Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preventive treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Preventive treatment for refractory chronic cluster headache (rCCH) is challenging and many therapies have been tried.

Objective

To study what could be considered the therapy of choice in rCCH through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42021290983). A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO’s-International-Clinical-Trials-Registry-Platform. Studies on the preventive treatment for rCCH as defined by the European Headache Federation consensus statement were included. A meta-analysis of the pooled response rate was conducted for the different therapies.

Results

Of 336 results, 45 were eligible for inclusion. Most articles studied the effect of neuromodulation as a preventive treatment for rCCH. The most studied neuromodulation technique was occipital nerve stimulation (ONS), with a pooled response rate in the meta-analysis of 57.3% (95% CI 0.481–0.665). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was the second most studied treatment with a pooled response rate of 77.0% (95% CI 0.594–0.957). DBS results were more heterogeneous than ONS, which could be related to the different stimulation targets in DBS studies, and reported more serious adverse events than in ONS studies. The remaining therapies (anti-CGRP pathway drugs, warfarin, ketamine-magnesium infusions, serial occipital nerve blocks, clomiphene, onabotulinum toxin A, ketogenic diet, sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency or stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, percutaneous bioelectric current stimulation, upper cervical cord stimulation, and vidian neurectomy) present weaker results or have less quality of evidence.

Conclusions

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that ONS could be the first therapeutic strategy for patients with rCCH based on the current evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38:1–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischera M, Marziniak M, Gralow I, Evers S (2008) The incidence and prevalence of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Cephalalgia 28:614–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmann J, May A (2018) Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management of cluster headache. Lancet Neurol 17:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robbins MS, Starling AJ, Pringsheim TM, Becker WJ, Schwedt TJ (2016) Treatment of cluster headache: the American headache society evidence-based guidelines. Headache 56:1093–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitsikostas DD et al (2014) Refractory chronic cluster headache: a consensus statement on clinical definition from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain 15:79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Amico D, Raggi A, Grazzi L, Lambru G (2020) Disability, quality of life, and socioeconomic burden of cluster headache: a critical review of current evidence and future perspectives. Headache 60:809–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen R, Lyngberg A, Jensen R (2007) Burden of cluster headache. Cephalalgia 27:535–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535–b2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dodick DW et al (2020) Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study of galcanezumab in patients with chronic cluster headache: results from 3-month double-blind treatment. Cephalalgia 40:935–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruscheweyh R et al (2020) Effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide (-receptor) antibodies in chronic cluster headache: results from a retrospective case series support individual treatment attempts. Cephalalgia 40:1574–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hakim SM (2011) Warfarin for refractory chronic cluster headache: a randomized pilot study. Headache 51:713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brandt RB et al (2021) Repeated greater occipital nerve injections with corticosteroids in medically intractable chronic cluster headache: a retrospective study. Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05399-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aurora S et al (2010) OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia 30:793–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lampl C, Mirjam R (2016) Botulinum Toxin a in the treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache—a pilot study. Cephalalgia 36:99

