J, Quick TJ, Senko JM (2012) Iron transformations induced by an acid-tolerant Desulfosporosinus species. Appl Environ Microb 78:81–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley KL, Hancock JE, Giardina CP, Pregitzer KS (2007) Soil microbial community responses to altered lignin biosynthesis in Populus tremuloides vary among three distinct soils. Plant Soil 294:185–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, Van Themaat EVL, Schulze-Lefert P (2013) Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:807–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YP, Rekha PD, Arun AB, Shen FT, Lai WA, Young CC (2006) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Appl Soil Ecol 34:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen RF, Zhang FL, Zhang QM, Sun QB, Dong XY, Shen RF (2012) Aluminium–phosphorus interactions in plants growing on acid soils: does phosphorus always alleviate aluminium toxicity? J Sci Food Agr 92:995–1000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cong WF, Suriyagoda LDB, Lambers H (2020) Tightening the phosphorus cycle through phosphorus-efficient crop genotypes. Trends Plant Sci 25:967–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dai ZM, Liu GF, Chen HH, Chen CR, Wang JK, Ai SY, Wei D, Li DM, Ma B, Tang CX et al (2020) Long-term nutrient inputs shift soil microbial functional profiles of phosphorus cycling in diverse agroecosystems. ISME J 14:757–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC, Sharpley AN, Lemunyon JL (1998) Agricultural phosphorus and eutrophication: a symposium overview. J Environ Qual 27:251–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries FT, Griffiths RI, Bailey M, Craig H, Girlanda M, Gweon HS, Hallin S, Kaisermann A, Keith AM, Kretzschmar M et al (2018) Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks. Nat Commun 9:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruyn JM, Bevard DA, Essington ME, McKnight JY, Schaeffer SM, Baxter HL, Mazarei M, Mann DGJ, Dixon RA, Chen F, Zhuo CL, Wang ZY, Stewart CN Jr (2017) Field-grown transgenic switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) with altered lignin does not affect soil chemistry, microbiology, and carbon storage potential. GCB Bioenergy 9:1100–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durán P, Thiergart T, Garrido-Oter R, Agler M, Kemen E, Schulze-Lefert P, Hacquard S (2018) Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival. Cell 175:973–983

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fan XF, Ding SM, Gong MD, Chen MS, Gao SS, Jin ZF, Tsang DC (2018) Different influences of bacterial communities on Fe (III) reduction and phosphorus availability in sediments of the cyanobacteria- and macrophyte-dominated zones. Front Microbiol 9:2636

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fixen PE, Johnston AM (2012) World fertilizer nutrient reserves: a view to the future. J Sci Food Agr 92:1001–1005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamuyao R, Chin JH, Pariasca-Tanaka J, Pesaresi P, Catausan S, Dalid C, Slamet-Loedin I, Tecson-Mendoza EM, Wissuwa M, Heuer S (2012) The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature 488:535–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grafe M, Goers M, von Tucher S, Baum C, Zimmer D, Leinweber P, Vestergaard G, Kublik S, Schloter M, Schulz S (2018) Bacterial potentials for uptake, solubilization and mineralization of extracellular phosphorus in agricultural soils are highly stable under different fertilization regimes. Env Microbiol Rep 10:320–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han MG, Chen Y, Li R, Yu M, Fu LC, Li SF, Su JR, Zhu B (2022) Root phosphatase activity aligns with the collaboration gradient of the root economics space. New Phytol 234:837–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW (2005) Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol 168:293–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby R, Peukert M, Succurro A, Koprivova A, Kopriva S (2017) The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—current knowledge and future directions. Front Plant Sci 8:1617

