Skip to main content
Log in

Accumulation of multiple-repeat starch-binding domains (SBD2–SBD5) does not reduce amylose content of potato starch granules

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates whether it is possible to produce an amylose-free potato starch by displacing the amylose enzyme, granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSSI), from the starch granule by engineered, high-affinity, multiple-repeat family 20 starch-binding domains (SBD2, SBD3, SBD4, and SBD5). The constructs were introduced in the amylose-containing potato cultivar (cv. Kardal), and the starches of the resulting transformants were compared with those of SBD2-expressing amylose-free (amf) potato clones. It is shown that a correctly sized protein accumulated in the starch granules of the various transformants. The amount of SBD accumulated in starch increased progressively from SBD to SBD3; however, it seemed as if less SBD4 and SBD5 was accumulated. A reduction in amylose content was not achieved in any of the transformants. However, it is shown that SBDn expression can affect physical processes underlying granule assembly, in both genetic potato backgrounds, without altering the primary structure of the constituent starch polymers and the granule melting temperature. Granule size distribution of the starches obtained from transgenic Kardal plants were similar to those from untransformed controls, irrespective of the amount of SBDn accumulated. In the amf background, granule size is severely affected. In both the Kardal and amf background, apparently normal oval-shaped starch granules were composed of multiple smaller ones, as evidenced from the many “Maltese crosses” within these granules. The results are discussed in terms of different binding modes of SBD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8a-f
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SBD:

Starch-binding domain

SBD2:

Double starch-binding domain

GBSSI:

Granule-bound starch synthase I

amf :

Amylose-free

LM:

Light microscopy

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

DSC:

Differential scanning calorimetry

KD-UT:

Kardal untransformed

amf-UT:

Amylose-free mutant untransformed

KDS:

Kardal transformant containing SBD gene

KDSS:

Kardal transformant containing double SBD gene

KDS3:

Kardal transformant containing triple SBD gene

KDS4:

Kardal transformant containing quadruple SBD gene

KDS5:

Kardal transformant containing pentuple SBD gene

amfS:

amf mutant transformed with SBD gene

amfSS:

