Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing exposure to back pain mechanical risk factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To validate a self-administered questionnaire assessing exposure to mechanical risk factors, developed for a cohort study aiming at assessing the influence of physical and psycho-social factors on the incidence of low back pain (LBP). Methods: The study first involved a criterion validity test. A sample of the cohort workers (n=152) was observed at the workplace during four 30 min periods randomly distributed along the shift. At the end of the work shift, the questionnaire was filled in both by the worker and the observer. Agreements were tested between self-reports and observations, and between self-reports and observer opinion. Secondly, a comparison of exposure–effect relationships based on self-reports to those based on observations was carried out on the whole study cohort (n=716). Both sets of Relative Risks of being an incident case (LBP lasting at least 7 consecutive days in the follow-up year) were tested for heterogeneity. Results: Self-reports agreement levels were better with observer opinion than with observational data and were higher for answers at a dichotomous level. Vehicle driving, manual handling without estimation of weight and frequencies, or trunk bending without rotation showed a fair to good agreement with the external criteria. Limits in the validation procedure did not allow validating the sitting and standing durations. As regards the health outcome comparison, questionnaire and observations led to homogeneous Relative Risks for the variables tested. Conclusions: Results show that self-reports provide a limited accuracy to assess actual frequencies and durations of work activities. Using a questionnaire, classifying the workers into exposure categories is rather relative, but questionnaire and observations seem similar in their relationships to outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battie MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, Manninen H, Gill K, Pope M, Kaprio J (2002) Occupational driving and lumbar disc degeneration: a case-control study. Lancet 360(9343):1369–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz B, Paquet V, Punnett L, Lee D, Moir S (1996) PATH: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. Appl Ergon 27(3):177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdorf A, Laan J (1991) Comparison of Methods for the Assessment of Postural Load on the Back. Scand J Work Environ Health 17(6):425–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burdorf A, Sorock G (1997) Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(4):243–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell L, Pannett B, Egger P, Cooper C, Coggon D (1997) Validity of a questionnaire for assessing occupational activities. Am J Ind Med 31(4):422–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cucherat M (1997) Hétérogénéité et analyse en sous groupes. Méta-analyse des essais thérapeutiques, Masson, pp 253–261

  • Derriennic F, Leclerc A, Mairiaux Ph, Meyer JP, Ozguler A (2000) Lombalgies en milieu professionnel: quels facteurs de risque et quelle prévention? INSERM ed, Paris, p 137

  • Duquette J, Lortie M, Rossignol M (1997) Perception of difficulties for the back related to assembly work: general findings and impact of back health. Appl Ergon 28(5–6):389–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL (1981) The measurement of interrater agreement: statisticalmethods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 212–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson-Hall C, Gloria R, Kilbom A, Winkel J (1995) A portable ergonomic observation method (PEO) for computerized on-line recording of posture and manual handling. Appl Ergon 26(2):93–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich J, Blatter BM, Bongers PM, Heinrich J, Blatter BM, Bongers PM (2004) A comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load and duration of computer use. Occup Environ Med 61(12):1027–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollmann S, Klimmer F, Schmidt KH, Kylian H (1999) Validation of a questionnaire for assessing physical work load. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(2):105–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1999) Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(5):387–403

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, Douwes M, Koes BW, Miedema MC, Ariens GA, Bouter LM (2000) Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 25(23):3087–3092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoozemans MJ, Burdorf A, Van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MH, Mathiassen SE (2001) Group-based measurement strategies in exposure assessment explored by bootstrapping. Scand J Work Environ Health 27(2):125–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbom A (1994) Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders—what information can be obtained from systematic observations? Scand J Work Environ Health 20(Spec no):30–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masset DF, Piette AG, Malchaire JB (1998) Relation between functional characteristics of the trunk and the occurrence of low back pain. Associated risk factors. Spine 23(3):359–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pope DP, Silman AJ, Cherry NM, Pritchard C, Macfarlane GJ (1998) Validity of a self-completed questionnaire measuring the physical demands of work. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(5):376–385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridd JE, Nicholson AS, Montan AJ (1989) A portable microcomputer based system for “on-site” activity and posture recording. Taylor and Francis. Ergonomics-designing process. Megaw ED ed. London, pp 366–369

  • Rossignol M, Baetz J (1987) Task-related risk factors for spinal injury: validation of a self-administered questionnaire on hospital employees. Ergonomics 30(11):1531–1540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somville PR, Mairiaux Ph (2003a) Using on-site observations for low back related work load assessment. Methodological issues. In: Strasser H, Kluth K, Rausch H, Bubb H (eds) Quality of work and products in entreprises of the future. Ergonomia verlag, Stutgart, pp 219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Somville PR, Mairiaux Ph (2003b) Evaluation des risques biomécaniques pour la colonne lombaire sur la base d’un questionnaire. Méd Travail Ergon 40(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen SW, Mathiassen SE, Bonde JP (2005) Task based exposure assessment in ergonomic epidemiology: a study of upper arm elevation in the jobs of machinists, car mechanics, and house painters. Occup Environ Med 62(1):18–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torgen M, Winkel J, Alfredsson L, Kilbom A (1999) Evaluation of questionnaire-based information on previous physical work loads. Stockholm MUSIC 1 study group. Musculoskeletal intervention center. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(3):246–254

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MH (1998) Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology. Occup Environ Med 55(5):291–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Beek AJ, Van Gaalen LC, Frings-Dresen MH (1992) Working posures and activities of lorry drivers: a reliability study of on-site observation and recording on a pocket computer. Appl Ergon 23(5):331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Nieuwenhuyse A, Somville PR, Crombez G, Burdorf A, Verbeke G, Johannik K, Van den Bergh O, Masschelein R, Mairiaux Ph, Moens G (2005) The role of physical workload and pain-related fear in the development of low back pain in young workers. Evidence from the belcoback study: results after one year of follow-up. Occup Environ Med (in press)

  • Viikari-Juntura E, Rauas S, Martikainen R, Kuosma E, Riihimaki H, Takala EP, Saarenmaa K (1996) Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 22(4):251–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells R, Norman R, Neumann P, Andrews D, Frank J, Shannon H, Kerr M (1997) Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: common measurement metrics for exposure assessment. Ergonomics 40(1):51–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorin C, Karlqvist L, Winkel J (1993) Validity of self-reported exposures to work postures and manual materials handling. Stockholm MUSIC I study group. Scand J Work Environ Health 19(3):208–214

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorin C, Hjelm EW, Winkel J, Koster M (1996) Reproducibility of a questionnaire for assessment of physical load during work and leisure time. Stockholm MUSIC I study group. J Occup Environ Med 38(2):190–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorin C, Vingard E, Mortimer M, Pernold G, Wigaeus-Hjelm E, Kilbom A, Alfredsson L (1999) Interview versus questionnaire for assessing physical loads in the population-based MUSIC-Norrtalje study. Am J Ind Med 35(5):441–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The BelCoBack study was supported by the Belgian government, SPP-PS research projects PS/93/25, PS/12/26, PS/01/27; the present study was also supported by the SMIL Foundation and a FNRS research grant S 2/5-DD-E42. The authors thank the other co-workers from the BelCoBack study group for their contribution to data collection and data processing: G. Crombez, K. Johannik, A. Leys, L. Moors, E. Persijn, D. Pirenne, G. Verbeke and O. Van den Bergh. The authors also thank F. Richy for his contribution in the statistical treatment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-R. Somville.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 5 Questionnaire variables and answer modalities

Appendix 2

Table 6 Answer modalities

Appendix 3

Table 7 Observation grid

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Somville, PR., Nieuwenhuyse, A.V., Seidel, L. et al. Validation of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing exposure to back pain mechanical risk factors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79, 499–508 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-005-0068-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-005-0068-1

Keywords

Navigation