Skip to main content
Log in

Differential expression of two β-amylase genes (Bmy1 and Bmy2) in developing and mature barley grain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) β-amylase genes (Bmy1 and Bmy2) were studied during the late maturation phase of grain development in four genotypes. The Bmy1 and Bmy2 DNA and amino acid sequences are extremely similar. The largest sequence differences are in the introns, seventh exon, and 3′ UTR. Accumulation of Bmy2 mRNA was examined in developing grain at 17, 19, and 21 days after anthesis (DAA). One genotype, PI 296897, had significantly higher Bmy2 RNA transcript accumulation than the other three genotypes at all developmental stages. All four genotypes had Bmy2 mRNA levels decrease from 17 to 19 DAA, and remain the same from 19 to 21 DAA. Levels of Bmy1 mRNA were twenty thousand to over one hundred thousand times more than Bmy2 mRNA levels in genotypes Legacy, Harrington, and Ashqelon at all developmental stages and PI 296897 at 19 and 21 DAA. PI 296897 had five thousand times more Bmy1 mRNA than Bmy2 mRNA at 17 DAA. However, Bmy2 protein was not found at 17 DAA in any genotype. The presence of Bmy2 was immunologically detected at 19 DAA and was present in greater amounts at 21 DAA. Also, Bmy2 protein was found to be stored in mature grain and localized in the soluble fraction. However, Bmy1 protein was far more prevalent than Bmy2 at all developmental stages in all genotypes. Thus, the vast majority of β-amylase activity in developing and mature grain can be attributed to endosperm-specific β-amylase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DAA:

Days after anthesis

RT-qPCR:

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

RER:

Relative expression ratio

References

  • Burton RA, Shirley NJ, King BJ, Harvey AJ, Fincher GB (2004) The CesA gene family of barley. Quantitative analysis of transcripts reveals two groups of co-expressed genes. Plant Physiol 134:224–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SE, Hayes PM, Henson CA (2003) Effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms in β-amylase1 alleles from barley on functional properties of the enzymes. Plant Physiol Biochem 41:798–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SE, Hayes PM, Henson CA (2005) Characterization of barley tissue-ubiquitous β-amylase2 and effects of the single nucleotide polymorphisms on the enzyme’s thermostability. Crop Sci 45:1868–1877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daussant J, Laurière C (1990) Detection and partial characterization of 2 antigenically distinct β-amylases in developing kernels of wheat. Planta 181:505–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doehlert DC, Duke SH (1983) Specific determination of α-amylase activity in crude plant extracts containing β-amylase. Plant Physiol 71:229–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duke SH, Henson CA (2009a) A comparison of barley malt amylolytic enzyme activities as indicators of malt sugar concentrations. J Am Soc Brew Chem 67:99–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duke SH, Henson CA (2009b) A comparison of barley malt osmolyte concentrations and standard malt quality measurements as indicators of barley malt amylolytic enzyme activities. J Am Soc Brew Chem 67:206–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eglinton JK, Langridge P, Evans DE (1998) Thermostability variation in alleles of barley β-amylase. J Cereal Sci 28:301–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä MJ (1999) Intron III-specific markers for screening of β-amylase alleles in barley cultivars. Plant Mol Biol Rep 17:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä MJ, Ahokas H (2001) Special barley β-amylase allele in a Finnish landrace line HA52 with high grain enzyme activity. Hereditas 134:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä MJ, Leah R, Ahokas H, Cameronmills V (1998) Allele-dependent barley grain β-amylase activity. Plant Physiol 117:679–685

