Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment at the C1–C2 level in chronic cluster headache: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases

  • Original article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed a study of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment directed at C1 and C2 levels as performed at our local pain clinic in refractory chronic cluster headache (CCH) patients. We identified 21 CCH patients treated with PRF (240 s, max. 45 V, max. 42 °C) directed at the ganglion and/or nerve root of C1 and C2. Data were collected through retrospective analysis of patients’ files and include demographic variables, onset and duration of the headache, mean attack frequency, and prior pharmacological treatment. Safety and reduction of attack frequency in the first 3 months after a first PRF treatment was the primary outcome parameter of this study. All patients had been treated with at least two prophylactic drugs and 19 (90%) had previously been treated with verapamil, lithium, and topiramate. Ten patients (47.6%) reported no meaningful effect, four patients (19%) reported a meaningful reduction of < 50%, and seven patients (33.3%) reported a reduction in headache burden of at least 50% in the 3 months following treatment. Two patients reported occurrence or increase in frequency of contralateral cluster attacks. No other adverse events were reported or detected at follow-up. Upper cervical PRF treatment appears to be a safe procedure that could prove effective in the treatment of patients with refractory CCH and warrants a prospective study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Standring S (2016) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 41st edn. Elsevier

  2. Goadsby PJ, Bartsch T (2008) On the functional neuroanatomy of neck pain. Cephalalgia 28(Suppl 1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01606.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chudler EH, Foote WE, Poletti CE (1991) Responses of cat C1 spinal cord dorsal and ventral horn neurons to noxious and non-noxious stimulation of the head and face. Brain Res 555(2):181–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandler MJ, Qin C, Yuan Y, Foreman RD (1999) Convergence of trigeminal input with visceral and phrenic inputs on primate C1–C2 spinothalamic tract neurons. Brain Res 829(1–2):204–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartsch T, Goadsby PJ (2003) Increased responses in trigeminocervical nociceptive neurons to cervical input after stimulation of the dura mater. Brain 126(Pt 8):1801–1813. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartsch T, Goadsby PJ (2003) The trigeminocervical complex and migraine: current concepts and synthesis. Curr Pain Headache Rep 7(5):371–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ambrosini A, Vandenheede M, Rossi P, Aloj F, Sauli E, Pierelli F, Schoenen J (2005) Suboccipital injection with a mixture of rapid- and long-acting steroids in cluster headache: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Pain 118(1–2):92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leroux E, Valade D, Taifas I, Vicaut E, Chagnon M, Roos C, Ducros A (2011) Suboccipital steroid injections for transitional treatment of patients with more than two cluster headache attacks per day: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 10(10):891–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70186-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Magis D, Allena M, Bolla M, De Pasqua V, Remacle JM, Schoenen J (2007) Occipital nerve stimulation for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache: a prospective pilot study. Lancet Neurol 6(4):314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70058-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burns B, Watkins L, Goadsby PJ (2009) Treatment of intractable chronic cluster headache by occipital nerve stimulation in 14 patients. Neurology 72(4):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000341279.17344.c9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burns B, Watkins L, Goadsby PJ (2007) Treatment of medically intractable cluster headache by occipital nerve stimulation: long-term follow-up of eight patients. Lancet 369(9567):1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60328-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolter T, Kiemen A, Kaube H (2011) High cervical spinal cord stimulation for chronic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 31(11):1170–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102411412627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Erdine S, Yucel A, Cimen A, Aydin S, Sav A, Bilir A (2005) Effects of pulsed versus conventional radiofrequency current on rabbit dorsal root ganglion morphology. Eur J Pain 9(3):251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lozano AMGP, Tasker RR (2009) Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Chua NH, Vissers KC, Wilder-Smith OH (2011) Quantitative sensory testing may predict response to sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in cluster headaches: a case series. Pain Pract 11(5):439–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00445.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Bets B, Raets I, Gypen E, Mestrum R, Heylen R, Van Zundert J (2014) Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the pterygopalatine (sphenopalatine) ganglion in cluster headache: a 10 year retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 31:233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003643-201406001-00672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bendersky DC, Hem SM, Yampolsky CG (2015) Unsuccessful pulsed radiofrequency of the sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with chronic cluster headache and subsequent successful thermocoagulation. Pain Pract 15(5):E40–E45. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fang L, Jingjing L, Ying S, Lan M, Tao W, Nan J (2016) Computerized tomography-guided sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in 16 patients with refractory cluster headaches: Twelve- to 30-month follow-up evaluations. Cephalalgia 36(2):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102415580113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathew NT, Hurt W (1988) Percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal gangliorhizolysis in intractable cluster headache. Headache 28(5):328–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202

  21. Gaul C, Diener HC, Silver N, Magis D, Reuter U, Andersson A, Liebler EJ, Straube A (2016) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for PREVention and Acute treatment of chronic cluster headache (PREVA): a randomised controlled study. Cephalalgia 36(6):534–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102415607070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katoh Y, Itoh T, Tsuji H, Matsui H, Hirano N, Kitagawa H (1990) Complications of lateral C1-2 puncture myelography. Spine 15(11):1085–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnston MM, Jordan SE, Charles AC (2013) Pain referral patterns of the C1 to C3 nerves: implications for headache disorders. Ann Neurol 74(1):145–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Yalcin B, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA (2009) Classification and clinical anatomy of the first spinal nerve: surgical implications. J Neurosurg Spine 10(4):390–394. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.12.Spine08661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Halim W, Chua NH, Vissers KC (2010) Long-term pain relief in patients with cervicogenic headaches after pulsed radiofrequency application into the lateral atlantoaxial (C1-2) joint using an anterolateral approach. Pain Pract 10(4):267–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00360.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koen Paemeleire.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest regarding this work.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by our institutional ethical review board and was in accordance with the ethical standards and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

For this retrospective study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelderman, T., Vanschoenbeek, G., Crombez, E. et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment at the C1–C2 level in chronic cluster headache: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases. Acta Neurol Belg 119, 601–605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01203-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01203-6

Keywords

Navigation