amf mutant transformed with double SBD gene

References

  • Boraston AB, McLean BW, Chen G, Li A, Warren RAJ, Kilburn DG (2002) Co-operative binding of triplicate carbohydrate-binding modules from a thermophilic xylanase. Mol Microbiol 43:187–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bustos R, Fahy B, Hylton CM, Seale R, Nebane NM, Edwards A, Martin C, Smith A (2004) Starch granule initiation is controlled by a heteromultimeric isoamylase in potato tubers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2215–2220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards A, Borthakur A, Bornemann S, Venail J, Denyer K, Waite D, Fulton D, Smith A, Martin C (1999a) Specificity of starch synthase isoforms from potato. Eur J Biochem 266:724–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards A, Fulton DC, Hylton CM, Jobling SA, Gidley M, Rössner U, Martin C, Smith AM (1999b) A combined reduction in activity of starch synthases II and III of potato has novel effects on the starch of tubers. Plant J 17:251–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flipse E, Keetels CJAM, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF (1996) The dosage effect of the wildtype GBSS allele is linear for GBSS activity but not for amylose content: absence of amylose has a distinct influence on the physico-chemical properties of starch. Theor Appl Genet 92:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton DC, Edwards A, Pilling E, Robinson HL, Fahy B, Seale R, Kato L, Donald AM, Geigenberger P, Martin C, Smith AM (2003) Role of granule-bound starch synthase in determination of amylopectin structure and starch granule morphology in potato. J Biol Chem 277:10834–10841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giardina T, Gunning AP, Juge N, Faulds CB, Furniss CSM, Svensson B, Morris VJ, Williamson G (2001) Both binding sites of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase are essential for inducing a conformational change in amylose. J Mol Biol 313:1149–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hovenkamp-Hermelink JHM, de Vries JN, Adamse P, Jacobsen E, Witholt B, Feenstra WJ (1988) Rapid estimation of the amylose/amylopectin ratio in small amounts of tuber and leaf tissue of potato. Potato Res 31:241–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt CA, Rahman S, Morell MK (2006) Expression of bacterial starch-binding domains in Arabidopsis increases starch granule size. Func Plant Biol 33:257–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Q, Vincken J-P, Suurs LCJM, Visser RGF (2003) Microbial starch-binding domain as a tool for targeting proteins to granules during starch biosynthesis. Plant Mol Biol 51:789–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Q, Oomen RJFJ, Vincken J-P, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Suurs LCJM, Visser RGF (2004) Reduction of starch granule size by expression of an engineered tandem starch-binding domain in potato plants. Plant Biotechnol J 2:251–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobling SA, Westcott RJ, Tayal A, Jeffcoat R, Schwall GP (2002) Production of a freeze-thaw-stable potato starch by antisense inhibition of three starch synthase genes. Nat Biotechnol 20:295–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kok-Jacon GA, Ji Q, Vincken J-P, Visser RGF (2003) Towards a more versatile α-glucan biosynthesis in plants. J Plant Physiol 160:765–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kok-Jacon GA, Vincken J-P, Suurs LCJM, Visser RGF (2005) Mutan produced in potato amyloplasts adheres to starch granules. Plant Biotechnol J 3:341–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kossmann J, Lloyd J (2000) Understanding and influencing starch biochemistry. Crit Rev Plant Sci 19:171–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers AGJ, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF (1994) Formation and deposition of amylose in the potato tuber starch granule are affected by the reduction of granule-bound starch synthase gene expression. Plant Cell 6:43–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JR, Landschütze V, Kossmann J (1999a) Simultaneous antisense inhibition of two starch synthase isoforms in potato tubers leads to accumulation of grossly modified amylopectin. Biochem J 338:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JR, Springer F, Buleon A, Müller-Röber B, Willmitzer L, Kossmann J (1999b) The influence of alterations in ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activities on starch structure and composition in potato tubers. Planta 209:230–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris VJ, Gunning AP, Faulds CB, Williamsson G, Svensson B (2005) AFM images of complexes between amylose and Aspergillus niger glucoamylase mutants, native and mutant starch binding domains: a model for the action of glucoamylase. Starch 57:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paldi T, Levy I, Shoseyov O (2003) Glucoamylase starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger B1: molecular cloning and functional characterization. Biochem J 372:905–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng M, Gao M, Båga M, Hucl P, Chibbar RN (2000) Starch branching enzymes preferentially associated with A-type starch granules in wheat endosperm. Plant Physiol 124:265–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwall GP, Safford R, Westcott RJ, Jeffcoat R, Tayal A, Shi Y-C, Gidley MJ, Jobling SA (2000) Production of very-high-amylose potato starch by inhibition of SBE A and B. Nat Biotechnol 18:551–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southall SM, Simpson PJ, Gilbert HJ, Williamson G, Williamson MP (1999) The starch-binding domain from glucoamylase disrupts the structure of starch. FEBS Lett 447:58–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visser RGF (1991) Regeneration and transformation of potato by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Tiss Cult Man B5:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser RGF, Suurs LCJM, Bruinenberg PM, Bleeker I, Jacobsen E (1997a) Comparison between amylose-free and amylose containing potato starches. Starch 49:438–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visser RGF, Suurs LCJM, Steeneken PAM, Jacobsen E (1997b) Some physicochemical properties of amylose-free potato starch. Starch 49:443–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos-Scheperkeuter GH, de Boer W, Visser RGF, Feenstra WJ, Witholt B (1986) Identification of granule-bound starch synthase in potato tubers. Plant Physiol 82:411–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wakelin JH, Virgin HS, Crystal E (1959) Development and comparison of two X-ray methods for determining the crystallinity of cotton cellulose. J Appl Phys 30:1654–1662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard G. F. Visser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Firouzabadi, F.N., Vincken, JP., Ji, Q. et al. Accumulation of multiple-repeat starch-binding domains (SBD2–SBD5) does not reduce amylose content of potato starch granules. Planta 225, 919–933 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0411-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0411-0

Keywords

Navigation