Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcomes of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe the results of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (non-DSAEK). Retrospective, interventional, consecutive clinical case series. Twenty-three patients underwent non-DSAEK from January 2010 to February 2011. The various indications were pseudophakic corneal edema, aphakic corneal edema, failed graft, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome and congenital glaucoma. Corneal edema cleared in all patients within 1–4 weeks. Mean follow-up duration was 7.6 months. Post-operative best corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/400 to 20/40. Fourteen patients had co-morbid factors affecting the vision. No patient had interface haze. Immediate post-operative complications were partial graft detachment (1 patient) and secondary angle closure (1 patient). Corneal clarity was restored following secondary interventions. One late post-operative complication was graft rejection at 6 months, leading to graft failure. Non-DSAEK is a safe and viable option in cases of corneal decompensation when the Descemet membrane is non-pathological.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Price FW Jr, Price MO (2006) Endothelial keratoplasty to restore clarity to a failed penetrating graft. Cornea 25:895–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nikolic L, Jovanovic V, Lackovic V, Todorovic V (2010) Endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet’s membrane stripping: histologic and ultrastructural findings. Ophthal Res 43:56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K (2008) Non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction secondary to argon laser iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 146:543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaurasia S, Muralidhar R, Murthy S, Garg P, Sangwan V (2011) Endothelial keratoplasty without stripping the Descemet’s membrane. Br J Ophthalmol 95(10):1473–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Price MO, Price FW Jr (2010) Endothelial keratoplasty—a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 38(2):128–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobbins KR, Price FW Jr, Whitson WE (2000) Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the Midwestern United States. Cornea 19:813–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation and Hyderabad Eye Institute. The authors do not have any financial interest or any conflicting relationship in any of the issues or products referred to in the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunita Chaurasia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaurasia, S., Ramappa, M. & Sangwan, V.S. Clinical outcomes of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol 32, 571–575 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9615-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9615-4

Keywords

Navigation