Abstract
Background
Uric acid (UA) has emerged as a factor that can modify cognitive function both in the general population and in people with neurodegenerative disorders. Since very few data are available concerning amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we explored the correlation of UA levels and cognitive impairment in a large cohort of ALS patients.
Methods
We enrolled ALS patients consecutively seen at the Turin ALS expert center in the 2007–2018 period who underwent both cognitive/behavioral and UA evaluation at diagnosis. Patients were classified in 5 categories: normal cognition (ALS-CN), isolated cognitive impairment (ALSci), isolated behavioural impairment (ALSbi), cognitive and behavioural impairment (ALScbi), frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD). For this study, ALSci, ALSbi and ALScbi were merged as ALS with intermediate cognitive impairment (ALS-INT).
Results
Out of the 841 ALS patients, 422 had ALS-CN, 271 ALS-INT and 148 ALS-FTD. The mean values of UA were significantly different among the cognitive subgroups of patients, with the lowest values in the ALS-FTD (ALS-CN, 288.5 ± 78.0 (μmol/L; ALS-INT, 289.7 ± 75.5 μmol/L; ALS-FTD, 271.8 ± 74.9 μmol/L; p = 0.046). The frequency of ALS-FTD was significantly higher in the 1st tertile of UA. Lower UA levels were independently associated with FTD (OR 1.32, 95% c.i. 1.01–1.43; p = 0.038) in binary logistic regression.
Conclusions
We found that in ALS lower UA serum levels are correlated with reduced frequency of co-morbid FTD. Patients with intermediate cognitive impairment showed UA levels similar to ALS-CN but higher than ALS-FTD, implying that higher UA levels can prevent or delay cognitive function deterioration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder encompassing motor and cognitive disturbances [1]. ALS clinical heterogeneity, and in particular the presence of cognitive impairment, has profound negative effects on the course of the disease and impacts both the planning of the management and the design and interpretation of clinical trials. The causes of ALS phenotypical heterogeneity are still incompletely understood and may include the different pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the disease, i.e., genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors [1, 2]. A better understanding of these mechanisms and their interactions will help to improve the treatment of ALS patients.
Uric acid (UA) has emerged among the factors that can modify cognitive function both in the general population and in people with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) [3]. However, despite several biological mechanisms that have been proposed for this relationship, reverse causality has not been definitely excluded. The aim of this study is to explore the correlation of serum UA levels and cognitive impairment in a large cohort of ALS patients.
Methods
The study population includes ALS patients who were consecutively seen at the Turin ALS expert center in the 2007–2018 period, and who underwent both cognitive/behavioral testing and serum UA evaluation dosage. A comprehensive battery of cognitive tests was administered within 2 months of diagnosis. Fasting serum UA was assessed as part of the diagnostic work-up and is reported as μmol/L. Patients were diagnosed as definite, probable, probable laboratory-supported and possible ALS according to El Escorial revised criteria [4]. At the time of cognitive testing the ALS Functional Rating Scale–revised (ALSFRS-R) score was collected. Patients with a history of disorders which may potentially affect cognition (i.e., major stroke, severe head injuries, mental retardation), alcohol or drug dependence, severe mental illness, or use of high-dose psychoactive medications were tested but not included in data analysis. Patients who were not in Italian native language were assessed only through an unstructured interview and therefore were excluded from the analysis.
Neuropsychological assessment
Patients and controls underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests encompassing executive function, verbal and visual memory, attention and working memory, visuospatial function, language, social cognition, and behavior selected according to the Diagnostic Criteria for the Behavioural variant of Frontotemporal Dementia [5], and ALS-FTD Consensus Criteria (ALS-FTDC) [6]. The list of tests included in the battery are reported in the Supplemental methods. According to ALS-FTDC patients were classified in 5 categories: patients with normal cognition (ALS-CN), patients with isolated cognitive impairment (ALSci), patients with isolated behavioural impairment (ALSbi), patients with both cognitive and behavioural impairment (ALScbi) and patients with frontotemporal dementia (ALS-FTD) [6]. For this study, ALSci, ALSbi and ALScbi were merged as ALS with intermediate cognitive impairment (ALS-INT).
