Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of luminance combinations on the characteristics of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG)

  • Basic Science
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to ascertain the characteristics of the response triggered by the global flash multifocal electroretinogram (MOFO mfERG) under various combinations of global and focal flash luminance, and to determine the optimal conditions for this measurement.

Methods

Ten normal subjects with mean age 23.2 yrs (± 1.14 yrs) were recruited for the MOFO mfERG measurement. The visual stimulation consisted of four video frames (stimulus frame with 103 scaled hexagonal focal flashes, followed by a dark frame, a global flash and then another dark frame). The focal and global flash intensities were varied independently for four levels (50, 100, 200 and 400 cd/m2). The subjects then underwent measurements with sixteen combinations of focal and global flash luminance. The direct component (DC) and induced component (IC) of the MOFO mfERG were grouped into central and peripheral regions for analysis.

Results

The central and peripheral DC amplitude increased with the focal flash luminance under constant global flash luminance. Moreover, the proportion of the global flash and focal flash intensity was shown to be important to achieve an optimal IC response. When the ratio of global flash luminance to focal flash luminance (g/f ratio) was kept at about 2:1, the central and peripheral IC amplitude reached the peak value, and further increasing the global flash luminance would not enhance the IC response magnitude. The implicit time of both central and peripheral DC generally decreased with the increase of g/f ratio. However, the implicit time of central and peripheral IC increased with the g/f ratio.

Conclusion

The g/f ratio is important in the MOFO mfERG paradigm, since the DC and IC responses change with this ratio. In order to obtain both optimal DC and IC responses, a g/f ratio of 1:1 with focal flash luminance between 100 cd/m2 and 200 cd/m2 would be recommended. As the global flash mfERG paradigm is studying the interaction triggered by both flashes, the g/f ratio is a vital parameter for measurement in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Asano E, Mochizuki K, Sawada A, Nagasaka E, Kondo Y, Yamamoto T (2007) Decreased nasal-temporal asymmetry of the second-order kernel response of multifocal electroretinograms in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 51:379–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan HH, Brown B (2000) Pilot study of the multifocal electroretinogram in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 84:1147–1153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan HL, Brown B (1998) Investigation of retinitis pigmentosa using the multifocal electroretinogram. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18:335–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan HL, Brown B (1999) Multifocal ERG changes in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19:306–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerth C (2009) The role of the ERG in the diagnosis and treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol 118:63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kretschmann U, Bock M, Gockeln R, Zrenner E (2000) Clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 100:99–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagy D, Schonfisch B, Zrenner E, Jagle H (2008) Long-term follow-up of retinitis pigmentosa patients with multifocal electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:4664–4671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palmowski-Wolfe AM, Allgayer RJ, Vernaleken B, Schotzau A, Ruprecht KW (2006) Slow-stimulated multifocal ERG in high- and normal-tension glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 112:157–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmowski-Wolfe AM, Todorova MG, Orguel S, Flammer J, Brigell M (2007) The ‘two global flash’ mfERG in high and normal tension primary open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 114:9–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tyrberg M, Ponjavic V, Lovestam-Adrian M (2008) Multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in patients with diabetes mellitus and an enlarged foveal avascular zone (FAZ). Doc Ophthalmol 117:185–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolsley CJ, Silvestri G, O'Neill J, Saunders KJ, Anderson RS (2009) The association between multifocal electroretinograms and OCT retinal thickness in retinitis pigmentosa patients with good visual acuity. Eye (Lond) 23:1524–1531

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S (2002) Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1673–1685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ng YF, Chan HH, Chu PH, Siu AW, To CH, Beale BA, Gilger BC, Wong F (2008) Pharmacologically defined components of the normal porcine multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 116:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutter EE SY, Li Y, Bearse MA (1999) Mapping inner retinal function through enhancement of adaptation components in the M-ERG. In: . Vision Science and Its Applications, 1999 OSA Technical Digest Series Vol. 1 Washington, DC: Optical Society of America: 52–55

  15. Shimada Y, Li Y, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE, Fung W (2001) Assessment of early retinal changes in diabetes using a new multifocal ERG protocol. Br J Ophthalmol 85:414–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chu PH, Chan HH, Brown B (2006) Glaucoma detection is facilitated by luminance modulation of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:929–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu PH, Chan HH, Brown B (2007) Luminance-modulated adaptation of global flash mfERG: fellow eye losses in asymmetric glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2626–2633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada Y, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE (2005) Multifocal electroretinograms combined with periodic flashes: direct responses and induced components. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:132–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chu PH, Chan HH, Ng YF, Brown B, Siu AW, Beale BA, Gilger BC, Wong F (2008) Porcine global flash multifocal electroretinogram: possible mechanisms for the glaucomatous changes in contrast response function. Vision Res 48:1726–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sutter EE, Bearse MA Jr (1999) The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res 39:419–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sutter EE, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man–I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32:433–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons JS, Palmowski-Wolfe AM (2008) ISCEV guidelines for clinical multifocal electroretinography (2007 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 116:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Associated Fund (Research Postgraduate) from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Competitive Earmark Research Grant (PolyU 5415/06M) from The Research Grants Committee of the Hong Kong SAR, Internal Competitive Research Grant (GYF32), Departmental General Research Fund (GU352) and the Niche Areas–Myopia Research (J-BB7P) and Glaucoma Research (J-BB76) from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. We thank Prof. Peter G Swann and Dr. Allen MY Cheong for their comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Experimental Optometry (Neuroscience), School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China

    Jenny C. Y. Lung & Henry H. L. Chan

  2. School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Henry H. L. Chan

Authors
  1. Jenny C. Y. Lung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henry H. L. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry H. L. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lung, J.C.Y., Chan, H.H.L. Effects of luminance combinations on the characteristics of the global flash multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 1117–1125 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1346-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1346-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation