Quality of Life (QoL) is the preferred outcome in non-pharmacological trials, but there is little UK population evidence of QoL in epilepsy. In advance of evaluating an epilepsy self-management course we aimed to describe, among UK participants, what clinical and psycho-social characteristics are associated with QoL. We recruited 404 adults attending specialist clinics, with at least two seizures in the prior year and measured their self-reported seizure frequency, co-morbidity, psychological distress, social characteristics, including self-mastery and stigma, and epilepsy-specific QoL (QOLIE-31-P). Mean age was 42 years, 54% were female, and 75% white. Median time since diagnosis was 18 years, and 69% experienced ≥10 seizures in the prior year. Nearly half (46%) reported additional medical or psychiatric conditions, 54% reported current anxiety and 28% reported current depression symptoms at borderline or case level, with 63% reporting felt stigma. While a maximum QOLIE-31-P score is 100, participants’ mean score was 66, with a wide range (25–99). In order of large to small magnitude: depression, low self-mastery, anxiety, felt stigma, a history of medical and psychiatric comorbidity, low self-reported medication adherence, and greater seizure frequency were associated with low QOLIE-31-P scores. Despite specialist care, UK people with epilepsy and persistent seizures experience low QoL. If QoL is the main outcome in epilepsy trials, developing and evaluating ways to reduce psychological and social disadvantage are likely to be of primary importance. Educational courses may not change QoL, but be one component supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions, like epilepsy.
Drug management enables the majority of people with epilepsy (PWE) to control their seizures, but in about 40% seizures persist [1, 2]. Long-term persisting seizures expose PWE to further risk of psychological and social disadvantage, as well as to premature death [3,4,5]. Barriers to seizure control include: severe brain pathology, psychological co-morbidity , social disadvantage [7, 8], and lack of provision of self-management advice and support . Some of these barriers may be amenable to change through psychological, social and educational interventions [10, 11]. None have been tested in the United Kingdom (UK) by means of a large randomized controlled trial.
In this context, we aimed to recruit a large group of PWE with persistent seizures from specialist clinics, and test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 2-day self-management education course in an RCT . The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) and National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) require evidence of change following complex interventions, with the primary outcome being quality of life (QoL) . Many instruments have been used to measure QoL in randomized controlled trials with PWE, some more generic and others adapted specifically for epilepsy, such as the QoL in Epilepsy Scale (QOLIE). A study using a non-epilepsy-specific QoL measure had been unable to show an improvement in scores in patients attending self-management courses . However, two studies using epilepsy-specific QoL measures had shown improvements in the intervention group [15, 16]. In one, some domains of QoL improved immediately after the intervention, but benefits did not persist at 6 months . In the other, there had been co-interventions including monthly appointments with a pharmacist . It, therefore, remains to be seen whether an epilepsy-specific QoL measure would improve following a stand-alone self-management education course after 1 year.
There is little evidence about QoL among UK PWE [17, 18]. From international evidence we knew QoL in epilepsy is multidimensional, and consistently associated with psychological and epilepsy status [19,20,21]. Social characteristics such as stigma, perceived self-mastery, and the effect of self-management education interventions have not been measured consistently in international studies [8, 23, 24]. In this context, and prior to carrying out an evaluation of the effectiveness of a self-management course on QoL, we aimed to answer the questions: (1) what are the clinical, psychological and social characteristics of UK adults with persistent seizures?; (2) to what extent do the individual domains of the QoL instrument correlate with the total measure?; (3) to what extent are clinical, psychological and social characteristics, which underlie constructs of QoL, associated with QoL?
To participate in the trial, patients had to: have a diagnosis of epilepsy (all epilepsy syndromes) documented by a specialist, have had at least two self-reported seizures in the previous 12 months, be currently prescribed anti-epileptic drugs, be aged ≥16 years, be able to provide informed consent, be able to participate in a 2-day epilepsy self-management course, and be able to complete questionnaires in English . Exclusion criteria were having non-epileptic seizures only, having seizures related to an acute illness or substance overuse, having a serious psychiatric condition or terminal illness, and participating in other epilepsy-related studies .