Statistical methods
Binary logistic regression analysis (backward) was performed, adjusting for sex, age at the time of diagnosis, type of onset (bulbar vs spinal), ALSFRS-R score at diagnosis; King’s stage at diagnosis, and MiToS stage at diagnosis [7, 8]. Pairwise analyses were performed comparing ALS-CN, ALS-INT and ALS-FTD. Partial correlation between UA levels and cognitive tests, controlled for age at the time of testing and educational level, was performed. All tests were two-tailed. Statistical analyses were carried out with the SPSS 29.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents
The study design was approved by the institutional Ethical Committees of the Turin ALS Expert center (Comitato Etico Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, #0038876). Patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. The database was anonymized according to Italian law for the protection of privacy.
Results
A total of 841 ALS patients were included in the study, 422 ALS-CN, 271 ALS-INT and 148 ALS-FTD. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are reported in Table 1. A flow chart reporting patients’ selection is reported in Fig. 1.
The mean values of UA were significantly different among the 3 cognitive subgroups of patients, with the lowest values in the ALS-FTD group (ALS-CN, 288.5 μmol/L [SD 78.0]; ALS-INT 289.7 μmol/L [SD 75.5]; ALS-FTD 271.8 μmol/L [74.9]; p = 0.046). The frequency of ALS-FTD significantly increased in the 3rd tertile of UA levels (Table 2).
Binary logistic regression analyses comparing the different cognitive subgroups gave the following results:
-
(a)
ALS-CN vs ALS-FTD (Table 3): Higher UA levels resulted in being independently associated with FTD (OR 1.32, 95% c.i. 1.01–1.43; p = 0.038). As expected, bulbar onset, older age at onset and ALSFRS-R score were also significantly related to the presence of FTD.
-
(b)
ALS-CN vs ALS-INT (Table 4): UA levels were not correlated with the presence of ALS-INT (OR 1.02, 95% c.i. 0.89–1.15; p = 0.82). Only older age at onset results in being correlated with ALS-INT.
-
(c)
ALS-INT vs ALS-FTD (Table 5): UA levels were independently associated with FTD (OR 1.20, 95% c.i. 1.01–1.49; p = 0.047). In this analysis, other factors related to ALS-FTD were bulbar onset and a lower ALSFRS-R score at diagnosis.
To understand whether UA levels are correlated with specific cognitive domains we performed a binary logistic regression analysis comparing UA levels with the scores of each cognitive test (Table 6). A significant correlation was found between UA serum levels and TMT-B (p = 0.033), TMT B-A (p = 0.023), BSRT-DR (p = 0.025), CPM47 (p = 0.003) and ECAS language subscore (p = 0.025).
An exploratory analysis was also performed on the 61 patients with C9orf72 GGGGCC repeat expansion. Of these patients, 21 were CN-ALS, 14 ALS-INT and 26 ALS-FTD. UA mean levels were not different in the 3 cognitive groups, although UA levels in ALS-FTD were lower than in the other two groups (CN-ALS 277.2 μmol/L [SD 88.0], ALS-INT 276.0 μmol/L [SD 60.1], ALS-FTD 263.5 μmol/L [78.5], p = 0.82), although they were lower in the ALS-FTD group. In accordance, all binary logistic regression analyses did not find UA as a significant predictor of cognitive impairment.
Discussion
In this large cohort of ALS patients evaluated with an extensive battery for cognitive impairment at the time of diagnosis we found that lower UA levels were independently correlated with the occurrence of FTD. Conversely, when analyzing the C9orf72 patients, this correlation was not found, although FTD subjects had slightly lower UA levels. Besides, we found that lower serum UA levels were significantly correlated with impairment in tests assessing Executive Functions (TMT B-A), Verbal Memory (BSRT Delayed Recall), Cognitive Flexibility (TMT B), Non-Verbal Intelligence (CPM47) and Language (ECAS Language subdomain).
High serum UA levels have been associated with slower progression of ALS [9], although with an effect primarily limited to female [10]. A bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study did not support a significant contribution of UA to the risk of ALS [11], but the relationship of UA with ALS prognosis and/or cognitive involvement was not explored. On the other side, a serum metabolome analysis, based on a two-sample MR, reported a significant protective link between high serum UA levels and disease risk in ALS but not in Parkinson’s disease (PD) [12]. Therefore, at least in the case of ALS, a reverse causality cannot be definitely excluded.
