Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the “transpalpebral tonometer” TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

An irregular corneal surface compromises IOP measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry. In such cases accurate measurement without corneal contact would be desirable. The new eyelid tonometer TGDc-01 measures IOP without corneal contact through the eyelid. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the eyelid tonometer compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry (cornea thickness-corrected values) in subjects without corneal alterations.

Methods

IOP was measured in 199 eyes of 103 subjects without corneal alterations by means of two different methods. Measurements with the transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer were performed within 5 min in random order.

Results

The mean difference between lid tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry was 0.71 mmHg, SD ±2.467 mmHg. In the reliability analysis the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.8620. Compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry 66.4% of the IOP readings measured by lid tonometry were in an interval of ±2 mmHg, 81.0% in an interval of ±3 mmHg. The maximum of deviation was −6 mmHg and +6 mmHg, respectively. The Bland and Altman plots are shown.

Conclusions

Lid tonometry correlates sufficiently with Goldmann applanation tonometry, but in more than 10% of the measurements the IOP readings differed by more than 3 mmHg. The eyelid tonometer may be helpful as a screening tool when Goldmann applanation tonometry is not applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group (1998) Comparison of glaucoma progression between untreated patients with normal tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 126:487–497

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group (1998) The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 126:498–505

    Google Scholar 

  3. Draeger J (1966) Tonometry—physical fundamentals, development of methods and clinical application. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. (1975) Applanation tonomerty and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 53:34–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Flammer J, Gasser P, Prünte C, Yao K (1992) The probable involvement of factors other than intraocular pressure in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. In: Drance SM, Van Buskirk EM, Neufeld AH (eds) Pharmacology of the glaucomas. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 273–283

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldmann H (1955) Un nouveau tonomètre a l’applanation. Bull Mém Soc Franç Ophtal 67:474–477

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldmann H, Schmidt TH (1957) Über Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 53:221–242

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grundwald JE, Riva CE, Stone RA, Keates EU, Petrig BL (1984) Retinal autoregulation in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 91:1690–1694

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris A, Sergott RC, Spaeth GL, Katz LJ, Shoemaker JA, Martin BJ (1994) Color Doppler analysis of ocular vessel blood velocity in normal tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 118:642–649

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz J, Sommers A (1988) Risk-factors for primary open angle glaucoma. Am J Prev M 642–649:110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klaver JHJ, Greve EL, Goslinga H, Geijssen HC, Heuvelmans JHA (1985) Blood and plasma viscosity measurements in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 69:765–770

    Google Scholar 

  12. Madjlessi F, Marx W, Reinhard T, Althaus C, Sundmacher R (1997) Impression and applanation tonometry in irregular cornea. Comparison with intraocular needle tonometry. Ophthalmologe 200(7):478–481

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pillunat LE, Stodtmeister R, Wilmanna I (1987) Pressure compliance of the optic nerve head in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 71(3):181–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pillunat LE, Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Puersten A, Spoerl E (2003) Effect of corneal thickness, curvature and axial length on Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4237 (E-abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study [AGIS] (2000) The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol 130:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Buskirk EM, Cioffi GA (1992) Glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 113:447–452

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wolf S, Arend O, Sponsel WE, Schulte K, Cantor LB, Reim M (1993) Retinal hemodynamics using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and hemorheology in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 100:1561–1566

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Sandner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandner, D., Böhm, A., Kostov, S. et al. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the “transpalpebral tonometer” TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243, 563–569 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1037-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1037-1

Keywords

Navigation