Participants were recruited from epilepsy clinics at eight hospitals in South East England. In the context of frequent memory problems reported among PWE , likely lack of harm from this educational intervention, and to maximise participation, recruitment was by an opt-out process . Individuals had two opportunities to opt out by returning a paper slip by pre-paid post: (1) prior to medical note screening and (2) once deemed eligible after medical note screening, and prior to contact by researcher. Thus, patients could opt out of the recruitment process without having to speak to clinical staff or a researcher. When being contacted by a researcher, patients could still verbally decline to enrol in the study. Participants enrolled into the study were subsequently asked to give written informed consent at a face-to-face meeting with a researcher.
The study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee London—Fulham (REC reference 12/LO/1962). Trial registration: ISRCTN57937389.
Primary and secondary outcomes were used according to general specifications made by our national funding agency, with flexibility offered about specific measures used. The information was obtained by means of a composite questionnaire using validated assessments, which included the following:
Quality of life
A heath-related epilepsy-specific QoL scale was used, the QoL in Epilepsy Scale (QOLIE). The QOLIE-31 has different versions. QOLIE-31-P  is a modified version of the QOLIE-31  with added patient-specific weightings. It contains seven domains reflecting aspects affected by living with epilepsy: energy, mood, daily activity, cognition (including memory), medication effects, seizure worry, and overall QoL. Scores for domains and for total QOLIE-31-P were calculated according to existing methods and can range from 0 to 100 , with higher scores indicating better QoL. QoL was included as the primary outcome because the funding agency specified this.
These included age, gender, ethnicity, education, employment, living arrangements, marital status, and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The IMD measures the level of deprivation, using participants’ postcode and data from the UK Office of National Statistics  which are normalized so a ‘normal’ distribution includes 20% of the population values in each quintile.
Clinical and psychological characteristics
These included years since diagnosis, number of seizures in the previous year , date of last seizure, and physical/psychiatric medical history. Current psychological distress was measured by the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) which classifies cases or borderline cases of anxiety and depression with cut-offs at 0–7 for normal, 8–10 for borderline, ≥11 for case estimates .
Social and self-management characteristics
Self-management assessments included perceived self-mastery over epilepsy using an epilepsy-specific scale . Scores range from 6 to 24 with a higher score representing greater perceived self-mastery. Medication adherence was recorded using the ten-item Medication Management subscale from the Epilepsy Self-Management Scale . Scores range from 10 to 50, with greater scores indicating better adherence to medication plans.
To measure the social impact of epilepsy, we assessed perceived stigma with the Stigma of Epilepsy Scale. It includes three statements: “Because of epilepsy, (1) other people are uncomfortable with me, (2) treat me as inferior, and (3) prefer to avoid me”. It is scored on a Likert-type four-point scale: “not at all”, “yes, maybe”, “yes, probably” and “yes, definitely”, which is scored from 0 to 9 and categorized as not stigmatized (score of 0), mild-moderate (1–6) and highly stigmatized (7–9) .
The statistical analysis plan for the trial has been described . To characterize our baseline sample, demographic, social and clinical data are described using relevant summary statistics. To describe the QOLIE-31-P instrument, the total QOLIE-31-P score was used as the dependent variable to test associations with each of the scale’s individual domains. Each pairwise combination of the individual domains was compared to each other using Pearson’s correlation to determine whether they assess similar components of QoL. Similarly, we tested whether individual domains were correlated with HADS anxiety and depression scores.
To investigate associations between total QOLIE-31-P score and other baseline measures such as demographics, simple linear regression analyses were performed. Associations between total QOLIE-31-P score and other continuous measures are represented by Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), as above. To assess an association with a categorical variable, dummy variables were created to represent the effect of the factor and to select a reference category, and then F tests were used for the combined effect of the respective variables. To aid interpretation of such effects, marginal means (MM) of total QOLIE-31-P were estimated for each level of the factor variable, and similarly the MMs were estimated for each quartile of the continuous variables. Coefficients and MMs from the simple linear regression are provided with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), along with p values of significance tests. For each scale, a category was chosen as a reference for comparative purposes (“ref”). For example, when looking at gender, the category “male” was chosen as a reference to which the category “female” was compared.
Figure 1 illustrates the pathway for those not opting out of the recruitment process and who had their medical records screened. From a final group of 1088 eligible patients, 407 participants enrolled in this study, with 404 completing assessments, representing a 37% recruitment rate.
