Abstract
Background
Colonic resection according to the procedure by Hartmann is considered a fast and safe surgical intervention, which has been used for years, in particular, in emergency situations.
Methods
Using data of a prospective multicentre study on the operative treatment of colorectal carcinoma over the time period from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2002, the value of Hartmann’s procedure was investigated in carcinoma of the left colon (n=8825) compared with alternative surgical options under emergency circumstances. The significant impact of independent variables on the type of the selected approach was determined by means of logistic regression.
Results
While in total 422 primary Hartmann’s procedures (4.8%) were executed under curative intention, 213 (50.5%) of those were carried out in emergency situations. Hartmann’s procedure was beneficial in cases with tumour-associated obstruction and perforation of the left colon as it resulted in the lowest mortality (7.5%) of the radical operations. Even under palliative intention, Hartmann’s procedure was preferred at the left colon but led to a postoperative mortality (32.7%) very similar to that in creation of a colostoma (33.3%) or segmental colonic resection (38.9%).
Conclusions
Hartmann’s procedure has been widely accepted as a curative intervention in emergency cases (oncosurgically adequate R0 resection) for the carcinoma of the left colon. Because of the high postoperative morbidity and mortality in emergency situations with only palliative options (R0 resection not possible), alternative endoscopic treatment should be considered more frequently.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, F., Marusch, F., Koch, A. et al. Emergency operation in carcinomas of the left colon: value of Hartmann’s procedure. Tech Coloproctol 8 (Suppl 1), s226–s229 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-004-0164-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-004-0164-3