Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carcinogenic potential of formaldehyde in occupational settings: a critical assessment and possible impact on occupational exposure levels

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To review epidemiological studies which led to a change in the classification of formaldehyde by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2004 as well as studies published thereafter, with the objective to examine whether occupational exposure levels for formaldehyde should be adapted.

Method

Cohort and case–control studies investigating the association between occupational exposure to formaldehyde and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and reporting estimates of formaldehyde exposure as well as the most recent meta-analyses, published after 1994, were reviewed.

Results

Evidence of an association between occupational formaldehyde exposure and NPC appears debatable. Results of the cohort studied by Hauptmann et al. (Am J Epidemiol 159(12):1117–1130, 2004) were key findings in the IARC evaluation. In this study, mortality from NPC was elevated compared with that of the US general population. However, internal comparison analysis using alternative categorization revealed that none of the relative risk for NPC was statistically significantly increased in any category of exposure (Marsh and Youk in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 42(3):275–283, 2005) and re-analyses of the data highlighted the inappropriateness of the exposure assessment used by Hauptmann et al. (Am J Epidemiol 159(12):1117–1130, 2004) and Marsh et al. (Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 47(1):59–67, 2007). Two other cohorts (Coggon et al. in J Natl Cancer Inst 95(21):1608–1615, 2003; Pinkerton et al. in Occup Environ Med 61(3)193–200, 2004) reported no increase in NPC. Two case–control studies brought some evidence of an increased risk of NPC but the assessment of exposure levels was uncertain.

Discussion

Human studies fail to raise a convincing conclusion concerning the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde and are not helpful to delineate a possible dose–response relationship. Experimental data indicate that in rats, the carcinogenic activity of formaldehyde is associated with cytotoxic/proliferative mechanisms. Therefore protecting from these effects associated with formaldehyde exposure should be sufficient to protect from its potential carcinogenic effects, if any in humans.

Conclusion

Current occupational exposure levels to formaldehyde, set to protect against local irritation, should not be adapted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACGIH (American Conference of Industrial Hygienists) (1997) Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices, 6th edn, vol. 2. Cincinnati

  • ACGIH (2006) TLVs and BEIs based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents & biological exposure indices. Cincinnati

  • Acheson ED, Barnes HR, Gardner MJ, Osmond C, Pannett B, Taylor CP (1984) Formaldehyde in the British chemical industry. An occupational cohort study. Lancet 1:611–616

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong RW, Imrey PB, Lye MS, Armstrong MJ, Yu MC, Sani S (2000) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Malaysian Chinese: occupational exposures to particles, formaldehyde and heat. Int J Epidemiol 29(6):991–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arts JH, Rennen MA, de Heer C (2006) Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 44(2):144–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) (1999) Toxicological profile for formaldehyde. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Atlanta

  • Binetti R, Costamagna FM, Marcello I (2006) Development of carcinogenicity classifications and evaluations: the case of formaldehyde. Ann Ist Super Sanita 42(2):132–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair A, Stewart P, O’Berg M, Gaffey W, Walrath J, Ward J, Bales R, Kaplan S, Cubit D (1986) Mortality among industrial workers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst 76(6):1071–1084