Description of sample of PWE
Demographic characteristics of the sample of people with poorly controlled epilepsy are described in Table 1. The average age of participants was 41.7 years (SD 14.1) with 54.2% being female, and three-quarters white (75.3%). Almost one-third (31.5%) were educated to university degree level or above. However, almost one half (49.2%) of the total had no paid work. Most of the PWE lived with at least one other person (75.5%) and 51% were single. A higher than national proportion of this group of PWE lived in the most deprived areas, 60.7% (versus 40%) in IMD quintiles 4 and 5.
Clinical and psychological characteristics
Participants had been diagnosed with epilepsy for a median of 18 years (range 1–66). This group of PWE reported frequent seizures, with 69.3% having 10 or more per year. The median number of days since their last seizure was 34 days (Table 2). Just under half (45.9%) reported co-morbidity, including 13.2% reporting a prior ‘psychiatric condition’. HADS scores suggested that a larger proportion, 53.6%, had current borderline or case levels of anxiety, and 28% had current borderline or case depression (Table 2).
Social and self-management characteristics
A high proportion (63.1%) felt some level of epilepsy-related stigma (Table 2). The mean score for the perceived Self-Mastery of Epilepsy Scale was 14.1 (SD 3.3), indicating that on average they felt they had some control over their condition, with room for improvement. The Medication Adherence Scale suggested that they felt they followed their medication plan well, as the average score was 45.4 out of a maximum of 50 (Table 2).
Quality of life
Compared to a maximum possible score of 100, the mean score on the QOLIE-31-P scale was 66.0 (SD 14.2), with a wide range from 24.8 to 98.5. When patient-specific weighting is removed, the QOLIE-31 mean score was 62.0 (SD 15.6), ranging from 24.5–97.6. The seven subscales of QOLIE-31-P reflecting domains affected by living with epilepsy are presented in Table 3a. The lowest subscale score was for energy, followed by cognition (which includes memory) and seizure worry. Table 3a shows how each of the QOLIE-31-P subscales contributed a similar amount to the total score, with strong pairwise correlation coefficients, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71. This suggests the QOLIE-31-P is not dominated by a particular subscale. The correlations between subscales were weaker, suggesting they are indeed measuring different domains. Table 3b shows that HADS anxiety is particularly associated with mood and seizure anxiety domains, whilst HADS depression is associated with mood, energy and daily activity. Thus, current psychological distress is associated with participants’ perception that QoL is reduced.
Associations of demographic, clinical and psycho-social factors with QOLIE-31-P
Total QOLIE-31-P scores were found to be moderately associated with several demographic factors (Table 4). Females had lower scores than males (females MM: 64.2; males MM: 68.2). Less education (no formal qualifications MM: 61.8; higher education MM: 68.3) and not being employed (not employed MM: 62.0; employed MM: 69.5) were associated with lower QOLIE-31-P scores.
Clinical and psychological characteristics
A more recent diagnosis of epilepsy (p = 0.037) and a higher seizure frequency, specifically with 10 or more seizures in the past year (≥10 seizures MM: 64.0; 1–3 seizures MM: 73.6), were associated with a moderately lower total QOLIE-31-P score. Reporting prior co-morbidity, especially psychiatric, was associated with lower QoL (both medical and psychiatric MM: 56.8; no co-morbidity MM: 68.5). Current borderline or case scores for anxiety or depression determined by HADS were associated with the greatest reductions in QOLIE-31-P scores (no anxiety MM: 74.4; anxiety case MM: 56; no depression MM: 70.8; depression case MM: 47.2). Pairwise correlations of current depression and anxiety HADS scores with total QOLIE-31-P showed that they were closely associated (ρ = −0.66, and ρ = −0.63, respectively) (Fig. 2a, b).
Social and self-management characteristics
Table 4 shows that lower scores on the Self-Mastery Scale were associated with much lower total QOLIE-31-P scores (self-mastery—highest quartile MM: 70; lowest MM: 49.2). Felt stigma (no stigma MM: 71.6; highly stigmatized MM: 58.9) and less medication adherence were also associated with lower total QOLIE-31-P scores. Pairwise correlations of self-mastery and stigma scores with total QOLIE-31-P show their association (ρ = 0.49, p < 0.001 (Fig. 2c) and ρ = −0.31, p < 0.001).
