Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein–to–albumin ratio as prognostic factors for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the prognostic value of C-reactive protein–to–albumin (CAR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) in conjunction with host-related factors in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

Methods

A total of 411 patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer were treated at Kochi Medical School between 2007 and 2019. Associations between clinicopathological parameters and systemic inflammatory and nutritional markers, including CAR and NLR, with overall survival were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

The optimal cut-off values of predicted median survival time were 0.096 (sensitivity, 74.9%; specificity, 42.5%) for CAR and 3.47 (sensitivity, 64.1%; specificity, 57.5%) for NLR, based on the results of receiver operating characteristic analysis. A weak significant positive correlation was identified between CAR and NLR (r = 0.388, P < 0.001). The median survival time was significantly higher in patients with intestinal-type than those with diffuse-type histology (18.3 months vs. 9.5 months; P = 0.001), CAR < 0.096 than those with CAR ≥ 0.096 (14.8 months vs. 9.9 months; P < 0.029), and those with NLR < 3.47 than NLR ≥ 3.47 (14.7 months vs. 8.8 months; P < 0.001). Multivariate survival analysis revealed that diffuse-type histology (hazard ratio (HR) 1.865; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.397–2.490; P < 0.001)), 1 or more performance status (HR 11.510; 95% CI 7.941–16.683; P < 0.001), and NLR ≥ 3.47 (HR 1.341; 95% CI 1.174–1.769; P = 0.023) were significantly associated with independent predictors of worse prognosis.

Conclusions

High CAR and NLR are associated with poor survival in patients with unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Digklia A, Wagner AD (2016) Advanced gastric cancer: current treatment landscape and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 22:2403–2414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021 Feb 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660. Online ahead of print.

  3. Fidler MM, Gupta S, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Bray F (2017) Cancer incidence and mortality among young adults aged 20–39 years worldwide in 2012: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 18:1579–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohtsu A, Yoshida S, Saijo N (2006) Disparities in gastric cancer chemotherapy between the East and West. J Clin Oncol 24:2188–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2021) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer 24:1–21.

  6. Namikawa T, Kawanishi Y, Fujisawa K, Munekage E, Iwabu J, Munekage M, Maeda H, Kitagawa H, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2018) Serum carbohydrate antigen 125 is a significant prognostic marker in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Surg Today 48:388–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wen J, Bedford M, Begum R, Mitchell H, Hodson J, Whiting J, Griffiths E (2018) The value of inflammation based prognostic scores in patients undergoing surgical resection for oesophageal and gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 117:1697–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tokunaga R, Sakamoto Y, Nakagawa S, Izumi D, Kosumi K, Taki K, Higashi T, Miyata T, Miyamoto Y, Yoshida N, Baba H (2017) Comparison of systemic inflammatory and nutritional scores in colorectal cancer patients who underwent potentially curative resection. Int J Clin Oncol 22:740–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Namikawa T, Munekage E, Munekage M, Maeda H, Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2016) Evaluation of systemic inflammatory response biomarkers in patients receiving chemotherapy for unresectable and recurrent advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 90:321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saito H, Kono Y, Murakami Y, Shishido Y, Kuroda H, Matsunaga T, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, Ashida K, Fujiwara Y (2018) Prognostic significance of the preoperative ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer patients. World J Surg 42:1819–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kudou K, Saeki H, Nakashima Y, Kamori T, Kawazoe T, Haruta Y, Fujimoto Y, Matsuoka H, Sasaki S, Jogo T, Hirose K, Hu Q, Tsuda Y, Kimura K, Ando K, Oki E, Ikeda T, Maehara Y (2019) C-reactive protein/albumin ratio is a poor prognostic factor of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 34:355–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshida K, Yamaguchi K, Okumura N, Tanahashi T, Kodera Y (2016) Is conversion therapy possible in stage IV gastric cancer: the proposal of new biological categories of classification. Gastric Cancer 19:329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Namikawa T, Marui A, Yokota K, Fujieda Y, Munekage M, Uemura S, Maeda H, Kitagawa H, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2021) Successful conversion surgery for advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases following ramucirumab plus paclitaxel combination treatment. In Vivo 35:2929–2935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histoclinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Rüschoff J, Kang YK, Investigators TT (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376:687–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, Miyashita K, Nishizaki T, Kobayashi O, Takiyama W, Toh Y, Nagaie T, Takagi S, Yamamura Y, Yanaoka K, Orita H, Takeuchi M (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, Koizumi W, Saito H, Yamaguchi K, Takiuchi H, Nasu J, Ohtsu A; Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069

  18. Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Sugimoto N, Lipatov O, Kim TY, Cunningham D, Rougier P, Komatsu Y, Ajani J, Emig M, Carlesi R, Ferry D, Chandrawansa K, Schwartz JD, Ohtsu A; RAINBOW Study Group (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235

