Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Standardized surgical training is increasingly confronted with the public demand for high quality of surgical care in modern teaching hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed by resident surgeons (RS) and attending surgeons (AS).

Methods

In this retrospective review of prospectively collected data 1,747 LC were performed in a community hospital between 1999 and 2009. Seven hundred seventy operations were performed by RS. Parameters analysed included the duration of operation and length of hospital stay, intraoperative complications, 30-day morbidity and mortality.

Results

Duration of operation was 88 (25–245) min for RS vs. 75 (30–190) min by AS (p = 0.001). Elective operations were shorter when performed by AS (70 (30–190) [AS] vs. 85 (25–240) [RS] min, p = 0.001). Length of hospital stay was shorter in patients treated by RS (4 (1–49) days [RS] vs. 5 (1–83) days [AS], p = 0.1). Intraoperative complications showed no differences between the groups (1.0% [RS] vs. 1.3% [AS], p = 0.6), whereas 30-day morbidity was lower in patients treated by RS (3.8% [RS] vs. 6.2% [AS], p = 0.02). Overall mortality was 0.6% and independent of surgical expertise (0.5% [RS] vs. 0.8% [AS], p = 0.5).

Conclusions

Provided adequate training, supervision and patient selection, surgical residents are able to perform LC with results comparable to those of experienced surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mühe E (1986) Die erste Cholezystektomie durch das Laparoskop. Langenbecks Arch Chir (Kongressband) 369:804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Inderbitzin DT, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanakala V, Bawa S, Gallagher P, Woodcock S, Attwood SE, Horgan LF, Seymour K (2010) Outcome of patients in laparoscopic training courses compared to standard patients. Surgeon 8:132–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2006) Training in the operating theatre: is it safe? Thorax 61:278–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SL, Yaghoubian A (2010) Comparison of pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals: a multi-institutional study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:863–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balaa F, Moloo H, Poulin EC, Haggar F, Trottier DC, Boushey RP, Mamazza J (2007) Broad-based fellowships: a cornerstone of minimally invasive surgery education and dissemination. Surg Innov 14:205–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang CS, Pagano CR, Wichterman KA, Dunnington GL, Alfrey EJ (2008) Resident versus no resident: a single institutional study on operative complications, mortality, and costs. Surgery 144:339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Babineau TJ, Becker J, Gibbons G, Sentovich S, Hess D, Robertson S, Stone M (2004) The “cost” of operative training for surgical residents. Arch Surg 139:366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koulas SG, Tsimoyiannis J, Koutsourelakis I, Zikos N, Pappas-Gogos G, Siakas P, Tsimoyiannis EC (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgical trainees. JSLS 10:484–487

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim HS, Salleh I, Poh BK, Tay KH (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of our training programme. ANZ J Surg 75:231–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kauvar DS, Braswell A, Brown BD, Harnisch M (2006) Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 132:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rageth JC (1998) Statistical models with reference to their value for medical process quality assurance. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 128:1703–1712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang CS, Wichtermann KA, Alfrey EJ (2010) The cost of resident education. J Surg Res 163:18–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuiman MW, Fletcher DR, Ridout SC (2006) Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:844–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152,776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141:1207–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergmann JJGHM, van den Brink GR, Rauws EAJ, de Wit L, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Tytgat GNJ, Gouma D-J (1996) Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut 38:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H (2006) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:868–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan OA, Balaji S, Branagan G, Bennett DH, Davies N (2011) Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:362–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamad MA, Nada AA, Abdel-Atty MY, Kawashti AS (2011) Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1780-4

  22. Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors of 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF (2010) Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 211:73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scollay JM, Mullen R, McPhillips G, Thompson AM (2011) Mortality associated with the treatment of gallstone disease: a 10-year contemporary national experience. World J Surg 35:643–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schöfer M (2011) Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg 35:826–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Imhof M, Zacherl J, Rais A, Lipovac M, Jakesz R, Fuegger R (2002) Teaching laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do beginners adversely affect the outcome of the operation? Eur J Surg 168:470–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanjay P, Moore J, Saffouri E, Ogston SA, Kulli C, Polignano FM, Tait IS (2010) Index laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute admissions with cholelithiasis provides excellent training opportunities in emergency general surgery. Surgeon 8:127–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dotzenrath CM, Cupisti K, Raffel A, Aust B, Yang Q, Krüger B, Ohmann C, Röher HD, Goretzki PE (2005) Do Germans keep patients too long in hospital? A prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 29:1189–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heistermann HP, Tobusch A, Palmes D (2006) Prevention of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Zentralbl Chir 131:460–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Raval MV, Wang X, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, Bentrem DJ, Dimick JB, Flynn T, Hall BL, Ko CY (2011) The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 212:889–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Fahrner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fahrner, R., Turina, M., Neuhaus, V. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397, 103–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0863-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0863-y

Keywords

Navigation