Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

State-of-the-art review: spinal and supraspinal responses to muscle potentiation in humans

  • Invited Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post-activation potentiation (PAP), described as a muscular phenomenon, refers to the enhancement of contractile properties following a voluntary or electrically stimulated short duration (< 10 s) high-intensity contraction. Mechanistic factors and subsequent effects on voluntary performance have been well documented. Associations between neural activation and PAP, however, are less understood and systematically have not been explored. Thus, the aim is to critically summarize the current understanding of PAP regarding the motor pathway from the corticospinal tract to spinal level factors including the H-reflex and motor unit activation. This review highlights aspects for further investigation by providing an integrative summary of the relationship between PAP and neural control. Contractile history affects neural control in subsequent contractions, (e.g. fatiguing tasks), however, by contrast acute contractile enhancement due to PAP in relation to neural responses are not well-studied. From the limited number of investigations, motor unit discharge rates are reduced subsequent to PAP and, although less consistently reported, generally H-reflexes are depressed. Additionally, corticomedullary evoked potentials are depressed and the cortical silent period is elongated. Thus, overall there is a depression of spinal and supraspinal responses following PAP. Although specific factors responsible and their pathways are unclear, this down-regulation may occur to conserve neural activation when muscle contraction is more responsive, and concurrently a strategy used to delay neuromuscular fatigue. Indeed, the co-existence of PAP and fatigue is not a novel concept, but the interactions between PAP and neural responses are not understood and likely are more than coincidental.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ca2 + :

Calcium

CaM:

Calmodulin

CC:

Conditioning contraction

CMEP:

Cervicomedullary motor evoked potential

LG:

Lateral gastrocnemius

MEP:

Motor evoked potential

MU:

Motor unit

MUDRs:

Motor unit discharge rates

NME:

Neuromuscular efficiency

PAP:

Post-activation potentiation

PAPE:

Post-activation performance enhancement

PSI:

Presynaptic inhibition

RLC:

Regulatory myosin light chain

skMLCK:

Skeletal myosin light chain kinase

SP:

Silent period

TMS:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

TMES:

Transmastoid electrical stimulation

References

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (Grant no. 180970) as well as an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles L. Rice.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AM Zero and CL Rice have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content in this article.

Additional information

Communicated by Michael Lindinger.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zero, A.M., Rice, C.L. State-of-the-art review: spinal and supraspinal responses to muscle potentiation in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 121, 1271–1282 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04610-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04610-x

Keywords

Navigation