Summary of findings
Due to the restrictions on data that can be legally collected from non-participants, we are unable to evaluate characteristics of those not consenting to the study. Compared to the population of London, our study group was older than the average of 34.0 years, with more white ethnicities, and a greater proportion living in areas of high deprivation . Our group had a higher proportion of people that were single (43.8% vs national statistics: 33.9%) and living with others (75.5% vs national statistics: 60.6%) . Our group of PWE was relatively highly educated with 51.3% having post-secondary qualifications which is close to national figures of 62.6%. Yet despite this, 49.2% were unemployed. Figures for London, UK show 28.5% of people not in work (unemployed and economically inactive between 16 and 64) . Thus, in comparison to general population statistics, the members of our group of PWE with continuing seizures experiences more unemployment, live more with others in areas with high deprivation and are more likely to be single.
Among these UK adults with persistent seizures recruited from specialist clinics, their experience of having epilepsy was long, with a median of 18 years since diagnosis, and their epilepsy was difficult to control, with the majority (69%) experiencing 10 or more seizures in the previous year. Nearly half (45.8%) reported an additional history of a medical or psychiatric condition. Anxiety symptoms were twice as common as symptoms of depression (54 vs 28%). An even greater proportion of participants (63.1%) reported feeling to some extent stigmatized.
QoL measured by QOLIE-31-P had a mean score of 66 and varied widely over a range of 74 points. Factors that were associated with diminished total QOLIE-31-P were: depression, low self-mastery, anxiety, greater felt stigma, a history of medical and psychiatric comorbidity, low medication adherence, and greater seizure frequency, in decreasing order of effect.
Generalizability of sample
A key strength of this study is that it recruited from a large group of PWE attending publicly funded epilepsy clinics, and results are likely to be generalizable to people in countries where medical care is also publically funded . In such contexts, income is not a main factor in receiving access to health care. Studies from the USA find low QoL in epilepsy is associated with lower income . We did not find that levels of deprivation were associated with QoL. Recruiting volunteers via advertisements or through user groups also requires an active response from patients, and may result in a patient group taking a more active role in managing their condition which may not be representative of the whole population . An opt-out process can help with recruiting patients with memory problems, which can be a challenge to recruitment in epilepsy . We had a relatively high recruitment rate at 37%, which is higher than a previous trial recruiting PWE . Our current trial population does not represent the 60% of PWE without two or more seizures in the prior year, nor does it necessarily represent PWE with and without persistent seizures who are managed by doctors without referral to an epilepsy specialist. A small UK cohort study has found PWE recruited in primary care, at least 60% of whom would have epilepsy without persistent seizures, had a higher mean QOLIE-31 of 70 .
Implications for clinical practice and research
Evidence from our UK group is consistent with evidence internationally that PWE and particularly those with persistent, frequent seizures have important psycho-social disadvantage and impaired QoL [8, 17, 19,20,21, 23, 24, 36]. Although our group had experienced epilepsy for a median of 18 years, these disadvantages have seemingly not been identified or, if identified, not redressed in usual medical care. Nevertheless, their QOLIE-31 scores were comparable to studies reported from other countries for people with and without persistent seizures. The UK group’s mean QOLIE-31 was 62 (SD 15.6) compared to a global mean score of 59.8 (SD 8.0) . The wide range in UK mean QOLIE-31 scores (24.5–97.6) overlap the means reported in the lowest and highest scoring countries, the Russian Federation mean 42.1 (SD 4.1), and Canada mean 82 (SD 32.8), respectively .
Luoni et al. suggest that when epilepsy is accompanied by persistent seizures there is ‘a diagnostic gap’ when it comes to depression . Screening for depression has been recommended [19, 20] but is still not routine. In epilepsy with persistent seizures, anxiety symptoms are even more common, and this is another diagnostic gap . Many specialists work in isolation, with insufficient multi-disciplinary team support to address mental health issues, even if they are identified. If mental health issues are not redressed, there is likely over time to be a vicious cycle of negative consequences [3,4,5]. This requires exploration with longitudinal research, and development and testing of interventions to redress the gap. Research has begun on interventions aimed to reduce psychological distress, and because of their association, such interventions are more likely to affect QoL . This research has not necessarily focused on people with poorly controlled epilepsy, who are likely to be most affected by psychological distress, and require intervention [10, 11].
Compared to other stigmatized conditions, there has thus far been less focus on testing interventions to reduce social impairment, such as stigma, lack of social support and lack of self-mastery in epilepsy care [8, 31]. Stigma, lack of social support and low self-mastery are potentially amenable to change. Moreover, it has been proposed that improving self-esteem and self-mastery is prerequisite if education is to lead to behaviour change [10, 31, 39]. In other stigmatized conditions, like HIV and mental ill-health, group interventions have been developed and tested specifically to provide social support, and to prevent isolation, loss of confidence, and self-stigma early on after diagnosis [40, 41]. People with epilepsy in the UK and elsewhere would benefit from this approach.
