In this study, we could detect visible changes to MAs on OCTA before and after focal photocoagulation. Before treatment, MAs were seen preferentially in the deep retinal slab, as Matte et al. [15] reported previously, but relatively large MAs were found in both the superficial and deep slabs. Spaide et al. [16] also reported that some MAs in patients with diabetic retinopathy were seen in both the superficial and deep retinal slabs. However, as reported previously [7, 17, 18], not all MAs observed on FA or ICGA were delineated on OCTA. As we did not perform manual segmentation, some MAs could not be visualized because of errors in segmentation caused by retinal edema; repeated scans [19] and multiple image averaging [20] might increase the ability to detect MAs. Hard exudates were found to be the major cause of artifacts and were difficult to discriminate from MAs.
After photocoagulation, almost half of the treated MAs disappeared from OCTA within 15 min. All but two of the MAs that immediately disappeared were not apparent at 6 weeks and later. Furthermore, a few MAs that were visible just after photocoagulation were not visible at 6 weeks or later. Previously, in an analysis of FA, Sachdev et al. [21] observed that MA closure was only 0.67% at 2 weeks, but increased to 89.6% by 12 weeks. Using spectral-domain OCT, Lee et al. [22] and Yamada et al. [23] reported that MAs associated with diabetic maculopathy and that closed following focal laser photocoagulation showed uniform hyperreflectivity, finally disappearing over time. Immediately after photocoagulation, the lumen of MAs is changed and turbulent blood flow may occur within the treated MAs, making the MAs invisible on OCTA, as Nakao et al. reported. [24] Later, thrombus is formed, and the obstruction of blood flow within vessels can cause permanent closure of MAs. These time- and efficacy-dependent changes within the MAs after photocoagulation could cause a change in visibility on OCTA during the follow-up period.
Earlier disappearance of signals corresponding to the MAs on OCTA suggests the success of photocoagulation, although complete closure of MAs requires a long time, and in some cases, recanalization may occur during follow-up. In our study, the eyes in which MAs disappeared showed significant reductions in CRT, although 7 of 12 eyes with persistent MAs and CME required additional treatment over 24 weeks. Finally, all but one eye obtained a foveal pit. To avoid laser-induced damage, we selected the MAs to treat, and the results suggest that the resolution of CME depends on which MAs cause CME, and whether they are treatable with photocoagulation. Hirano et al. [25] reported that a combined focal/grid laser successfully reduced the number of anti-VEGF injections for diabetic macular edema. Therefore, we suggest that careful evaluation of OCTA images for MAs could reduce additional treatments with anti-VAGF and photocoagulation.
Regarding the BCVA, it had not improved significantly from baseline, although the CRT decreased significantly. A previous report showed that, in addition to the CRT, microvascular density, ellipsoid zone disruption, and the presence of disorganization in the retinal inner slabs might be predictive biomarkers of VA in Mac Tel type 1 [26]. We did not observe any retinal pigment epithelial atrophy during the post-treatment period, and only two eyes showed a thinning of the outer retinal layer around the area of photocoagulation; therefore, for photocoagulation to achieve its optimum effectiveness, a careful procedure targeting only selected MAs may be essential.
The limitations of this study are the small sample size and relatively short observation period. As mentioned earlier, the number of MAs could be inaccurate because of segmentation errors and artifacts. Furthermore, the use of combined anti-VEGF drugs depended on the physician.
In conclusion, the visualization of MAs on OCTA changed after direct photocoagulation. The results suggest that the success of photocoagulation can be monitored using noninvasive OCTA.