  19. Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T, Ryu MH, Chao Y, Kato K, Chung HC, Chen JS, Muro K, Kang WK, Yeh KH, Yoshikawa T, Oh SC, Bai LY, Tamura T, Lee KW, Hamamoto Y, Kim JG, Chin K, Oh DY, Minashi K, Cho JY, Tsuda M, Chen LT (2017) Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390:2461–2471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shitara K, Doi T, Dvorkin M, Mansoor W, Arkenau HT, Prokharau A, Alsina M, Ghidini M, Faustino C, Gorbunova V, Zhavrid E, Nishikawa K, Hosokawa A, Yalçın Ş, Fujitani K, Beretta GD, Cutsem EV, Winkler RE, Makris L, Ilson DH, Tabernero J (2018) Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:1437–1448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakurai K, Ohira M, Tamura T, Toyokawa T, Amano R, Kubo N, Tanaka H, Muguruma K, Yashiro M, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2016) Predictive potential of preoperative nutritional status in long-term outcome projections for patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saito H, Kono Y, Murakami Y, Shishido Y, Kuroda H, Matsunaga T, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, Ashida K, Fujiwara Y (2018) Prognostic significance of platelet-based inflammatory indicators in patients with gastric cancer. World J Surg 42:2542–2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Namikawa T, Yokota K, Tanioka N, Fukudome I, Iwabu J, Munekage M, Uemura S, Maeda H, Kitagawa H, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2020) Systemic inflammatory response and nutritional biomarkers as predictors of nivolumab efficacy for gastric cancer. Surg Today 50:1486–1495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kong F, Gao F, Chen J, Zheng R, Liu H, Li X, Yang P, Liu G, Jia Y (2016) Elevated serum C-reactive protein level predicts a poor prognosis for recurrent gastric cancer. Oncotarget 7:55765–55770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mao M, Wei X, Sheng H, Chi P, Liu Y, Huang X, Xiang Y, Zhu Q, Xing S, Liu W (2017) C-reactive protein/albumin and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios and their combination predict overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 14:7417–7424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Namikawa T, Ishida N, Tsuda S, Fujisawa K, Munekage E, Iwabu J, Munekage M, Uemura S, Tsujii S, Tamura T, Yatabe T, Maeda H, Kitagawa H, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K (2019) Prognostic significance of serum alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 22:684–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu J, Xu BB, Zheng ZF, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Zheng CH, Huang CM, Li P (2019) CRP/prealbumin, a novel inflammatory index for predicting recurrence after radical resection in gastric cancer patients: post hoc analysis of a randomized phase III trial. Gastric Cancer 22:536–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A, Shigemori T, Ichikawa T, Yin C, Suzuki A, Fujikawa H, Yasuda H, Hiro J, Yoshiyama S, Ohi M, Araki T, McMillan DC, Kusunoki M (2020) Lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio and score are clinically feasible nutrition-inflammation markers of outcome in patients with gastric cancer. Clin Nutr 39:1209–1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ni XF, Wu J, Ji M, Shao YJ, Xu B, Jiang JT, Wu CP (2018) Effect of the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio on prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer . Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 14:402–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Z, Jin K, Guo M, Long J, Liu L, Liu C, Xu J, Ni Q, Luo G, Yu X (2017) Prognostic value of the CRP/Alb ratio, a novel inflammation-based score in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 24:561–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shibutani M, Maeda K, Nagahara H, Iseki Y, Ikeya T, Hirakawa K (2016) Prognostic significance of the preoperative ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin in patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 36:995–1001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Otowa Y, Nakamura T, Yamamoto M, Kanaji S, Matsuda Y, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Sumi Y, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2017) C-reactive protein to albumin ratio is a prognostic factor for patients with cStage II/III esophageal squamous cell cancer. Dis Esophagus 30:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu X, Sun X, Liu J, Kong P, Chen S, Zhan Y, Xu D (2015) Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for gastric cancer. Transl Oncol 8:339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Takahari D, Boku N, Mizusawa J, Takashima A, Yamada Y, Yoshino T, Yamazaki K, Koizumi W, Fukase K, Yamaguchi K, Goto M, Nishina T, Tamura T, Tsuji A, Ohtsu A (2014) Determination of prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer using the data from a randomized controlled trial, Japan clinical oncology group 9912. Oncologist 19:358–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Takahari D, Mizusawa J, Koizumi W, Hyodo I, Boku N (2017) Validation of the JCOG prognostic index in advanced gastric cancer using individual patient data from the SPIRITS and G-SOX trials. Gastric Cancer 20:757–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang H, Xing XM, Ma LN, Liu L, Hao J, Feng LX, Yu Z (2018) Metastatic lymph node ratio and Lauren classification are independent prognostic markers for survival rates of patients with gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 15:8853–8862

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Berlth F, Bollschweiler E, Drebber U, Hoelscher AH, Moenig S (2014) Pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer: diagnostic relevance and prognostic value. World J Gastroenterol 20:5679–5684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mönig S, Baldus SE, Collet PH, Zirbes TK, Bollschweiler E, Thiele J, Dienes HP, Hölscher AH (2001) Histological grading of gastric cancer by Goseki classification: correlation with histopathological subtypes and prognosis. Anticancer Res 21:617–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kubota T, Shoda K, Konishi H, Okamoto K, Otsuji E (2020) Nutrition update in gastric cancer surgery. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4:360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Park SH, Lee S, Song JH, Choi S, Cho M, Kwon IG, Son T, Kim HI, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH, Choi YY (2020) Prognostic significance of body mass index and prognostic nutritional index in stage II/III gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 46:620–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the colleagues of the Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Tsutomu Namikawa. Acquisition of data: Tsutomu Namikawa, Shigeto Shimizu, Keiichiro Yokota, Nobuhisa Tanioka, Masaya Munekage, Sunao Uemura, Hiroyuki Kitagawa, and Michiya Kobayashi. Analysis and interpretation of data: Tsutomu Namikawa and Hiromichi Maeda. Drafting of manuscript: Tsutomu Namikawa. Critical revision of the manuscript: Tsutomu Namikawa and Kazuhiro Hanazaki.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsutomu Namikawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan (approval number: 2020–136).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants or their family included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Namikawa, T., Shimizu, S., Yokota, K. et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein–to–albumin ratio as prognostic factors for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 609–621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02356-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02356-w

Keywords

Navigation