A question remains as to whether stand-alone educational interventions are likely to improve QoL. Memory problems are more prevalent among PWE with persistent seizures [25, 35]. Questions about memory are included in the cognitive subscale of the QOLIE-31 [22, 27], and so they may affect the total score. Memory issues are likely to make learning about self-management more challenging for PWE, with persistent seizures. Some studies report an improvement in epilepsy knowledge following self-management courses with follow-up at 6 months, at most [14, 42]. Long-term assessments have not been done, thus it is not known what impact memory would have on knowledge. A measure of acquired knowledge was not included in our study due to the volume of outcomes mandated by program funders. One hypothesis was that other measures, such as self-mastery, medication adherence and seizure frequency, could improve with increased knowledge. In the UK and other European countries, epilepsy nurses are taking an increasing role reinforcing advice about self-management [43,44,45] which could reduce the impact of memory issues. Self-management education, which is reinforced over time by a co-intervention of advice from a nurse or other professional, seems more likely to promote QoL [16, 43, 46].
In common with PWE internationally, UK PWE reports impaired QoL compared to the general population and to PWE managed in primary care [17, 18]. The impairment in QoL in this large group of PWE with persistent seizures was significantly associated with symptoms of depression, lack of sense of self-mastery, anxiety, felt stigma and high seizure frequency, in diminishing order. Given this, stand-alone educational interventions may not be sufficient to change QoL. The close association of QoL and psychological distress supports a hypothesis that developing and testing stepped-up psychological interventions are more likely to improve QoL. In addition, social interventions, which aim to provide peer support and reduce stigma, may also improve QoL, especially early on after diagnosis [40, 41]. If psycho-social interventions result in more self-confidence, information derived from courses, provided as co-interventions or subsequently, may be more likely to promote QoL and self-management practice.
Moran N, Poole K, Bell G, Solomon J, Kendall S, McCarthy M, McCormick D, Nashef L, Johnson A, Sander J, Shorvon S (2000) NHS services for epilepsy from the patient’s perspective: a survey of primary, secondary and tertiary care access throughout the UK. Seizure 9(8):559–565. doi:10.1053/seiz.2000.0451
Brodie MJ, Barry SJ, Bamagous GA, Norrie JD, Kwan P (2012) Patterns of treatment response in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Neurology 78(20):1548–1554. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182563b19
Thapar A, Kerr M, Harold G (2009) Stress, anxiety, depression, and epilepsy: investigating the relationship between psychological factors and seizures. Epilepsy Behav 14(1):134–140. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.09.004
Ettinger AB, Good MB, Manjunath R, Edward Faught R, Bancroft T (2014) The relationship of depression to antiepileptic drug adherence and quality of life in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 36:138–143. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.05.011
Ridsdale L (2015) Avoiding premature death in epilepsy. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.h718
Fiest KM, Dykeman J, Patten SB, Wiebe S, Kaplan GG, Maxwell CJ, Bulloch AG, Jette N (2013) Depression in epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 80(6):590–599. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827b1ae0
Noble AJ, McCrone P, Seed PT, Goldstein LH, Ridsdale L (2014) Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a nurse led self-management intervention to reduce emergency visits by people with epilepsy. PLoS One 9(6):e90789. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090789
Amir M, Roziner I, Knoll A, Neufeld MY (1999) Self-efficacy and social support as mediators in the relation between disease severity and quality of life in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 40(2):216–224
Prinjha S, Chapple A, Herxheimer A, McPherson A (2005) Many people with epilepsy want to know more: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 22(4):435–441. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi024
Bradley PM, Lindsay B, Fleeman N (2016) Care delivery and self management strategies for adults with epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD006244. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006244.pub3
Michaelis R, Tang V, Wagner JL, Modi AC, LaFrance W, Goldstein LH, Lundgren T, Reuber M (2016) Psychological treatments for people with epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012081