On the basis of the evidence, pharmacological trials have been undertaken both in PD and in ALS to explore the possible effect of inosine, a drug that acts to increase the level of serum and cerebrospinal fluid UA [13, 14]. Despite a significant target engagement (serum urate increase), no clinical effect on disease progression was detected. Of note, cognition was not explored in the trial on ALS patients [14].
To the best of our knowledge, the only study that has explored the role of serum UA serum levels on cognitive impairment in a small ALS cohort reported that patients cognitively impaired showed significantly lower levels of UA [15]. In that study, UA levels were significantly correlated with the Language and Executive Function subdomains of ECAS (p < 0.01 and p = 0.047 respectively). In our cohort, only ECAS Language subdomain was significantly related to UA serum levels, but in addition our extensive cognitive series of tests detected low UA levels in other cognitive domains, i.e., executive functions (TMT B-A), verbal memory (BSRT delayed recall), cognitive flexibility (TMT B), and non-verbal intelligence (CPM47).
In our cohort, patients with ALS-INT had levels of UA similar to ALS-CN, but significantly higher than those with ALS-FTD. This finding could indicate that higher UA levels at diagnosis can be protective in patients with mild cognitive impairment, preventing their progression to full-blown FTD. However, to confirm our hypothesis longitudinal studies are necessary.
In an exploratory analysis, we did not find any correlation of serum UA levels and FTD in C9orf72 patients, despite their lower levels of serum UA. Such discrepancy could be due to the relatively small number of C9orf72 patients. However, we can also hypothesize that the strong direct effect of this gene on the occurrence of FTD overcome the protective effect of UA on cognitive function [16]. Studies on larger series of C9orf72 patients will help to better understand this aspect.
UA has different, two-faced, mechanisms related to neuroprotection/neurotoxicity in general. Its protective effects could be related to an important anti-oxidative activity in human plasma reducing the formation of peroxynitrite [17, 18], and an anti-inflammatory activity; in fact, UA is thought to prevent the disruption of blood–brain barrier integrity and to increase IL-6 levels, with the subsequent activation of the IL-6/signal transducer and of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway [19, 20]. However, UA may also have pro-oxidative activity through lipid peroxidation, free radical formation [21], and pro-inflammatory activity by triggering interleukin (IL)-1b-mediated inflammation via activation of the nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor protein (NLRP) 3 inflammasome, and also through the nuclear factor kappa-light chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) signaling pathway [22, 23]. This two-faced effect of UA on oxidative and inflammatory processes reflects on cognitive function. In fact, high UA levels have been shown to be related to worse cognitive function in subjects with cardiovascular cerebrovascular and chronic kidney disorders, including elderly hemodialysis subjects [3]. Besides, in subjects with high vascular burden low UA levels were associated with poorer cognitive performances, manifested by lower global cognitive, memory, executive, and visuospatial scores [24]. On the contrary, high UA levels were found to be related to better cognitive function in subjects older than 60 [25,26,27,28]. In addition, higher UA levels are reported to be protective against cognitive damage in PD [29], while their effect on Alzheimer disease are inconclusive [30]. In summary, it appears that UA can be detrimental to cognitive function in subjects with co-morbid systemic disorders, while it can be protective in patients with neurodegenerative disorders and also in healthy elderly.
This study is not without limitations. First, cognitive status and serum UA levels have been evaluated at the time of diagnosis and, therefore, represents the condition at an early-intermediate stage of the disease. Longitudinal data assessing UA levels and cognitive conditions would be important to better understand the persistence of a protective role of UA, in particular in patients converting from normal cognition to cognitive impairment. However, in our series the effect of UA was independent of clinical staging, which has been shown to be strongly related to the severity of cognitive impairment [31, 32]. Second, ECAS was performed only in patients seen from 2016, when the validated Italian translation became available.
In this large cohort of ALS patients with extensive cognitive and behavioural evaluation performed at the time of diagnosis we found that high UA serum levels are correlated with a reduced frequency of co-morbid FTD. Patients with intermediate cognitive impairment (ALSci, ALSbi and ALScbi) showed UA levels similar to those with ALS-CN but higher than those of ALS-FTD, a possible indication that higher UA levels can prevent or delay the deterioration of cognitive function. However, UA serum levels were not significantly correlated with the presence of FTD in patients carrying C9orf72 repeat expansion. Together with the proposed role of UA as a prognostic factor in ALS, our data show that UA can also be a protective factor for the cognitive-behavioural component of the disease. Further study on UA will better elucidate the mechanisms through which this metabolite may exert its protective activity in ALS.
