Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally fibrotic stage 5 ROP: a clinical prognostic factor in eyes undergoing vitrectomy for stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Title

Minimally fibrotic Stage 5: A clinical prognostic factor in eyes undergoing vitrectomy for stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Purpose

To define minimally fibrotic stage 5 ROP and to demonstrate better surgical outcomes in this subgroup.

Methods

A cohort of eligible eyes with stage 5 ROP undergoing vitrectomy were further divided into those with minimally fibrotic stage 5 and others. Minimally fibrotic stage 5 ROP was defined as those stage 5 eyes having a translucent retrolental membrane with visibility of the underlying retinal vessels and absence of anteriorly rotated ciliary processes. We reported on anatomic and visual outcomes in eyes with defined characteristics of this subgroup identified before surgery and then observing them post vitrectomy over a period of time as compared to others.

Results

Minimally fibrotic stage 5 eyes had better visual (p = .0068) and anatomical outcomes (p = .0001).

Conclusion

Minimally fibrotic stage 5 ROP shows ridge to ridge traction that has resulted in a traction retinal detachment with a retrolental membrane, but fibrotic change has just begun. This stage 5 ROP with limited fibrosis represents a subset of this stage 5 ROP with a positive anatomic and visual prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Machemer R (1983) Closed vitrectomy for severe retrolental fibroplasias in the infant. Ophthalmology 90:436–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trese MT (1984) Surgical results of stage V retrolental fibroplasias and timing of surgical repair. Ophthalmology 91:461–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trese MT (1986) Visual results and prognostic factors for visionfollowing surgery for stage V retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 93:574–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chong LP, Machemer R, deJuan E (1986) Vitrectomy for advanced stages of retinopathy of prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol 102:710–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tasman W, Borrone RN, Bolling J (1987) Open sky vitrectomy for total retinal detachment in retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 94:449–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zillis JD, deJuan E, Machemer R (1990) Advanced retinopathy of prematurity: the anatomical and visual results of vitreous surgery. Ophthalomology 97:821–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quinn GE, Dobson V, Barr CC et al (1991) Visual acuity in infants after vitrectomy for severe retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 98:5–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchino Y, Hayashi H, Kono T, Ohshima K (1995) Long-term follow-up of visual acuity in eyes with stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity after closed vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 120:308–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quinn GE, Dobson V, Barr CC et al (1996) Visual acuity of eyes after vitrectomy for retinopathy of prematurity: follow-up at 5 ½ years. Ophthalmology 103:595–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trese MT, Droste PJ (1998) Long-term postoperative results of a consecutive series of stages 4 and 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 105:992–997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi MY, Yu YS (1998) Anatomical and visual results of vitreous surgery for advanced retinopathy of prematurity. Korean J Ophthalmol 12:60–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kono T, Oshima K, Fuchino Y (2000) Surgical results and visual outcomes of vitreous surgery for advanced stages of retinopathy of prematurity. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:661–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lakhanpal RR, Sun RL, Albini TA, Holz ER (2006) Anatomical success rate after primary three-port lens-sparing vitrectomy in stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Retina 26:724–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fielder AR (1997) Retinopathy of prematurity. Community Eye Health J 10:17–19

    Google Scholar 

  15. Capone A, Trese MT (2006) Stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity: then and now. Retina 26:721–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jalali S, Anand R, Kumar H, Dogra MR, Azad R, Gopal L (2003) Programme planning and screening strategy in retinopathy of prematurity. Indian J Ophthalmol 51:89–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jalali S, Hussain A, Matalia J, Anand R (2006) Modification of screening criteria for India and other middle income group countries. Am J Ophthalmol 141:966–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ICROP Committee for the classification of late stages of retinopathy of prematurity, II (1987) The classification of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 105:906–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group (2003) Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomised trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121:1684–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Seaber JH, Machemer R, Eliott D et al (1995) Long-term visual results of children after initially successful vitrectomy for stage V retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 102:199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gadkari S, Kamdar RR, Kulkarni S et al (2015) Vision development over an extended follow-up period in babies after successful vitrectomy for stage 4b retinopathy of prematurity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253(5):705–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Algvere P, Kock E (1976) Experimental fibroplasia in the rabbit vitreous. Retinal detachment induced by autologous fibroblasts. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Klin Ophthalmol 199:215–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grierson I, Rahi A (1981) Structural basis of contraction in vitreal fibrous membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 65:737–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Woo KI, Kwak SI, Yu YS (1992) The components of the proliferative membranes in retinopathy of prematurity: an electron microscopic study. Korean J Ophthalmol 6(1):36–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gadkari SS, Kamdar RR, Kulkarni SR et al (2015) Vitreoretina surgery for advanced ROP : presentation and outcomes from a developing country. Can J Ophthalmol 50(1):54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hartnett ME, McColm JR (2006) Fibrovascular organization in the vitreous following laser for ROP: implications for prognosis. Retina 26(7 Suppl):S24–31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. P M Velankar, senior anaesthetist who made the surgeries possible. The authors wish to thank Mr. Umesh Pawar, senior optometrist for the RetCam photographs. and Dr. Pravin Narwadkar for his invaluable assistance in coordinating the ROP project at our hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salil S Gadkari.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No external funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gadkari, S.S., Deshpande, M. & Kulkarni, S. Minimally fibrotic stage 5 ROP: a clinical prognostic factor in eyes undergoing vitrectomy for stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254, 1303–1309 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3197-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3197-6

Keywords

Navigation