Kralj-Hans I, Goldstein LH, Noble AJ, Landau S, Magill N, McCrone P, Baker G, Morgan M, Richardson M, Taylor S, Ridsdale L (2014) Self-management education for adults with poorly controlled epILEpsy (SMILE (UK)): a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurol 14:69. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-14-69
Magill N, Ridsdale L, Goldstein LH, McCrone P, Morgan M, Noble AJ, Baker G, Richardson M, Taylor S, Landau S (2015) Self-management education for adults with poorly controlled epilepsy (SMILE (UK)): statistical, economic and qualitative analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 16:269. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0788-9
May TW, Pfafflin M (2002) The efficacy of an educational treatment program for patients with epilepsy (MOSES): results of a controlled, randomized study. Modular service package epilepsy. Epilepsia 43(5):539–549
Fraser RT, Johnson EK, Lashley S, Barber J, Chaytor N, Miller JW, Ciechanowski P, Temkin N, Caylor L (2015) PACES in epilepsy: results of a self-management randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia 56(8):1264–1274. doi:10.1111/epi.13052
Losada-Camacho M, Guerrero-Pabon MF, Garcia-Delgado P, Martinez-Martinez F (2014) Impact of a pharmaceutical care programme on health-related quality of life among women with epilepsy: a randomised controlled trial (IPHIWWE study). Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:162. doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0162-8
Saadi A, Patenaude B, Mateen FJ (2016) Quality of life in epilepsy-31 inventory (QOLIE-31) scores: a global comparison. Epilepsy Behav 65:13–17. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.032
Peters M, Crocker H, Dummett S, Jenkinson C, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R (2014) Change in health status in long-term conditions over a one year period: a cohort survey using patient-reported outcome measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:123. doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0123-2
Gilliam F (2002) Optimizing health outcomes in active epilepsy. Neurology 58(8 suppl 5):S9–S20
Elliott JO, Richardson VE (2014) The biopsychosocial model and quality of life in persons with active epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 41:55–65. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.035
Taylor RS, Sander JW, Taylor RJ, Baker GA (2011) Predictors of health-related quality of life and costs in adults with epilepsy: a systematic review. Epilepsia 52(12):2168–2180. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03213.x
Cramer JA, Van Hammee G, Group NS (2003) Maintenance of improvement in health-related quality of life during long-term treatment with levetiracetam. Epilepsy Behav 4(2):118–123
Taylor J, Baker GA, Jacoby A (2011) Levels of epilepsy stigma in an incident population and associated factors. Epilepsy Behav 21(3):255–260. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.04.002
Whatley AD, DiIorio CK, Yeager K (2010) Examining the relationships of depressive symptoms, stigma, social support and regimen-specific support on quality of life in adult patients with epilepsy. Health Educ Res 25(4):575–584. doi:10.1093/her/cyq001
Blake RV, Wroe SJ, Breen EK, McCarthy RA (2000) Accelerated forgetting in patients with epilepsy: evidence for an impairment in memory consolidation. Brain 123(Pt 3):472–483
Trevena L, Irwig L, Barratt A (2006) Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised controlled trial. J Med Ethics 32(8):473–477. doi:10.1136/jme.2004.011320
Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, Bryant-Comstock L, Meador K, Hermann B (1998) Development and cross-cultural translations of a 31-item quality of life in epilepsy inventory. Epilepsia 39(1):81–88
(UK) DfCaLG (2011) English indices of deprivation 2010. Department for Communities and Local Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2010. Accessed 08 Nov 2016
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370
Wagner AK, Keller SD, Kosinski M, Baker GA, Jacoby A, Hsu MA, Chadwick DW, Ware JE Jr (1995) Advances in methods for assessing the impact of epilepsy and antiepileptic drug therapy on patients’ health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 4(2):115–134
DiIorio C, Shafer PO, Letz R, Henry TR, Schomer DL, Yeager K, Project Esg (2004) Project EASE: a study to test a psychosocial model of epilepsy medication managment. Epilepsy Behav 5(6):926–936
Office of National Statistics (2013) Region and country profiles, key statistics and profiles, October 2013. Office for National Statistics. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/regional-trends/region-and-country-profiles/region-and-country-profiles—key-statistics-and-profiles–october-2013/index.html. Accessed 08 Nov 2016
Statistics OFN (2015) Population estimates by marital status and living arrangements, England and Wales: 2002 to 2015. Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/populationestimatesbymaritalstatusandlivingarrangements/2002to2015. Accessed 08 Nov 2016
