Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of the amniotic membrane on healing of colonic anastomoses in experimental left-sided colonic obstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the effects of the amniotic membrane on experimental primary colonic anastomoses of colonic obstruction in rats.

Methods

Fifty female Sprague–Dawley rats were used in this study. All rats were submitted to a 2-0 silk ligature obstruction of the left colon 4 cm above the peritoneal reflexion and were reoperated upon 24 h later. Ten animals served as controls for measurement of bursting pressure, while the other 40 animals underwent colonic resection followed by primary anastomosis and were divided into two groups, the anastomosis (O) and amniotic membrane (OA). The latter group had anastomoses covered by amniotic membranes. Fifty percent of both OA and O groups were killed on postoperative day 3 (OA3, O3), and the other 50% were killed on postoperative day 7 (OA7, O7).

Results

Bursting pressures were significantly higher in groups OA3 and OA7 compared to those in O3 (p < 0.5) and O7 (p < 0.01), respectively. Inflammatory cell infiltration and adhesion scores were significantly lower in groups OA3 and OA7 compared to those in O3 (p = 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively) and O7 (p = 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Neoangiogenesis, fibroblast activity, collagen deposition, and hydroxyproline concentrations were significantly higher in groups with amniotic membrane than in groups without amniotic membrane (p < 0.05, for all comparisons).

Conclusions

Covering colonic anastomoses with amniotic membranes has a positive effect on both the early and late phases of anastomotic healing on left-sided large bowel obstruction and provides a safer and stronger alternative than suturing one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Carlomagno N et al (2003) Safety of primary anastomosis in emergency colo-rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 5:262–269, doi:10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00432.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohman U (1982) Prognosis in patients with obstructing colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 143:742–747, doi:10.1016/0002-9610(82)90050-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carraro PG, Segala M, Cesana BM et al (2001) Obstructing colonic cancer: failure and survival patterns over a ten-year follow-up after one-stage curative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:243–250, doi:10.1007/BF02234300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lopez-Kostner F, Hool GR, Lavery IC (1997) Management and causes of acute large-bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 77:1265–1290, doi:10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70617-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer F, Marusch F, Koch A et al (2004) Emergency operation in carcinomas of the left colon: value of Hartmann's procedure. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s226–s229, doi:10.1007/s10151-004-0164-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Fry JS et al (1985) Malignant large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 72:296–302, doi:10.1002/bjs.1800720417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turan M, Ok E, Sen M et al (2002) A simplified operative technique for single-staged resection of left-sided colon obstructions: report of a 9-year experience. Surg Today 32:959–964, doi:10.1007/s005950200192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biondo S, Parés D, Kreisler E et al (2005) Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2272–2280, doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0159-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Syk I, Mirastschijski U, Jeppsson BW et al (2003) Experimental colonic obstruction increases collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases in the bowel wall. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1251–1259, doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6723-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Savage FJ, Lacombe DL, Hembry RM et al (1998) Effect of colonic obstruction on the distribution of matrix metalloproteinases during anastomotic healing. Br J Surg 85:72–75, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00550.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moran M, Ozmen MM, Duzgun AP et al (2007) The effect of erythropoietin on healing of obstructive vs nonobstructive left colonic anastomosis: an experimental study. World J Emerg Surg 2:13–18, doi:10.1186/1749-7922-2-13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Mathie RT, Man WK et al (1995) Enhanced intra-anastomotic healing by operative lavage with nutrient solutions in experimental left-sided colonic obstruction. Br J Surg 82:461–464, doi:10.1002/bjs.1800820410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perju D, Târcoveanu E, Lupaşcu C (2005) Comparative experimental study of left colonic anastomoses in intestinal obstruction; the value of anastomoses protection with free peritoneal graft. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 109:781–786, Romanian

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hulkko OA, Haukipuro KA, Laitinen ST (1988) Fibrin glue protection of primary anastomosis in the obstructed left colon. An experimental study on the rat. Acta Chir Scand 154:49–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erbil Y, Calis A, Berber E et al (2000) The effect of intraoperative colonic lavage with NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) on anastomotic healing in the presence of left-sided colonic obstruction in the rat. Surg Today 30:421–425, doi:10.1007/s005950050615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourne GL (1960) The microscopic anatomy of the human amnion and chorion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 79:1070–1073

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toda A, Okabe M, Yoshida T et al (2007) The potential of amniotic membrane/amnion-derived cells for regeneration of various tissues. J Pharmacol Sci 105:215–228, doi:10.1254/jphs.CR0070034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dua HS, Gomes JA, King AJ et al (2004) The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 49:51–77, doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Subrahmanyam M (1995) Amniotic membrane as a cover for microskin grafts. Br J Plast Surg 48:477–478, doi:10.1016/0007-1226(95)90123-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tseng SC, Li DQ, Ma X et al (1999) Suppression of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol 179:325–335, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199906)179:3<325::AID-JCP10>3.0.CO;2-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mermet I, Pottier N, Sainthillier JM et al (2007) Use of amniotic membrane transplantation in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 15:459–464, doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00252.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Talmi YP, Sigler L, Inge E et al (1991) Antibacterial properties of human amniotic membranes. Placenta 12:285–288, doi:10.1016/0143-4004(91)90010-D

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rinastiti M, Harijadi, Santoso AL, Sosroseno W (2006) Histological evaluation of rabbit gingival wound healing transplanted with human amniotic membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:247–251, doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2005.09.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis JW (1910) Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Med J 15:307

    Google Scholar 

  25. van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM et al (1992) Effect of antibiotics in fibrin sealant on healing colonic anastomoses in the rat. Br J Surg 79:525–528, doi:10.1002/bjs.1800790617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Phillips JD, Kim CS, Fonkalsrud EW et al (1992) Effects of chronic corticosteroids and vitamin A on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 163:71–77, doi:10.1016/0002-9610(92)90255-P

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergman I, Loxley R (1963) Two improved and simplified methods fort he spectrophotometric determination of hyroxyproline. Anal Chem 35:1961–1965, doi:10.1021/ac60205a053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D et al (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502, doi:10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Törnqvist A, Blomquist P, Jiborn H et al (1990) Anastomotic healing after resection of left-colon stenosis: effect on collagen metabolism and anastomotic strength. An experimental study in the rat. Dis Colon Rectum 33:217–221, doi:10.1007/BF02134183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hillan K, Nordlinger B, Ballet F, Puts JP, Infante R (1988) The healing of colonic anastomoses after early intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an experimental study in rats. J Surg Res 44(2):166–171, doi:10.1016/0022-4804(88)90045-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Witte MB, Barbul A (2003) Repair of full-thickness bowel injury. Crit Care Med 31(8 Suppl):S538–S546, doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000081436.09826.A4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thornton FJ, Barbul A (1997) Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 77(3):549–573, doi:10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70568-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martens MF, Hendriks T (1991) Postoperative changes in collagen synthesis in intestinal anastomoses of the rat: differences between small and large bowel. Gut 32:1482–1487, doi:10.1136/gut.32.12.1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stumpf M, Cao W, Klinge U et al (2002) Collagen distribution and expression of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 13 in patients with anastomotic leakage after large-bowel surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:502–506, doi:10.1007/s00423-001-0255-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Park WC, Tseng SC (2000) Modulation of acute inflammation and keratocyte death by suturing, blood, and amniotic membrane in PRK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2906–2914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim JS, Kim JC, Na BK et al (2000) Amniotic membrane patching promotes healing and inhibits proteinase activity on wound healing following acute corneal alkali burn. Exp Eye Res 70:329–337, doi:10.1006/exer.1999.0794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hao Y, Ma DH, Hwang DG et al (2000) Identification of antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea 19:348–352, doi:10.1097/00003226-200005000-00018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rowe TF, King LA, MacDonald PC et al (1997) Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 expression in human amnion mesenchymal and epithelial cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:915–921, doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70621-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Solomon A, Rosenblatt M, Monroy D et al (2001) Suppression of interleukin 1alpha and interleukin 1beta in human limbal epithelial cells cultured on the amniotic membrane stromal matrix. Br J Ophthalmol 85:444–449, doi:10.1136/bjo.85.4.444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li H, Niederkorn JY, Neelam S et al (2005) Immunosuppressive factors secreted by human amniotic epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:900–907, doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. te Velde EA, Voest EE, van Gorp JM et al (2002) Adverse effects of the antiangiogenic agent angiostatin on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg Oncol 9:303–309, doi:10.1245/aso.2002.9.3.303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Barbul A (2005) Wound healing. In: Brunicardi FC (ed) Schwart’z principles of surgery, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 223–248

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xing L, Franz MG, Marcelo CL et al (2007) Amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells increase gain of incisional breaking strength and decrease incidence and severity of acute wound failure. J Burns Wounds 7:e5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Koizumi NJ, Inatomi TJ, Sotozono CJ et al (2000) Growth factor mRNA and protein in preserved human amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 20:173–177, doi:10.1076/0271-3683(200003)20:3;1-9;FT173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Steed DL (1997) The role of growth factors in wound healing. Surg Clin North Am 77:575–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. de Hingh IH, Siemonsma MA, de Man BM, et al (2002) The matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BB-94 improves the strength of intestinal anastomoses in the rat. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Uludag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uludag, M., Citgez, B., Ozkaya, O. et al. Effects of the amniotic membrane on healing of colonic anastomoses in experimental left-sided colonic obstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395, 535–543 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0443-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0443-y

Keywords

Navigation