Data availability
Data will be available upon reasonable request by interested researchers.
References
Goutman SA, Hardiman O, Al-Chalabi A, Chió A, Savelieff MG, Kiernan MC, Feldman EL (2022) Emerging insights into the complex genetics and pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 21(5):465–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00414-2. (PMID: 35334234; PMCID: PMC9513754)
Akçimen F, Lopez ER, Landers JE, Nath A, Chiò A, Chia R, Traynor BJ (2023) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: translating genetic discoveries into therapies. Nat Rev Genet 24(9):642–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00592-y. (PMID: 37024676)
Mijailovic NR, Vesic K, Borovcanin MM (2022) The influence of serum uric acid on the brain and cognitive dysfunction. Front Psychiatry 22(13):828476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.828476. (PMID: 35530021)
Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL, World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases (2000) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1(5):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/146608200300079536. (PMID: 11464847)
Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, van Swieten JC, Seelaar H, Dopper EG, Onyike CU, Hillis AE, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Kertesz A, Seeley WW, Rankin KP, Johnson JK, Gorno-Tempini ML, Rosen H, Prioleau-Latham CE, Lee A, Kipps CM, Lillo P, Piguet O, Rohrer JD, Rossor MN, Warren JD, Fox NC, Galasko D, Salmon DP, Black SE, Mesulam M, Weintraub S, Dickerson BC, Diehl-Schmid J, Pasquier F, Deramecourt V, Lebert F, Pijnenburg Y, Chow TW, Manes F, Grafman J, Cappa SF, Freedman M, Grossman M, Miller BL (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134(Pt 9):2456–2477. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr179. (PMID: 21810890)
Strong MJ, Abrahams S, Goldstein LH, Woolley S, Mclaughlin P, Snowden J, Mioshi E, Roberts-South A, Benatar M, HortobáGyi T, Rosenfeld J, Silani V, Ince PG, Turner MR (2017) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): revised diagnostic criteria. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 18(3–4):153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2016.1267768. (PMID: 28054827)
Roche JC, Rojas-Garcia R, Scott KM, Scotton W, Ellis CE, Burman R, Wijesekera L, Turner MR, Leigh PN, Shaw CE, Al-Chalabi A (2012) A proposed staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 135(Pt 3):847–852. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr351. (PMID: 22271664)
Chiò A, Hammond ER, Mora G, Bonito V, Filippini G (2015) Development and evaluation of a clinical staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-306589. (PMID: 24336810)
Hussein et al (2023) The impact of serum uric acid on the progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in adults aged 18 and older: a systematic review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42312
Bai J, Zhang X, Wang H, Yu W, He Z, Wang J, Feng F, Li M, Wang H, Yang F, Huang X (2023) Gender-specific association of uric acid and survival in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Brain Res 7(1815):148445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148445. (PMID: 37290609)
Zhang Q, Li Q, Zhao H, Shu M, Luo M, Li Y, Ding Y, Shi S, Cheng X, Niu Q (2023) Neurodegenerative disease and antioxidant biomarkers: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Front Neurol 23(14):1158366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1158366. (PMID: 37034095)
Şanlı BA, Whittaker KJ, Motsi GK, Shen E, Julian TH, Cooper-Knock J (2022) Unbiased metabolome screen links serum urate to risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 120:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.09.004. (PMID: 36206691)
Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3 Investigators, Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A, Casaceli C, Curhan GC, Fitzgerald R, Kamp C, Lungu C, Macklin EA, Marek K, Mozaffarian D, Oakes D, Rudolph A, Shoulson I, Videnovic A, Scott B, Gauger L, Aldred J, Bixby M, Ciccarello J, Gunzler SA, Henchcliffe C, Brodsky M, Keith K, Hauser RA, Goetz C, LeDoux MS, Hinson V, Kumar R, Espay AJ, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Christine C, Daley A, Leehey M, de Marcaida JA, Friedman JH, Hung A, Bwala G, Litvan I, Simon DK, Simuni T, Poon C, Schiess MC, Chou K, Park A, Bhatti D, Peterson C, Criswell SR, Rosenthal L, Durphy J, Shill HA, Mehta SH, Ahmed A, Deik AF, Fang JY, Stover N, Zhang L, Dewey RB Jr, Gerald A, Boyd JT, Houston E, Suski V, Mosovsky S, Cloud L, Shah BB, Saint-Hilaire M, James R, Zauber SE, Reich S, Shprecher D, Pahwa R, Langhammer A, LaFaver K, LeWitt PA, Kaminski P, Goudreau J, Russell D, Houghton DJ, Laroche A, Thomas K, McGraw M, Mari Z, Serrano C, Blindauer K, Rabin M, Kurlan R, Morgan JC, Soileau M, Ainslie M, Bodis-Wollner I, Schneider RB, Waters C, Ratel AS, Beck CA, Bolger P, Callahan KF, Crotty GF, Klements D, Kostrzebski M, McMahon GM, Pothier L, Waikar SS, Lang A, Mestre T (2021) Effect of urate-elevating inosine on early Parkinson disease progression: the SURE-PD3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 326(10):926–939. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.10207. (PMID: 34519802)