Office of National Statistics (2015) UK Labour Market, March 2015. Office for National Statistics. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lms/labour-market-statistics/march-2015/statistical-bulletin.html. Accessed 08 Nov 2016
Butler CR, Zeman AZ (2008) Recent insights into the impairment of memory in epilepsy: transient epileptic amnesia, accelerated long-term forgetting and remote memory impairment. Brain 131(9):2243–2263. doi:10.1093/brain/awn127
Luoni C, Bisulli F, Canevini MP, De Sarro G, Fattore C, Galimberti CA, Gatti G, La Neve A, Muscas G, Specchio LM, Striano S, Perucca E, Group SS (2011) Determinants of health-related quality of life in pharmacoresistant epilepsy: results from a large multicenter study of consecutively enrolled patients using validated quantitative assessments. Epilepsia 52(12):2181–2191. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03325.x
Beyenburg S, Mitchell AJ, Schmidt D, Elger CE, Reuber M (2005) Anxiety in patients with epilepsy: systematic review and suggestions for clinical management. Epilepsy Behav 7(2):161–171. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.05.014
Smith A, McKinlay A, Wojewodka G, Ridsdale L (2017) A systematic review and narrative synthesis of group self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy. BMC Neurol (in press)
Edward KL, Cook M, Giandinoto JA (2015) An integrative review of the benefits of self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 45:195–204. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.01.026
Stangl AL, Lloyd JK, Brady LM, Holland CE, Baral S (2013) A systematic review of interventions to reduce HIV-related stigma and discrimination from 2002 to 2013: how far have we come? J Int AIDS Soc 16(3 suppl 2):18734. doi:10.7448/IAS.16.3.18734
Thornicroft G, Mehta N, Clement S, Evans-Lacko S, Doherty M, Rose D, Koschorke M, Shidhaye R, O’Reilly C, Henderson C (2016) Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination. Lancet 387(10023):1123–1132. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00298-6
Olley BO, Osinowo HO, Brieger WR (2001) Psycho-educational therapy among Nigerian adult patients with epilepsy: a controlled outcome study. Patient Educ Couns 42(1):25–33
Helde G, Bovim G, Brathen G, Brodtkorb E (2005) A structured, nurse-led intervention program improves quality of life in patients with epilepsy: a randomized, controlled trial. Epilepsy Behav 7(3):451–457. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.06.008
Ridsdale L (2009) The social causes of inequality in epilepsy and developing a rehabilitation strategy: a UK-based analysis. Epilepsia 50(10):2175–2179. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02150.x
Pfafflin M, Schmitz B, May TW (2016) Efficacy of the epilepsy nurse: results of a randomized controlled study. Epilepsia 57(7):1190–1198. doi:10.1111/epi.13424
Taylor SJC, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, Parke HL, Schwappach A, Purushotham N, Jacob S, Griffiths CJ, Greenhalgh T, Sheikh A (2014). In: A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions: PRISMS—Practical systematic Review of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions. Health Services and Delivery Research, Southampton. doi:10.3310/hsdr02530
Thanks to members of the Trial Steering Committee, Anne Rogers (chair), Howard A. Ring, Phil Smith, Henry Smithson, Ajay Thapar, Marie Edgar, and the Data Monitoring Committee, Gene Feder (chair), Adrian Mander and Mark Manford. This Research was independent and funded by the National Institute for Health Research [Health Technology Assessment, 09/165/01—Self-Management education for adults with poorly controlled epILEpsy (SMILE) A Randomized Controlled Trial]. This report also represents independent research part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. Support for recruitment was obtained from the NIHR Clinical Research Network South London. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
SMILE Team: Paul McCrone, Matthew Walker, Dora Lozsadi, Bridget MacDonald, Jennifer Quirk, Robert S. Delamont, Michalis Koutroumanidis, Lina Nashef, Nandini Mullatti, Asra Siddiqui, Hannah Cock, Fergus Rugg-Gun, Dominic Heaney, John Duncan, Robert Elwes, Alison McKinlay, Carly Pearson, Sarah Feehan, Iris Mosweu and Ray Chaudhuri.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
This study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee London—Fulham (REC reference 12/LO/1962) and was performed by the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, and its later amendments. All participants, themselves, gave their written consent prior to enrolment.
About this article
Cite this article
Ridsdale, L., Wojewodka, G., Robinson, E. et al. Characteristics associated with quality of life among people with drug-resistant epilepsy. J Neurol 264, 1174–1184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8512-1
- Quality of life