Abstract
Objective
To compare the outcomes of medial rectus plication and medial rectus resection procedures in the treatment of exotropia.
Methods
Articles from Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until July 2021 with a minimum follow-up period of 1 month were retrieved. No restriction on language was applied. Eligible studies must comply with the inclusion criteria. Only studies with comparisons between unilateral medial rectus plication versus unilateral medial rectus resection, unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus plication (RP) versus unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection (RR), or bilateral medial rectus plication(BMRP) versus bilateral medial rectus resection (BMRR) would be included for subsequent analysis. Two primary outcomes were specified: success rate and mean postoperative deviation. Dichotomous data were calculated as pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and continuous data as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% CIs.
Results
A total of 8 studies with 557 participants were enrolled in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion criteria. Seven studies compared lateral rectus recession + medial rectus plication to unilateral lateral rectus recession + medial rectus resection and one study compared bilateral medial rectus plication to bilateral medial rectus resection. Differences in success rates between plication and resection groups were not statistically significant (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43–1.02; P = 0.06), and the unsatisfactory effects (the undercorrection and overcorrection rates) between the two groups were comparable. Additionally, there were also no significant differences in postoperative deviation and the amount of exodrift between the two groups.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis provides evidence that both the medial rectus plication and medial rectus resection procedures have similar efficacy in the treatment of exotropia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sukhija J, Kaur S (2018) Comparison of plication and resection in large-angle exotropia. J AAPOS 22:348–351
Huston PA, Hoover DL (2018) Surgical outcomes following rectus muscle plication versus resection combined with antagonist muscle recession for basic horizontal strabismus. J AAPOS 22:7–11
Wang X, Zhang W, Chen B, Liao M, Liu L (2019) Comparison of bilateral medial rectus plication and resection for the treatment of convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia. Acta Ophthalmol 97:e448–e453
Kimura Y, Kimura T (2017) Comparative study of plication-recession versus resection-recession in unilateral surgery for intermittent exotropia. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61:286–291
Chaudhuri Z, Demer JL (2014) Surgical outcomes following rectus muscle plication: a potentially reversible, vessel-sparing alternative to resection. JAMA Ophthalmol 132:579–585
Anand K, Baindur S, Dhiman S, Dutta P, Mishra M, Rastogi A, Suresh P (2020) Surgical outcomes of plication versus resection in basic type of intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol 55:323–329
Rajavi Z, Arabikhalilabad S, Sabbaghi H, Kheiri B, Abdi S (2021) Comparison of medial rectus resection and plication in exotropic patients. Int Ophthalmol 41:11–19
Oltra EZ, Pineles SL, Demer JL (2015) The effect of rectus muscle recession, resection and plication on anterior segment circulation in humans. Br J Ophthalmol 99:556–560
Lee HJ, Kim SJ (2020) Long-term outcomes following resection-recession versus plication-recession in children with intermittent exotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 104:350–356
Alkharashi M, Hunter DG (2017) Reduced surgical success rate of rectus muscle plication compared to resection. J AAPOS 21:201–204
Issaho DC, de Freitas D, Cronemberger MF (2020) Plication versus resection in horizontal strabismus surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol 2020:5625062
Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898
Wells G, Shea B, O’connell DL et al (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558
Chiu A, Din N, Ali N (2014) Standardising reported outcomes of surgery for intermittent exotropia—a systematic literature review. Strabismus 22(1):32–36
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Jing Qian and Yixia Du who were involved in the early phases of the review including contributing to the design of the search strategies and screening. We would also like to thank Zhijun Chen for administrative support.
Funding
This work was funded by the Young Medical Talents Foundation of Jiangsu Province.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Desheng Song and Zhijun Chen conceived the study. Jing Qian designed and performed the searches. Desheng Song and Jing Qian conducted data extraction, appraisal, and synthesis and wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in discussions about the eligibility and quality of the included studies and critically reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, D., Qian, J. & Chen, Z. Efficacy of medial rectus plication versus resection for exotropia: a meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 2095–2101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05589-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05589-7