Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pediatric endothelial keratoplasty: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recently, endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has been increasingly considered the first intervention in pediatrics with isolated corneal endothelial dysfunction. This systematic review aims to investigate the current evidence about the advantages, disadvantages, technical challenges, and clinical outcomes of EK in the pediatric group.

Method

All the English literature relevant to pediatric EK was searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases with appropriate keywords. Relevant data were pooled to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Results

Of 1646 articles found initially, 35 articles were finally eligible to be included in our study. A total of 154 eyes of 107 patients underwent Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) was the most reported indication for pediatric DSAEK (108 eyes). Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) was performed in 2 eyes of 2 cases, one with PPCD and another one in a patient with Kearns–Sayre syndrome. Owing to some specific anatomical and physiological pediatric characteristics, some modifications in a standard procedure were suggested. The average follow-up period was 23.80 ± 20.18 months (3 months to 8.5 years). Seventy-six eyes who had a mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 1.36 ± 0.70 (0.49 to 3) logMAR preoperatively found mean BCVA of 0.51 ± 0.33 (0.04 to 2) logMAR postoperatively. Graft dislocation was the most reported complication (26 eyes). The rate of other complications was low. Endothelial cell loss was reported from 8.3 to 63.7% after pediatric EK with follow-up duration from 3 months to 8.3 years.

Conclusion

EK procedures, despite some technical challenges, are feasible surgical techniques with acceptable visual and anatomical outcomes in the management of pediatrics with corneal endothelial dysfunction and minimal stromal involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available per request (data transparency).

References

  1. Anwar HM, El-Danasoury A (2014) Endothelial keratoplasty in children. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25(4):340–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma B, Priyadarshini S, Chaurasia S, Das S (2018) Recent advances in paediatric keratoplasty. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 13(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2018.1429266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fung SSM, Ali A, Mireskandari K (2017) Pediatric corneal transplantation—where are we heading? Curr Ophthalmol Rep 5(1):23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-017-0126-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trief D, Marquezan MC, Rapuano CJ, Prescott CR (2017) Pediatric corneal transplants. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 28(5):477–484. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mittal V, Mittal R (2014) Challenges in pediatric endothelial keratoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol 62(2):251–254. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.128638

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Medsinge A, Nischal KK (2013) Paediatric keratoplasty: choices and conundrums. Br J Ophthalmol 97(10):1225–1227. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tierney JF SL, Clarke M (2021) Chapter 26: Individual participant data. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Cochrane, 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-26 .Accessed 6 Oct 2021

  9. Colby K (2008) Changing times for pediatric keratoplasty. J AAPOS 12(3):223–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Panahi-Bazaz M, Sharifipour F, Malekahmadi M (2014) Modified Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 9(4):522–525. https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.150836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mittal V, Mittal R, Sangwan VS (2011) Successful Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea 30(3):354–356. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181e8441a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jastaneiah SS (2012) Descemet’s stripping-automated endothelial keratoplasty for traumatic aniridia and aphakia. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med 2012:982657. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/982657

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang F, Hong J, Xiao G, Feng Y, Peng R, Wang M et al (2020) Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in pediatric patients with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 209:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohebbi M, Nabavi A, Fadakar K, Hashemi H (2020) Outcomes of Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Eye Contact Lens 46(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu AY, Prescott CR (2019) Recent surgical trends in pediatric corneal transplantation: a 13-year review. Cornea 38(5):546–552. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vadhul R, Halbach CS, Areaux RG Jr, Berry S, Hou JH (2019) Endothelial dysfunction in a child with Pearson marrow-pancreas syndrome managed with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using a suture pull-through technique. Digit J Ophthalmol DJO 25(4):59–64. https://doi.org/10.5693/djo.02.2019.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rishi E, Srinivasan B, Singh N, Gopal L (2019) Late onset Descemet’s membrane detachment: 15 years after limbal lensectomy with vitrectomy for ROP. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(6):965–966. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_725_18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. HerminaStrungaru M, Ali A, Rootman D, Mireskandari K (2017) Endothelial keratoplasty for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in a 4-month-old infant. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 7:23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2017.05.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Low JR, Anshu A, Tan ACS, Htoon HM, Tan DTH (2014) The outcomes of primary pediatric keratoplasty in Singapore. Am J Ophthalmol 158(3):496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kothari M, Rao K, Moolani S (2014) Recurrent progressive anterior segment fibrosis syndrome following a Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty in an infant with congenital aniridia. Indian J Ophthalmol 62(2):246–248. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.128635

