Abstract
Solid metallic implants in soft or hard tissues are serious challenges for histological processing. However, metallic implants are more frequently used in e.g. cardiovascular or orthopaedic therapies. Before clinical use, these devices need to be tested thoroughly in a biological environment and histological analysis of their biocompatibility is a major requirement. To allow the histological analysis of metallic implants in tissues especially in calcified hard tissues, we describe a method for embedding these tissues in the resin Technovit 9100 New and removing the metallic implants by electrochemical dissolution. With the combination of these two processes, we are able to achieve 5 μm thick sections from soft or hard tissues with a superior preservation of tissue architecture and especially the implant-tissue interface. These sections can be stained by classical stainings, immunohistochemical and enzymehistochemical as well as DNA-based staining methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson JM, McNally AK (2011) Biocompatibility of implants: lymphocyte/macrophage interactions. Semin Immunopathol 33:221–233
Bjursten LM, Emanuelsson L, Ericson LE, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Mattsson L, Rolander U, Kasemo B (1990) Method for ultrastructural studies of the intact tissue-metal interface. Biomaterials 11:596–601
Brown SA, Simpson J (1979) Electrochemical dissolution of metallic implants prior to histologic sectioning. J Biomed Mater Res 13:337–338
Christel P, Meinier A, Therin M (1990) A method of analysis of cellular distribution in the membrane encapsulating surgically implanted biomaterials. J Appl Biomat 1:205–214
Donath K (1988) Die Trenn-Dünnschliff-Technik zur Herstellung histologischer Präparate von nicht schneidbaren Geweben und Materialien. Der Präparator 34:197–206
Donath K, Breuner G (1982) A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge–Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 11:318–326
Garvey BT, Bizios R (1995) A transmission electron microscopy examination of the interface between osteoblasts and metal biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 29:987–992
Janning C, Willbold E, Vogt C, Nellesen J, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Windhagen H, Thorey F, Witte F (2010) Magnesium hydroxide temporarily enhancing osteoblast activity and decreasing the osteoclast number in peri-implant bone remodelling. Acta Biomater 6:1861–1868
Park J, Lakes RS (2007) Biomaterials—an introduction, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Saito C, Hayashi M, Sakai A, Fujie M, Kuroiwa H, Kuroiwa T (1999) Improved sensitivity for high resolution in situ hybridization using resin extraction of methyl methacrylate embedded material. Biotech Histochem 74:40–48
Singhrao SK, Müller CT, Gilbert SJ, Duance VC, Archer CW (2009) An immunofluorescence method for postembedded tissue in the acrylic resin Technovit 9100 New using fluorescein isothiocyanate secondary detection. Microsc Res Tech 72:501–506
Singhrao SK, Sloan AJ, Smith EL, Archer CW (2010) Technical advances in the sectioning of dental tissue and of on-section cross-linked collagen detection in mineralized teeth. Microsc Res Tech 73:741–745
Willbold E, Witte F (2010) Histology and research at the hard tissue-implant interface using Technovit 9100 New embedding technique. Acta Biomater 6:4447–4455
Williams DF (2008) On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 29:2941–2953
Witte F, Ulrich H, Rudert M, Willbold E (2007) Biodegradable magnesium scaffolds: part 1: appropriate inflammatory response. J Biomed Mater Res A 81:748–756
Wittenburg G, Volkel C, Mai R, Lauer G (2009) Immunohistochemical comparison of differentiation markers on paraffin and plastic embedded human bone samples. J Physiol Pharmacol 60(Suppl 8):43–49
Yang R, Davies CM, Archer CW, Richards RG (2003) Immunohistochemistry of matrix markers in Technovit 9100 New-embedded undecalcified bone sections. Eur Cell Mater 6:57–71
Acknowledgments
We thank Maike Haupt and Katharina Bobe (Hannover Medical School) for helpful discussions and technical support, Jens Nellesen (Technische Universität Dortmund) for the microtomographical imaging, Fabian Goede (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School) for the production of Fig. 1 and Matthias Lerch (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School), IMTM GmbH (Magdeburg) and DERU GmbH (Norderstedt) for providing samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willbold, E., Reebmann, M., Jeffries, R. et al. Electrochemical removal of metallic implants from Technovit 9100 New embedded hard and soft tissues prior to histological sectioning. Histochem Cell Biol 140, 585–593 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-013-1089-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-013-1089-6