Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and visual outcome of endophthalmitis patients: a single-center experience

  • Inflammatory Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report the clinical and visual outcome and the therapeutical management in a large cohort of endophthalmitis patients.

Methods

In a monocentric, observational study, we retrospectively analyzed the data of all patients with endophthalmitis who were referred to the department of ophthalmology of the Carl Gustav Carus Hospital Dresden between 2006 and 2018.

Results

In total, data of 104 patients (49 female, 55 male) were included in the present analysis. The most frequent clinical scenario for endophthalmitis was postcataract surgery (30.8%). The most frequent treatment at presentation was a pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) in 42 patients, followed by an intravitreal antibiotic in 41 patients. Out of 41 patients who received an intravitreal antibiotic, 35 patients (85%) needed additional treatment. In contrast, out of 42 patients who received a ppV as the initial treatment, 19 patients (42%) needed additional therapy, which was significantly different (p < 0.0001). The best presenting visual acuity improved significantly after treatment (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that, compared with an intravitreal antibiotic, a ppV as the initial therapy of endophthalmitis might reduce the number of additional treatments. From our data, it can be hypothesized that a ppV should be performed as early as possible to achieve the best visual outcome in most endophthalmitis patients. Prospective studies are now needed to address this issue in greater detail and to confirm our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barry P, Cordovés L, Gardner S (2013) ESCRS guidelines for prevention and treatment of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: data, dilemmas and conclusions. The European Society for Cataract & Refractive Surgeons, Ireland, Dublin, pp 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group (1995) Results of the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 113:1479–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhn F, Gini G (2005) Ten years after... are findings of the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study still relevant today? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:1197–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhn F, Gini G (2006) Vitrectomy for endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 113:714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Monnet D, Labetoulle M, Lautier-Frau M, Offret H, Frau E (2002) Therapeutic strategy in delayed postoperative endophthalmitis: a report on 15 cases. J Fr Ophtalmol 25:599–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bach M, Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L (2007) Author response: numerical imputation for low vision states. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci eLetter:1–3

  7. Karacal H, Kymes SM, Apte RS (2007) Retrospective analysis of etiopathogenesis of all cases of endophthalmitis at a large tertiary referral center. Int Ophthalmol 27:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yannuzzi NA, Si N, Relhan N, Kuriyan AE, Albini TA, Berrocal AM, Davis JL, Smiddy WE, Townsend J, Miller D, Flynn HW Jr (2017) Endophthalmitis after clear corneal cataract surgery: outcomes over two decades. Am J Ophthalmol 174:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer C, Loos D, Feucht N, Zapp D, Prahs PM, Tandogan T, Khoramnia R (2018) [Endogenous endophthalmitis: epidemiology, clinic, therapy and visual outcome]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd

  10. Dave VP, Pathengay A, Basu S, Gupta N, Basu S, Raval V, Das T, Sharma S, Mathai A, Narayanan R, Chhablani J, Sharma P, Tyagi M, Balakrishnan D, Jalali S, Rani PK, Pappuru RR (2016) Endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy: clinical features, risk factors, and management outcomes. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 5:192–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yospaiboon Y, Meethongkam K, Sinawat S, Laovirojjanakul W, Ratanapakorn T, Sanguansak T, Bhoomibunchoo C (2018) Predictive factors in the treatment of streptococcal endophthalmitis. Clin Ophthalmol 12:859–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayer CS, Loos DA (2016) Posttraumatic endophthalmitis: complication following severe eye injury. Ophthalmologe 113:478–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuriyan AE, Weiss KD, Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy WE, Berrocal AM, Albini TA, Miller D (2014) Endophthalmitis caused by streptococcal species: clinical settings, microbiology, management, and outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 157:774–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang XB, Liu YY, Huang ZX, Mao Y, Zhao L, Xu ZP (2018) Clinical analysis of 1593 patients with infectious endophthalmitis: a 12-year study at a tertiary referral center in Western China. Chin Med J 131:1658–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nobe JR, Gomez DS, Liggett P, Smith RE, Robin JB (1987) Post-traumatic and postoperative endophthalmitis: a comparison of visual outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 71:614–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doft BH, Kelsey SF, Wisniewski SR (1998) Additional procedures after the initial vitrectomy or tap-biopsy in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Ophthalmology 105:707–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Siqueira RC, Gil AD, Canamary F, Minari M, Jorge R (2009) Pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for acute endophthalmitis treatment. Arq Bras Oftalmol 72:28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke B, Williamson TH, Gini G, Gupta B (2018) Management of bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis and the role of vitrectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 63:677–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaynak S, Oner FH, Kocak N, Cingil G (2003) Surgical management of postoperative endophthalmitis: comparison of 2 techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:966–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bali E, Huyghe P, Caspers L, Libert J (2003) Vitrectomy and silicone oil in the treatment of acute endophthalmitis. Preliminary results. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol:9–14

  21. Engelbert M, Mino de KH, Thiel M, Grasbon T, Ta CN, Schulze-Schwering M, Klauss V, Kampik A (2004) Intravitreal vancomycin and amikacin versus intravenous imipenem in the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:313–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zghal I, Souguir A, Fekih O, Chebbi A, Romdhane O, Bouguila H, Nacef L (2017) Postoperative endophthalmities: therapeutic results and early vitrectomy. Tunis Med 95:172–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin M, Zhang W, Liu Y, Wang L, Ding Y, Wu X, Shi Y, Sun L, Li Y (2011) Nosocomial acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis at a university teaching hospital in China. J Hosp Infect 79:323–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aaberg TM Jr, Flynn HW Jr, Schiffman J, Newton J (1998) Nosocomial acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis survey. A 10-year review of incidence and outcomes. Ophthalmology 105:1004–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pijl BJ, Theelen T, Tilanus MA, Rentenaar R, Crama N (2010) Acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: 250 consecutive cases treated at a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. Am J Ophthalmol 149:482–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McCannel CA (2011) Meta-analysis of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: causative organisms and possible prevention strategies. Retina 31:654–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, Barza M, Vine AK, Doft BH, Kelsey SF (1996) Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol 122:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Kitsche.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study (retrospectively study), formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Clinical features of endophthalmitis
Table 2 Number of additional treatments after initial treatment at first presentation
Table 3 Visual acuity outcomes for the different clinical scenarios

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitsche, M., Herber, R., Pillunat, L.E. et al. Clinical and visual outcome of endophthalmitis patients: a single-center experience. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258, 183–189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04480-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04480-2

Keywords

Navigation