Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Substructured flexible multibody model for simulating toothbrush cleaning process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archive of Applied Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective brushing is the basis for maintaining the oral health of millions of people. Since the 1960s, brushing has been described in mathematical models, but mainly through empirical in vivo and in vitro studies. The development of new materials and devices dedicated to the removal of oral biofilm, with a view to environmental sustainability, has necessitated the development of modern brushing simulation models. With the aim of making the estimation of the cleaning performance of a toothbrush quantitative, and in order to set up a numerical tool for supporting the design and optimization of the brushing operations, the present study describes the development of a novel computational model. It is able to estimate the forces exchanged between the bristles of the toothbrush and the tooth surface through numerical simulations. The innovative modeling approach, based on discrete flexible multibody techniques, allowed a three-dimensional description of the behavior of the bristles, obtaining accurate results with reasonable computational time. The verification of the model is performed through a dedicated test bench performing controlled movements. The comparison between the numerical model and experimental results demonstrates the reliability of the approach. The proposed approach is also tested on a complex three-dimensional case of brushing in order to verify the behavior in complex scenarios. The proposed novel simulation model has proven to be able to simulate the brushing action of a toothbrush composed of thousands of bristles on a detailed and three-dimensional dental surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bay, I., Kardel, K.M., Skougaard, M.R.: Quantitative evaluation of the plaque removing ability of different types of toothbrushes. J. Periodontol. 38, 526–533 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson, J.A., Wade, A.B.: Plaque removal by the bass and roll techniques. J. Periodontol. 48, 456–459 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Weijden, G.A., Timmerman, M.F., Nijboer, A., et al.: A comparative study of electric toothbrushes for the effectiveness of plaque removal in relation to toothbrushing duration. Timerstudy J. Clin. Periodontol. 20, 476–481 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rawls, H.R., Mkwayi-Tulloch, N.J., Krull, M.E.: A mathematical model for predicting toothbrush stiffness. Dent. Mater. J. 6, 111–117 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Langa, G.P.J., Muniz, F.W.M.G., Wagner, T.P., et al.: Anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis efficacy of different bristle stiffness and end-shape toothbrushes on interproximal surfaces: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 21, 101548 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. International Standards Organization.: Dentistry-Stiffness of the Tufted Area of Toothbrushes, Standards Document ISO 8627, 1st edn. London England (1987)

  7. Stango, R.J., Heinrich, S.M., Shia, C.Y.: Analysis of constrained filament deformation and stiffness properties of brushes. J. Eng. Ind. 111, 238–243 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stango, R.J., Capriapa, V., Prasad, A., Lian, S.K.: Measurement and analysis of brushing tool performance characteristics, part 1: stiffness response. J. Eng. Ind. 113, 283–289 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stango, R.J., Capriapa, V., Prasad, A., Lian, S.K.: Measurement and analysis of brushing tool performance characteristics, part 2: contact zone geometry. J. Eng. Ind. 113, 290–296 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heinrich, S.M., Stango, R.J., Shia, C.Y.: Effect of workpart curvature on the stiffness properties of circular filamentary brushes. J. Eng. Ind. 113, 276–282 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shia, C.Y., Stango, R.J.: On the frictional response of a filamentary brush in contact with a curved workpart. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 34, 573–589 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdel-Wahab, M.M., Parker, G.A., Wang, C.: Modelling rotary sweeping brushes and analyzing brush characteristic using finite element method. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 43, 521–532 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vanegas-Useche, L.V., Abdel-Wahab, M.M., Parker, G.A.: Determination of friction coefficients for cutting brush-road surface interaction through FEM. In: Proceedings of IEEE Southeast Conference, pp. 77–80 (2010)

