Abstract.
In this work we studied the proton secretion mechanisms in recently cloned MDCK–C11 cells. We measured intracellular pH (pHi) in monolayers grown on permeable filters, using the pH-sensitive probe BCECF and an inverted epifluorescence microscope. The cells have a basal pHi of 7.20±0.01 (n=136) and after an acid-releasing NH4Cl pulse pHi recovered at a rate (dpHi/dt) of 0.167±0.006 pH units/ per minute (n=20). This rate decreased significantly when Na+ was removed from both cell surfaces, and was further reduced when they were both perfused with a solution containing no Na+ and K+. pHi recovery fell again in the presence of concanamycin (at a concentration of 4.6×10–8 M; a specific inhibitor of the vacuolar H+-ATPase). When Na+ was removed from the apical or the basolateral side, pHi recovery (in pH units per minute) was significantly reduced to 0.099±0.008 (n=11) and 0.086±0.01 (n=10), respectively. The Na+-independent mechanism of pHi recovery was significantly inhibited by the presence of 5×10–5 M Schering 28080 (an inhibitor of the H+-K+-ATPase) at the apical side (0.065±0.01 versus 0.099±0.008 pH units per minute, P<0.05), but not at the basolateral side (0.072±0.01 versus 0.086±0.01 pH units per minute). On the other hand, concanamycin inhibited the Na+-independent pHi recovery when applied apically (0.0304±0.005 pH units per minute, n=7) and basolaterally (0.025±0.004 pH units per minute, n=7). From these results we conclude that monolayers of MDCK–C11 cells have a Na+/H+ exchanger and a concanamycin-sensitive H+-ATPase on their apical and basolateral membranes; and a K+-dependent, Schering 28080-sensitive H+-K+-ATPase on their apical side.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received after revision: 26 June 2000
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandez, R., Oliveira-Souza, M. & Malnic, G. Na+-independent proton secretion in MDCK–C11 cells. Pflügers Arch - Eur J Physiol 441, 287–293 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004240000411
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004240000411