Walk D, Nicholson K, Locatelli E, Chan J, Macklin EA, Ferment V, Manousakis G, Chase M, Connolly M, Dagostino D, Hall M, Ostrow J, Pothier L, Lieberman C, Gelevski D, Randall R, Sherman AV, Steinhart E, Walker DG, Walker J, Yu H, Wills AM, Schwarzschild MA, Beukenhorst AL, Onnela JP, Berry JD, Cudkowicz ME, Paganoni S (2023) Randomized trial of inosine for urate elevation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 67(5):378–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27807. (PMID: 36840949)
Tang J, Yang Y, Gong Z, Li Z, Huang L, Ding F, Liu M, Zhang M (2021) Plasma uric acid helps predict cognitive impairment in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurol 6(12):789840. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.789840. (PMID: 34938266; PMCID: PMC8685604)
Chiò A, Moglia C, Canosa A, Manera U, D’Ovidio F, Vasta R, Grassano M, Brunetti M, Barberis M, Corrado L, D’Alfonso S, Iazzolino B, Peotta L, Sarnelli MF, Solara V, Zucchetti JP, De Marchi F, Mazzini L, Mora G, Calvo A (2020) ALS phenotype is influenced by age, sex, and genetics: a population-based study. Neurology 94(8):e802–e810. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008869. (PMID: 31907290)
Ames BN, Cathcart R, Schwiers E, Hochstein P (1981) Uric acid provides an antioxidant defense in humans against oxidant- and radical-caused aging and cancer: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78(11):6858–6862. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.11.6858. (PMID: 6947260)
Squadrito GL, Cueto R, Splenser AE, Valavanidis A, Zhang H, Uppu RM, Pryor WA (2000) Reaction of uric acid with peroxynitrite and implications for the mechanism of neuroprotection by uric acid. Arch Biochem Biophys 376(2):333–337. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.2000.1721. (PMID: 10775420)
Hooper DC, Scott GS, Zborek A, Mikheeva T, Kean RB, Koprowski H, Spitsin SV (2000) Uric acid, a peroxynitrite scavenger, inhibits CNS inflammation, blood-CNS barrier permeability changes, and tissue damage in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. FASEB J 14(5):691–698. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.14.5.691. (PMID: 10744626)
Aliena-Valero A, Rius-Pérez S, Baixauli-Martín J, Torregrosa G, Chamorro Á, Pérez S, Salom JB (2021) Uric acid neuroprotection associated to IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway activation in rat ischemic stroke. Mol Neurobiol 58(1):408–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02115-w. (PMID: 32959172)
Glantzounis GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Kappas AM, Galaris DA (2005) Uric acid and oxidative stress. Curr Pharm Des 11(32):4145–4151. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161205774913255. (PMID: 16375736)
Martinon F, Pétrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J (2006) Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature 440(7081):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04516. (PMID: 16407889)
Spiga R, Marini MA, Mancuso E, Di Fatta C, Fuoco A, Perticone F, Andreozzi F, Mannino GC, Sesti G (2017) Uric acid is associated with inflammatory biomarkers and induces inflammation via activating the NF-κB signaling pathway in HepG2 cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 37(6):1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309128. (PMID: 28408375)
Molshatzki N, Weinstein G, Streifler JY, Goldbourt U, Tanne D (2015) Serum uric acid and subsequent cognitive performance in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0120862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120862. (PMID: 25794156)
Euser SM, Hofman A, Westendorp RG, Breteler MM (2009) Serum uric acid and cognitive function and dementia. Brain 132(Pt 2):377–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn316. (PMID: 19036766)
Wu Y, Zhang D, Pang Z, Jiang W, Wang S, Tan Q (2013) Association of serum uric acid level with muscle strength and cognitive function among Chinese aged 50–74 years. Geriatr Gerontol Int 13:672–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00962.x
