Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
![figure a](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00417-024-06463-4/MediaObjects/417_2024_6463_Figa_HTML.png)
Introduction
Recent trials in stem-cell derived cell transplantation, for retinal diseases, have suggested the potential for visual recovery [1, 2]. Despite this, concerns about their potential risks remain [3, 4]. Currently, data from these studies in humans has been published to 1 years using human Embryonic Stem Cell derived (hESC) retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) monolayer [1, 2] and 4 years using induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSC) monolayer transplantation [2]. Importantly, none of these have reported evidence of uncontrolled RPE proliferation, tumour formation or major ocular immune reactions [1, 2]. In this brief report, we describe safety, structural and functional outcomes to 5-years for 2 patients following hESC-RPE monolayer transplantation.
Methods
The study, including patient selection, surgical procedures, derivation of hESC-RPE, production of the patch, clinical investigations and detailed results to 12 months have been previously described [1]. Functional assessment of refracted best corrected visual acuity (ETDRS) was carried out by independent optometrists.
Results
Safety
There were 4 serious adverse events (SAEs) during the study. Subject 1 developed a scleral suture related conjunctival erosion which was repaired surgically. Subject 2 developed a peripheral retinal detachment, 2 months after the initial surgery, due to proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). It was repaired with a single operation with retention of silicone for an additional 2 months before removal. The retina remained fully attached to 5-years. The other two SAEs were related to Subject 2 comorbidities with elevated blood sugars related to peri-operative oral steroids, managed medically, and a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in year 2.
There were no signs of uncontrolled RPE proliferation, ectopic differentiation or tumorigenicity on assessment during the five-year period.
Function
Subjects 1 and 2 had an improved best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 2 years of 16 and 15 letters respectively. For Subject 1 there was a linear reduction from 2 years; reaching baseline at 4 years (11 letters) and below baseline at 5 years (2 letters) (Fig. 1. A1). For Subject 2 the improved BCVA reduced but remained above baseline by 9 letters at 5 years (Fig. 1. A2).
Structure
SD-OCT showed areas of continuous, double, hyper-reflective lines consistent in thickness and position with the hESC-RPE, and matching areas of pigmentation for both patients at 5 years (Fig. 1. A2 and B2, Fig. 2. A4 and B4). For subject 1 the neurosensory retina was thinned over the patch with no regular architecture at 5 years (Fig. 1. A2). Subject 2 had preservation of some retinal architecture with thinned fovea at year 5. (Figure 1. B2).
Discussion
We observed patch pigmentation corresponding to OCT signals suggesting persistence of transplanted RPE in both patients at 5 years (Fig. 1. A2 and B2, Fig. 2. A4 and B4). We cannot be certain whether this was because of the surgery, the health of the neuroretina, the function of the choriocapillaris or a low-grade, chronic rejection-related inflammation, as no histology is available.
Sustained BCVA improvement to 2 years for subject 1, and, 5 years for subject 2 was recorded, though it is not possible to attribute the improvement to the RPE transplant alone in the absence of a controls. Improvements in vision have been seen with removal of blood alone [5], but these results suggests that the transplanted RPE may be capable of sustaining retinal function long-term.
In terms of safety, there was no uncontrolled proliferation or tumorigenicity and no clinically evident intraocular inflammation over the five-year period. Both subjects received oral and topical steroids as immunosuppression as described previously [1]. In both subjects epiretinal and sub-retinal fibrosis was seen and in subject 2 a PVR retinal detachment occurred, which did not occur or progress after the 1st 12 months. It is possible that the fibrosis and retinal detachments were related to the transplanted RPE or the underlying neovascular AMD combined with retinal surgery.
Conclusion
We report findings at 5 years for 2 patients with hESC-RPE sheet transplantation to provide early information, that will assist the preparation of further and more definitive studies in this field, that will begin to answer the many ongoing questions in the field.
References
Da Cruz L, Fynes K, Georgiadis O et al (2018) Phase 1 clinical study of an embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium patch in age-related macular degeneration. Nat Biotechnol 36:328–337
Rohowetz LJ, Koulen P (2023) Stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium cell therapy: Past and future directions. Front Cell and Dev Biol 11:01–06
Kuriyan AE, Albini TA, Townsend JH et al (2017) Vision Loss after Intravitreal Injection of Autologous “Stem Cells” for AMD. New England J Med 376:1047–1053
Kuriyan AE, Albini TA, Flynn HW (2017) The Growing “Stem Cell Clinic” Problem. Am J Ophthalmol 177:1–2
Iglicki M, Khoury M, Donato L et al (2024) Comparison of subretinal aflibercept vs ranibizumab vs bevacizumab in the context of PPV, pneumatic displacement with subretinal air and subretinal tPA in naïve submacular haemorrhage secondary to nAMD. “The Submarine Study.” Eye 38:292–296
Funding
This study was funded by Pfizer (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01691261).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the UK Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (GTAC), the Moorfields Research Governance Committee, the London–West London & GTAC Research Ethics Committee and the MHRA.
Conflicts of interest
Lyndon da Cruz and Peter J Coffey are named on 2 patents lodged by University College London (UCL) Business. They are named on the Patent Application No. PCT/GB2009/000917 (for the patch) and International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2011/051262 (for the surgical tool).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Soomro, T., Georgiadis, O., Coffey, P.J. et al. Safety, structure and function five years after hESC-RPE patch transplantation in acute neovascular AMD with submacular haemorrhage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06463-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06463-4