Skip to main content
Log in

The energy cost of shuttle running

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to: (1) determine directly the energy cost of shuttle running (C Sh) and (2) compare it to the values indirectly estimated from kinematic data. C Sh over distances of ≈10 or ≈20 m was determined on 65 subjects (group 1) from gas exchange measurements over 155 trials, or indirectly estimated on 10 subjects (group 2) from the time course of the speed as follows. (1) The cost to accelerate from zero to peak speed was estimated assuming a 25 % efficiency and added to that of constant-speed running, as obtained on subjects of group 1. (2) Since (i) accelerated running on flat terrain is equivalent to running uphill at constant speed, on a slope dictated by the forward acceleration (di Prampero et al. in J Exp Biol 208:2809–2816, 2005), and (ii) the energy cost of running uphill is known, C Sh was obtained from the time course of the acceleration. C Sh increased with the average speed, at any given speed being significantly greater for the shorter distances; e.g., at ≈4 m/s over 10 m, it amounted to ≈14 J/(kg m), i.e., 3.5-fold larger than that at constant speed. The two indirect methods yielded results not significantly different from C Sh over the longer (≈20 m), but underestimated it over the shorter (≈10 m) distances. From our results, over ≈20 m C Sh can be obtained with sufficient accuracy from actual measurements of peak speed alone, thus, greatly simplifying the experimental procedure. The so-obtained data can then be utilized to assess the athletic status of any subject, as well as to plan appropriate training strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bangsbo J (1994) Fitness Training in Football “a scientific approach” publisher August Krogh Institute, Copenhagen University

  • Bangsbo J (1996) Yo–Yo test. Ancona, Kells

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P (2008) The Yo–Yo intermittent recovery test: a useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports. Sports Med 38(1):37–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buglione A, Lazzer S, Colli R, Introini E, di Prampero PE (2011) Energetics of best performance in elite kayakers and canoeist. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43(5):877–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Komarek L, Mazzoleni S (1971) The mechanics of sprint running. J Physiol 217:709–721

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colli R, Buglione A, Introini E, D’Ottavio S (2007) L’allenamento intermittente tra scienza e prassi. SDS no. 72, pp 45–52

  • di Prampero PE (1981) Energetics of musclar exercise. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 89:143–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Ferretti G (1999) The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism. Respir Physiol 118:103–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Peeters L, Margaria R (1973) Alactic O2 debt and lactic acid production after exhausting exercise in man. J Appl Physiol 34(5):628–632

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Fusi S, Sepulcri L, Morin JB, Belli A, Antonutto G (2005) Sprint running: a new energetic approach. J Exp Biol 208:2809–2816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Salvadego D, Fusi S, Grassi B (2009) A simple method for assessing the energy cost of running during incremental tests. J Appl Physiol 107:1068–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iaia FM, Rampinini E, Bangsbo J (2009) High-intensity training in football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 4(3):291–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Léger L, Gadoury C (1989) Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with 1 min stages to predict VO2max in adults. Can J Sport Sci 14:21–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Léger LA, Lambert J (1982) A maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test to predict VO2max. Eur J Appl Physiol 49:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J (1988) The multistage 20 meter shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci 6:93–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margaria R, Cerretelli P, Aghemo P, Sassi G (1963) Energy cost of running. J Appl Physiol 18:367–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Saibene F (1994) Mechanical determinants of the minimum energy cost of gradient running in humans. J Exp Biol 195:211–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Moia C, Roi GS, Susta D, Ferretti G (2002) Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Physiol 93:1039–1046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nassis GP, Geladas ND, Soldatos Y, Sotiropoulos A, Bekris V, Souglis A (2010) Relationship between the 20-m multistage shuttle run test and 2 soccer-specific field tests for the assessment of aerobic fitness in adult semi-professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 24(10):2693–2697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbottom R, Brewer J, Williams C (1988) A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med 22:141–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zadro I, Sepulcri L, Lazzer S, Fregolent R, Zamparo P (2011) A protocol of intermittent exercise (shuttle runs) to train young basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 25(6):1767–1773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Buglione.

Additional information

Communicated by David C. Poole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buglione, A., di Prampero, P.E. The energy cost of shuttle running. Eur J Appl Physiol 113, 1535–1543 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2580-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2580-9

Keywords

Navigation