Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
To the Editor:
The article of Galbraith and Weill (2009), which seriously questions whether diacetyl-induced bronchiolitis obliterans exists, also expressed doubt about the validity of the diagnoses of the two cases reported by the California Department of Health Services (Harrison 2006). We agree that the CAT scan results alone do not establish the diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans; however, bronchiolitis obliterans is by far the most likely diagnosis when considering the other clinical findings and pulmonary function testing showing severe nonreversible obstructive spirometric abnormalities, lung volume hyperinflation and air trapping, and maintained diffusing capacity. Similar comments apply to the biopsy of the second case, which was actually interpreted as highly consistent with bronchiolitis obliterans by an expert pathologist.
While the authors severely criticize individual components of much of the published literature, the overall weight of the scientific evidence supports an association between flavoring exposure and bronchiolitis obliterans. We concur, however, that the link to diacetyl per se is not 100% established, although the data are strongly supportive of such a causal association.
References
Galbraith D, Weill D (2009) Popcorn lung and bronchiolitis obliterans: a critical appraisal. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:407–416
Harrison R, Gelb A, Harber P (2006) Food flavoring workers with bronchiolitis obliterans following exposure to diacetyl—California. California Department of Health, 15 May 2006. Available at http://www.capanet.org/pdfs/BO_cases_%20final_5_16_06.pd
Conflict of interest
Dr. Harber has agreed to testify on behalf of two of his patients if necessary. UCLA receives research and educational funding from CDC/NIOSH for occupational health matters that may include diacetyl effects. Dr. Gelb and Dr. Harrison report no potential conflicts.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Harber, P., Harrison, R. & Gelb, A. Response to Galbraith and Weill. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 83, 111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0432-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0432-7