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Fixen PE, Curtin D (2014) Phosphorus: its efficient use in agriculture. Adv Agron 123:177–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalam S, Basu A, Ahmad I, Sayyed R, El-Enshasy HA, Dailin DJ, Suriani NL (2020) Recent understanding of soil acidobacteria and their ecological significance: a critical review. Front Microbiol 11:580024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM, Kong HG, Song GC, Ryu CM (2021) Disruption of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria abundance in tomato rhizosphere causes the incidence of bacterial wilt disease. ISME J 15:330–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li XL, Zhao XQ, Dong XY, Ma JF, Shen RF (2021) Secretion of gluconic acid from Nguyenibacter sp. L1 is responsible for solubilization of aluminum phosphate. Front Microbiol 12:784025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Gao H, Wu X, Fang Q, Chen L, Zhao FJ, Huang CF (2016) Isolation and characterization of an aluminum-resistant mutant in rice. Rice 9:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Zhao L, Liao YH, Luo ZL, Wang H, Wang P, Zhao H, Xia JX, Huang CF (2020) Dysfunction of the 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase 4CL4 impacts aluminum resistance and lignin accumulation in rice. Plant J 104:1233–1250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YX, Qin Y, Chen T, Lu M, Qian X, Guo X, Bai Y (2021) A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data. Protein Cell 12:315–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JP, Brown KM (2008) Root strategies for phosphorus acquisition. In: White PJ, Hammond JP (eds) The ecophysiology of plant-phosphorus interactions. Springer, pp 83–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ma JF, Ryan PR, Delhaize E (2001) Aluminium tolerance in plants and the complexing role of organic acids. Trends Plant Sci 6:273–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma JF, Shen RF, Zhao ZQ, Wissuwa M, Takeuchi Y, Ebitani T, Yano M (2002) Response of rice to Al stress and identification of quantitative trait loci for Al tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 43:652–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald GK, Bennett EM, Potter PA, Ramankutty N (2011) Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world’s croplands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3086–3091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanram S, Kumar P (2019) Rhizosphere microbiome: revisiting the synergy of plant-microbe interactions. Ann Microbiol 69:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu YF, Chai RS, Jin GL, Wang H, Tang CX, Zhang YS (2013) Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review. Ann Bot 112:391–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Community ecology package. R Pack Ver 2:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid MI, Mujawar LH, Shahzad T, Almeelbi T, Ismail IM, Oves M (2016) Bacteria and fungi can contribute to nutrients bioavailability and aggregate formation in degraded soils. Microbiol Res 183:26–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond NS, Gómez-Muñoz B, van der Bom FJT, Nybroe O, Jensen LS, Müller-Stöver DS, Oberson A, Richardson AE (2021) Phosphate-solubilising microorganisms for improved crop productivity: a critical assessment. New Phytol 229:1268–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AE, Simpson RJ (2011) Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol 156:989–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez PA, Rothballer M, Chowdhury SP, Nussbaumer T, Gutjahr C, Falter-Braun P (2019) Systems biology of plant-microbiome interactions. Mol Plant 12:804–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Andrea I, Stams AJ, Hedrich S, Ňancucheo I, Johnson DB (2015) Desulfosporosinus acididurans sp. nov.: an acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from acidic sediments. Extremophiles 19:39–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse J, Martinoia E, Northen T (2018) Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends in Plant Sci 23:25–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus 2:587

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shen JB, Yuan LX, Zhang JL, Li HG, Bai ZH, Chen XP, Zhang WF, Zhang FS (2011) Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol 156:997–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Strock CF, Morrow de la Riva L, Lynch JP (2018) Reduction in root secondary growth as a strategy for phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol 176:691–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK (2020) Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:607–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner TR, James EK, Poole PS (2013) The plant microbiome. Genome Biol 14:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol 157:423–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vejchasarn P, Lynch JP, Brown KM (2016) Genetic variability in phosphorus responses of rice root phenotypes. Rice 9:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll HR, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microb 73:5261–5267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JL, Liu KL, Zhao XQ, Zhang HQ, Li D, Li JJ, Shen RF (2021) Balanced fertilization over four decades has sustained soil microbial communities and improved soil fertility and rice productivity in red paddy soil. Sci Total Environ 793:148664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Withers PJA, Sylvester-Bradley R, Jones DL, Healey JR, Talboys PJ (2014) Feed the crop not the soil: rethinking phosphorus management in the food chain. Environ Sci Technol 48:6523–6530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao X, Wang JL, Li JJ, Li XL, Dai XJ, Shen RF, Zhao XQ (2022) Distinct patterns of rhizosphere microbiota associated with rice genotypes differing in aluminum tolerance in an acid sulfate soil. Front Microbiol 13:933722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong JB, Lu J, Li X, Qiu Q, Chen J, Yan C (2021) Effect of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotype on yield: Evidence from recruiting spatially consistent rhizosphere microbiome. Soil Biol Biochem 161:108395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan L, Li S, Cheng J, Zhang YR, Jiang CC (2022) Boron-mediated lignin metabolism in response to aluminum toxicity in citrus (Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.) root. Plant Physiol Biochem 185:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Liu YX, Zhang N, Hu B, Jin T, Xu HR, Qin Y, Yan PX, Zhang XN, Guo XX et al (2019) NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat Biotechnol 37:676–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XQ, Chen RF, Shen RF (2014) Coadaptation of plants to multiple stresses in acidic soils. Soil Sci 179:503–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to C-F Huang for providing rice seed materials and nice comments on this study. We thank HZ, JL, XL, and YW: for their assistance with rice cultivation and soil sampling. We thank LB (Edanz) (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac) for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (nos XDA24020104 and XDA24040203) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 42077101 and 31672229).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue Qiang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