Xiu S, Zheng Z, Guan S, Zhang J, Ma J, Chan P (2018) Serum uric acid and impaired cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly in Beijing. Neurosci Lett 637:182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.013. (PMID: 27890742)
Geng R, Zhang Y, Liu M, Deng S, Ding J, Zhong H, Tu Q (2022) Elevated serum uric acid is associated with cognitive improvement in older American adults: a large, population-based-analysis of the NHANES database. Front Aging Neurosci 8(14):1024415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1024415. (PMID: 36570535)
Li Q, Cen K, Cui Y, Feng X, Hou X (2023) Uric acid levels and their association with vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 44(6):2017–2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06620-3. (PMID: 36690824)
Qiao M, Chen C, Liang Y, Luo Y, Wu W (2021) The influence of serum uric acid level on Alzheimer’s disease: a narrative review. Biomed Res Int 2(2021):5525710. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5525710. (PMID: 34124244)
Crockford C, Newton J, Lonergan K, Chiwera T, Booth T, Chandran S, Colville S, Heverin M, Mays I, Pal S, Pender N, Pinto-Grau M, Radakovic R, Shaw CE, Stephenson L, Swingler R, Vajda A, Al-Chalabi A, Hardiman O, Abrahams S (2018) ALS-specific cognitive and behavior changes associated with advancing disease stage in ALS. Neurology 91(15):e1370–e1380. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006317. (PMID: 30209236)
Chiò A, Moglia C, Canosa A, Manera U, Vasta R, Brunetti M, Barberis M, Corrado L, D’Alfonso S, Bersano E, Sarnelli MF, Solara V, Zucchetti JP, Peotta L, Iazzolino B, Mazzini L, Mora G, Calvo A (2019) Cognitive impairment across ALS clinical stages in a population-based cohort. Neurology 93(10):e984–e994. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008063. (PMID: 31409738)
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Torino within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ministero della Salute, Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata, grant RF-2016-02362405); the Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale program of the Ministry of Education, University and Research (grant 2017SNW5MB); the European Commission’s Health Seventh Framework Programme (project EUROMOTOR under grant agreement 259867); the Horizon 2020 Programme (project Brainteaser under grant agreement 101017598); and the Joint Programme–Neurodegenerative Disease Research (Strength, ALS-Care and Brain-Mend projects), granted by Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. This study was performed under the Department of Excellence grant of the Italian Ministry of University and Research to the “Rita Levi Montalcini” Department of Neuroscience, University of Torino, Italy. The funders had no role in data collection or analysis and did not participate in writing or approving the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ACH had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: BI, MG, ACL, ACH. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: BI, MG, CM, ACN, UM, RV, SCB, SCL, EM, FdP, FP, GM, ACL, ACH. Drafting of the manuscript: BI, MG, GM, ACL, ACH. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: BI, MG, CM, ACN, UM, RV, SCB, SCL, EM, FdP, FP, GM, ACL, ACH. Obtained funding: ACH. Administrative, technical, or material support: EM, FdP. Study supervision: BI, MG, ACL, ACH.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Adriano Chiò serves on scientific advisory boards for Mitsubishi Tanabe, Biogen, Roche, Denali Pharma, Cytokinetics, Lilly, Ferrer, Zambon Biotech, and Amylyx Pharmaceuticals and has received a research grant from Biogen. Barbara Iazzolino, Maurizio Grassano, Cristina Moglia, Antonio Canosa, Umberto Manera, Rosario Vasta, Sara Cabras, Stefano Callegaro, Enrico Matteoni, Francesca Di Pede, Francesca Palumbo, Gabriele Mora have no disclosures. Andrea Calvo has received a research grant from Cytokinetics.
Ethical approval
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the ALS Expert Center of Torino (Comitato Etico Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, #0038876). Patients and controls provided written informed consent before enrollment. The databases were anonymized according to Italian law for the protection of privacy.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Iazzolino, B., Grassano, M., Moglia, C. et al. High serum uric acid levels are protective against cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 271, 955–961 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-12056-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-12056-8