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair A, Stewart PA, Hoover RN (1990) Mortality from lung cancer among workers employed in formaldehyde industries. Am J Ind Med 17(6):683–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coggon D, Harris EC, Poole J, Palmer KT (2003) Extended follow-up of a cohort of british chemical workers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(21):1608–1615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cogliano VJ, Grosse Y, Baan RA, Straif K, Secretan MB, El Ghissassi F (2005) Meeting report: summary of IARC monographs on formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol. Environ Health Perspect 113(9):1205–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JJ, Caporossi JC, Utidjian HM (1988) Formaldehyde exposure and nasopharyngeal cancer: re-examination of the National Cancer Institute Study and an update of one plant. J Natl Cancer Inst 80(5):376–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JJ, Acquavella JF, Esmen NA (1997) An updated meta-analysis of formaldehyde exposure and upper respiratory tract cancers. J Occup Environ Med 39(7):639–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conolly RB, Kimbell JS, Janszen D, Schlosser PM, Kalisak D, Preston J, Miller FJ (2003) Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat. Toxicol Sci 75(2):432–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conolly RB, Kimbell JS, Janszen D, Schlosser PM, Kalisak D, Preston J, Miller FJ (2004) Human respiratory tract cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde: dose–response predictions derived from biologically-motivated computational modeling of a combined rodent and human dataset. Toxicol Sci 82(1):279–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • COSHH –HSC/E (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health–Health and Safety Commission/Executive) (last update consultation: 2006) http://www.hse.gov.uk

  • DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) (2002) Occupational toxicants critical data evaluation for MAK values and classification of carcinogens, vol 17, Wiley-VCH, Bonn

  • DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) (2006) List of MAK and BAT Values 2006, Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, Report No.41, Wiley-VCH, Bonn

  • EC–SCOEL (Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits) (2006) Recommendation from the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits for formaldehyde. SCOEL/SUM/125, Luxembourg

  • EEC (2004) Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC-OJ L 152. 30/04/2004

  • Gardner MJ, Pannett B, Winter PD, Cruddas AM (1993) A cohort study of workers exposed to formaldehyde in the British chemical industry: an update. Br J Ind Med 50(9):827–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Olsen JH (1995) Formaldehyde and cancer morbidity among male employees in Denmark. Cancer Causes Control 6(4):354–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann M, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Blair A (2004) Mortality from solid cancers among workers in formaldehyde industries. Am J Epidemiol 159(12):1117–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RB, Blair A, Stewart PA, Herrick RF, Mahar H (1990) Mortality of U.S. embalmers and funeral directors. Am J Ind Med 18(6):641–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HCN–DECOS (Health Council of the Netherlands–Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Standards) (2003) Formaldehyde; Health-based recommended occupational exposure limit. Publication no. 2003/02OSH, The Hague

  • Hildesheim A, Dosemeci M, Chan CC, Chen CJ, Cheng YJ, Hsu MM, Chen IH, Mittl BF, Sun B, Levine PH, Chen JY, Brinton LA, Yang CS (2001) Occupational exposure to wood, formaldehyde, and solvents and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(11):1145–1153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) (1995) IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Wood dust and formaldehyde, vol 62. IARC, Lyon

  • IARC (2006) IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxy-2-propanol, vol. 88. IARC, Lyon

  • Marsh GM, Stone RA, Henderson VL (1992a) A reanalysis of the National Cancer Institute study on lung cancer mortality among industrial workers exposed to formaldehyde. J Occup Med 34(1):42–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh GM, Stone RA, Henderson VL (1992b) Lung cancer mortality among industrial workers exposed to formaldehyde: a Poisson regression analysis of the National Cancer Institute Study. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53(11):681–691

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh GM, Stone RA, Esmen NA, Henderson VL (1994) Mortality patterns among chemical plant workers exposed to formaldehyde and other substances (brief communication). J Natl Cancer Inst 86(5):384–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh GM, Stone RA, Esmen NA, Henderson VL, Lee KY (1996) Mortality among chemical workers in a factory where formaldehyde was used. Occup Environ Med 53(9):613–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh GM, Youk AO, Buchanich JM, Cassidy LD, Lucas LJ, Esmen NA, Gathuru IM (2002) Pharyngeal cancer mortality among chemical plant workers exposed to formaldehyde. Toxicol Ind Health 18(6):257–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh GM, Youk AO (2005) Reevaluation of mortality risks from nasopharyngeal cancer in the formaldehyde cohort study of the National Cancer Institute. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 42(3):275–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh GM, Youk AO, Morfeld P (2007) Mis-specified and non-robust mortality risk models for nasopharyngeal cancer in the National Cancer Institute formaldehyde worker cohort study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 47(1):59–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NTP (National Toxicology Program) (2005) 11th Report on Carcinogens (RoC). http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov

  • NIOSH (2005) NIOSH Pocket Guide to chemical hazards. Publication No. 2005-149. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg

  • Olsen JH, Jensen SP, Hink M, Faurbo K, Breum NO, Jensen OM (1984) Occupational formaldehyde exposure and increased nasal cancer risk in man. Int J Cancer 34(5):639–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration) (last update-consultation: 2006). http://www.osha.gov

  • Pinkerton LE, Hein MJ, Stayner LT (2004) Mortality among a cohort of garment workers exposed to formaldehyde: an update. Occup Environ Med 61(3):193–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Pambrun M, Chute C, Blevins D (1988) Estimating the effect of formaldehyde exposure on lung cancer and non-malignant respiratory disease (NMRD) mortality using a new method to control for the healthy worker survivor effect. In: Hogstedt C, Reuterwall C (eds) Progress in occupational epidemiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Roush GC, Walrath J, Stayner LT, Kaplan SA, Flannery JT, Blair A (1987) Nasopharyngeal cancer, sinonasal cancer, and occupations related to formaldehyde: a case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 79(6):1221–1224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuz J (2007) Implications from epidemiologic studies on magnetic fields and the risk of childhood leukemia on protection guidelines. Health Phys 92(6):642–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stayner L, Smith AB, Reeve G, Blade L, Elliott L, Keenlyside R, Halperin W (1985) Proportionate mortality study of workers in the garment industry exposed to formaldehyde. Am J Ind Med 7(3):229–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stayner LT, Elliott L, Blade L, Keenlyside R, Halperin W (1988) A retrospective cohort mortality study of workers exposed to formaldehyde in the garment industry. Am J Ind Med 13(6):667–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling TD, Weinkam JJ (1988) Reanalysis of lung cancer mortality in a National Cancer Institute study on mortality among industrial workers exposed to formaldehyde. J Occup Med 30(11):895–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling TD, Weinkam JJ (1989) Reanalysis of lung cancer mortality in a National Cancer Institute Study on “mortality among industrial workers exposed to formaldehyde”. Exp Pathol 37(1–4):128–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling TD, Weinkam JJ (1994) Mortality from respiratory cancers (including lung cancer) among workers employed in formaldehyde industries. Am J Ind Med 25(4):593–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart PA, Schairer C, Blair A (1990) Comparison of jobs, exposures, and mortality risks for short-term and long-term workers. J Occup Med 32(8):703–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK (2005) Re: “mortality from solid cancers among workers in formaldehyde industries”. Am J Epidemiol 161(11):1089–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan TL, Strader C, Davis S, Daling JR (1986) Formaldehyde and cancers of the pharynx, sinus and nasal cavity: I. Occupational exposures. Int J Cancer 38(5):677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan TL, Stewart PA, Teschke K, Lynch CF, Swanson GM, Lyon JL, Berwick M (2000) Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Occup Environ Med 57(6):376–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West S, Hildesheim A, Dosemeci M (1993) Non-viral risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the Philippines: results from a case–control study. Int J Cancer 55(5):722–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2002) CICAD (Concise International Chemical Assessment Document) 40. Formaldehyde, Geneva

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unité de toxicologie industrielle et médecine du travail, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, 53 boite 53 02, 1200, Bruxelles, Belgium

    S. Duhayon, P. Hoet, G. Van Maele-Fabry & D. Lison

Authors
  1. S. Duhayon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Hoet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Van Maele-Fabry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Lison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Duhayon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duhayon, S., Hoet, P., Van Maele-Fabry, G. et al. Carcinogenic potential of formaldehyde in occupational settings: a critical assessment and possible impact on occupational exposure levels. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81, 695–710 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0241-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0241-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation