Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships of low back outcomes to internal spinal load: a prospective cohort study of professional drivers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the relationships between low back symptoms and alternative measures of external dose and internal spinal dose in professional drivers exposed to whole body vibration (WBV).

Methods

The occurrence of low back symptoms was investigated in a cohort of 537 drivers over a 2-year follow-up period. Low back pain (LBP), individual characteristics, and work-related risk factors were investigated with a structured questionnaire. Exposure to WBV was evaluated by means of measures of external dose (daily vibration exposure in terms of either equivalent continuous acceleration over an 8-h period (A(8)) or vibration dose value according to the EU Directive on mechanical vibration) and measures of internal lumbar load (daily compressive dose S ed and risk factor R according to ISO/CD 2631-5 2014).

Results

In the drivers’ cohort, the cumulative incidence of 12-month low back outcomes was 16.8 % for LBP, 9.3 % for chronic LBP, and 21.8 % for sciatic pain. The measures of internal spinal load were better predictors of the occurrence of low back symptoms than the measures of daily vibration exposure. A twofold increase in the risk estimates for low back outcomes was found in the upper quartile of the R factor (0.41–0.72 units) compared to the lower one (0.07–0.19 units).

Conclusions

In this prospective cohort study, measures of internal spinal dose performed better than measures of daily vibration exposure (external dose) for the prediction of low back outcomes in professional drivers. The ISO boundary values of the risk factor R for low and high probabilities of adverse health effects on the lumbar spine tend to underestimate the health risk in professional drivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bongers PM, Boshuizen HC (1990) Back disorders and whole-body vibration at work. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam

  • Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MAJ, Hildebrandt VH (1993) Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:297–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenzi M (2009) Metrics of whole-body vibration and exposure-response relationship for low back pain in professional drivers: a prospective cohort study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:893–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenzi M (2010) A longitudinal study of low back pain and daily vibration exposure in professional drivers. Ind Health 48:584–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenzi M, Hulshof CTJ (1999) An updated review of epidemiologic studies on the relationship between exposure to whole-body vibration and low back pain (1986–1997). Int Arch Occup Environ Health 72:351–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenzi M, Palmer KT (2010) Whole body vibration. In: Baxter P, Aw TC, Cockcroft A, Durrington P, Harrington M (eds) Hunter’s diseases of occupations, 10th edn. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 513–522

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brickmann P, Biggeman M, Hilweg D (1988) Fatigue failure of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech 4(suppl 2):S1–S23

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickmann P, Biggeman M, Hilweg D (1989) Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Spine 14:606–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdorf A, Sorock G (1997) Positive and negative evidence on risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 23:243–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burdorf A, van der Beek AJ (1999) In musculoskeletal epidemiology are we asking the unanswerable in questionnaires on physical load? Scand J Work Environ Health 25:81–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) (2012) Mechanische Schwingungen und Stöße—Verfahren zur Bewertung stoßhaltiger Ganzkörper-Vibrationen; mit CD-ROM (Mechanical vibration and shock—Method for evaluation of impulsive whole-body vibration; with CD-ROM). German National Standard, DIN SPEC 45697

  • Directive 2002/44/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 June 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration) (sixteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Official Journal of the European Communities, L 117/13, 6.7.2002

  • Eisen EA (1999) Methodology for analyzing episodic events. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(suppl 4):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Farioli A, Mattioli S, Quaglieri A, Curti S, Violante FS, Coggon D (2014) Musculoskeletal pain in Europe: the role of personal, occupational and social risk factors. Scand J Work Environ Health 40:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MJ (1990) Handbook of human vibration. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MJ, Howarth HVC, Pitts PM, Fischer S, Kaulbars U, Donati PM, Bereton PF (2006) Guide to good practice on whole-body vibration. European Commission Directorate General Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (contract VC/2004/0341)

  • Hartvigsen J, Lings S, Leboeuf-Yde C, Bakketeig L (2004) Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain: a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies. Occup Environ Med 61:1–10, electronic review, e2 (http://www.occenvmed.com/cgi/content/full/61/1/e2)

  • Hinz B, Seidel H, Hofmann J, Menzel G (2008) The significance of using anthropometric parameters and postures of European drivers as a database for finite-element models when calculating spinal forces during whole-body vibration exposure. Int J Ind Ergon 28:816–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MNM, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM (2000) Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine 25:2114–2125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Twisk JWR, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM (2002) Comparison of two different approaches for the analysis of data from a prospective cohort study: an application to work related risk factors for low back pain. Occup Environ Med 59:459–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy D, Brooks P, Blythc F, Buchbinder R (2010) The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24:769–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F et al (2012) Systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 64:2028–2037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) Mechanical vibration and shock—guide for the evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—part 1: general requirements. ISO 2631-1. ISO, Geneva

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2014) Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to vibration—Part 5: Methods for evaluation of vibration containing multiple shocks. ISO/TC 108/SC 4/WG 15 No. 735. ISO/CD 2631-5. Secretariat: DIN

  • Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. ASQ 24:285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbom Å (1994) Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders—what information can be obtained from systematic observations? Scand J Work Environ Health 20:30–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom Å, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G et al (1987) Standardised Nordic Questionnaire for the analysis of musculo-skeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 18:233–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YK, Njus G, Buckwalter J, Wakano K (1983) Fatigue response of lumbar intervertebral joints under axial cyclic loading. Spine 8:857–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr D (2004) Eine einfache Methode zur Beurteilung stoßhaltiger Ganzkörper-Schwingungen (in German) (A simple method for evaluation of whole-body vibration containing shocks). VDI Ber 1821:271–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson T, Burström L, Wahlström J (2013) The effects of whole body vibration on low back pain and sciatica: aspects on a systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Hulshof CTJ (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on whole body vibration injuries. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, abstract No. 11

  • Norman TL, Nivargikar SV, Burr DB (1996) Resistance to crack growth in human cortical bone is greater in shear than in tension. J Biomech 29:1023–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer KT, Haward B, Griffin MJ, Bendall H, Coggon D (2000) Validity of self-reported occupational exposures to hand-transmitted and whole-body vibration. Occup Environ Med 57:237–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto I, Stacchini N (2006) Uncertainty in the evaluation of occupational exposure to whole body vibration. J Sound Vib 298:556–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope M, Magnusson M, Lundström R, Hulshof CTJ, Verbeek J, Bovenzi M (2002) Guidelines for whole-body vibration health surveillance. J Sound Vib 253:131–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riihimäki H, Viikari-Juntura E, Moneta G, Kuha J, Videman T, Tola S (1994) Incidence of sciatic pain among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. A three-year follow up. Spine 19:138–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risks of Occupational Vibration Exposures (VIBRISKS) (2007) FP5 Project No. QLK4-2002-02650. European commission quality of life and management of living resources programme. Southampton, UK: Human Factors Research Unit, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton [updated 28 February 2007; cited 5 November 2013]. Available from: http://www.vibrisks.soton.ac.uk

  • Schust M, Hinz B, Menzel G, Pinto I, Hofmann J, Bovenzi M (2012) Comparison of different methods for detecting multiple shocks in vibration time histories. In: Human Factors Research Unit (ed) Proceedings of the 47th United Kingdom conference on human responses to vibration. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University Southampton, Southampton, paper 23, pp 1–15

  • Schust M, Menzel G, Hofmann J, Forta NG, Pinto I, Hinz B, et al. (2013) Measures of internal lumbar load in professional drivers—dependence on posture, anthropometry, age, duration of exposure and type of machine. In: Hulshof CTJ (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on whole body vibration injuries. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, abstract No. 09

  • Seidel H, Blüthner R, Hinz B (2001) Application of finite-element models to predict forces acting on the lumbar spine during whole-body vibration. Clin Biomech 16(suppl 1):S57–S63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel H, Hinz B, Hofmann J, Menzel G (2008) Intraspinal forces and health risk caused by whole-body vibration—prediction for European drivers and different field conditions. Int J Ind Ergon 28:856–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypiec DM, Klein A, Bishop NE, Stahmer F, Püschel K, Seidel H et al (2012) Shear strength of the human lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 27:646–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypiec DM, Bishop NE, Klein A, Pueschel K, Morlock MM, Huber G (2013) Estimation of shear load sharing in moderately degenerated human lumbar spine. J Biomech 46:651–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiemessen IJH, Hulshof CTJ, Frings-Dresen MHW (2008) Low back pain in drivers exposed to whole body vibration: analysis of a dose-response pattern. Occup Environ Med 65:667–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Twisk JWR (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology. A practical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the European Commission under the Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources programme—Project No. QLK4-2002-02650 (VIBRISKS), and by the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Germany—Research Project F 2257. The authors thank Barbara Hinz, Jörg Hofmann, and Iole Pinto for the critical view of the manuscript, the support for the application of the FE models, and the measurement and check of the acceleration time histories.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Bovenzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bovenzi, M., Schust, M., Menzel, G. et al. Relationships of low back outcomes to internal spinal load: a prospective cohort study of professional drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 88, 487–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0976-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0976-z

Keywords

Navigation