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crespi J et al (2020) Open-label, multi-dose, pilot safety study of injection of onabotulinumtoxina toward the Otic ganglion for the treatment of intractable chronic cluster headache. Headache 60:1632–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aschehoug I, Bratbak DF, Tronvik EA (2018) Long-term outcome of patients with intractable chronic cluster headache treated with injection of onabotulinum toxin A toward the sphenopalatine ganglion—an observational study. Headache 58:1519–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khatami R, Tartarotti S, Siccoli MM, Bassetti CL, Sandor PS (2011) Long-term efficacy of sodium oxybate in 4 patients with chronic cluster headache. Neurology 77:67–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nobre ME, Peres MFP, Moreira PFF, Leal AJ (2017) Clomiphene treatment may be effective in refractory episodic and chronic cluster headache. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 75:620–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moisset X, Clavelou P, Lauxerois M, Dallel R, Picard P (2017) Ketamine infusion combined with magnesium as a therapy for intractable chronic cluster headache: report of two cases. Headache 57:1261–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moisset X et al (2020) Ketamine-magnesium for refractory chronic cluster headache: a case series. Headache 60:2537–2543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilbrink LA et al (2021) Safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation for attack prevention in medically intractable chronic cluster headache (ICON): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, electrical dose-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 20:515–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leone M, ProiettiCecchini A, Messina G, Franzini A (2017) Long-term occipital nerve stimulation for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 37:756–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Díaz-de-Terán J et al (2021) Occipital nerve stimulation for pain modulation in drug-resistant chronic cluster headache. Brain Sci 11:236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leplus A et al (2021) Long-term efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation for medically intractable cluster headache. Neurosurgery 88:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Magis D, Gerardy P-Y, Remacle J-M, Schoenen J (2011) Sustained effectiveness of occipital nerve stimulation in drug-resistant chronic cluster headache. Headache 51:1191–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller S, Watkins L, Matharu M (2017) Treatment of intractable chronic cluster headache by occipital nerve stimulation: a cohort of 51 patients. Eur J Neurol 24:381–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Burns B, Watkins L, Goadsby PJ (2009) Treatment of intractable chronic cluster headache by occipital nerve stimulation in 14 patients. Neurology 72:341–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fontaine D et al (2011) Treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache by chronic occipital nerve stimulation. Cephalalgia 31:1101–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Magis D et al (2007) Occipital nerve stimulation for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache: a prospective pilot study. Lancet Neurol 6:314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aibar-Durán JÁ et al (2021) Occipital nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation for refractory cluster headache: a prospective analysis of efficacy over time. J Neurosurg 134:393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Belvis R et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of cluster headache. Med Clin (Barc) 154:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dzhafarov VM, Slavin KV (2021) Simultaneous sphenopalatine and occipital nerve stimulation in treatment of chronic refractory cluster headache: a case report. Neuromodulation. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fontaine D et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation in refractory cluster headache: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial followed by a 1-year open extension. J Headache Pain 11:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Leone M, Franzini A, Cecchini AP, Bussone G (2013) Success, failure, and putative mechanisms in hypothalamic stimulation for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache. Pain 154:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fontaine D et al (2010) Anatomical location of effective deep brain stimulation electrodes in chronic cluster headache. Brain 133:1214–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schoenen J (2005) Hypothalamic stimulation in chronic cluster headache: a pilot study of efficacy and mode of action. Brain 128:940–947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cappon D et al (2019) Ventral tegmental area deep brain stimulation for chronic cluster headache: effects on cognition, mood, pain report behaviour and quality of life. Cephalalgia 39:1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Akram H et al (2016) Ventral tegmental area deep brain stimulation for refractory chronic cluster headache. Neurology 86:1676–1682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Akram H et al (2017) Optimal deep brain stimulation site and target connectivity for chronic cluster headache. Neurology 89:2083–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Seijo-Fernandez F et al (2018) Long-term results of deep brain stimulation of the mamillotegmental fasciculus in chronic cluster headache. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 96:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schoenen J et al (2013) Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia 33:816–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goadsby PJ et al (2019) Safety and efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for chronic cluster headache: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 18:1081–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nesbitt AD, Marin JCA, Tompkins E, Ruttledge MH, Goadsby PJ (2015) Initial use of a novel noninvasive vagus nerve stimulator for cluster headache treatment. Neurology 84:1249–1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gaul C et al (2015) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for PREVention and Acute treatment of chronic cluster headache (PREVA): a randomised controlled study. Cephalalgia 36:534–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Molsberger A, McCaig CD (2020) Percutaneous bioelectric current stimulation for chronic cluster headache—a possible transformative approach to cluster headache. J pain Res 13:817–828. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S242093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wolter T, Kiemen A, Kaube H (2011) High cervical spinal cord stimulation for chronic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 31:1170–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lazzari ZT, Palmisani S, Hill B, Al-Kaisy A, Lambru G (2020) A prospective case series of sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency therapy for refractory chronic cluster headache. Eur J Neurol 27:1190–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen Z, Ren H, Zhao C, Luo F (2020) Long-term outcomes of computerized tomography-guided sphenopalatine ganglion-targeted pulsed radiofrequency for refractory cluster headache. Pain Pract 20:289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Salgado-López L et al (2019) Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency in refractory chronic cluster headache. World Neurosurg 122:e262–e269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Guo Y et al (2021) Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation for the management of refractory cluster headache. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 16:362–368

    Google Scholar 

  51. Narouze S, Kapural L, Casanova J, Mekhail N (2009) Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache. Headache 49:571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kelderman T, Vanschoenbeek G, Crombez E, Paemeleire K (2019) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment at the C1–C2 level in chronic cluster headache: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases. Acta Neurol Belg 119:601–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu S-C, Kao M-C, Huang Y-C, Su W-F (2019) Vidian neurectomy for management of chronic cluster headache. Neurosurgery 84:1059–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. di Lorenzo C et al (2018) Efficacy of modified Atkins ketogenic diet in chronic cluster headache: an open-label, single-arm, clinical trial. Front Neurol 9:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fontaine D, Lanteri-Minet M (2021) Occipital nerve stimulation for chronic cluster headache. Lancet Neurol 20:498–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mueller O et al (2013) Occipital nerve stimulation for intractable chronic cluster headache or migraine: a critical analysis of direct treatment costs and complications. Cephalalgia 33:1283–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bulsei J et al (2021) Occipital nerve stimulation for refractory chronic cluster headache: a cost-effectiveness study. Neuromodulation 24:1083–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Seijo-Fernandez F et al (2011) Review of the target for the deep brain stimulation of chronic cluster headache. Rev Neurol 52:366–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Goadsby PJ et al (2019) Trial of galcanezumab in prevention of episodic cluster headache. N Engl J Med 381:132–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Vollesen ALH et al (2018) Effect of infusion of calcitonin gene-related peptide on cluster headache attacks. JAMA Neurol 75:1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bussone G et al (1990) Double blind comparison of lithium and verapamil in cluster headache prophylaxis. Headache 30:411–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Steiner T, Hering R, Couturier E, Davies P, Whitmarsh T (1997) Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of lithium in episodic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 17:673–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab (TEV-48125) for the Prevention of Chronic Cluster Headache (CCH). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02964338. Posted September 18, 2019. Accessed September 9, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02964338

  64. Lipton RB et al (1995) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in cluster headache. Cephalalgia 15:452–45262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Dodick DW et al (2022) Challenges and complexities in designing cluster headache prevention clinical trials: a narrative review. Headache 62:453–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Blanca Fuentes for her guidance.

Funding

The authors did not receive financial or non-financial support or funding for this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and study design and data collection. JAM wrote the protocol of the systematic review, performed the search, and wrote the final draft. In the screening and study selection, JAM. and JDT performed the abstract and full-text reading. JR performed the quality assessment. JDT critically revised for important intellectual content. All authors finally approved the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier A. Membrilla.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Membrilla, J.A., Roa, J. & Díaz-de-Terán, J. Preventive treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 270, 689–710 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11436-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11436-w

Keywords

Navigation