  14. Vanegas-Useche, L.V., Abdel-Wahab, M.M., Parker, G.A.: Effectiveness of gutter brushes in removing street sweeping waste. J. Waste Manag. 30, 174–184 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, C., Sun, Q., Abdel-Wahab, M.M., et al.: Regression modeling and prediction of road sweeping brush load characteristics from finite element analysis and experimental results. J. Waste Manag. 43, 19–27 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shia, C.Y., Stango, R.J., Heinrich, S.M.: Analysis of contact mechanics for a circular filamentary brush/workpart system: part 1-modelling and formulation. Contact Probl. Interact. Manuf. Tribol. Syst. 113, 171–179 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shia, C.Y., Stango, R.J., Heinrich, S.M.: Analysis of contact mechanics for a circular filamentary brush/workpart system. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 120, 715–721 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uhlmann, E., Sommerfeld, C.: Three-dimensional dynamic contact analysis of abrasive filaments with a multibody system. Procedia CIRP 72, 615–621 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma, Z., Liu, Z., Zou, H., Liu, J.: Dynamic modeling and analysis of satellite detumbling using a brush type contactor based on flexible multibody dynamics. Mech. Mach. Theory 170, 104675 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, J.: Physically-based modeling of brush painting. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 29, 1571–1576 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, S., Tang, M., Lau, F., Pan, Y.: A solid model based virtual hairy brush. In: Computer Graph Forum vol. 21, pp. 299–308 (2002)

  22. Valentini, P.P., Pennestrì, E.: Modelling elastic beams using dynamic splines. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 25, 271–284 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, Y.Q., Howell, L., Lusk, C., et al.: Dynamic modeling of compliant mechanisms based on the pseudo-rigid-body model. ASME J. Mech. Des. 127, 760–765 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Valentini, P.P., Pennestrì, E.: Elasto-kinematic comparison of flexure hinges undergoing large displacement. Mech. Mach. Theory 110, 50–60 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cera, M., Cirelli, M., Colaiacovo, L., Valentini, P.P.: Second-order approximation pseudo-rigid model of circular arc flexure hinge. Mech. Mach. Theory 175, 104963 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu, Y.Q., Zhu, S.K., Xu, Q.P., Zhou, P.: A novel model of large deflection beams with combined end loads in compliant mechanisms. Precis. Eng. 43, 395–405 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Howell, L.L.: Compliant mechanisms. John Wiley and Sons Inc, Hoboken (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gerstmayr, J., Shabana, A.A.: Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn. 45, 109–130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-006-1856-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Huston RL, Wang Y (1994) Flexibility Effects in Multibody Systems. In: Seabra Pereira, M.F.O., Ambrósio, J.A.C. (eds) Computer-Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Mechanical Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 268. Springer, Dordrecht:351–377

  30. Bauchau, O.A., Han, S.: Advanced beam theory for multibody dynamics. In: Proceedings of ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, August 4–7, 2013, Portland, Oregon, USA

  31. Hutchinson, J.: Shear coefficients for Timoshenko beam theory. J. Appl. Mech. 68, 87–92 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Flores, P., Machado, M., Silva, M.T., Martins, J.M.: On the continuous contact force models for soft materials in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 25, 357–375 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Mirtich, B.V.: Impulse-based dynamic simulation of rigid body systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkley, USA (1996)

  34. Schmitt, A., Bender, J.: Impulse-based dynamic simulation of multibody systems: numerical comparison with standard methods. In: Proceedings of Automation of Discrete Production Engineering, pp. 324–329 (2005)

  35. Mariti, L., Valentini, P.P.: Efficiency and precise interaction for multibody simulations in augmented reality. Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. 28, 173–192 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Valentini, P.P., Pezzuti, E.: Interactive multibody simulation in augmented reality. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 48, 733–750 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Valentini, P.P., Pezzuti, E.: Design and interactive simulation of cross-axis compliant pivot using dynamic splines. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 7, 261–269 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zimmer, S., Barthel, C.R., Coffman, L., et al.: Evaluation of dentin abrasion during professional tooth cleaning in an in vitro model. J. Clin. Periodontol. 32, 947–950 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Reye, K.T.: "Zur Theorie der Zapfenreibung". Der Civilingenieur - Zeitschrift für das Ingenieurwesen. Neue Folge (NF) (in German). Bornemann, K. R. (ed.). 6:235–255 (1860)

Download references

Funding

This project received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161, Rome, Italy

    Marta Mazur & Livia Ottolenghi

  2. Rome, Italy

    Andrea Scrascia

  3. Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

    Mattia Cera, Marco Cirelli & Pier Paolo Valentini

Authors
  1. Marta Mazur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Livia Ottolenghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Scrascia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mattia Cera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marco Cirelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pier Paolo Valentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Mazur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazur, M., Ottolenghi, L., Scrascia, A. et al. Substructured flexible multibody model for simulating toothbrush cleaning process. Arch Appl Mech 93, 4125–4141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-023-02485-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-023-02485-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation