Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of an anal fistula plug on anal function after surgery for treatment of a trans-sphincteric anal fistula

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anal function in patients with trans-sphincteric anal fistulas who underwent an anal fistula plug procedure, and analyze risk factors that might affect post-operative anal function.

Methods

This was an observational, retrospective study of patients diagnosed with trans-sphincteric anal fistulas and initially underwent anal fistula plug procedures between August 2008 and September 2012 at our institute. The analysis includes clinical characteristics, anal fistula healing, and the Wexner score for pre- and post-operative anal function (0 = no incontinence to 20 = complete incontinence).

Results

A total of 123 patients who had an adequate follow-up in the end were included. The median duration of follow-up was 8 years (range 72–121 months). The overall healing rate was 56% (69/123), and 33 (26.8%) patients had decreased anal function after surgery. The post-operative Wexner score on anal function was significantly higher than that before the operation (p < 0.001), as well as scores of gas, liquid stool, solid stool incontinence, and alteration in lifestyle (p < 0.05). Based on multiple logistic regression analysis, a high body mass index (p < 0.001) and long distance between the external opening and anal verge (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with a decline in post-operative anal function.

Conclusions

As a sphincter-preserving technique for the treatment of anal fistulas, the anal fistula plug procedure might impair the anal function. Especially for patients with obesity or long distance between the external opening of anal fistula and anal verge, the reduced anal function is more likely to occur after treatment with anal fistula plug therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM, Paquette IM, Saclarides TJ, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess, fistula-in-ano, and rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 59:1117–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ommer A, Herold A, Berg E et al (2011) Cryptoglandular anal fistulas. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108:707–713

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bokhari S, Lindsey I (2010) Incontinence following sphincter division for treatment of anal fistula. Color Dis 12:e135–e139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shawki S, Wexner SD (2011) Idiopathic fistula-in-ano. World J Gastroenterol 17:3277–3285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho KS, Tsang C, Seow-Choen F, Ho YH, Tang CL, Heah SM, Eu KW (2001) Prospective randomised trial comparing ayurvedic cutting seton and fistulotomy for low fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol 5:137–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ritchie RD, Sackier JM, Hodde JP (2009) Incontinence rates after cutting seton treatment for anal fistula. Color Dis 11:564–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uribe N, Millán M, Minguez M, Ballester C, Asencio F, Sanchiz V, Esclapez P, del Castillo JR (2007) Clinical and manometric results of endorectal advancement flaps for complex anal fistula. Int J Color Dis 22:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubsky PC, Stift A, Friedl J, Teleky B, Herbst F (2008) Endorectal advancement flaps in the treatment of high anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin: full-thickness vs. mucosal-rectum flaps. Dis Colon Rectum 51:852–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Köckerling F, Alam NN, Narang SK, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2015) Treatment of fistula-in-Ano with fistula plug - a review under special consideration of the technique. Front Surg 2:55

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. O'Riordan JM, Datta I, Johnston C, Baxter NN (2012) A systematic review of the anal fistula plug for patients with Crohn's and non-Crohn's related fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 55:351–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Limura E, Giordano P (2015) Modern management of anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 21:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de la Portilla F, MVD M, Maestre MV et al (2019) Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus fibrin glue in cryptogenic fistula-in-ano: a phase III single-center, randomized, double-blind trial. Int J Color Dis 34:1113–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koperen PJ, Bemelman WA, Gerhards MF et al (2011) The anal fistula plug treatment compared with the mucosal advancement flap for cryptoglandular high transsphincteric perianal fistula: a double-blinded multicenter randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heydari A, Attinà GM, Merolla E, Piccoli M, Fazlalizadeh R, Melotti G (2013) Bioabsorbable synthetic plug in the treatment of anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 56:774–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leng Q, Jin HY (2012) Anal fistula plug vs mucosa advancement flap in complex fistula-in-ano: a meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 4:256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herold A, Ommer A, Fürst A, Pakravan F, Hahnloser D, Strittmatter B, Schiedeck T, Hetzer F, Aigner F, Berg E, Roblick M, Bussen D, Joos A, Vershenya S (2016) Results of the Gore bio-a fistula plug implantation in the treatment of anal fistula: a multicentre study. Tech Coloproctol 20:585–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Song WL, Wang ZJ, Zheng Y, Yang XQ, Peng YP (2008) An anorectal fistula treatment with acellular extracellular matrix: a new technique. World J Gastroenterol 14:4791–4794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stamos MJ, Snyder M, Robb BW, Ky A, Singer M, Stewart DB, Sonoda T, Abcarian H (2015) Prospective multicenter study of a synthetic bioabsorbable anal fistula plug to treat cryptoglandular transsphincteric anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 58:344–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Portilla F, Rada R, Jiménez-Rodríguez R, Díaz-Pavón JM, Sánchez-Gil JM (2011) Evaluation of a new synthetic plug in the treatment of anal fistulas: results of a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1419–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwandner O (2011) Obesity is a negative predictor of success after surgery for complex anal fistula. BMC Gastroenterol 11:61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boenicke L, Karsten E, Zirnqihl H, Ambe P (2017) Advancement flap for treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistula: prediction of therapy success or failure using anamnestic and clinical parameters. World J Surg 41:2395–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lauretta A, Falco N, Stocco E, Bellomo R, Infantino A (2018) Anal fistula laser closure: the length of fistula is the Achille’heel. Tech Coloproctol 22:933–939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao B, Wang Z, Han J, Zheng Y, Cui J, Yu S (2019) Long-term outcomes of ligation of the inter-Sphincteric fistula tract plus bioprosthetic anal fistula plug (LIFT-plug) in the treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistula. Med Sci Monit 25:1350–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han JG, Wang ZJ, Zhao BC, Zheng Y, Zhao B, Yi BQ, Yang XQ (2011) Long-term outcomes of human acellular dermal matrix plug in closure of complex anal fistulas with a single trace. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1412–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Halland M, Talley NJ (2012) Fecal incontinence: mechanisms and management. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 28:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lara FJ, Serrano AM, Moreno JU et al (2015) Platelet-rich fibrin sealant as a treatment for complex perianal fistulas: a multicentre study. J Gastrointest Surg 19:360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pérez Lara FJ, Hernández González JM, Ferrer Berges A, Navarro Gallego I, Oehling de los Reyes H, Oliva Muñoz H (2019) Can perianal fistula be treated non-surgically with platelet-rich fibrin sealant? J Gastrointest Surg 23:1030–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070685), The Capital Health Research and Development of Special (2018-1-2032), Project of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital 1351 talents training (CYXZ-2017-09), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals incubating Program (PX2019012), and the Scientific Research and Cultivation Fund of Capital Medical University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Tao, Zheng, Han, Wang, Cui, Zhao, Yang; acquisition of data: Tao, Zheng, Han, Wang, Cui, Zhao, Yang; analysis and interpretation of data: Tao, Zheng, Han, Wang; drafting of manuscript: Tao, Zheng, Han, Wang, Cui, Zhao, Yang; critical revision of manuscript: Tao, Zheng, Han, Wang.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jia Gang Han or Zhen Jun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (the reference number: 2019-ke-286). All enrolled patients gave informed consent for use of their data in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Oral poster presentation at the meeting of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, MA, June 06 to 10, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, Y., Zheng, Y., Han, J.G. et al. Effects of an anal fistula plug on anal function after surgery for treatment of a trans-sphincteric anal fistula. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406, 855–861 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02024-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02024-5

Keywords

Navigation