Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

d-dimer-based screening for early diagnosis of venous thromboembolism after hepatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel diagnostic algorithm based on serum d-dimer levels for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hepatectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 742 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy in our hospital from 2009 to 2019. From 2015, we routinely measured serum d-dimer level postoperatively and computed tomography was performed when d-dimer level was ≥ 20 μg/mL.

Results

VTE was diagnosed in 26 patients and pulmonary embolism (PE) was diagnosed in 18 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that resected liver weight ≥ 120 g is a significant predictor of VTE (P = 0.011). The incidence of VTE from 2015 to 2019 was greater than that from 2009 to 2014 (5.0% versus 2.1%, P = 0.044). The number of low-risk PE patients between 2015 and 2019 was significantly greater than that between 2009 and 2014 (P = 0.013). There was no in-hospital mortality of patients with PE from 2015 to 2019.

Conclusion

Patients who undergo hepatectomy are at high risk for VTE, especially when the resected liver weight is high. The proposed diagnostic algorithm based on serum d-dimer levels for VTE after hepatectomy can be useful for early diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset analyzed for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rasmussen MS, Wille-Jørgensen P, Jorgensen LN (1995) Postoperative fatal pulmonary embolism in a general surgical department. Am J Surg 169:214–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakon M, Kakkar AK, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Nakamori S, Yano M, Monden M (2004) Current status of pulmonary embolism in general surgery in Japan. Surg Today 34:805–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeo DX, Junnarkar S, Balasubramaniam S et al (2015) Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its pharmacological prophylaxis in Asian general surgery patients: a systematic review. World J Surg 39:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kenjo A, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Shimada M, Baba H, Tomita N, Kimura W, Sugihara K, Mori M (2014) Risk stratification of 7,732 hepatectomy cases in 2011 from the National Clinical Database for Japan. J Am Coll Surg 218:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee D, Lidor AO, Chu KM, Gearhart SL, Haut ER, Chang DC (2008) Postoperative venous thromboembolism rates vary significantly after different types of major abdominal operations. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2015–2022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tzeng CW, Curley SA, Vauthey JN, Aloia TA (2013) Distinct predictors of pre- versus post-discharge venous thromboembolism after hepatectomy: analysis of 7621 NSQIP patients. HPB (Oxford) 15:773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Turley RS, Reddy SK, Shortell CK, Clary BM, Scarborough JE (2012) Venous thromboembolism after hepatic resection: analysis of 5,706 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1705–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barton JS, Riha GM, Differding JA, Underwood SJ, Curren JL, Sheppard BC, Pommier RF, Orloff SL, Schreiber MA, Billingsley KG (2013) Coagulopathy after a liver resection: is it over diagnosed and over treated? HPB (Oxford) 15:865–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly J, Rudd A, Lewis RR, Hunt BJ (2002) Plasma D-dimers in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 162:747–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. JCS Joint Working Group (2011) Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism and deep vein thrombosis (JCS 2009). Circ J 75:1258–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, Cushman M, Goldenberg N, Goldhaber SZ, Jenkins JS, Kline JA, Michaels AD, Thistlethwaite P, Vedantham S, White RJ, Zierler BK, American Heart Association Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, American Heart Association Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (2011) Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123:1788–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lippi G, Bonfanti L, Saccenti C, Cervellin G (2014) Causes of elevated D-dimer in patients admitted to a large urban emergency department. Eur J Intern Med 25:45–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shiota N, Sato T, Nishida K, Matsuo M, Takahara Y, Mitani S, Murakami T, Inoue H (2002) Changes in LPIA D-dimer levels after total hip or knee arthroplasty relevant to deep-vein thrombosis diagnosed by bilateral ascending venography. J Orthop Sci 7:444–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iyama K, Inokuma T, Sato S et al (2018) Novel screening criteria for post-traumatic venous thromboembolism by using D-dimer. Acute Med Surg 6:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Madoiwa S, Kitajima I, Ohmori T, Sakata Y, Mimuro J (2013) Distinct reactivity of the commercially available monoclonal antibodies of D-dimer and plasma FDP testing to the molecular variants of fibrin degradation products. Thromb Res 132:457–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatt M, Braun C, Patel P, Patel P, Begum H, Wiercioch W, Varghese J, Wooldridge D, Alturkmani HJ, Thomas M, Baig M, Bahaj W, Khatib R, Kehar R, Ponnapureddy R, Sethi A, Mustafa A, Nieuwlaat R, Lim W, Bates SM, Lang E, le Gal G, Righini M, Husainat NM, Kalot MA, al Jabiri YN, Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA (2020) Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy. Blood Adv 4:1250–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, Maître S, Girard P, Leroyer C, Revel MP, Carette MF, Laurent M, Charbonnier B, Laurent F, Mal H, Nonent M, Lancar R, Grenier P, Simonneau G (2002) Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicenter outcome study. Lancet 360:1914–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aloia TA, Fahy BN, Fischer CP, Jones SL, Duchini A, Galati J, Gaber AO, Ghobrial RM, Bass BL (2009) Predicting poor outcome following hepatectomy: analysis of 2313 hepatectomies in the NSQIP database. HPB (Oxford) 11:510–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hata T, Ikeda M, Miyata H, Nomura M, Gotoh M, Sakon M, Yamamoto K, Wakabayashi G, Seto Y, Mori M, Doki Y (2019) Frequency and risk factors for venous thromboembolism after gastroenterological surgery based on the Japanese National Clinical Database (516 217 cases). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3:534–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dondero F, Taillé C, Mal H et al (2006) Respiratory complications: a major concern after right hepatectomy in living liver donors. Transplantation 81:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J (2000) Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 83:416–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, Campbell DA Jr, Caprini JA (2010) A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg 251:344–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shiba H, Ishida Y, Wakiyama S, Iida T, Matsumoto M, Sakamoto T, Ito R, Gocho T, Furukawa K, Fujiwara Y, Hirohara S, Misawa T, Yanaga K (2009) Negative impact of blood transfusion on recurrence and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1636–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.com) for the English language review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Onda S. Acquisition of data: Onda S, Furukawa K, Haruki K, Shirai Y, Hamura R, Yasuda J, Shiozaki H, Gocho T, and Shiba H. Analysis and interpretation of data: Furukawa K, Haruki K, and Shirai Y. Drafting of manuscript: Onda S. Critical revision of manuscript: Ikegami T

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinji Onda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The study meeting the ethical standards of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and its protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Jikei University School of Medicine (27-177[8062]).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Consent for publication

The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onda, S., Furukawa, K., Haruki, K. et al. d-dimer-based screening for early diagnosis of venous thromboembolism after hepatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406, 883–892 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02058-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02058-9

Keywords

Navigation