Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Temporary portal decompression during liver transplantation: a video review of the different techniques

  • How-I-Do-It articles
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Temporary portal decompression (TPD) during liver transplantation (LT) remains a divisive technical issue in the liver transplant community. In this video-based article, we show the technical details of the different techniques used for TPD during LT.

Methods

An early portal section, before liver mobilization, should be preferred in order to achieve hepatectomy of a totally devascularized liver. Portal decompression can be achieved through direct right portocaval shunts and indirect portosystemic shunts (i.e., mesentericosaphenous and portosaphenous shunts).

Results

The preference for direct portocaval or indirect portosystemic shunts is tailored on patients and anatomical characteristics. Each of these three techniques presents specific indications, limitations, and advantages.

Conclusion

TPD during LT can be achieved through different techniques that aim to facilitate the recipient hepatectomy, reduce the blood loss, and maintain hemodynamic stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Tzakis AG, Reyes J, Nour B, Marino IR, Todo S, Starzl TE (1993) Temporary end to side portacaval shunt in orthotopic hepatic transplantation in humans. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:180–182

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Belghiti J, Noun R, Sauvanet A (1995) Temporary portocaval anastomosis with preservation of caval flow during orthotopic liver transplantation. Am J Surg 169:277–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Czigany Z, Scherer MN, Pratschke J, Guba M, Nadalin S, Mehrabi A, Berlakovich G, Rogiers X, Pirenne J, Lerut J, Mathe Z, Dutkowski P, Ericzon BG, Malagó M, Heaton N, Schöning W, Bednarsch J, Neumann UP, Lurje G (2019) Technical aspects of orthotopic liver transplantation-a survey-based study within the eurotransplant, Swisstransplant, Scandiatransplant, and British Transplantation Society Networks. J Gastrointest Surg 23:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kluger MD, Memeo R, Laurent A, Tayar C, Cherqui D (2011) Survey of adult liver transplantation techniques (SALT): an international study of current practices in deceased donor liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford) 13:692–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmann K, Weigand MA, Hillebrand N, Buchler MW, Schmidt J, Schemmer P (2009) Is veno-venous bypass still needed during liver transplantation? A review of the literature. Clin Transplant 23:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pratschke S, Rauch A, Albertsmeier M, Rentsch M, Kirschneck M, Andrassy J, Thomas M, Hartwig W, Figueras J, del Rio Martin J, de Ruvo N, Werner J, Guba M, Weniger M, Angele MK (2016) Temporary intraoperative porto-caval shunts in piggy-back liver transplantation reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve postoperative transaminases and renal function: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 40:2988–2998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faitot F, Addeo P, Besch C, Michard B, Oncioiu C, Ellero B, Woehl-Jaeglé ML, Bachellier P (2019) Passive mesenterico-saphenous shunt: an alternative to portocaval anastomosis for tailored portal decompression during liver transplantation. Surgery 165:970–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pratschke S, Meimarakis G, Bruns CJ, Kaspar M, Prix N, Zachoval R, Guba M, Jauch KW, Loehe F, Angele MK (2013) Temporary intraoperative porto-caval shunt: useless or beneficial in piggy back liver transplantation? Transpl Int 26:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Addeo P, Locicero A, Faitot F, Bachellier P (2019) Temporary Right Portocaval Shunt During Piggyback Liver Transplantation. World J Surg 43:2612–2615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lerut J, Ciccarelli O, Roggen F, Laterre PF??, Danse E, Goffette P, Aunac S, Carlier M, de Kock M, van Obbergh L, Veyckemans F, Guerrieri C, Reding R, Otte JB (2003) Cavocaval adult liver transplantation and retransplantation without venovenous bypass and without portocaval shunting: a prospective feasibility study in adult liver transplantation. Transplantation 75:1740–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lerut JP, Molle G, Donataccio M et al (1997) Cavocaval liver transplantation without venovenous bypass and without temporary portocaval shunting: the ideal technique for adult liver grafting? Transpl Int 10:171–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Figueras J, Llado L, Ramos E et al (2001) Temporary portocaval shunt during liver transplantation with vena cava preservation. Results of a prospective randomized study. Liver Transpl 7:904–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghinolfi D, Marti J, Rodriguez-Laiz G et al (2011) The beneficial impact of temporary porto-caval shunt in orthotopic liver transplantation: a single center analysis. Transpl Int 24:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nacif LS, Zanini LY, Costa Dos Santos JP et al (2020) Intraoperative temporary portocaval shunt in liver transplant. Transplant Proc

  15. Rayar M, Levi Sandri GB, Cusumano C, Locher C, Houssel-Debry P, Camus C, Lombard N, Desfourneaux V, Lakehal M, Meunier B, Sulpice L, Boudjema K (2017) Benefits of temporary portocaval shunt during orthotopic liver transplantation with vena cava preservation: A propensity score analysis. Liver Transpl 23:174–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panaro F, Boisset G, Chanques G, Guiu B, Herrero A, Bouyabrine H, Pageaux GP, Boudjema K, Navarro F (2016) Vena cava encirclement predicts difficult native hepatectomy. Liver Transpl 22:906–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work: PA, OJ, AT, CS, FF, and PB. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work: PA, OJ, AT, CS, FF, and PB. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published: PA, OJ, AT, CS, FF, and PB. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: PA, OJ, AT, CS, FF, and PB

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Addeo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Addeo, P., Julliard, O., Terrone, A. et al. Temporary portal decompression during liver transplantation: a video review of the different techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406, 227–231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01991-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01991-z

Keywords

Navigation