425_2023_4158_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary file 1: Table S1 Primers used for detection of Pi starvation response gene expression. Table S2 Primers and thermal cycling protocols used for high-throughput sequencing. Table S3 Analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) test of the effects of P level and genotype on the beta diversity of bacterial and fungal community structures based on Bray–Curtis distance matrixes. Table S4 Mantel test of the correlation between selected soil and rice properties based on Euclidean distances and rhizosphere microbiological structure based on Bray–Curtis distances. Table S5 Bacterial and fungal OTUs enriched in the rhizosphere of Kasalath and ral1 under non-liming (-Ca) and liming (+ Ca) conditions. Table S6 Key topological features of co-occurrence network patterns under non-liming (-Ca) and liming (+ Ca) conditions. Table S7 Relative abundance and taxonomy of hub species in co-occurrence networks. Fig. S1 The general biosynthesis pathway of lignin in higher plants modified from Liu et al. (2018). Green words indicate the specific step of 4CL4 involved in lignin biosynthesis. PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; TAL, tyrosine ammonia-lyase; C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; 4CL, 4-coumarate: CoA ligase; CCR, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; HCT, hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA shikimate/Quinatehydroxycinnamoyltransferase; C3H, p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; CCoAOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase; F5H, ferulate 5-hydroxylase; CSE, caffeoyl shikimate esterase; COMT, caffeic acid O-methyltransferase; CAD, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; LAC, laccase; POD, peroxidase. Fig. S2 Shoot growth picture of Kasalath and ral1 under the soil culture experiment. 10-day-old seedlings were grown in soil supplemented with 0, 10, or 50 mg kg−1 P under liming (+ Ca) or non-liming (-Ca) conditions for 40 days. Fig. S3 Short-term P uptake rate of wild-type Kasalath rice and its mutant ral1. Sixteen-day-old seedlings were exposed to 10 or 180 μM P for 4 h. Asterisks indicate significant differences between Kasalath and ral1 at the same P level (P < 0.05, independent-sample t-test). Data are means ± standard deviation (n = 4). Fig. S4 Gene expression related to rice P starvation responses. 10-day-old rice plants were exposed to half-strength Kimura B solution (pH 4.6) containing 5, 20, 90, or 180 μM P for 10 days, and then roots were sampled for the expression analysis. Expression level relative to Kasalath with 90 μM P is shown. Different uppercase and lowercase letters above bars indicate significant differences among different P levels for Kasalath and ral1, respectively (P < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test). Asterisks indicate significant differences between Kasalath and ral1 under the same treatment conditions (P < 0.05, independent-sample t-test). Data are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Fig. S5 Richness and Shannon diversity indexes of bacteria (a, c) and fungi (b, d) in rhizosphere soils of wild-type Kasalath rice and its mutant ral1 at different P levels under liming (+ Ca) and non-liming (-Ca) conditions. Different uppercase and lowercase letters above bars indicate significant differences among different P levels for Kasalath and ral1, respectively (P < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test). Data are means (n = 4). Fig. S6 Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of bacterial (a) and fungal (b) community structure based on a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Fig. S7 Stamp analysis of the relative abundance of bacterial (a, b) and fungal (c, d) phyla at the 95% confidence interval level between Kasalath and ral1 under liming (+ Ca) and non-liming (-Ca) conditions. Fig. S8 Soil chemical properties of rhizospheres of Kasalath and ral1 at different P levels under liming (+ Ca) and non-liming (-Ca) conditions. a Soil pH. b Bray P. c Exchangeable Al. Different uppercase and lowercase letters above bars indicate significant differences among different P levels for Kasalath and ral1, respectively (P < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test). Asterisks indicate significant differences between Kasalath and ral1 under the same treatment conditions (P < 0.05, independent-sample t-test). Data are means ± standard deviation (n = 4) (DOCX 8032 KB)

425_2023_4158_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx

Supplementary file 2: Table S5 Bacterial and fungal OTUs enriched in the rhizosphere of Kasalath and ral1 under non-liming (-Ca) and liming (+ Ca) conditions (XLSX 55 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, X., Hu, A.Y., Dong, X.Y. et al. Involvement of the 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase 4CL4 in rice phosphorus acquisition and rhizosphere microbe recruitment via root growth enlargement. Planta 258, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-023-04158-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-023-04158-4

Keywords

Navigation