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonnermann J, Klamann MKJ, Maier AKB, Bertelmann E, Schroeter J, Von Au K et al (2014) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in a child with corneal endothelial dysfunction in Kearns-Sayre syndrome. Cornea 33(11):1232–1234. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sella R, Rootman D, Bahar I (2013) Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in an 8-month-old boy. J AAPOS 17(1):94–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sati A, Ramappa M, Chaurasia S (2013) Cataract following endothelial keratoplasty (EK) in a child. Med J Armed Forces India 69(4):398–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lenhart PD, Evans CT, Beck AD, Lee WB (2013) Visual outcome after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in an 8-month-old with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. J AAPOS 17(6):637–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.08.005

  25. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Plaka A, Kankariya VP (2013) First bilateral pediatric Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J AAPOS 17(3):337–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hong Y, Peng RM, Wang M, Qu HQ, Hong J (2013) Suture pull-through insertion techniques for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in Chinese phakic eyes: outcomes and complications. PloS one 8(4):e61929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061929 (Print 2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Beltz J, Madi S, Santorum P, Scorcia V, Busin M (2013) Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial decompensation in buphthalmos. Am J Ophthalmol 156(3):608–15.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ashar JN, Ramappa M, Vaddavalli PK (2013) Paired-eye comparison of Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol 97(10):1247–1249. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ashar JN, Ramappa M, Chaurasia S (2013) Endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet’s stripping in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. J AAPOS 17(1):22–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramappa M, Ashar J, Vaddavalli PK, Chaurasia S, Murthy SI (2012) Endothelial keratoplasty in children: surgical challenges and early outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 96(8):1148–1149. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Madi S, Santorum P, Busin M (2012) Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in pediatric age group. Saudi J Ophthalmol 26(3):309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.04.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kymionis GD, Kankariya VP, Diakonis VF, Karavitaki AE, Siganos CS, Pallikaris IG (2012) Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a child after failed penetrating keratoplasty. J AAPOS 16(1):95–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hashemi H, Ghaffari R, Mohebi M (2012) Posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DSAEK) in Peters anomaly. Cornea 31(10):1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31825697a4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goshe JM, Li JY, Terry MA (2012) Successful Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy in a pediatric patient. Int Ophthalmol 32(1):61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-011-9511-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chaurasia S, Ramappa M, Sangwan VS (2012) Clinical outcomes of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol 32(6):571–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9615-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashar JN, MadhaviLatha K, Vaddavalli PK (2012) Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) for children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy: surgical challenges and 1-year outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol  250(9):1341–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2014-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Anwar HM, El Danasoury AM, Hashem AN (2012) Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Clin Ophthalmol 6(1):159–163. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S28405

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Busin M, Beltz J, Scorcia V (2011) Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill : 1960) 129(9):1140–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bellucci R, Chierego C, Bellucci C (2011) Endothelial keratoplasty in a newborn baby with CHED. Cornea 30(12):1488–1490. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318221c2f3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pineda IR, Jain V, Shome D, Hunter DC, Natarajan S (2010) Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: is it an option for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy? Int Ophthalmol 30(3):307–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-009-9315-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Belliveau MJ, Rocha G, Manchur A, Brownstein S (2010) Bilateral Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in a young phakic patient. Can J Ophthalmol 45(2):180–181. https://doi.org/10.1139/i09-199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ponchel C, Malecaze F, Arne JL, Fournie P (2009) Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a child with Descemet membrane breaks after forceps delivery. Cornea 28(3):338–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181861c40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jun B, Kuo AN, Afshari NA, Carlson AN, Kim T (2009) Refractive change after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty surgery and its correlation with graft thickness and diameter. Cornea 28(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318182a4c1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jeng BH, Marcotty A, Traboulsi EI (2008) Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a 2-year-old child. J AAPOS 12(3):317–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fernandez MM, Buckley EG, Afshari NA (2008) Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a child. J AAPOS  12(3):314–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Price MO, Price FW Jr, Trespalacios R (2007) Endothelial keratoplasty technique for aniridic aphakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(3):376–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu S, Veldman P (2017) Evidence-based endothelial rehabilitation. Semin Ophthalmol 32(1):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2016.1228409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Holz HA, Meyer JJ, Espandar L, Tabin GC, Mifflin MD, Moshirfar M (2008) Corneal profile analysis after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and its relationship to postoperative hyperopic shift. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(2):211–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ Jr, Meisler DM (2007) Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea 26(6):670–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3180544902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Clemmensen K, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J (2015) Changes in corneal power after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Refract Surg 31(12):807–12. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20151111-04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Prasher P, Muftuoglu O, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP, Mootha VV (2010) Corneal power measurement with a rotating Scheimpflug imaging system after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(8):1358–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amin Dehghani Sanij or Masoud Mirghorbani.

Ethics declarations

Financial Support

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohebbi, M., Mehrpour, M., Sanij, A.D. et al. Pediatric endothelial keratoplasty: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 1069–1082 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05459-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05459-8

Keywords

Navigation