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filichkin TP, Vinje MA, Budde AD, Corey AE, Duke SH, Gallagher L, Helgesson J, Henson CA, Obert DE, Ohm JB, Petrie SE, Ross AS, Hayes PM (2010) Phenotypic variation for diastatic power, β-amylase activity, and β-amylase thermostability vs. allelic variation at the Bmy1 locus in a sample of North American barley germplasm. Crop Sci 50:826–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin JR, Lance RCM, Wallace W (1992) Release and activation of barley β-amylase by malt endopeptidases. J Cereal Sci 15:5–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M, Daussant J (1986) Conversion of free β-amylase to bound β-amylase on starch granules in the barley endosperm during desiccation phase of seed development. Protoplasma 134:149–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henson CA, Duke SH (2008) A comparison of standard and nonstandard measures of malt quality. J Am Soc Brew Chem 66:11–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung W, Skadsen RW, Peterson DM (2001) Characterization of a novel barley β-amylase gene expressed only during early grain development. Seed Sci Res 11:325–333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreis M, Williamson M, Buxton B, Pywell J, Hejgaard J, Svendsen I (1987) Primary structure and differential expression of β-amylase in normal and mutant barleys. Eur J Biochem 169:517–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreis M, Williamson MS, Shewry PR, Sharp P, Gale M (1988) Identification of a second locus encoding β-amylase on chromosome 2 of barley. Genet Res 51:13–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livak KJ, Schmitgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 25:402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Stewart DC, Eglinton JK, Logue SJ, Langridge P, Evans DE (2000) Comparative enzyme kinetics of two allelic forms of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) β-amylase. J Cereal Sci 31:335–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma YF, Evans DE, Logue SJ, Langridge P (2001) Mutations of barley β-amylase that improve substrate-binding affinity and thermostability. Mol Genet Genomics 266:345–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mutisya J, Sathish P, Sun CX, Andersson L, Ahlandsberg S, Baguma Y, Palmqqvist S, Odhiambo B, Aman P, Jansson C (2003) Starch branching enzymes in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and barley (Hordeum vulgare): comparative analyses of enzyme structure and gene expression. J Plant Physiol 160:921–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen G, Johansen H, Jensen J, Hejgaard J (1983) Localization on barley chromosome 4 of genes coding for β-amylase (Bmy1) and protein Z (Paz1). Barley Genet Newsl 13:55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2002–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper–excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26:509–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powling A, Islam AKMR, Shepherd KW (1981) Isozymes in wheat-barley hybrid derivative lines. Biochem Genet 19:237–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radchuk VV, Borisjuk L, Sreenivasulu N, Merx K, Mock HP, Rolletschek H, Wobus U, Weschke W (2009) Spatiotemporal profiling of starch biosynthesis and degradation in the developing barley grain. Plant Physiol 150:190–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen R (2001) Quantification on the LightCycler instrument. In: Meurer S, Wittwer C, Nakagawara K (eds) Rapid cycle real-time PCR: methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 21–34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rorat T, Sadowski J, Irzykowski W, Ziegler P, Daussant J (1995) Differential expression of two β-amylase genes of rye during seed development. Physiol Plant 94:19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shewry PR, Parmar S, Buxton B, Gale MD, Liu CJ, Hejgaard J, Kreis M (1988) Multiple molecular forms of β-amylase in seeds and vegetative tissues of barley. Planta 176:127–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjakste TG, Zhuk AF (2006) Novel haplotype description and structural background of the eventual functional significance of the barley β-amylase gene intron III rearrangements. Theor Appl Genet 113:1063–1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sopanen T, Laurière C (1989) Release and activity of bound β-amylase in germinating barley grain. Plant Physiol 89:244–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Henson CA (1991) A quantitative assessment of the importance of barley seed α-amylase, β-amylase, debranching enzyme, and α-glucosidase in starch degradation. Arch Biochem Biophys 284:298–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vinje MA, Duke SH, Henson CA (2010) Utilization of different Bmy1 intron III alleles for predicting β-amylase activity and thermostability in wild and cultivated barley. Plant Mol Biol Rep 28:491–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vinje MA, Willis DK, Duke SH, Henson CA (2011) Differential RNA expression of Bmy1 during seed development and the association with β-amylase accumulation, activity, and total protein. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:39–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner G, Zemanova L, Hager KP, Ziegler P (1999) The major β-amylase isoforms of wheat leaves correspond to one of two ubiquitously expressed β-amylase genes. Plant Physiol Biochem 37:515–530

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshigi N, Okada Y, Sahara H, Koshino S (1994) PCR cloning and sequencing of the β-amylase cDNA from barley. J Biochem 115:47–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Charles Karpelenia for his excellent technical assistance and Dr. Ron Skadsen for the generous donation of antibodies. Research supported by USDA-ARS and USDA-CREES U.S. Barley Genome Project Special Grant. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other suitable products.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia A. Henson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (EPS 1582 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (EPS 1591 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinje, M.A., Willis, D.K., Duke, S.H. et al. Differential expression of two β-amylase genes (Bmy1 and Bmy2) in developing and mature barley grain. Planta 233, 1001–1010 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1348-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1348-5

Keywords

Navigation